| Forum Index > BW General |
|
Mastermind
Canada7096 Posts
On July 03 2009 11:14 CharlieMurphy wrote: LOL @ TANK Btw, a non combat unit would be a HT or reaver right? PS- Btw, this will be the end of terrans leaving leftover meds near in zerg bases. Overlord sight + medic in nat = worker harass LOL That makes no sense at all. Try reading the OP again. | ||
|
Kentor
United States5784 Posts
On July 03 2009 11:57 XDawn wrote: Could you possibly make a video of you doing it? for small example. Nice find people aren't satisfied with just pics nowadays... it's from the rep in the OP... | ||
|
chongu
Malaysia2602 Posts
| ||
|
Athos
United States2484 Posts
 Jaedong, sAviOr, or another  Really good progaming zerg and ask them if they know about this? | ||
Mystlord
United States10264 Posts
| ||
|
ForTheSwarm
United States556 Posts
This is really awesome! | ||
|
konadora
Singapore66364 Posts
So at Step 2.5, you can manually change the target by clicking 'a' or does that target have to attack you? | ||
|
RaiZ
2813 Posts
On July 03 2009 14:50 konadora wrote: Mm, I'm confused So at Step 2.5, you can manually change the target by clicking 'a' or does that target have to attack you? "That target" as you mention it have to attack a neutral building NEAR ur shunken. Although i'm not sure if it works if it's the sunken indeed that is attacked. (From what i've read on this op and replies, i'm sure it's not) Ps : and no, you have to not target it manually. Otherwise it doesn't work. | ||
|
Purind
Canada3562 Posts
On July 03 2009 04:38 Perguvious wrote: moments like these make me realize how much I still don't know like the time I found out that arbok is kobra backwards and ekans is snake backwards. Whaaat?? Learn something new every day | ||
|
CharlieMurphy
United States22895 Posts
I always wondered why blizzard didn't fix this annoying little thing with devs. espeiailly now when you can stack and swoop in and hit and run. | ||
|
thunk
United States6233 Posts
The video by Kentor was really useful. Thanks for posting it up on youtube. | ||
|
zobz
Canada2175 Posts
Thank you | ||
|
Ry-Masta-T
United States478 Posts
Great work. More threads like this would be awesome would make teamliquid a much better place | ||
|
StRyKeR
United States1739 Posts
On July 03 2009 11:44 Kentor wrote: The title is very misleading I think... because you said Well the TARGET doesn't have infinite range (or maybe............. domino) and your last sentence just shows that this won't give sunkens an infinite range. True, I wanted to sound it so that people would read, but I think I ended up misleading people into thinking it could attack Nexuses and workers, lol. In the paragraph, I was actually describing that the allied unit must be near the Sunken. For example, if the Cannon out of range is attacking your Hatchery, your Hatchery must be adjacent to your Sunken Colony. It doesn't matter where the Cannon is. Yes, in practical terms, it is impossible for a Sunk to have infinite range, but the only reason is that there is no enemy attacker with infinite range. Unless you get an Arbiter to recall a Dragoon that is just about to attack, so that he starts his attack sequence before getting recalled but ends up shooting his plasma cannon after the recall so that it travels across the map to hit the Hatchery next to the Sunken which triggers the Sunk to change target to the Dragoon and thus Sunk hits the Dragoon on the other side of the map.  | ||
|
Perguvious
United States1783 Posts
| ||
|
StRyKeR
United States1739 Posts
On July 03 2009 15:02 RaiZ wrote: "That target" as you mention it have to attack a neutral building NEAR ur shunken. Although i'm not sure if it works if it's the sunken indeed that is attacked. (From what i've read on this op and replies, i'm sure it's not) Ps : and no, you have to not target it manually. Otherwise it doesn't work. At step 2.5, the enemy target must attack either your sunk or a unit next to it. In the replay (youtubed above) the Cannon attacks the Hatchery, which is next to the Sunk. | ||
|
scrubtastic
1166 Posts
| ||
jhNz
Germany2762 Posts
btw is that the reason why sometimes reavers are outranged by sunkens? | ||
|
StRyKeR
United States1739 Posts
On July 03 2009 17:47 jhNz wrote: nice writeup... i would have needed that yesterday when some protoss cannon rushed me -.- btw is that the reason why sometimes reavers are outranged by sunkens? It could be. Or it could be because reaver AI is pretty retarded and will walk up to a sunk and not attack it. | ||
|
Ry-Masta-T
United States478 Posts
On July 03 2009 03:53 StRyKeR wrote: Unless you get an Arbiter to recall a Dragoon that is just about to attack, so that he starts his attack sequence before getting recalled but ends up shooting his plasma cannon after the recall so that it travels across the map to hit the Hatchery next to the Sunken which triggers the Sunk to change target to the Dragoon and thus Sunk hits the Dragoon on the other side of the map. Someone should recreate this scenario, film it and post it. | ||
| ||
|
|
RotterdaM Event
The PiG Daily
BASILISK vs TBD
Serral vs Rogue
Korean StarCraft League
GSL
Replay Cast
WardiTV Weekly
Sparkling Tuna Cup
Afreeca Starleague
GSL
PiGosaur Cup
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
