• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 15:53
CEST 21:53
KST 04:53
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)10Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy4Code S RO8 Preview: herO, Zoun, Bunny, Classic7Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru3
Community News
Weekly Cups (June 9-15): herO doubles on GSL week1Firefly suspended by EWC, replaced by Lancer12Classic & herO RO8 Interviews: "I think it’s time to teach [Rogue] a lesson."2Rogue & GuMiho RO8 interviews: "Lifting that trophy would be a testament to all I’ve had to overcome over the years and how far I’ve come on this journey.8Code S RO8 Results + RO4 Bracket (2025 Season 2)14
StarCraft 2
General
The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL Weekly Cups (June 9-15): herO doubles on GSL week Nexon wins bid to develop StarCraft IP content, distribute Overwatch mobile game Rogue EWC 2025 Hype Video!
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025 SOOP Starcraft Global #22 $3,500 WardiTV European League 2025
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] Darkgrid Layout
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 478 Instant Karma Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target
Brood War
General
ASL20 Preliminary Maps BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion Recent recommended BW games FlaSh Witnesses SCV Pull Off the Impossible vs Shu
Tourneys
Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL20] GosuLeague RO16 - Tue & Wed 20:00+CET [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - WB Finals & LBR3 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile Beyond All Reason What do you want from future RTS games?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine UK Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Echoes of Revolution and Separation
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024 2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
A Better Routine For Progame…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 7792 users

[Q] Drone Production

Forum Index > Brood War Strategy
Post a Reply
1 2 Next All
CharlieMurphy
Profile Blog Joined March 2006
United States22895 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-04-07 23:39:43
April 07 2009 23:28 GMT
#1
I've always wondered why it was the way it was. Usually Zergs will power nothing but drones (except for maybe a few lings and an overlord or two) for the early part of the game (usually like 24 total mining/gassing not counting morphed structures which is usually like 9+ until unit production). This is all fine and makes sense. But then once they decide to start making units they just stop drone production all together.

Now zerg is only making attack units and they won't make any more drones until: An advantage is gained, a new base is up, or a building is made (and usually people replace that lost drone).

Take 3 hatch muta for example, z will power drones, tech to muta, hatch the mutas and go harass. Usually zerg will start making lurker tech and some ground units as well. If the harass does significant damage he can afford to make another volley of drones for his new hatch/expo (which the muta containment provided). If the harass has not done enough damage (or any at all). Then you have the dilemma of another hatchery but not enough units to defend it, so you need more units and then the hatch sits there providing more larva that you either can't use, or can't turn into drones.


Now I remember someone posting some graphs on mineral gains and worker production a while back and noticed that the zerg one fluctuated but as stated here http://www.sirlin.net/blog/2009/2/28/uc-berkeley-starcraft-class-week-5.html as long as the units are made eventually it can nearly even out because of the spikes.

Is spiking better optimally than a constant gradual gain? Does that mean that speaking on a purely macro standpoint that zerg is the best race at adapting/responding to gaining resources?

One of the big factors I see for why the current meta game on drone production is the way it is, is because rally points. Drones and units share the same point which can make it difficult/annoying to macro compared to T/P. In sc2 this has been addressed, so maybe we will see a change in the way zerg macro/econ is done in the future.

I was thinking alternatively to throw out everything you know about drone production and just trying to build 1 drone every 20 game seconds (which is how long a drone takes to build and a larva takes to spawn) instead. Use the rest of the larva for units of course.
Especially in late game when there are 6+ hatches, often see players just making a huge volley of like 9~ drones at once when there is a lull in the action.
Would it have been better if the zerg would have been making a drone every 20 seconds for each base (or a few bases) instead of all units for X amount of time then all drones for Y amount of time back and forth? (this is obviously much harder to do and I'm wondering if it's more efficient essentially).

Also for early/mid game could it be be applicable there? The fact that drones are killed in order to make buildings is also another big contributing factor as to why current drone production meta game is the way it is.


What is the optimal spiking guideline for drone production currently? If the P/T are making workers constantly, then after a minute on 2 bases that is 6 workers lost for zerg. So could a semi-spiking style of just making a volley of 3 drones every minute per base work slightly better than how it is now?


To summarize
, I'm wondering if the way we play a zerg economy is wrong?
And all this time we just assumed it was correct (even pros) and adapted play styles that work for it. If we changed to a more constant economy, instead of a spiking economy for zerg, would that change strategies & build orders for the better/worse? Could completely new styles/strats of zerg emerge with a more streamlined zerg economy?


PS- (Bit of sc2 theorycrafting here), but would it be good or bad if in sc2 there was 1 red larva every 20 seconds only for drone morph per hatch near a resource, in order to streamline the zerg economy like protoss/terrans' ?
..and then I would, ya know, check em'. (Aka SpoR)
Piy
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
Scotland3152 Posts
April 07 2009 23:42 GMT
#2
So you're basically saying that after they start making units they should always be making drones slowly?

That wouldn't work because you need to get the amount of drones that will give you the amount of units that you need to block whatever timing push the T or P is doing. Think of it as having the correct number of drones. So Lurkerling requires 26 (I think...) drones on minerals and 3 gas to make off 5 hatches. So why would you keep making drones? You've got the production you need, you need to expand again before those drones you're constantly building would be cost effective, and if you expand again you can't block their timing.

Dunno man, I think I'm just confused.
My. Copy. Is. Here.
Aerox
Profile Blog Joined September 2004
Malaysia1213 Posts
April 07 2009 23:56 GMT
#3
First problem would be the limitation of larvae spawning out of hatcheries. It can break your rhythm if you decided to up your APM and there's no larvae from the hatch. Secondly, the larvae selection hotkey, you have less hassle having to deselect to have a certain amount of larvaes selected. Lastly, the micromanagement of huge armies earlier than other races in the game. This is too taxing on your macromanagement system that it's better obviously to do similar tasks together.

But if someone comes up with a constant style of economy, I'm all for it if it works. But I think past players have already tried or attempt at these constant styles.
"Eyes in the sky."
APurpleCow
Profile Blog Joined August 2008
United States1372 Posts
April 08 2009 00:02 GMT
#4
A constant economy doesn't make any sense at all for Zerg and doesn't take advantage of how Zerg's unit production works.

Let's look at a standard ZvP. Zerg gets 40th drones then starts spamming Hydras, and then when the Protoss attacks, Zerg has just enough Hydralisks to fight him off. If Zerg did a gradual build up, then his 40th drone would be mining for much less time than if he did a spiking style. This is obviously less optimal.

If I understand what you're saying right, it's not a very complex concept.
Zozma
Profile Blog Joined November 2008
United States1626 Posts
April 08 2009 00:10 GMT
#5
I've read it explained like this:

The reason Terran and Protoss continue building workers is not to mine the base they have optimally, but to quickly maynard and gain the benefit from other bases they take.


Zerg players should just build as many drones as they need, and then use the hatcheries to build more drones when they take expansions.
Misrah
Profile Blog Joined February 2008
United States1695 Posts
April 08 2009 00:35 GMT
#6
I brought this up a bit ago in this thread-

On December 10 2008 06:54 Misrah wrote:
My fellow swarm, i come to you today because i am getting so tired of studying for a huge anatomy final, so to try and procrastinate and waste some time, I have decided to write this.

Now i would like to tell you before you read any further into this theoryguidypalooza that this is 100% conjecture. I have yet to fully test any of the below stated out, however i think that each and every one of you can understand wher i am coming from. Basically with zerg in the shitter right now, and all of our great's in deep deep slumps, zerg needs to try and do something to bring us back. A REVOLUTION! So i began thinking about this while listening to my rpofessor talk about the retro peritoneal properties of the renal cavities ext.

I digress.

*Please note, i am trying to break down this economic problem into a very very simple idea. So i am (for the time being) forgoing teching and all of that.*

So of the 3 races in SC zerg is by far the odd child. Our economy is weird. To say the least. Our production buildings produce our attacking units, and our drones all at the same time. The worthless Protoss and Terran have it easy, one building makes their SCV, probes and what not. So when playing any other race (besides zerg) your economy will go in a straight line. Always going up. The rule of thumb (while playing P or T) is to constantly build probes/scv's and you will always see a steady increase in economy. To increase your army size, all one must do is build barrax or gateways at a comparable rate to economic growth, for a constant production of zealots and marines. Simple? Yes. Really, your army and economy will grow at a proportional rate. (if you don't spend excess money on upgrades and tech.)

But back to the swarm. Once again we have hatcheries. NO CC's NO Nexus. Zerg has that unique ability to produce drones and lings at the same time. I have noticed that in every single zerg matuchup except zvz. IN Zvt and Zvp zerg will (when going for an economic game, ie not a two hatch or any type of tech game) will ALWAYS ALWAYS try and build as many drones as possible in the shortest amount of time. I have heard time and time again, the simple fact that if you stop producing mass drones in the early and early mid game, you will be economically behind. The hardest part about playing zerg is the simple fact, that a zerg player has to try and find balance.

By balance i am talking about the inverse relationship zerg economy has, when you decide to produce zerglings insted of drones. For example. Why build 12 lings, when only 2 are neccesary early game? Yes you may be trying a runby- but when you get right down to it, you are hurting your economy. The larve that are now lings, could have become drones. So the traight of a good zerg player is to always have the BARE MINIMUM of attacking units early game. That way, they can drone whore and stay on par with protoss and terran economy. Balance is key. Two few drones, no econ. Two many drones, no zerglings, and no defense.

Normally zerg players do the following in a normal (standard) Zvt and Zvp.
12 hatch
11 pool
13 hatch
and depending on the match up either T or P you can get a 4th hatch start gass ext.
after wards though, one thing is always clear. DRONE WHORE
in a standard 3hatch muta game vs Standard T a zerg player expects to have 35+ drones beofre his muta are compleated. However in order to achive this, the zerg player builds little to no lings- and suckens up. The Z is powering off of 3 hatch and going nuts.

BUT

What if this idea could be changed?

Here is really the bulk of my economic idea. If T and P players are always going to be a steadily increasing line (as far as economics and army size are concerned) Zerg is nothing but. Zerg can do anything (with enough hatcheries) Think about it. You can have 4 hatcheries with 3 larve at each. So that is 12 units you can create. INSTANTLY. no wait, just BAM, units. All at the same time, no waiting, no nothing. You can see the benefits of doing so very very quickly. For example, you can have all 4 of your hatcheries produce lings. And you have an INSTANT army. Or you can have all of them go drones. INSTANT economic benefit. You don't have to wait for your expos to kick in, you can have any expo saturated INSTANTLY. But of course at a price.

I was think about that above, and suddenly my idea hit me. Why oh why does zerg try and mirror protoss and terran? Why does zerg mirror the ever increasing line? A line? Fuck that. Zerg jumps. I remember when i watch players play zerg. Lets say they are taking their 3rd expo (in Zvt) so- once the expo pops, the first thing that is done, is have a drone build an extractor. You need the gas. Then have some of your drones from your Natural and natural expo Maynard over to your third. This is done to (saturate) this expo. But, have you done anything? no- not really. You are not adding drones, while i do agree that you have made your drones more efficient, and yes your economy will grow faster- you are still going to be producing drones at that new expo, and only at that expo. So a linear progression.

Insted of doing the old way, and the type of economic management i see so often from zergs, why not have all of your hatcheries POP a batch of drones? (Right now your thinking Misrah is fucking clueless) Doing that in a midgame Zvt will leave you with no army- and you will get run over. Well i am so glad that you thought of this dear reader- because you right.

When it comes right down to it, i just don't think that zerg players are not playing to our flexible economy's strenagths. All i see is linear thinking. that is all.

Now I am going to try and theory craft out my idea for zerg play and how i believe with such a flexible economy, zerg should think about their unique economy differently.

So the matchup will be Zvp. P will play standard forge FE into a whatever, +1 rush- why not.

So zerg- will also play standard, 12 hatch and then proceed to 11 pool and 13 hatch yada yada you get it.

Normally the zerg player, off of his/her 3/4 hatcheries would be powering drones. To try and keep up economically with the protoss player. One the zerg player deems he has enough drones (and this depends on game sense, and experience. Noobs make more of an army for a safer yet in the long run more risker type of play, while the gosu is the compleate opposite) All the while Protoss is just going up their steady line. Slowly increasing economy and army size. They are not playing a difficult game, they are just building probes from 2 nexus and power zealots- from 5 or so gates. NO big deal. The zerg on the other hand, has to properly balance out his economy to try and make sure he is not far behind the protoss, and at the same time can survive the +1 timing attack- and not over compensating for said attack, because i have said above this would place him behind.

So instead of looking at this from the old way, try and be more flexible.

The zerg player, instead of trying to power drones, does the complete reverse to any other methodology, and works on increasing his PRODUCTION. Notice i didn't say economy. I'm not talking about drones, I'm not talking about zerglins. I'm talking about hatcheries. You see, noramally zerg players build hatcheris to facilitate a linear growth. Just like Terran and Protoss. But Zerg is NOT LIKE T OR P. So powering on production, zerg has a meger economy. and next to no attacking units. So what should zerg do? Well i think zerg needs an army- to try and fight off that timing push. So mass army. Start building an army earlier. basically start pulling a noob move. Build up, and keep building up. Is your economy shitty? Yes! But! Who cares? We have PRODUCTION on our side! So after building up an army, and not waiting till the last second, like all other zerg MU's zerg and protoss armies collide. And zerg comes out on top.

Right now your thinking, sure you won the battle, but how about the war? Misrah, your economy is shit. Yes i agree, but once again- im not constraining myself to a linear economioc growth. Insted- I can just 'PoP' drones from my 4+ hatch and there- I now have 12+ drones ready to immidiatly begin mining more minirals.

So lets recap our ZvP game. With added production- zerg was able to more comfortably fend off the +1 timing push. But now because of this, is economically behind. In this case, the zerg player- because of added production can "PoP" more drones and INSTANTLY see a benifit. I am not building them one at a time, from 1 or maybe two hatch- I am insted Throwing all of my hatch's to quickly prodcue a dozen or so drones. Afterwards, I can go back to mass army. And when need be, PoP mass drones.

Now are my ideas radicle? Yes. Have they been tested? Yes and no. Now let me explain.

Basically, it would be very very helpful (and i plan to do the following after finals) to try and find that perfect amount of hatcheries to drones. If you have made it this far into my theory guide thingy- then one quesion should still be on your mind.

It should be this: Misrah your still fucking clueless, You need Economy to facilite Production.

My answer? Yes and no. Yes in the fact that you are correct, you do need economy, but what i am trying to get across to you- is the simple fact that zerg players, are always seen producing units off of 3 hatch early game. They never have a larve idle. Yet we always seem to have excess money laying around. (Forgoing the cost of tecking) What can't we have the opposite to some degree? You see, having hatcheries is amazing because you can have a ton of shit building at the same time. Not all at once, but close. Off of your modest economy, couldyou produce 12 drones exactly at one time? NO probably not- but you can get close. I bet that you could have all of them morphing at the same time however.

So thanks for reading. Basically with the above posted, i am just trying to find a way for zerg to jump back. Zerg is flexible. Zerg is not constrained by some silly CC or Nexus. Zerg's kick ass. I just think that, could zerg economics be looked at from a non linear point of view? Can't we be more FLEXIBLE? Zerg has the unique ability to produce producion facilites at an early point in the game. So why not?

I await your scathing comments.


Charlie it almost seems like we are kind of thinking at the same level? idk- anyway here is the thread link:

Take a look if you like. Chill and company ripped my idea apart:http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=83732
A thread vaguely bashing SC2? SWARM ON, LOW POST COUNT BRETHREN! DEFEND THE GLORIOUS GAME THAT IS OUR LIVELIHOOD
CharlieMurphy
Profile Blog Joined March 2006
United States22895 Posts
April 08 2009 00:40 GMT
#7
k, will read later ty
..and then I would, ya know, check em'. (Aka SpoR)
Misrah
Profile Blog Joined February 2008
United States1695 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-04-08 01:02:11
April 08 2009 00:58 GMT
#8
but now that i look at it- i was thinking more of a production oriented idea. Which is vastly different from what you are trying to say (i think)

Is this right?: Basically go P and T style and just build single drones like P and T while at the same time, going for army? I guess if you could spare the brain power, you could 'alternate' each an every single larve.

If that is what you are trying to say- then i have some bchart data that might be useful to you?

These replays and resource charts show my zerg on crank build vs an FE t or meching t. In my crank build i start pumping drones from one hatch, then hydras from another. So basically i am not drone whoring at all, in fact i am using 1 (sometimes 2) hatcheries for dra production, while one hatchery stays a drone production center. As you can see, from an economic point of view- it really isn't that bad. If you think about it 2 hatch can quickly surpass t or p worker numbers, while all of your left over hatch can be used for amy production. If the t/p you are playing is staying of 1 base, then you only need to relocate 1 hatch to stay even with them.

pics:
+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]

[image loading]
A thread vaguely bashing SC2? SWARM ON, LOW POST COUNT BRETHREN! DEFEND THE GLORIOUS GAME THAT IS OUR LIVELIHOOD
WhenHellfreezes
Profile Joined November 2008
United States81 Posts
April 08 2009 01:10 GMT
#9
Yeah I think that it makes perfect sense how current drone production is done. However successfully sneaking drones is key to every matchup and once you sneak enough drones on minerals it gives you the basis to lay down tons of hatcheries for expansions in zvt and zvp.

Another thing is that zerg is mostly limited by its gas, at least in zvt so without expanding how are the extra minerals helping you?
Doom!
Knickknack
Profile Joined February 2004
United States1187 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-04-08 01:30:59
April 08 2009 01:25 GMT
#10
Im no zerg, but I think we can agree that you want the most eco possible, and the most units possible. So, it is a balancing act.

The way this is achieved is by making lots of drones first, then stop and make your units as late as possible. That way you have the strongest eco along with the enough units for the time being. Like you said, this makes sense.

Now I will consider your main quote:
"Especially in late game when there are 6+ hatches, often see players just making a huge volley of like 9~ drones at once when there is a lull in the action. Would it have been better if the zerg would have been making a drone every 20 seconds for each base (or a few bases) instead of all units for X amount of time then all drones for Y amount of time back and forth? (this is obviously much harder to do and I'm wondering if it's more efficient essentially)."

The answer is sometimes yes, sometimes no. I think the problem you are having is that you don't realize that there is no such thing as 'more efficient essentially'. There are only trade offs. Choices necessarily have opportunity costs. So, if you make drones gradually rather than all at once later, then yes you will have stronger economy later, but you will also not have units as quickly short term.
| www.ArtofProtoss.vze.com |
red.venom
Profile Joined October 2002
United States4651 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-04-08 01:36:20
April 08 2009 01:31 GMT
#11
i play this way sometimes. like in ZvP; but if you think about it making nonstop drones at an early point is always better from an economic standpoint.. Like if you put up an expansion I think right before the expand goes up if you were pumping drones from all hats and had 10-12 to go straight to it, that would be best. But you don't always have the ability to gauge whether it will be safe or not so instead you dedicate all resources to units and let that hatchery populate itself.

The way zerg is played isnt wrong. Getting out nonstop drones early on and having to to use some minerals on a sunken is far more beneficial than trying to make your economy production similar to the other races.

Edit: Also there is never a reason to arbitrarily do something like this. All production with Zerg should have purpose, so you want to fulfill 1 of these criteria..

1: Making as many units as possible/macroing down your minerals to contain/destroy the opponents army
2: Building as much economy as possible(drones and overlords as required)
3: Building economy while remaining safe...

So instead of making 1 drone every 2 seconds you might make 2 every 20 seconds. This isn't uncommon anyway, for someone to have 3 hats and be pumping mostly drones and a few sets of lings to stop say the initial Zealot harass after a protoss FE.

hope that makes sense i just got off work and am tired as hell but really feel like this thread is needless theorizing when good players have known the strengths of zerg economy since BW came out really
Broom
w3jjjj
Profile Joined April 2007
United States760 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-04-08 02:12:52
April 08 2009 01:52 GMT
#12
On April 08 2009 08:42 Piy wrote:
That wouldn't work because you need to get the amount of drones that will give you the amount of units that you need to block whatever timing push the T or P is doing. Think of it as having the correct number of drones. So Lurkerling requires 26 (I think...) drones on minerals and 3 gas to make off 5 hatches. So why would you keep making drones? You've got the production you need, you need to expand again before those drones you're constantly building would be cost effective, and if you expand again you can't block their timing.


This advice is correct. The number of drones made must be based on the particular strategy you are using and you have to take all the timing issues into consideration.

FYI Piy: 5 hatch lurker/ling on 3 gas takes 21 drones on minerals and 9 on gas for pure constant production of lurker/ling, this is the bare minimum saturation as you will not have any extra money at all, not even for overlords. But the less drones you get the faster you can pump units, so I imagine if you are going for an all-in constant lurker/ling attack to finish the game do or die, this number of drones will yield the fastest and strongest attack possible.

A more moderate saturation would be 23 - 9, then you can afford overlords and keep the growth going. However, you still have no money for any growth, such as tech or more buildings or even more drones, since all your economy can support is 5 hatch lurker/ling/overlord. In a desperate situation where you are under tremendous pressure to survive and you need the maximum number of lurker/ling to live, this may be your desired saturation.

In a normal zvt game, typically Z will get 23-9 and then pump units from 4 hatch, while letting the 3rd base hatch to add more drones gradually and build up to 30-9. The extra minerals will be able to make sunkens, various tech buildings, and additional hatcheries. From my experience, going over 30-9 before defiler comes out is counter productive, since you are willingly reducing your own army size and frankly you might die before the extra minerals can be of any help.

At OP, the idea of drone saturation is to find the fastest path to reach your desired production speed based on the particular strategy you are using. Like in the 5 hatch hydra build, Z wants to have 28 drones on minerals and 6 on gas before hydra production, the fastest way to get there is pure drones/hatches/buildings all the way up to 34 supply then make hydras, but in a real game P will not allow such undisturbed growth, so he will pressure with zealots and fast corsair, etc, and in response, Z's build order must incorporate proper defense, such as speedlings, sunken, and scourge. Z will try to minimize the defense so that he can have the fastest path to 28-6 drones to support 5 hatch hydra, and in turn have the fastest hydra production, which will then yield the maximum army size.

Every Z strategy is designed to reach a particular production speed of a particular unit mix, be it 5 hatch lurker/ling in zvt or 5 hatch hydra in zvp. The early game objective is to execute your build orders in a particular way so that you can reach the desired drone saturation in the shortest amount of time. That is why every Z tries to power drones early instead of taking on a linear growth pattern, simply because you want the fastest saturation to begin army production.

In my experience, as the game progresses into mid and late game, you can produce drones either way. I prefer making drones in batches if my strategy involves a rapid change in army mix, and thus require a completely different saturation point. On the other hand, if I already have the desired army mix and production speed, I prefer to make drones slowerly just a couple at a time here and there, and keep my army at its max size at all times.
Chuck Norris can salvage his opponent's structures.
Misrah
Profile Blog Joined February 2008
United States1695 Posts
April 08 2009 01:57 GMT
#13
Once again people just think that zerg needs to be some economy whore house of a race. When i watch zvt and zvp it pisses me off. Zerg only goes for this macro shit and really T and P can get away with just making the bare minimum of units early game and sim city their way to mid game. I agree that zerg should try and play more like t and p. In tvp and pvt there are none of these sim city builds. It just isn't going to happen, because if you do try and do something like that you are going to get killed.

If zerg is going to begin units in the early game and early mid game, and not just the standard *build just enough to hold of this attack* t and p are going to have to get used to making more defenses in the early game, disrupting the sim city of their builds.

Really i just think that the hit t and p are going to take from their economy can be calculated into averaging with zergs hit in economy. but remember unlike t or p zerg can build many peons at one time, catching up very quickly in economy, and or surging an economy ahead if need be. We are not stuck with a single unit at a time thing like p and t.

I think that charlie is on to something here, and really i think that this should be explored more. Zerg have a far more adaptable economy game than any of the other races, simply because we can pop drones like no tomorrow, and are not constrained to a linear economy.

*Zerg doesn't produce 1/2 peons every 20 seconds. If we have the production we can produce 9-12 peons in 20 seconds*

this is something huge for zerg. I really think that zerg players should take a look at this and try and do something to capitalize on this advantage.
A thread vaguely bashing SC2? SWARM ON, LOW POST COUNT BRETHREN! DEFEND THE GLORIOUS GAME THAT IS OUR LIVELIHOOD
Knickknack
Profile Joined February 2004
United States1187 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-04-08 02:43:21
April 08 2009 02:28 GMT
#14
re Misrah
well I don't think that was quite what charley was getting at. It is more along the lines of what you were getting at in your other thread ;d.
But i think it is explored...it is all about the balance, more units or more drones.
Zergs have the drone whore builds but they also have the unit builds such as 2hatch hydra bust vs p, and a whole range in between.
if you want to explorer buidls more oriented in low eco then switch eco into high gear suddenly go ahead. Will these sorts of builds consistently give you an advantage? I think not (or they would be done more, for one). Travel distance is a huge concern early game. You are giving up alot for the ability to attack quickly. So yes Z can catch up quickly, but this should not be take like "oh my we can catch up quick...its so great!". It would be just as true to say "need to catch up because my eco is shit atm!"

Where I think you are right is that in theory you can calculate the hit your economy takes relative to the hit your should opponent take. For example, strong FD vs protoss, Stylish says that it takes more minerals to be able to consistently stop it as P than it takes terran to do it. I am not sure if this is true, but if so, it certainly seems unfair no? And if you can find something 'unfair' why not 'abuse' it to win! Theoretically zerg should be able to figure out things such as this as well I suppose. But of course, you opponent should be trying to do the same. So it is a clash of play, and who wins often comes down to many factors.
| www.ArtofProtoss.vze.com |
FieryBalrog
Profile Blog Joined July 2007
United States1381 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-04-08 04:41:22
April 08 2009 04:21 GMT
#15
On April 08 2009 10:57 Misrah wrote:
Once again people just think that zerg needs to be some economy whore house of a race. When i watch zvt and zvp it pisses me off. Zerg only goes for this macro shit and really T and P can get away with just making the bare minimum of units early game and sim city their way to mid game. I agree that zerg should try and play more like t and p. In tvp and pvt there are none of these sim city builds. It just isn't going to happen, because if you do try and do something like that you are going to get killed.

If zerg is going to begin units in the early game and early mid game, and not just the standard *build just enough to hold of this attack* t and p are going to have to get used to making more defenses in the early game, disrupting the sim city of their builds.




Dude, the strategy of the game has been deeply explored through hundreds of thousands of hours of analysis. You think something this obvious is being overlooked by people whose careers are on the line? 1 minute of thought would have shown you the gaping flaws in your statement:


"Zerg only goes for this macro shit and really T and P can get away with just making the bare minimum of units early game and sim city their way to mid game."



Awesome. If T and P want to Sim City their way to mid game, thats fantastic. I can drone whore and expand faster and better than they can and out sim-city them any day. I don't need multiples of production buildings and larvae produce pure drones faster than command centers and nexuses.

You DONT want to "force T and P to build defenses". Do you know why? Because YOU, the Zerg, lose the most from the exchange. "Wow, I sacrificed loads of drones and minerals to make 20 zerglings and forced the Terran to make a bunker with a supply depot in front of it. SWEET." Spending larvae and minerals on units- which costs you drones and minerals- hurts you far more than the P who simply puts up 3 well placed photon cannons (costing him only minerals, not probes) and he's already pumping units (since he CAN pump units without hurting his probe count). T and P are not zerg. Forcing defenses from them doesn't cost them anything. The situation is, in fact, completely the opposite. T and P should force Z to make defenses because it costs Z a lot more.


On top of that, from about 3-7 minutes in, basically anything between a 9 pool rush and the arrival of mutalisks/lurkers, Zerg early aggression is completely non threatening unless its basically all-out. Building OMG FOUR HYDRALISKS isn't going to do jack shit in terms of forcing defenses from a Terran or Protoss who is going to be pumping units anyway. Substantial early game Zerg aggression, beyond 6 lings off a 9 pool speed, MUST do damage or it is counterproductive. Its not enough to "force a bunker".
I will eat you alive
skindzer
Profile Blog Joined May 2005
Chile5114 Posts
April 08 2009 04:40 GMT
#16
Because more drones wont give you more gas.
Its not only the rain that brings the thunder
Hot_Bid
Profile Blog Joined October 2003
Braavos36374 Posts
April 08 2009 04:51 GMT
#17
what exactly does "disrupting the sim city of their builds" mean?

i thought "sim city" was just a cute label for when a player is careful to place their buildings effectively
@Hot_Bid on Twitter - ESPORTS life since 2010 - http://i.imgur.com/U2psw.png
Puremiss
Profile Joined August 2008
United States232 Posts
April 08 2009 05:30 GMT
#18
the way we play zerg, economy wise, is not wrong. The reason that worker production is so different from the other 2 races is because zerg is the only race that when u build a building, u lose a worker,

that, along with the fact that workers and units are built from the same larva, make it so that you cannot keep building drones like the other two races, especially into the late game
Dromar
Profile Blog Joined June 2007
United States2145 Posts
April 08 2009 05:58 GMT
#19
On April 08 2009 13:21 FieryBalrog wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 08 2009 10:57 Misrah wrote:
Once again people just think that zerg needs to be some economy whore house of a race. When i watch zvt and zvp it pisses me off. Zerg only goes for this macro shit and really T and P can get away with just making the bare minimum of units early game and sim city their way to mid game. I agree that zerg should try and play more like t and p. In tvp and pvt there are none of these sim city builds. It just isn't going to happen, because if you do try and do something like that you are going to get killed.

If zerg is going to begin units in the early game and early mid game, and not just the standard *build just enough to hold of this attack* t and p are going to have to get used to making more defenses in the early game, disrupting the sim city of their builds.




Dude, the strategy of the game has been deeply explored through hundreds of thousands of hours of analysis. You think something this obvious is being overlooked by people whose careers are on the line? 1 minute of thought would have shown you the gaping flaws in your statement:


"Zerg only goes for this macro shit and really T and P can get away with just making the bare minimum of units early game and sim city their way to mid game."



Awesome. If T and P want to Sim City their way to mid game, thats fantastic. I can drone whore and expand faster and better than they can and out sim-city them any day. I don't need multiples of production buildings and larvae produce pure drones faster than command centers and nexuses.

You DONT want to "force T and P to build defenses". Do you know why? Because YOU, the Zerg, lose the most from the exchange. "Wow, I sacrificed loads of drones and minerals to make 20 zerglings and forced the Terran to make a bunker with a supply depot in front of it. SWEET." Spending larvae and minerals on units- which costs you drones and minerals- hurts you far more than the P who simply puts up 3 well placed photon cannons (costing him only minerals, not probes) and he's already pumping units (since he CAN pump units without hurting his probe count). T and P are not zerg. Forcing defenses from them doesn't cost them anything. The situation is, in fact, completely the opposite. T and P should force Z to make defenses because it costs Z a lot more.


On top of that, from about 3-7 minutes in, basically anything between a 9 pool rush and the arrival of mutalisks/lurkers, Zerg early aggression is completely non threatening unless its basically all-out. Building OMG FOUR HYDRALISKS isn't going to do jack shit in terms of forcing defenses from a Terran or Protoss who is going to be pumping units anyway. Substantial early game Zerg aggression, beyond 6 lings off a 9 pool speed, MUST do damage or it is counterproductive. Its not enough to "force a bunker".


Interesting post. I agree.
leejas
Profile Blog Joined August 2007
United States440 Posts
April 08 2009 08:36 GMT
#20
I don't think it's a complex answer.

Zerg players have one unit production building, so we can use that building to build whatever we want.

P/T don't.

Basically, everytime they need to build another factory/barracks/gateway/etc. we've already got the hatchery we need, we just need the tech building.

Now flip that concept around. Imagine if all their factories/rax could generate SCVs/probes.

Thats the Zerg econ.
1 2 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 4h 7m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 757
UpATreeSC 141
IndyStarCraft 137
Livibee 85
ProTech34
StarCraft: Brood War
Rain 2872
EffOrt 674
Mini 648
Horang2 411
Soulkey 271
Dewaltoss 104
hero 70
sas.Sziky 67
Backho 12
yabsab 5
[ Show more ]
Shine 1
League of Legends
Dendi1758
Counter-Strike
fl0m3964
olofmeister2610
sgares409
Skadoodle292
zeus172
rGuardiaN111
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu467
Other Games
Grubby2584
C9.Mang0490
Hui .129
KnowMe125
Fuzer 89
Trikslyr78
Organizations
Other Games
BasetradeTV21
angryscii15
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta3
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• Ler140
League of Legends
• TFBlade1919
Other Games
• imaqtpie1541
• WagamamaTV426
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
4h 7m
OSC
4h 7m
RSL Revival
14h 7m
Reynor vs Scarlett
ShoWTimE vs Classic
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
19h 7m
Replay Cast
1d 6h
SOOP
1d 13h
Cure vs Zoun
SC Evo League
1d 16h
Road to EWC
1d 18h
SOOP Global
1d 19h
Future vs MaNa
Harstem vs Cham
BSL: ProLeague
1d 22h
Sziky vs JDConan
Cross vs MadiNho
Hawk vs Bonyth
[ Show More ]
Circuito Brasileiro de…
2 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
Road to EWC
2 days
BSL: ProLeague
2 days
UltrA vs TBD
Dewalt vs TBD
Replay Cast
4 days
Replay Cast
6 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #3 - GSC
2025 GSL S2
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025

Upcoming

NPSL Lushan
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.