EPTStarCraft: Remastered coming in May? - Page 10
| Forum Index > BW General |
|
eviltomahawk
United States11135 Posts
| ||
|
Jealous
10314 Posts
On March 15 2017 04:19 Lorch wrote: Well if this is happening they'll add widescreen 100% so the visible area will have to change either way. Let's just hope that it won't end up being super zoomed out like the widescreen hack that exists now. Not to mention that a resolution change of this nature would certainly affect the game if you consider the task bar at the bottom and different spawn locations on popular maps. | ||
|
bObA
France300 Posts
| ||
|
pebble444
Italy2503 Posts
| ||
|
Lucumo
6850 Posts
| ||
|
paxconsciente
Belgium91 Posts
An HD version is good from every angle, so please stop being negative and have some hope, blizzard, believe it or not, is a smart company. Just because they made a few bad games and decisions doesn't make them satan. BW is a better game then sc2 but western players couldn't care less, and please don't tell me the western community is strong because it isn't, at all. I'm still watching commentary's in korean, if the western scene was truly strong there would be english commentaries for almost every great game so far. An HD remake done well means new games by pros, commentated in english by professionals, and a vast, new and excited playerbase ready to learn the game against people of similar skill, not a gigantic pool of try hards who's basic muscle memory of bw is 4x that of a regular player at his top form. | ||
|
emc
United States3088 Posts
| ||
|
Swantanamo J
United States18 Posts
| ||
|
ilsamsamchil
155 Posts
| ||
|
Wildmoon
Thailand4189 Posts
| ||
|
MrMischelito
347 Posts
On March 14 2017 23:15 Piste wrote: I hope they'll keep it simple and keep the graphics as clear as they are. more pixels means nothing if army battles are just big explosions which make it hard to see and keep track of individual units. yes! this is actually one of the greatest concerns I have with sc2. same goes for diablo 3 over its predecessor. | ||
|
Psyonic_Reaver
United States4342 Posts
Just put in ALL units from SC1 and SC2 together and the game will randomly morph between SC1 graphics and SC2 graphics and players have to quickly adapt between the changing game environment. When it's SC1 it's BW units only. SC2, then SC2 units only. SC2 units can morph into SC1 graphics when the change occurs and vice versa. The best players are the ones that can adapt to the bad AI of SC1 and the deathballs of SC2. It would be glorious. Edit: And rocks and watch towers would just randomly spawn during each morph because fuck it. | ||
|
jalstar
United States8198 Posts
| ||
|
Musicus
Germany23576 Posts
On March 15 2017 05:26 jalstar wrote: There is no audience for this. SC2 is already too hard for non-Koreans, and Koreans seem perfectly happy with BW as it is. Who is this for? The new generation that has never played BW before. Every new game that shows up in the bnet launcher will have tons of people trying it out. | ||
|
The_Red_Viper
19533 Posts
On March 15 2017 05:36 Musicus wrote: The new generation that has never played BW before. Every new game that shows up in the bnet launcher will have tons of people trying it out. Exactly. Matchmaking alone makes such a big difference. Simply having to click on a few buttons is just a quality of live feature no game these days can't have if it wants to generate an audience. Higher resolution graphics also surely help a ton. Lot of things which could make it successful (enough) | ||
|
Highgamer
1451 Posts
Not even the "overly flirty Flash" thread got 10 pages. | ||
|
SetGuitarsToKill
Canada28396 Posts
I don't think that would stop big name players from trying it though, especially if there's tournament money on the line. | ||
|
iG.Arcneon
Finland333 Posts
| ||
|
Wildmoon
Thailand4189 Posts
On March 15 2017 05:42 The_Red_Viper wrote: Exactly. Matchmaking alone makes such a big difference. Simply having to click on a few buttons is just a quality of live feature no game these days can't have if it wants to generate an audience. Higher resolution graphics also surely help a ton. Lot of things which could make it successful (enough) You overestimate the size of playerbase interested in rts games. | ||
|
JimmyJRaynor
Canada17486 Posts
On March 15 2017 05:03 paxconsciente wrote: OK folks, the truth is BW is NOT fine as it is for western players, certainly not new ones, it's brutally hard, and it's impossible to get into as a new player unless you're already a talented and very strong rts player to begin with, good point. to add to that... every RTS multiplayer community slowly turns into a shark tank. novices and less dedicated players slowly leave. it becomes all sharks and no guppies. i could not convince my Red Alert 3 hardcore player friends to try Brood War. They all ended up getting SC2 though. currently, most of the SC2 clan i'm in consists of guppies with full time jobs; they love RTS but don't have much time to devote to the game. They range from bronze to gold and there is no way any of them are moving over to the Brood War shark tank. On March 15 2017 05:42 Highgamer wrote: Haven't seen a not-tournament-match-related-thread have 10 pages in less than a day, kinda speaks for the latent hype the BW community has going on about this remastered version, even though it's quite calm here most of the time. Not even the "overly flirty Flash" thread got 10 pages. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rQqwG_rQx7A&feature=youtu.be&t=1m14s "in a tree by the brook, there is a song-bird who sings... sometimes all of our thoughts are misgiven..." Brood War has as much of a chance of making a come back as Led Zeppelin. | ||
| ||
