|
On March 27 2017 22:39 Frolossus wrote:Show nested quote +On March 27 2017 19:43 Dampnut wrote:Blizzard fell for remasters i'm disappointed. It will be just another cash grab or some scenario like modern warfare remastered. It doesn't even look that different from the original. It only has more pixels and little better detail.  User was warned for this post nobody wants broodwar to have mechanical differences. all we need is modern online and support for modern windows
just wanna say, though I too have positive opinion about this remaster, it is seriously mental that minority opinions get warned so often or systematically on this forum. When you Frolossus say "nobody", you are wrong first (many dislike 12 unit selection or no MBS and have little gripes against the pathing, maybe not those who are currently playing because hey they probably have left at some point for this reason and/or others), and second any habit of actually banning minority opinions only goes towards enforcing a dominant ideology (dominant on this forum).
sure some people may tend to be negative no matter what and he might be like that, but anybody has also a simple right of having a negative opinion about this and I disapprove of TL tendency to bury/hide/suppress way too quickly certain types of posts or discussions in kind of an authoritarian way
maybe this guy is known to be someone else who trolled or abused before, but if not sorry but his opinion is OK even if I dont agree with it in this case. Even if he is wrong I see little reason to warn him here. Sure the classic team is rly doing this right and we are not even going to have to buy the HD version it seems to play with others and its just win/win, but why not just let people answer to this guy instead of just cutting it
it makes me want to stop reading and posting on TL sometimes
for example, a closed or locked thread is not just closed, its buried, also something I rly dislike
|
On March 26 2017 14:43 paralleluniverse wrote:
Hope this doesn't mean a decline in support for SC2 development.
This.
|
TLADT24920 Posts
On March 28 2017 01:22 ProMeTheus112 wrote:Show nested quote +On March 27 2017 22:39 Frolossus wrote:On March 27 2017 19:43 Dampnut wrote:Blizzard fell for remasters i'm disappointed. It will be just another cash grab or some scenario like modern warfare remastered. It doesn't even look that different from the original. It only has more pixels and little better detail. User was warned for this post nobody wants broodwar to have mechanical differences. all we need is modern online and support for modern windows just wanna say, though I too have positive opinion about this remaster, it is seriously mental that minority opinions get warned so often or systematically on this forum. When you Frolossus say "nobody", you are wrong first (many dislike 12 unit selection or no MBS and have little gripes against the pathing, maybe not those who are currently playing because hey they probably have left at some point for this reason and/or others), and second any habit of actually banning minority opinions only goes towards enforcing a dominant ideology (dominant on this forum). sure some people may tend to be negative no matter what and he might be like that, but anybody has also a simple right of having a negative opinion about this and I disapprove of TL tendency to bury/hide/suppress way too quickly certain types of posts or discussions in kind of an authoritarian way maybe this guy is known to be someone else who trolled or abused before, but if not sorry but his opinion is OK even if I dont agree with it in this case. Even if he is wrong I see little reason to warn him here. Sure the classic team is rly doing this right and we are not even going to have to buy the HD version it seems to play with others and its just win/win, but why not just let people answer to this guy instead of just cutting it it makes me want to stop reading and posting on TL sometimes for example, a closed or locked thread is not just closed, its buried, also something I rly dislike
If you have any concerns about moderation, take it to website feedback please.
|
I prefer writing publicly where it happens and others read since my message is not addressed only to the moderation but I don't mind copying this to website feedback too
|
On March 26 2017 15:45 Lunareste wrote:
I always thought lings looked like little frogs hopping around the battlefield.
Rip my little amphibian friends
100% agree, gonna miss 'em.
|
|
|
Any clarity 'zoomability'? Would love to play at proper up-scale resolutions.
|
The graphics are very nice! I analyzed the sliding-pictures on starcraft.com that you can have both point of view (old and new) and I have the feeling they have worsened the current state.. When you play BW, it doesnt look that bad. So if it is not made on purpose and it is due to picture quality, the remastered BW will probably 10x better 
|
I had the hilarious experience of playing the trailer video at 360p and BW:R looked worse ;P
|
will old replays work with new graphics?
|
Confused about the unit portraits, what are those?
Those aren't the little portraits you see at the bottom are they?
Cus the 3 here are obviously painted in 2D. But in the footage they shared, the unit portraits are animated and thus must be in 3D.
|
On March 28 2017 13:46 Yoshi Kirishima wrote:
Confused about the unit portraits, what are those?
Those aren't the little portraits you see at the bottom are they?
Cus the 3 here are obviously painted in 2D. But in the footage they shared, the unit portraits are animated and thus must be in 3D.
Considering the video has the Battlecruiser with updated portraits, I presume those are concept art.
|
On March 28 2017 01:28 Trizztein1 wrote:Show nested quote +On March 26 2017 14:43 paralleluniverse wrote:
Hope this doesn't mean a decline in support for SC2 development. This.
In the video interview with Yahoo, the developer said that there is only the 20-person classic games team that has been working on this remaster in addition to the recent patches for Diablo 2 and Warcraft 3. I think the SC2 team still bigger even now, unless they need to temporarily pull people to finish polishing the remaster before launch.
On March 28 2017 13:46 Yoshi Kirishima wrote:
Confused about the unit portraits, what are those?
Those aren't the little portraits you see at the bottom are they?
Cus the 3 here are obviously painted in 2D. But in the footage they shared, the unit portraits are animated and thus must be in 3D.
Maybe the portraits will be animated based on the 2D paintings. In the screenshots in the interview thread, the portraits look redone in that style.
|
|
|
On March 28 2017 13:46 Yoshi Kirishima wrote:
Confused about the unit portraits, what are those?
Those aren't the little portraits you see at the bottom are they?
Cus the 3 here are obviously painted in 2D. But in the footage they shared, the unit portraits are animated and thus must be in 3D.
I don't entirely see why they couldn't be 2D and also animated. Perhaps it could be prerendered, for one?
|
France1920 Posts
|
biggest deal for me is zealots actually having psi-blades, they look so fucking good it's insane
speedlot rush every game 4 sure
|
Ah, Bw with updated 2d graphics. There go the next 15 years of my gaming interests.
|
What about the upcomming patch? What will be changed, if anything?
|
would they ever dare try to do another expansion? or is that blasphemous already? lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
