|
I would love to know on what kind of shitty PC the OMG RM SO BAD screamer play. All the purist elitists probably never had a reason to upgrade their computer and simply sticked on windows xp. But you are incredible cool in here spamming "LOL RM SO BAD BLIZ SUX".
User was temp banned for this post.
|
BW needed its graphics updated. 640x480 in 2017 isn't acceptable. The only big issue is lag though.
|
I don't see any big in game issue with the RM. Played iccup and I enjoy it as much. If you are having an issue, maybe it's your pc.
|
Operating System
Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit SP1
CPU
Intel Core i7 4770 @ 3.40GHz
RAM
8.00GB Dual-Channel DDR3 @ 798MHz (11-11-11-28)
2048MB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 (ASUStek Computer Inc)
Game takes 70 seconds to start, from clicking on starcraft.exe until being able to log-in to multiplayer.
Starting witcher 3 through steam takes about 20-30 seconds less.
Sometimes battlenet is so slow I get null and void values instead of people's names, game names,...
Chat commands don't work, can't add people to my friends list, games are not being counted towards stats, can't search through your map folder by using hotkeys, and the list goes on..
|
This was to be expected considering the whole launch of remastered and considering what Blizz has done for the last 6+ years or so it just isn't the same company.
|
On October 02 2017 02:50 Heyjoray wrote:
I would love to know on what kind of shitty PC the OMG RM SO BAD screamer play. All the purist elitists probably never had a reason to upgrade their computer and simply sticked on windows xp. But you are incredible cool in here spamming "LOL RM SO BAD BLIZ SUX".
there is a lot of bugs man, I think it's funny that you're thinking a lot of these other players just have ancient toasters when that isn't the case.
|
There is a whole lot of interface bugs that are unacceptable and should be fixed. But people really need to call down. Remastered is ALOT better than what was before.
|
On October 02 2017 03:28 StarStruck wrote:Show nested quote +On October 02 2017 02:50 Heyjoray wrote:
I would love to know on what kind of shitty PC the OMG RM SO BAD screamer play. All the purist elitists probably never had a reason to upgrade their computer and simply sticked on windows xp. But you are incredible cool in here spamming "LOL RM SO BAD BLIZ SUX". there is a lot of bugs man, I think it's funny that you're thinking a lot of these other players just have ancient toasters when that isn't the case.
Really? Apart from lag and unresponsive battle.net when you click buttons too much, Remastered is perfectly fine on my computer. The battle.net issue is just bad programming not exactly hardware because someone is likely using UI thread to do too much.
|
On October 02 2017 03:58 sc-darkness wrote:Show nested quote +On October 02 2017 03:28 StarStruck wrote:On October 02 2017 02:50 Heyjoray wrote:
I would love to know on what kind of shitty PC the OMG RM SO BAD screamer play. All the purist elitists probably never had a reason to upgrade their computer and simply sticked on windows xp. But you are incredible cool in here spamming "LOL RM SO BAD BLIZ SUX". there is a lot of bugs man, I think it's funny that you're thinking a lot of these other players just have ancient toasters when that isn't the case. Really? Apart from lag and unresponsive battle.net when you click buttons too much, Remastered is perfectly fine on my computer. The battle.net issue is just bad programming not exactly hardware because someone is likely using UI thread to do too much.
Just because it's fine on your computer, does not mean it's fine for everyone's.
|
On October 02 2017 04:02 SchAmToo wrote:Show nested quote +On October 02 2017 03:58 sc-darkness wrote:On October 02 2017 03:28 StarStruck wrote:On October 02 2017 02:50 Heyjoray wrote:
I would love to know on what kind of shitty PC the OMG RM SO BAD screamer play. All the purist elitists probably never had a reason to upgrade their computer and simply sticked on windows xp. But you are incredible cool in here spamming "LOL RM SO BAD BLIZ SUX". there is a lot of bugs man, I think it's funny that you're thinking a lot of these other players just have ancient toasters when that isn't the case. Really? Apart from lag and unresponsive battle.net when you click buttons too much, Remastered is perfectly fine on my computer. The battle.net issue is just bad programming not exactly hardware because someone is likely using UI thread to do too much. Just because it's fine on your computer, does not mean it's fine for everyone's.
how hard is this to understand jeez.
'well I am not having a problem, therefore there is no problem!'
|
On October 02 2017 04:06 juvenal wrote:Show nested quote +On October 02 2017 04:02 SchAmToo wrote:On October 02 2017 03:58 sc-darkness wrote:On October 02 2017 03:28 StarStruck wrote:On October 02 2017 02:50 Heyjoray wrote:
I would love to know on what kind of shitty PC the OMG RM SO BAD screamer play. All the purist elitists probably never had a reason to upgrade their computer and simply sticked on windows xp. But you are incredible cool in here spamming "LOL RM SO BAD BLIZ SUX". there is a lot of bugs man, I think it's funny that you're thinking a lot of these other players just have ancient toasters when that isn't the case. Really? Apart from lag and unresponsive battle.net when you click buttons too much, Remastered is perfectly fine on my computer. The battle.net issue is just bad programming not exactly hardware because someone is likely using UI thread to do too much. Just because it's fine on your computer, does not mean it's fine for everyone's. how hard is this to understand jeez. 'well I am not having a problem, therefore there is no problem!'
Nah, I'm just saying it's ok for me. Please don't misinterpret other people's words. I never said it's fine for everyone.
|
On October 02 2017 02:08 Lazare1969 wrote:Show nested quote +On October 01 2017 23:16 Carnations wrote:On October 01 2017 22:42 noname_ wrote:On October 01 2017 22:07 Carnations wrote:On October 01 2017 16:46 arbiter_md wrote:
I've been using 1.16 and everything was fine. Don't like the graphics of RM and didn't plan to spend money on that. About a week ago I've made a mistake to try to join Europe server. And then it started. Auto-update to 1.18 and all the shit that comes with it. Now it takes 5 minutes to start the game and I have a pause of like 10 seconds before every game starts.
Of course CPU is way up to 40-50% now. And that's supposed to be the same game with few fixes?? I don't know how some developers manage to screw the software so badly. Don't even want to think what a possible RM would do to my computer. Maybe it's time to stop playing on an Etch-a-sketch? do you have to literally draw the map before the game loads? For a game with a 1998 release date and what used to run on a Pentium I, should really be a requirement to have a modern piece of hardware (and blizzard apps and whatnot) to run smoothly? Come on... Probably only a small portion of bw gamers are affected to this level, but this is ridiculous nonetheless. On October 01 2017 22:36 Dantak wrote:
I don't get it. Am I the only one who enjoys the new rm without any problems? I'm just glad that RM brought more people back (me included) and that I can use auto match making. Who didn`t played on icc/fish, won`t notice anything anyway. I don`t want to be rude, but most of the people who bought RM (with nostalgia in mind) will slip by and fade away within a few months, the core will remain to chew on on the unresolved issues. it's not ridiculous. if you're trying to play on a microwave you don't get to complain. Operating System: Windows® 7 / Windows® 8 / Windows® 10. Processor: Intel® Pentium® D or AMD™ Athlon™ 64 X2. Video: NVIDIA® GeForce; 6800 (256 MB) or ATI™ Radeon™ X1600 Pro (256 MB) or better. Memory: 2GB RAM. Storage: 2.8 GB HD space. Internet: Broadband Internet connection. Input: Keyboard and mouse. This shit is not much. The requirement for video card is outdated. 512MB of VRAM is the absolute minimum and you'll want at least 1GB VRAM for it to be smooth throughout the whole game. The game requires 2.2 GB VRAM to be able to turn on real-time lighting -- though the bright side is that it's an ugly effect anyway so it's no real loss. This article is so deceptive their "recommended" GPU has 512MB video memory: https://us.battle.net/support/en/article/28438
Wow, you're right dude. You need a computer from 2006, not 2005.. What a huge difference. Like, seriously, what's your point?
Stop trying to play on a potato and remastered should work fine.
|
On October 02 2017 03:16 B-royal wrote:
Operating System
Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit SP1
CPU
Intel Core i7 4770 @ 3.40GHz
RAM
8.00GB Dual-Channel DDR3 @ 798MHz (11-11-11-28)
2048MB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 (ASUStek Computer Inc)
Game takes 70 seconds to start, from clicking on starcraft.exe until being able to log-in to multiplayer.
Starting witcher 3 through steam takes about 20-30 seconds less.
Sometimes battlenet is so slow I get null and void values instead of people's names, game names,...
Chat commands don't work, can't add people to my friends list, games are not being counted towards stats, can't search through your map folder by using hotkeys, and the list goes on..
Yea, this is the bizarre stuff, and I've recall this has been fucked for you since day 1 of 1.18. Then people like me have the game run fine. I'm not sure I can recall even hearing about such a massive spread in how a game runs from person to person as I have for RM.
Wish I knew more about hardware/programming to have some idea why RM experiences are so completely over the map.
|
RM works fine for me
I would prefer if it could be started without the blizzard launcher, but that doesn't take long even on my shitty computers.
|
On October 02 2017 05:28 neptunusfisk wrote:
RM works fine for me
I would prefer if it could be started without the blizzard launcher, but that doesn't take long even on my shitty computers.
run it with StarCraft.exe -launch
|
5398 Posts
On October 02 2017 05:39 iopq wrote:
run it with StarCraft.exe -launch
Wow thanks, this worked great. For anyone not sure how to do this... find your install directory, right click starcraft.exe, and choose send to -> desktop (create shortcut). Then right click the shortcut on your desktop and go to properties,
and add " -launch" right after the starcraft.exe in the target.
Here's mine:
+ Show Spoiler +
This launches the game immediately (in 2 seconds) instead of waiting for the god-awful blizz launcher to boot up.
|
On October 02 2017 07:22 pheer wrote:Wow thanks, this worked great. For anyone not sure how to do this... find your install directory, right click starcraft.exe, and choose send to -> desktop (create shortcut). Then right click the shortcut on your desktop and go to properties, and add " -launch" right after the starcraft.exe in the target. Here's mine: + Show Spoiler +This launches the game immediately (in 2 seconds) instead of waiting for the god-awful blizz launcher to boot up.
This helped a lot thanks
|
On October 02 2017 04:28 Carnations wrote:Show nested quote +On October 02 2017 02:08 Lazare1969 wrote:On October 01 2017 23:16 Carnations wrote:On October 01 2017 22:42 noname_ wrote:On October 01 2017 22:07 Carnations wrote:On October 01 2017 16:46 arbiter_md wrote:
I've been using 1.16 and everything was fine. Don't like the graphics of RM and didn't plan to spend money on that. About a week ago I've made a mistake to try to join Europe server. And then it started. Auto-update to 1.18 and all the shit that comes with it. Now it takes 5 minutes to start the game and I have a pause of like 10 seconds before every game starts.
Of course CPU is way up to 40-50% now. And that's supposed to be the same game with few fixes?? I don't know how some developers manage to screw the software so badly. Don't even want to think what a possible RM would do to my computer. Maybe it's time to stop playing on an Etch-a-sketch? do you have to literally draw the map before the game loads? For a game with a 1998 release date and what used to run on a Pentium I, should really be a requirement to have a modern piece of hardware (and blizzard apps and whatnot) to run smoothly? Come on... Probably only a small portion of bw gamers are affected to this level, but this is ridiculous nonetheless. On October 01 2017 22:36 Dantak wrote:
I don't get it. Am I the only one who enjoys the new rm without any problems? I'm just glad that RM brought more people back (me included) and that I can use auto match making. Who didn`t played on icc/fish, won`t notice anything anyway. I don`t want to be rude, but most of the people who bought RM (with nostalgia in mind) will slip by and fade away within a few months, the core will remain to chew on on the unresolved issues. it's not ridiculous. if you're trying to play on a microwave you don't get to complain. Operating System: Windows® 7 / Windows® 8 / Windows® 10. Processor: Intel® Pentium® D or AMD™ Athlon™ 64 X2. Video: NVIDIA® GeForce; 6800 (256 MB) or ATI™ Radeon™ X1600 Pro (256 MB) or better. Memory: 2GB RAM. Storage: 2.8 GB HD space. Internet: Broadband Internet connection. Input: Keyboard and mouse. This shit is not much. The requirement for video card is outdated. 512MB of VRAM is the absolute minimum and you'll want at least 1GB VRAM for it to be smooth throughout the whole game. The game requires 2.2 GB VRAM to be able to turn on real-time lighting -- though the bright side is that it's an ugly effect anyway so it's no real loss. This article is so deceptive their "recommended" GPU has 512MB video memory: https://us.battle.net/support/en/article/28438 Wow, you're right dude. You need a computer from 2006, not 2005.. What a huge difference. Like, seriously, what's your point? Stop trying to play on a potato and remastered should work fine.
I have an i7 4770k oced at 4.4ghz, and a gtx 1070, 16gb ram (oc too) and i m having issues as well from weird graphic bugs to sluggish mouse and inputs. And then there s the horrible lag.
I m also pretty disappointed in how bad the remastered cinematics are, graphics wise.
So while I can understand your point, the product is not worthy of being a final commercial release and may be worse than the original for some people, without even using the hd settings.
|
TLADT24920 Posts
On October 02 2017 02:50 Heyjoray wrote:
I would love to know on what kind of shitty PC the OMG RM SO BAD screamer play. All the purist elitists probably never had a reason to upgrade their computer and simply sticked on windows xp. But you are incredible cool in here spamming "LOL RM SO BAD BLIZ SUX".
On October 02 2017 04:28 Carnations wrote:Show nested quote +On October 02 2017 02:08 Lazare1969 wrote:On October 01 2017 23:16 Carnations wrote:On October 01 2017 22:42 noname_ wrote:On October 01 2017 22:07 Carnations wrote:On October 01 2017 16:46 arbiter_md wrote:
I've been using 1.16 and everything was fine. Don't like the graphics of RM and didn't plan to spend money on that. About a week ago I've made a mistake to try to join Europe server. And then it started. Auto-update to 1.18 and all the shit that comes with it. Now it takes 5 minutes to start the game and I have a pause of like 10 seconds before every game starts.
Of course CPU is way up to 40-50% now. And that's supposed to be the same game with few fixes?? I don't know how some developers manage to screw the software so badly. Don't even want to think what a possible RM would do to my computer. Maybe it's time to stop playing on an Etch-a-sketch? do you have to literally draw the map before the game loads? For a game with a 1998 release date and what used to run on a Pentium I, should really be a requirement to have a modern piece of hardware (and blizzard apps and whatnot) to run smoothly? Come on... Probably only a small portion of bw gamers are affected to this level, but this is ridiculous nonetheless. On October 01 2017 22:36 Dantak wrote:
I don't get it. Am I the only one who enjoys the new rm without any problems? I'm just glad that RM brought more people back (me included) and that I can use auto match making. Who didn`t played on icc/fish, won`t notice anything anyway. I don`t want to be rude, but most of the people who bought RM (with nostalgia in mind) will slip by and fade away within a few months, the core will remain to chew on on the unresolved issues. it's not ridiculous. if you're trying to play on a microwave you don't get to complain. Operating System: Windows® 7 / Windows® 8 / Windows® 10. Processor: Intel® Pentium® D or AMD™ Athlon™ 64 X2. Video: NVIDIA® GeForce; 6800 (256 MB) or ATI™ Radeon™ X1600 Pro (256 MB) or better. Memory: 2GB RAM. Storage: 2.8 GB HD space. Internet: Broadband Internet connection. Input: Keyboard and mouse. This shit is not much. The requirement for video card is outdated. 512MB of VRAM is the absolute minimum and you'll want at least 1GB VRAM for it to be smooth throughout the whole game. The game requires 2.2 GB VRAM to be able to turn on real-time lighting -- though the bright side is that it's an ugly effect anyway so it's no real loss. This article is so deceptive their "recommended" GPU has 512MB video memory: https://us.battle.net/support/en/article/28438 Wow, you're right dude. You need a computer from 2006, not 2005.. What a huge difference. Like, seriously, what's your point? Stop trying to play on a potato and remastered should work fine.
These two posts are terrible and you should both feel bad about it. Stop making stupid assumptions and actually ask those people having issues what kind of computer they are using before trying to deride every poster having issues as having a "potato computer". I myself have an i5 laptop with 6gb ram and a dedicated 512mb nvidia graphics card. This 'potato' computer was running WoL on all high settings when it was released but wait, how can a potato computer run Starcraft II but not RM? I'll leave you to think about that one.
|
On October 02 2017 09:06 BigFan wrote:Show nested quote +On October 02 2017 02:50 Heyjoray wrote:
I would love to know on what kind of shitty PC the OMG RM SO BAD screamer play. All the purist elitists probably never had a reason to upgrade their computer and simply sticked on windows xp. But you are incredible cool in here spamming "LOL RM SO BAD BLIZ SUX". Show nested quote +On October 02 2017 04:28 Carnations wrote:On October 02 2017 02:08 Lazare1969 wrote:On October 01 2017 23:16 Carnations wrote:On October 01 2017 22:42 noname_ wrote:On October 01 2017 22:07 Carnations wrote:On October 01 2017 16:46 arbiter_md wrote:
I've been using 1.16 and everything was fine. Don't like the graphics of RM and didn't plan to spend money on that. About a week ago I've made a mistake to try to join Europe server. And then it started. Auto-update to 1.18 and all the shit that comes with it. Now it takes 5 minutes to start the game and I have a pause of like 10 seconds before every game starts.
Of course CPU is way up to 40-50% now. And that's supposed to be the same game with few fixes?? I don't know how some developers manage to screw the software so badly. Don't even want to think what a possible RM would do to my computer. Maybe it's time to stop playing on an Etch-a-sketch? do you have to literally draw the map before the game loads? For a game with a 1998 release date and what used to run on a Pentium I, should really be a requirement to have a modern piece of hardware (and blizzard apps and whatnot) to run smoothly? Come on... Probably only a small portion of bw gamers are affected to this level, but this is ridiculous nonetheless. On October 01 2017 22:36 Dantak wrote:
I don't get it. Am I the only one who enjoys the new rm without any problems? I'm just glad that RM brought more people back (me included) and that I can use auto match making. Who didn`t played on icc/fish, won`t notice anything anyway. I don`t want to be rude, but most of the people who bought RM (with nostalgia in mind) will slip by and fade away within a few months, the core will remain to chew on on the unresolved issues. it's not ridiculous. if you're trying to play on a microwave you don't get to complain. Operating System: Windows® 7 / Windows® 8 / Windows® 10. Processor: Intel® Pentium® D or AMD™ Athlon™ 64 X2. Video: NVIDIA® GeForce; 6800 (256 MB) or ATI™ Radeon™ X1600 Pro (256 MB) or better. Memory: 2GB RAM. Storage: 2.8 GB HD space. Internet: Broadband Internet connection. Input: Keyboard and mouse. This shit is not much. The requirement for video card is outdated. 512MB of VRAM is the absolute minimum and you'll want at least 1GB VRAM for it to be smooth throughout the whole game. The game requires 2.2 GB VRAM to be able to turn on real-time lighting -- though the bright side is that it's an ugly effect anyway so it's no real loss. This article is so deceptive their "recommended" GPU has 512MB video memory: https://us.battle.net/support/en/article/28438 Wow, you're right dude. You need a computer from 2006, not 2005.. What a huge difference. Like, seriously, what's your point? Stop trying to play on a potato and remastered should work fine. These two posts are terrible and you should both feel bad about it. Stop making stupid assumptions and actually ask those people having issues what kind of computer they are using before trying to deride every poster having issues as having a "potato computer". I myself have an i5 laptop with 6gb ram and a dedicated 512mb nvidia graphics card. This 'potato' computer was running WoL on all high settings when it was released but wait, how can a potato computer run Starcraft II but not RM? I'll leave you to think about that one.
"Stop making stupid assumptions". You are right, i should work with what they post here...Oh wait its just "OMG REMASTERED SUCKS ASS"
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT![[image loading]](https://i.imgur.com/J1uYAH0.png)
