EPTI'll let you keep the last word.
To: Map Makers - Page 5
| Forum Index > BW General |
|
SexWithTeroru
11 Posts
I'll let you keep the last word. | ||
|
Mora
Canada5235 Posts
| ||
Bill307
Canada9103 Posts
 http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=29994 | ||
|
[GiTM]-Ace
United States4935 Posts
btw mora i told u id read ur thread  | ||
|
Starparty
Sweden1963 Posts
On August 17 2005 20:17 Teroru wrote: Starpart did u read my last post? I feel that addressing it bears more importance than responding to SexWithTeroru. your last post was not directed to me, and im getting abit confused trying to figure out which one you meant  | ||
|
Mora
Canada5235 Posts
On August 18 2005 02:24 Starparty wrote: your last post was not directed to me, and im getting abit confused trying to figure out which one you meant The post adresses you specifically. It was posted at 18:47, the same minute you made a post. Starparty, i think i understand the most of what you are saying, but something still confuses me. Could you explain to me what criteria a 'critique' needs, that isn't just 'an opinion' and could be 'constructive'? The points i made are very accurate points in map making. Maps are not just about art. They're about broodwar. If the map isn't creating beautiful gameplay, it's not a good map, regardless of how beautiful it is in any other way. A good map has beauty, balance, and must create interesting gameplay. Falling short on any count means your map is doing just that, falling short. The guidelines i wrote are, for the most part, true. They can be broken while still maintaining good gameplay, but that is hard to accomplish and is why i have 'guided' to not do so. | ||
Empyrean
17070 Posts
| ||
|
Starparty
Sweden1963 Posts
My bladdering took me so far away from your question that i dont even know how to bladder myself back again. | ||
|
Tfums
Canada476 Posts
| ||
|
Murph
Canada591 Posts
On August 18 2005 15:07 Empyrean wrote: I'm curious as to who SexWithMora is. I think probably a guy who wants to get lucky. | ||
|
Murph
Canada591 Posts
On August 17 2005 19:34 Starparty wrote: perhaps. But it will take hella lot of trees to make the valks not fire correctly Sorry I didn't read any of the previous posts about this "debate" or whatever thats going on, but just so you guys know if I remeber correctly the sprite max in broodwar is about 1024. So after that you get the fire glitch. | ||
|
rel
Guam3521 Posts
| ||
|
[GiTM]-Ace
United States4935 Posts
On August 18 2005 19:16 Murph wrote: I think probably a guy who wants to get lucky. hes all mine | ||
|
Murph
Canada591 Posts
Lets fight for him. You make the stipulations, I call the terrain, or vise versa if you like.  You call the disqualification rules. I'll fly my ass to where ever you live and we can see who gets to go home with mora at the end of the night. I won't go easy, even though you're a cool guy. | ||
|
a-game
Canada5214 Posts
| ||
|
Starparty
Sweden1963 Posts
On August 18 2005 17:36 Tfums wrote: omg look at your maps for a few minutes. Doesn't it give you a headache or have you built up an immunity? lol, i didn't excpect that from the creator of imbroglio of misshap T_____T | ||
|
Starparty
Sweden1963 Posts
On August 18 2005 19:33 Murph wrote: Sorry I didn't read any of the previous posts about this "debate" or whatever thats going on, but just so you guys know if I remeber correctly the sprite max in broodwar is about 1024. So after that you get the fire glitch. 1640. | ||
|
Tfums
Canada476 Posts
On August 19 2005 01:44 Starparty wrote: lol, i didn't excpect that from the creator of imbroglio of misshap T_____T Wow, didn't expect that since I'm not MORA. Imbroglio of Mishap is one of the best maps I've seen in the longest time. | ||
|
Starparty
Sweden1963 Posts
But perhaps that sums up how much i really care. Im not here to make enemies, but obviously you are, and therefore i will not bother with you anymore. Good luck with your mapmaking. | ||
|
Ghin
United States2391 Posts
adj. Having or displaying a sense of overbearing self-worth or self-importance. Marked by or arising from a feeling or assumption of one's superiority toward others: an arrogant contempt for the weak. | ||
| ||
