• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 09:22
CEST 15:22
KST 22:22
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt2: News Flash10[ASL21] Ro24 Preview Pt1: New Chaos0Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - Presented by Monster Energy18ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT30Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book20
Community News
$5,000 WardiTV TLMC tournament - Presented by Monster Energy2GSL CK: More events planned pending crowdfunding3Weekly Cups (May 30-Apr 5): herO, Clem, SHIN win0[BSL22] RO32 Group Stage4Weekly Cups (March 23-29): herO takes triple6
StarCraft 2
General
Quebec Clan still alive ? BGE Stara Zagora 2026 cancelled Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool Weekly Cups (May 30-Apr 5): herO, Clem, SHIN win Rongyi Cup S3 - Preview & Info
Tourneys
GSL CK: More events planned pending crowdfunding $5,000 WardiTV TLMC tournament - Presented by Monster Energy Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL Season 4 announced for March-April Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
Custom Maps
[D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3 [A] Nemrods 1/4 players [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 520 Moving Fees Mutation # 519 Inner Power Mutation # 518 Radiation Zone
Brood War
General
ASL21 General Discussion so ive been playing broodwar for a week straight. BW General Discussion Gypsy to Korea Pros React To: JaeDong vs Queen
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 2 [ASL21] Ro24 Group F [BSL22] RO32 Group B - Sunday 21:00 CEST
Strategy
Muta micro map competition Fighting Spirit mining rates What's the deal with APM & what's its true value Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
General RTS Discussion Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Starcraft Tabletop Miniature Game Nintendo Switch Thread Darkest Dungeon
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
G2 just beat GenG in First stand
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Trading/Investing Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Movie Discussion!
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion Cricket [SPORT] Tokyo Olympics 2021 Thread General nutrition recommendations
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
[G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Loot Boxes—Emotions, And Why…
TrAiDoS
Broowar part 2
qwaykee
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Iranian anarchists: organize…
XenOsky
FS++
Kraekkling
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Electronics
mantequilla
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1815 users

[PvT] Bisu's mistakes in ASL S10 group A match

Forum Index > Brood War Strategy
Post a Reply
Normal
willjay84
Profile Joined June 2020
17 Posts
September 07 2020 12:36 GMT
#1
Bisu had a disastrous PvT performance following his exit in the recent ASL Season 10 Ro24 group A match. His decisions at times were questionable and his unit micro as well as tactical awareness were poor.

The below is a simple breakdown on his mistakes and what he can do better in the PvT matchup.

Versus Leta matchup:

1.Wrong Targeting/ Unit Micro
Bisu's unit micro was questionable at times. Zealots should be targeting tanks, not vultures, and he should pull his dragoons back when he couldn't break the tank lines.

[image loading]

[image loading]

2.Opting for recall first instead of stasis
Usually, when the Terran goes for a timing attack, it is always better to go stasis first to limit the Terran push. Recalls only work when the Protoss is practically ahead in the matchup where he can then sacrifice the recalled units to deal damage to the eco, main or natural.

[image loading]

Versus JyJ matchup:

1.Wrong Targeting/ Unit Micro
Again, zealots should be targeting tanks, not vultures, and he should pull his dragoons back in time.

[image loading]

[image loading]

2.Carriers flanked by Goliaths
Here, Bisu's carriers were being flanked left and right by JyJ's goliaths, which proved vital in reducing the carrier count.

[image loading]

[image loading]

3.No HTs/ Storms
Often, storms are used to break the Terran contain. A bit surprising here to see Bisu not opting for HTs and storms, or maybe he was too late as they could be invaluable in breaking the Terran push together with carriers and gateway units.

What do you guys think?


kogeT
Profile Joined September 2013
Poland2042 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-09-08 02:59:25
September 07 2020 13:01 GMT
#2
I think you are analyzing the result rather than the cause.
https://www.twitch.tv/kogetbw
Volka
Profile Joined December 2010
Argentina411 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-09-07 13:06:13
September 07 2020 13:03 GMT
#3
Vs Leta
1) Bisu was behind army-wise, he should have not commited to the attack. Even with perfect micro, I do not think he would have won that engagement. He needed to buy time, make Leta siege-unsiege untill he could muster a greater force, or his stasis had finished researching.

2) Most likely Bisu researched Recall before Stasis. Probably he did not have Statis available. Anyway, it was a desperate move at that time, he was so dead.

Vs JyJ

1) That attack felt unorganized. The Carriers came a bit late, the Zealots and Dragoons didnt work in sync. He didnt have the patience to carry out a proper fight.

2) Yeah.. attacking JyJs base from that angle, not doing any real damage, and getting flanked, a desperate move.

3) Maybe, but he was so screwed from 1) and the consequent push, probably didnt have the economy for it.
http://www.starsite.com.ar
angry_maia
Profile Joined August 2020
327 Posts
September 07 2020 20:52 GMT
#4
Even from the beginning, I don't understand why he'd go for a proxy robo against leta. Leta's tvp isn't great (especially on that map) and it feels like Bisu should have just played standard (maybe eco greedy because of the map).
Turbovolver
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
Australia2396 Posts
September 07 2020 22:19 GMT
#5
"Bisu could have had better micro when it came to his engages in PvT"

-- Everyone who has watched even a single Bisu PvT except that one single double shuttle game that was impressive


Quick, link the video of him amazingly shooting some mines with retreating dragoons!
The original Bogus fan.
LG)Sabbath
Profile Blog Joined July 2005
Argentina3024 Posts
September 07 2020 23:04 GMT
#6
vs leta he went 12 N into proxy robo, big gamble, his robo got scouted and then he had no obs and leta took map control with mines, the rest doesn't matter as much, he was behind from the start

vs jyj going carriers in close positions is a big gamble as well, he got scouted again and his engagements weren't great as the OP said so game over
https://www.twitch.tv/argsabbath/
TelecoM
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
United States10700 Posts
September 08 2020 00:54 GMT
#7
So uncharacteristic of him to make mistakes, wtf.
AKA: TelecoM[WHITE] Protoss fighting
Djabanete
Profile Blog Joined May 2008
United States2786 Posts
September 08 2020 02:54 GMT
#8
vs Leta
#2 Bisu had already lost, this didn't matter.

vs JyJ
#1 I'm not sure why Bisu attacked at all. To me that's more important than the zealot positioning.
#2 Bisu had already lost, this didn't matter.
May the BeSt man win.
120720
Profile Blog Joined July 2020
95 Posts
September 08 2020 06:14 GMT
#9
Should become a Patreon of BSL, they offer coaching.
whaski
Profile Joined December 2012
Finland577 Posts
September 08 2020 07:50 GMT
#10
On September 08 2020 08:04 LG)Sabbath wrote:
vs leta he went 12 N into proxy robo, big gamble, his robo got scouted and then he had no obs and leta took map control with mines, the rest doesn't matter as much, he was behind from the start

vs jyj going carriers in close positions is a big gamble as well, he got scouted again and his engagements weren't great as the OP said so game over


The proxy robo is Indeed strange. Bisu saw 2 marines so at worst he could have faced rax fe. Why not play safe, 12 nex is a huge advantage for toss and with even without obs should be alble to punish fact triple...
it's not just a music it's something else
XenOsky
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
Chile2356 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-09-09 07:28:48
September 08 2020 16:41 GMT
#11
Game 1 : Bisu's robo was scouted, Leta destroyed it and went -> Vulture -> Mine -> 3ple Command to punish lack of observers.

Is really difficult to come back at this point 3 base vs 3 base with protoss 3rd delayed.

gg

game 2 : Bisu has been playing Carriers in practice and spon matches like 90% of the time since polypoid came out...
JyJ knew that min only expo is bad vs carriers cause u can't produce enough goli in time to stop 4 carrier timing, so he timed 4 scans to confirm carriers and if no citadel + 2ble stargate he would take his gas expo as his 2nd natural.

11 vs 1 didint help bisu either.

well planed game by JyJ

gg
ἡ τῆς Νεμέσεως τάξις
Avi-Love
Profile Joined November 2003
Denmark423 Posts
September 08 2020 18:11 GMT
#12
Willjay84 my dude, I think you have the best intentions, but much like your "possible counter to 973 hydra bust" thread you just clearly don't really understand the fundamentals of the game. I appreciate that you're wanting to put in effort and be constructive, but unfortunately I just don't think you're a good enough player to do so correctly.
.gypsy
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
Canada689 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-09-08 18:12:53
September 08 2020 18:12 GMT
#13
op i think you're wrong ( :

good points xenosky
https://www.twitch.tv/gypsy93
TaardadAiel
Profile Joined May 2017
Bulgaria750 Posts
September 08 2020 20:00 GMT
#14
Bisu's proxy was a high risk, high reward situation. With a backdoor expo oriented towards his main I think it was just too tempting. Conversely, going for a quick third behind mines Leta knew he'd suffer from reaver play, plus he saw a single gate and it just made sense - would Bisu go for a quick second gate and range in this scenario on this map? He has nothing to pressure. Robo tech made a lot of sense and I still think he was just going on an intercept when he found the robo.

Smart guy Leta.
WriterReV hwaiting!
FlaShFTW
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
United States10360 Posts
September 09 2020 00:22 GMT
#15
On September 08 2020 09:54 TelecoM wrote:
So uncharacteristic of him to make mistakes, wtf.

Bisu has some of the worst Carrier control out of all Protoss. As soon as I watched the game and saw Bisu going carriers, I just facepalmed and expected JyJ to win after that.

Game 1 can be explained by Bisu falling incredibly far behind by losing his proxy robo. Leta already knew what was coming after he killed the robo and he got his 3rd incredibly fast. Bisu was on the backfoot the whole game from that point forward, I don't blame him for losing that one. Did he need to proxy? No.

Game 2: Bisu carrier. In the same way that Best's corsairs are nicknamed "Doh-sairs", Bisu's carrier control should be nicknamed something like "Taek carriers". Also, Bisu's army control in PvT for whatever reason has been historically awful. Realy bad engagements, poor micro within fights. He really should study replays from Stork/Best/Rain to understand how to successfully take engagements in late game PvT.
Writer#1 KT and FlaSh Fanboy || Woo Jung Ho Never Forget || Teamliquid Political Decision Desk
TL+ Member
onlystar
Profile Joined March 2015
United States971 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-09-09 15:25:51
September 09 2020 15:25 GMT
#16
lol guy in the chat :he microwed wrong look!: what actually happened bisus proxy robo destroyed proxy robo did nothing put him miles and miles behind also no obs for 10min k thx guy in the chaaat!
onlystar
Profile Joined March 2015
United States971 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-09-09 15:58:07
September 09 2020 15:55 GMT
#17
On September 09 2020 09:22 FlaShFTW wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 08 2020 09:54 TelecoM wrote:
So uncharacteristic of him to make mistakes, wtf.

Bisu has some of the worst Carrier control out of all Protoss. As soon as I watched the game and saw Bisu going carriers, I just facepalmed and expected JyJ to win after that.

Game 1 can be explained by Bisu falling incredibly far behind by losing his proxy robo. Leta already knew what was coming after he killed the robo and he got his 3rd incredibly fast. Bisu was on the backfoot the whole game from that point forward, I don't blame him for losing that one. Did he need to proxy? No.

Game 2: Bisu carrier. In the same way that Best's corsairs are nicknamed "Doh-sairs", Bisu's carrier control should be nicknamed something like "Taek carriers". Also, Bisu's army control in PvT for whatever reason has been historically awful. Realy bad engagements, poor micro within fights. He really should study replays from Stork/Best/Rain to understand how to successfully take engagements in late game PvT.


bisus carrier with the signature 4zealot shuttle drop to take down turrets fast / harass actually made quite an impact on the scene took down flash among others :-) (pre army)
I think your analysis is often very inaccurate but obviously he didn do well this time or after return from military service how ever u wanna see it
FlaShFTW
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
United States10360 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-09-09 21:25:23
September 09 2020 21:24 GMT
#18
On September 10 2020 00:55 onlystar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 09 2020 09:22 FlaShFTW wrote:
On September 08 2020 09:54 TelecoM wrote:
So uncharacteristic of him to make mistakes, wtf.

Bisu has some of the worst Carrier control out of all Protoss. As soon as I watched the game and saw Bisu going carriers, I just facepalmed and expected JyJ to win after that.

Game 1 can be explained by Bisu falling incredibly far behind by losing his proxy robo. Leta already knew what was coming after he killed the robo and he got his 3rd incredibly fast. Bisu was on the backfoot the whole game from that point forward, I don't blame him for losing that one. Did he need to proxy? No.

Game 2: Bisu carrier. In the same way that Best's corsairs are nicknamed "Doh-sairs", Bisu's carrier control should be nicknamed something like "Taek carriers". Also, Bisu's army control in PvT for whatever reason has been historically awful. Realy bad engagements, poor micro within fights. He really should study replays from Stork/Best/Rain to understand how to successfully take engagements in late game PvT.


bisus carrier with the signature 4zealot shuttle drop to take down turrets fast / harass actually made quite an impact on the scene took down flash among others :-) (pre army)
I think your analysis is often very inaccurate but obviously he didn do well this time or after return from military service how ever u wanna see it

I've never been impressed with Bisu's carrier control. Maybe my memory is wrong but every time I watch him use it, I'm watching him fail miserably and wishing that Snow or Stork were playing instead.

Could you show me his pre-military carrier games?
Writer#1 KT and FlaSh Fanboy || Woo Jung Ho Never Forget || Teamliquid Political Decision Desk
TL+ Member
Grouhh
Profile Joined May 2019
57 Posts
September 09 2020 21:53 GMT
#19
On September 09 2020 09:22 FlaShFTW wrote:
Game 2: Bisu carrier. In the same way that Best's corsairs are nicknamed "Doh-sairs", Bisu's carrier control should be nicknamed something like "Taek carriers". Also, Bisu's army control in PvT for whatever reason has been historically awful. Realy bad engagements, poor micro within fights. He really should study replays from Stork/Best/Rain to understand how to successfully take engagements in late game PvT.
Speaking of carrier play, I cannot encourage you guys enough to go watch set 4 of recent UBE event Snow vs Flash
Compared to Bisu's Ro24, it's day and night.
Instead of throwing away units for free, Snow is very patient, and does an incredible job at keeping his ground army just out of range of the tanks, so he can slow the push, snipe some tanks, and instantly jump on any goliath chasing his retreating carriers. Really impressive stuff.
FlaShFTW
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
United States10360 Posts
September 09 2020 23:58 GMT
#20
On September 10 2020 06:53 Grouhh wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 09 2020 09:22 FlaShFTW wrote:
Game 2: Bisu carrier. In the same way that Best's corsairs are nicknamed "Doh-sairs", Bisu's carrier control should be nicknamed something like "Taek carriers". Also, Bisu's army control in PvT for whatever reason has been historically awful. Realy bad engagements, poor micro within fights. He really should study replays from Stork/Best/Rain to understand how to successfully take engagements in late game PvT.
Speaking of carrier play, I cannot encourage you guys enough to go watch set 4 of recent UBE event Snow vs Flash
Compared to Bisu's Ro24, it's day and night.
Instead of throwing away units for free, Snow is very patient, and does an incredible job at keeping his ground army just out of range of the tanks, so he can slow the push, snipe some tanks, and instantly jump on any goliath chasing his retreating carriers. Really impressive stuff.

See, this is why I'm confused about Bisu's carrier play. He's so good with reavers and corsairs as harassing units where he picks off units bit by bit, but how is he bad with carriers when they function very similarly? Snow played this game really well and his carrier control impeccable.
Writer#1 KT and FlaSh Fanboy || Woo Jung Ho Never Forget || Teamliquid Political Decision Desk
TL+ Member
willjay84
Profile Joined June 2020
17 Posts
September 10 2020 02:02 GMT
#21
The reason why I didn't count Bisu's failed robo proxy as a mistake is because it was a gamble. A gamble always works 50/50. Hence, when his gamble failed, he fell way behind without observers. To make things worse (from his matchup vs Leta), his bad engagements with zealots and dragoons against tanks and vultures and bad decision making for opting recall ahead of stasis where had he gone stasis first, and didn't lose gateway units unnecessarily, he might at least put up a fight though Leta might still have won with 3 base vs 3 base and superior macro.
Golgotha
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Korea (South)8418 Posts
September 10 2020 05:53 GMT
#22
those engagements, it wouldnt have mattered if he targeted tanks instead of vults. he was gonna lose that battle and the game.
whaski
Profile Joined December 2012
Finland577 Posts
September 10 2020 07:18 GMT
#23
On September 10 2020 11:02 willjay84 wrote:
The reason why I didn't count Bisu's failed robo proxy as a mistake is because it was a gamble. A gamble always works 50/50. Hence, when his gamble failed, he fell way behind without observers. To make things worse (from his matchup vs Leta), his bad engagements with zealots and dragoons against tanks and vultures and bad decision making for opting recall ahead of stasis where had he gone stasis first, and didn't lose gateway units unnecessarily, he might at least put up a fight though Leta might still have won with 3 base vs 3 base and superior macro.



Proxy robo is a mistake itself, 12 nex against fact expo is a huge lead. If you just play safe with observer first Terran cannot go 3 cc on 1 factory.
it's not just a music it's something else
FlaShFTW
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
United States10360 Posts
September 10 2020 18:06 GMT
#24
On September 10 2020 16:18 whaski wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 10 2020 11:02 willjay84 wrote:
The reason why I didn't count Bisu's failed robo proxy as a mistake is because it was a gamble. A gamble always works 50/50. Hence, when his gamble failed, he fell way behind without observers. To make things worse (from his matchup vs Leta), his bad engagements with zealots and dragoons against tanks and vultures and bad decision making for opting recall ahead of stasis where had he gone stasis first, and didn't lose gateway units unnecessarily, he might at least put up a fight though Leta might still have won with 3 base vs 3 base and superior macro.



Proxy robo is a mistake itself, 12 nex against fact expo is a huge lead. If you just play safe with observer first Terran cannot go 3 cc on 1 factory.

I agree. Bisu was under no pressure to try to go for any risky play.

Bisu didn't lose the game through his micro mistakes, which we can point out, but from the robo. I think after that critical error in build order choice it's pointless to analyze the game unless Leta makes equally similar mistakes. At this professional level, Leta should take a comfortable macro game and roll Bisu, knowing that any 3rd base Bisu would set up is delayed, mines prevent any counter attack, and reavers are too late by the time Leta has turrets up to protect.
Writer#1 KT and FlaSh Fanboy || Woo Jung Ho Never Forget || Teamliquid Political Decision Desk
TL+ Member
Hot_Bid
Profile Blog Joined October 2003
Braavos36390 Posts
September 10 2020 19:06 GMT
#25
On September 10 2020 11:02 willjay84 wrote:
The reason why I didn't count Bisu's failed robo proxy as a mistake is because it was a gamble. A gamble always works 50/50. Hence, when his gamble failed, he fell way behind without observers. To make things worse (from his matchup vs Leta), his bad engagements with zealots and dragoons against tanks and vultures and bad decision making for opting recall ahead of stasis where had he gone stasis first, and didn't lose gateway units unnecessarily, he might at least put up a fight though Leta might still have won with 3 base vs 3 base and superior macro.

the control doesn't matter when you're behind in army and production the way bisu was, you can point to his units hitting the wrong thing but the reality is that no amount of carrier micro is going to stop goliaths when you're down 40 supply

yes, technically the screenshots you posted were examples of him not engaging optimally, but no pro player plays every engagement perfectly -- you can find micro and engagement inefficiencies in just about every single game

bisu has in general been sloppy and not as great as the bisu we remember from his peak years. maybe thats why he felt the need to take a risk with a proxy robotics, who knows.
@Hot_Bid on Twitter - ESPORTS life since 2010 - http://i.imgur.com/U2psw.png
XenOsky
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
Chile2356 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-09-11 04:46:05
September 11 2020 04:45 GMT
#26
Bisu vs JyJ re

same map


7:55

+ Show Spoiler +
ἡ τῆς Νεμέσεως τάξις
Rainalcar
Profile Joined April 2010
Croatia427 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-09-16 20:15:22
September 16 2020 20:13 GMT
#27
Today he played vs Light in KCM, opened Nexus and also made a proxy robo. It wasn't scouted, he got the Reaver, but didn't do much damage. He didn't suffer for it at least. He was up in supply and when he reached 200 he attacked T line behind Supply Depots. He lost everything, the supply evened, and from there Light was a bit in front and won in the end.

My question: what was he supposed to do at 200 instead of attacking? Bank on resources and let Light grow even more? He did open Nexus first and some say that it is a massive advantage, so what was he supposed to do to capitalise?
j.r.r.
Whatson
Profile Blog Joined January 2012
United States5357 Posts
September 16 2020 23:15 GMT
#28
On September 17 2020 05:13 Rainalcar wrote:
Today he played vs Light in KCM, opened Nexus and also made a proxy robo. It wasn't scouted, he got the Reaver, but didn't do much damage. He didn't suffer for it at least. He was up in supply and when he reached 200 he attacked T line behind Supply Depots. He lost everything, the supply evened, and from there Light was a bit in front and won in the end.

My question: what was he supposed to do at 200 instead of attacking? Bank on resources and let Light grow even more? He did open Nexus first and some say that it is a massive advantage, so what was he supposed to do to capitalise?

Do you have a link? Without looking at the game it's hard to tell.
Protoss can always deny bases and keep expanding/teching, or probe the front and recall somewhere else. But a protoss attacking an already entrenched Terran behind a wall sounds like a terrible choice.
¯\_(シ)_/¯
Muirhead
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States556 Posts
September 17 2020 06:57 GMT
#29
I also feel like I'm missing something hearing folks complain about Bisu's choices to do ~200 supply timing attacks.

It seems to my naive eye like there are often probing attempts to recall, keeping a terran honest, but if the terran spends enough on recall defense then attacking the front is perhaps the best approach one has at doing realistic damage before a terran reaches 200/200.

Now, it is often proposed that protoss should sit back and get more bases/gates/storm rather than attack into terran 3 base defense. It looks again to my naive eye like this is an extraordinarily difficult path to take, and that a protoss is not an idiot for thinking his best chance to win is never to let a terran reach 200/200 with 3 attack upgrades.

Consider for example the following recent game of Bisu:

It looks to me like Bisu makes a very good attempt to play the "sit back and macro" style here, rather than attacking. When Flash pushes out with 200 supply at around 19 minutes into the video, Bisu also does an excellent (and imo very difficult) job of preventing Flash from taking additional bases during the terran push. He does this masterfully with a single reaver, and even holds off the first 200/200 terran attack with storm while holding another main. Nonetheless, he is unable to hold off the inevitable and Flash eventually secures additional bases with the superior terran max supply 3/3 army to win the game.

What am I supposed to be thinking when I see protoss lose games like this, other than that you must kill a terran before max supply and max upgrades?
starleague.mit.edu
Rainalcar
Profile Joined April 2010
Croatia427 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-09-17 12:12:02
September 17 2020 12:10 GMT
#30
On September 17 2020 08:15 Whatson wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 17 2020 05:13 Rainalcar wrote:
Today he played vs Light in KCM, opened Nexus and also made a proxy robo. It wasn't scouted, he got the Reaver, but didn't do much damage. He didn't suffer for it at least. He was up in supply and when he reached 200 he attacked T line behind Supply Depots. He lost everything, the supply evened, and from there Light was a bit in front and won in the end.

My question: what was he supposed to do at 200 instead of attacking? Bank on resources and let Light grow even more? He did open Nexus first and some say that it is a massive advantage, so what was he supposed to do to capitalise?

Do you have a link? Without looking at the game it's hard to tell.
Protoss can always deny bases and keep expanding/teching, or probe the front and recall somewhere else. But a protoss attacking an already entrenched Terran behind a wall sounds like a terrible choice.


www.youtube.com

Game starts at 3:40.

Recalls were tried, but didn't do much. So the question is - how do you play that position?
j.r.r.
Whatson
Profile Blog Joined January 2012
United States5357 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-09-18 03:29:46
September 18 2020 03:25 GMT
#31
On September 17 2020 21:10 Rainalcar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 17 2020 08:15 Whatson wrote:
On September 17 2020 05:13 Rainalcar wrote:
Today he played vs Light in KCM, opened Nexus and also made a proxy robo. It wasn't scouted, he got the Reaver, but didn't do much damage. He didn't suffer for it at least. He was up in supply and when he reached 200 he attacked T line behind Supply Depots. He lost everything, the supply evened, and from there Light was a bit in front and won in the end.

My question: what was he supposed to do at 200 instead of attacking? Bank on resources and let Light grow even more? He did open Nexus first and some say that it is a massive advantage, so what was he supposed to do to capitalise?

Do you have a link? Without looking at the game it's hard to tell.
Protoss can always deny bases and keep expanding/teching, or probe the front and recall somewhere else. But a protoss attacking an already entrenched Terran behind a wall sounds like a terrible choice.


www.youtube.com

Game starts at 3:40.

Recalls were tried, but didn't do much. So the question is - how do you play that position?

Maybe somebody else with more game knowledge can explain better, but to me that just looked like a total suiciding of units at 12:30 (attacking into mines + a wall + sieged tanks + turrets) where he traded away his entire army for 6 tanks and like 10 vultures, and then proceeded to recall in the same spot three times in a row on top of mines and tanks. I'd be pissed if anybody were able to win a game from that position tbh. Even then I felt like if Bisu hadn't tried another recall just before he could've cleaned up a lot of Light's army at 18:30 when he pushed out .
So I guess to your question -- don't throw away your army multiple times? Hopefully somebody else has a better explanation because now I'm just as confused\ why Bisu played the way he did, it just seemed like throwing away units for his first big attack.

EDIT: looking at that fight again he still had half his zealots going around the supply depots when all the dragoons died lol
¯\_(シ)_/¯
Rainalcar
Profile Joined April 2010
Croatia427 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-09-18 10:50:52
September 18 2020 10:48 GMT
#32
It would be good to hear from someone knowledgeable:
1. would you recall as Bisu did
2. would you attack in full as he did

And if not, what would you do differently? Banking up? Waiting for Light to move out with 200/200?

Keep in mind that Nexus first should be a significant advantage for Bisu, as some have suggested. Light should not be in a position to be able to win by just sitting back and doing nothing - if who could do that, Nexus first is not a big advantage (and yet it is a big risk).
j.r.r.
Optimate
Profile Joined August 2020
250 Posts
September 18 2020 13:17 GMT
#33
On September 17 2020 15:57 Muirhead wrote:
I also feel like I'm missing something hearing folks complain about Bisu's choices to do ~200 supply timing attacks.

It seems to my naive eye like there are often probing attempts to recall, keeping a terran honest, but if the terran spends enough on recall defense then attacking the front is perhaps the best approach one has at doing realistic damage before a terran reaches 200/200.

Now, it is often proposed that protoss should sit back and get more bases/gates/storm rather than attack into terran 3 base defense. It looks again to my naive eye like this is an extraordinarily difficult path to take, and that a protoss is not an idiot for thinking his best chance to win is never to let a terran reach 200/200 with 3 attack upgrades.

Consider for example the following recent game of Bisu:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lA6GG9Ruf3w
It looks to me like Bisu makes a very good attempt to play the "sit back and macro" style here, rather than attacking. When Flash pushes out with 200 supply at around 19 minutes into the video, Bisu also does an excellent (and imo very difficult) job of preventing Flash from taking additional bases during the terran push. He does this masterfully with a single reaver, and even holds off the first 200/200 terran attack with storm while holding another main. Nonetheless, he is unable to hold off the inevitable and Flash eventually secures additional bases with the superior terran max supply 3/3 army to win the game.

What am I supposed to be thinking when I see protoss lose games like this, other than that you must kill a terran before max supply and max upgrades?

I think you have some good points here that people won't want to acknowledge because they want to believe the fairy tale that every aspect of this game is perfectly balanced.
Rainalcar
Profile Joined April 2010
Croatia427 Posts
September 19 2020 15:37 GMT
#34
I wouldn't call PvT imbalanced. I do think that unharassed T of an equal level obtaining 2/1 and pushing out will look imbalanced, but P has other aces in their sleeve for rushing or pressing early (so does T). If T is playing perfectly, I would say it has an advantage, but nobody plays perfectly all the time.

However, I am insterested in this specific game. Bisu is economically ahead, and all Light is doing is still staying back and macroing confident that he can win that way. This I don't appreciate much. Nexus first is a gamble for P, you can so easily lose to a push, but if you pull it off, P should have the advantage. The ball should be in T field.
j.r.r.
FlaShFTW
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
United States10360 Posts
September 19 2020 18:14 GMT
#35
Bisu had a 50 supply lead when he commenced his horrid attack in the wall of supply depots. Even if you feel like you need to pressure the Terran in some way, that is definitely not the way to do it.

Bisu should just be focused on getting more tech, grabbing all the bases on the map as soon as he hits 200. When he attacked, he only had 5 bases and no 2nd set of gateways. If you want to keep Terran back like that, you need recalls, or just an overwhelming hoard of gateways/bases and play almost like Sauron Zerg style of remaxing ASAP and then trying ot whittle down the Terran force.

Also, when Bisu sees that massive supply depot line, it should signal to him that Light is going to turtle. He sees this with a couple zealots at 15:00. I think a double expand then, and then adding more gateways is best. Then, Bisu should try to wait for Light's push and right as Light's army gets across the depot line is when Bisu should pounce.
Writer#1 KT and FlaSh Fanboy || Woo Jung Ho Never Forget || Teamliquid Political Decision Desk
TL+ Member
Muirhead
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States556 Posts
September 19 2020 19:12 GMT
#36
Bisu had a 50 supply lead when he commenced his horrid attack in the wall of supply depots. Even if you feel like you need to pressure the Terran in some way, that is definitely not the way to do it.

Bisu should just be focused on getting more tech, grabbing all the bases on the map as soon as he hits 200. When he attacked, he only had 5 bases and no 2nd set of gateways. If you want to keep Terran back like that, you need recalls, or just an overwhelming hoard of gateways/bases and play almost like Sauron Zerg style of remaxing ASAP and then trying ot whittle down the Terran force.

Also, when Bisu sees that massive supply depot line, it should signal to him that Light is going to turtle. He sees this with a couple zealots at 15:00. I think a double expand then, and then adding more gateways is best. Then, Bisu should try to wait for Light's push and right as Light's army gets across the depot line is when Bisu should pounce.


I also don't really believe the game of broodwar is "imbalanced" at the level of the whole game on ever-changing maps. I just want to emphasize that Bisu's 50 supply lead at the point of attack puts him in a unique position where his army will be strongest relative to Light's for the rest of the game. If Light moves out from behind supply depots a bit later, does the lack of protection from the supply depots actually make his army 50 supply weaker? If not, do the extra gates and bases really get leveraged into a win?

I haven't actually been convinced that sitting back and grabbing more bases is worth more than lowering the tank count at the point the protoss army is strongest. The fact that pros like Bisu and, previously, Rain, immediately go for these attacks seems like evidence that they are reasonable, rather than unreasonable. I'm 100% sure Bisu is aware that Light was attempting to turtle behind supply depots when he decided to attack, and he did even manage to lower the tank count despite suboptimal micro.
starleague.mit.edu
Turbovolver
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
Australia2396 Posts
Last Edited: 2020-09-20 01:57:38
September 20 2020 01:32 GMT
#37
But neither Bisu nor Rain is very famous for their PvT, only for their head against brick wall play in the matchup. Rain's macro sometimes made it a good strategy for him but you can absolutely be a good engager in PvT and neither of them is.
The original Bogus fan.
Magic Powers
Profile Joined April 2012
Austria4478 Posts
September 20 2020 05:47 GMT
#38
In my opinion Bisu has not been playing significantly worse lately than he usually does, in fact rather the opposite. I think he's improving quite rapidly.
This whole theorycrafting in here about the once fastest and most revolutionary protoss player is hilarious to me. Does anyone here actually believe they can criticize Bisu's tactical decisions? Ridiculous.

PS: That isn't me saying Bisu is beyond criticism. But please that's the job of the top pros. Any top pros in here? I think not. That should settle the debate I think.
If you want to do the right thing, 80% of your job is done if you don't do the wrong thing.
Rainalcar
Profile Joined April 2010
Croatia427 Posts
September 20 2020 18:30 GMT
#39
On September 20 2020 03:14 FlaShFTW wrote:
Bisu had a 50 supply lead when he commenced his horrid attack in the wall of supply depots. Even if you feel like you need to pressure the Terran in some way, that is definitely not the way to do it.

Bisu should just be focused on getting more tech, grabbing all the bases on the map as soon as he hits 200. When he attacked, he only had 5 bases and no 2nd set of gateways. If you want to keep Terran back like that, you need recalls, or just an overwhelming hoard of gateways/bases and play almost like Sauron Zerg style of remaxing ASAP and then trying ot whittle down the Terran force.

Also, when Bisu sees that massive supply depot line, it should signal to him that Light is going to turtle. He sees this with a couple zealots at 15:00. I think a double expand then, and then adding more gateways is best. Then, Bisu should try to wait for Light's push and right as Light's army gets across the depot line is when Bisu should pounce.


I would be doubtful of the outcome. Bisu pulled a Nexus first. By allowing a 200/200 T he is putting himself in a position to die from a single positional mistake during the T push, irrespective of his number of bases. In my opinion, P has a small set of options, none really being the best to punish a purely defensive T which should be behind after P went Nexus first. That being the case, it's clear why Nexus first is so rare.
j.r.r.
CROSSED7
Profile Joined June 2020
4 Posts
September 29 2020 12:33 GMT
#40
On September 10 2020 11:02 willjay84 wrote:
The reason why I didn't count Bisu's failed robo proxy as a mistake is because it was a gamble. A gamble always works 50/50. Hence, when his gamble failed, he fell way behind without observers. To make things worse (from his matchup vs Leta), his bad engagements with zealots and dragoons against tanks and vultures and bad decision making for opting recall ahead of stasis where had he gone stasis first, and didn't lose gateway units unnecessarily, he might at least put up a fight though Leta might still have won with 3 base vs 3 base and superior macro.


Idk how much insight you have into Bisu but he's an emotional player, I guarantee you he felt the game was already lost after that failed proxy and only played it out cuz it's a tournament setting. I would absolutely consider gambling vs a player weaker than you a big mistake (Bisu was heavily favored in both the matches he lost, at least in my opinion). I don't know why he did it but I imagine it was because he didn't feel too well or prepared (I know his few streams prior to the matches were of him drinking and partying and not even touching the game). A gamble is never 50/50 btw there's a thousand factors to consider as well as weighing the risks vs the rewards, this is the kind of stuff that really separates the boys from the men in terms of the strategy aspect of the game.
kogeT
Profile Joined September 2013
Poland2042 Posts
September 29 2020 12:43 GMT
#41
Overall Bisu is 10/10 macro 9/10 micro and 4/10 decision making.
https://www.twitch.tv/kogetbw
Piste
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
6183 Posts
September 29 2020 15:37 GMT
#42
On September 29 2020 21:43 kogeT wrote:
Overall Bisu is 10/10 macro 9/10 micro and 4/10 decision making.

I think that even some foreigners might be able to achieve 4/10 decision making on their best day. I'd say Bisu is still light years ahead.
kogeT
Profile Joined September 2013
Poland2042 Posts
September 30 2020 08:12 GMT
#43
On September 30 2020 00:37 Piste wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 29 2020 21:43 kogeT wrote:
Overall Bisu is 10/10 macro 9/10 micro and 4/10 decision making.

I think that even some foreigners might be able to achieve 4/10 decision making on their best day. I'd say Bisu is still light years ahead.


They are able to achieve 4/10 decision making, but they are not able to achieve 5/10 micro/macro, so it doesnt matter.
https://www.twitch.tv/kogetbw
FlaShFTW
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
United States10360 Posts
September 30 2020 19:05 GMT
#44
On September 20 2020 04:12 Muirhead wrote:
Show nested quote +
Bisu had a 50 supply lead when he commenced his horrid attack in the wall of supply depots. Even if you feel like you need to pressure the Terran in some way, that is definitely not the way to do it.

Bisu should just be focused on getting more tech, grabbing all the bases on the map as soon as he hits 200. When he attacked, he only had 5 bases and no 2nd set of gateways. If you want to keep Terran back like that, you need recalls, or just an overwhelming hoard of gateways/bases and play almost like Sauron Zerg style of remaxing ASAP and then trying ot whittle down the Terran force.

Also, when Bisu sees that massive supply depot line, it should signal to him that Light is going to turtle. He sees this with a couple zealots at 15:00. I think a double expand then, and then adding more gateways is best. Then, Bisu should try to wait for Light's push and right as Light's army gets across the depot line is when Bisu should pounce.


I also don't really believe the game of broodwar is "imbalanced" at the level of the whole game on ever-changing maps. I just want to emphasize that Bisu's 50 supply lead at the point of attack puts him in a unique position where his army will be strongest relative to Light's for the rest of the game. If Light moves out from behind supply depots a bit later, does the lack of protection from the supply depots actually make his army 50 supply weaker? If not, do the extra gates and bases really get leveraged into a win?

I haven't actually been convinced that sitting back and grabbing more bases is worth more than lowering the tank count at the point the protoss army is strongest. The fact that pros like Bisu and, previously, Rain, immediately go for these attacks seems like evidence that they are reasonable, rather than unreasonable. I'm 100% sure Bisu is aware that Light was attempting to turtle behind supply depots when he decided to attack, and he did even manage to lower the tank count despite suboptimal micro.

I tend to agree limiting Terran tank count is important but big supply depot line is really hard to break and that means even with 50 supply advantage, you're actually probably down in supply. Rewatch the attack and seeing goons get stuck attacking the depots and zealots clumping together, getting stuck on each other trying to get around the depot line, Bisu's army might as well have been down 50 supply instead. You need to take what you can and in this position, the supply count is deceptive because of the wall.
Writer#1 KT and FlaSh Fanboy || Woo Jung Ho Never Forget || Teamliquid Political Decision Desk
TL+ Member
Normal
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
WardiTV Team League
11:00
Playoffs
RotterdaM749
WardiTV583
ComeBackTV 495
IndyStarCraft 137
Rex106
3DClanTV 44
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 732
Lowko391
IndyStarCraft 137
Rex 102
Codebar 68
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 37975
Mini 974
Soma 581
EffOrt 577
Stork 472
actioN 354
ggaemo 183
Soulkey 182
sSak 180
Snow 164
[ Show more ]
Zeus 152
hero 138
Rush 133
Pusan 65
Sharp 58
Hyun 58
Shinee 57
[sc1f]eonzerg 56
Sea.KH 53
ToSsGirL 42
Barracks 41
Free 39
Hm[arnc] 36
scan(afreeca) 28
Nal_rA 26
sorry 26
yabsab 22
Movie 20
soO 18
GoRush 17
Terrorterran 17
Sexy 16
Sacsri 15
ajuk12(nOOB) 9
Icarus 4
Dota 2
420jenkins119
Counter-Strike
zeus461
edward228
Other Games
Gorgc4670
singsing2266
B2W.Neo989
shoxiejesuss619
hiko555
crisheroes372
DeMusliM275
Mlord245
ArmadaUGS180
XaKoH 142
QueenE64
djWHEAT61
Mew2King47
Organizations
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 983
Counter-Strike
PGL866
Other Games
BasetradeTV593
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 13
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• escodisco1434
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos1930
• TFBlade788
Upcoming Events
CranKy Ducklings
20h 38m
WardiTV Team League
21h 38m
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1d 1h
IPSL
1d 2h
Hawk vs TBD
StRyKeR vs TBD
BSL
1d 5h
n0maD vs perroflaco
TerrOr vs ZZZero
MadiNho vs WolFix
DragOn vs LancerX
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 20h
WardiTV Team League
1d 21h
OSC
1d 23h
BSL
2 days
Sterling vs Azhi_Dahaki
Napoleon vs Mazur
Jimin vs Nesh
spx vs Strudel
IPSL
2 days
Artosis vs TBD
Napoleon vs TBD
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
Wardi Open
2 days
Afreeca Starleague
2 days
Soma vs YSC
Sharp vs sSak
Afreeca Starleague
3 days
Snow vs PianO
hero vs Rain
GSL
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Kung Fu Cup
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
The PondCast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Escore
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Elite League 2026
RSL Revival: Season 4
NationLESS Cup

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
ASL Season 21
CSL 2026 SPRING (S20)
StarCraft2 Community Team League 2026 Spring
Nations Cup 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S2: W2
IPSL Spring 2026
Escore Tournament S2: W3
Acropolis #4
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
RSL Revival: Season 5
WardiTV TLMC #16
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
IEM Rio 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.