[WL SPOILERS] ......................GuemChi - Page 3
Forum Index > BW General |
Shikyo
Finland33997 Posts
| ||
![]()
disciple
9070 Posts
| ||
LordWeird
United States3411 Posts
<insert frown face> I was only kidding. Sheesh | ||
AstraBoy
Peru363 Posts
| ||
Sourdough
Germany92 Posts
On February 17 2009 07:07 rushz0rz wrote: All doubters will be put to shame when GeumChi suddenly appears in the OSL/MSL and takes the gold. Thats right, he is going to do it, Ninja-Style. Rush in and sneak/steal the gold. He might even bring his mom for support. Beware the future bonjwa-ninja! | ||
Kentor
![]()
United States5784 Posts
On February 17 2009 07:33 AstraBoy wrote: Is guemchi, Sea[Shield]'s brother? o,o yep both their last names are yum | ||
-orb-
United States5770 Posts
props sir | ||
thunk
United States6233 Posts
| ||
SkelA
Macedonia13017 Posts
![]() | ||
StRyKeR
United States1739 Posts
I commend you on your use of high-level statistics. I find myself looking at the graphs over and over again in case I missed something profound. I will present these findings to my grad school friends for further investigation. Nonetheless, I must bring up a point which may destroy your analysis. It is incorrect to say that Flash and Jaedong have a 0% winrate against Bisu last night. Here, winrate, by definition, equals (# games won against Bisu) / (# games played against Bisu). Now, if the denominator (i.e. # games played against bisu) equals zero, you have a meaningless statistic. Ergo, the stats for Flash and Jaedong are UNDEFINED, not zero. Please don't shit on Flash and Jaedong by using false statistics. I must add, however, that if you wanted to keep the misleading edge of your article while preserving the persuasiveness of statistics, I urge you to change "winrate" to "win count", so that you may use the following: Games won against bisu last night Guemchi: 1 Flash: 0 Jaedong: 0 As you can see, it's very similar to your analysis with "number of losses". Very misleading yet correct -- a perfect use of statistics. Sincerely, Your Fellow Statistician | ||
dekuschrub
United States2069 Posts
guemchi>all | ||
3clipse
Canada2555 Posts
| ||
h3r1n6
Iceland2039 Posts
![]() ![]() | ||
miseiler
United States1389 Posts
| ||
G0dly
United States450 Posts
On February 17 2009 07:50 StRyKeR wrote: Dear Realpenguin, I commend you on your use of high-level statistics. I find myself looking at the graphs over and over again in case I missed something profound. I will present these findings to my grad school friends for further investigation. Nonetheless, I must bring up a point which may destroy your analysis. It is incorrect to say that Flash and Jaedong have a 0% winrate against Bisu last night. Here, winrate, by definition, equals (# games won against Bisu) / (# games played against Bisu). Now, if the denominator (i.e. # games played against bisu) equals zero, you have a meaningless statistic. Ergo, the stats for Flash and Jaedong are UNDEFINED, not zero. Please don't shit on Flash and Jaedong by using false statistics. I must add, however, that if you wanted to keep the misleading edge of your article while preserving the persuasiveness of statistics, I urge you to change "winrate" to "win count", so that you may use the following: Games won against bisu last night Guemchi: 1 Flash: 0 Jaedong: 0 As you can see, it's very similar to your analysis with "number of losses". Very misleading yet correct -- a perfect use of statistics. Sincerely, Your Fellow Statistician Can't tell if it's sarcasm or not... -.- | ||
Realpenguin
8253 Posts
It's true. Anything divided by zero is undefined. But GuemChi is so good that he breaks that law and makes it equal zero. | ||
[DUF]MethodMan
Germany1716 Posts
![]() | ||
Fontong
United States6454 Posts
On February 17 2009 08:12 Realpenguin wrote: It's true. Anything divided by zero is undefined. But GuemChi is so good that he breaks that law and makes it equal zero. Aww shit GuemChi can divide by zero | ||
TheFoReveRwaR
United States10657 Posts
| ||
LordWeird
United States3411 Posts
On February 17 2009 08:04 h3r1n6 wrote: Yeah, ![]() ![]() I thought ![]() ![]() | ||
| ||