By the way, I don't think you should actually put more minerals in the high-yield expansion places. SC2 balances the high-yield expansions by the fact that they typically only have 6 patches, so the saturated income is the same (just requires less workers to saturate). I think it would be better if you just treated them as normal expos.

Also, having all those xel'naga temples everywhere is really hilarious.

Shebuha

Canada1335 Posts

January 22 2012 07:58 GMT

#30

These are so cute :3 Metal and Tal'darim look really good IMO!

Dustin Browder is very glad you kept all the destructible debris.

Blackrobe

United States806 Posts

January 22 2012 07:59 GMT

#31

Have you ever tried to do the reverse and change some BW maps to SC2?

Such as those used in '11-'12 proleague pool? :D
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=284827

Stratos

Czech Republic6104 Posts

January 22 2012 08:04 GMT

#32

Nice. I was looking forward to these ever since I first joined TL. I started with SC2 but switched to BW pretty soon and got quite discouraged by not knowing any of the maps.

Now finally I can put them into use. Thanks for the hard work!

Sinedd

Poland7052 Posts

January 22 2012 08:33 GMT

#33

those maps look more than weird in BW...

Bswhunter

Australia954 Posts

January 22 2012 09:31 GMT

#34

XNC and meta look the coolest. XNC because I haven't seen a BW map with that layout and meta cuz of the terrain.
Also Tal Darim for the center... Holyyy fuck that looks cool.

Talin

Montenegro10532 Posts

January 22 2012 09:39 GMT

#35

Only Tal Darim looks like an "acceptable" BW map at first sight, most of the others look like Python/LT clones or some of those obscure maps from early 2000s.

It would be interesting to see some of the newer maps like Cloud Kingdom.

SiaBBo

Finland132 Posts

January 22 2012 10:39 GMT

#36

They look very weird. If would never play these in BW cuz they look very imba and will not just work. I hope you put some more effor like decorating the map and don't just rush to finish, it really looks like you made these maps in 10 minutes. These maps are just too tight to play in BW and ofcourse there is some positional imbalances.

Found one Scrap Station too:

[image loading]

Boundz(DarKo)

5311 Posts

January 22 2012 11:50 GMT

#37

On January 22 2012 14:16 alffla wrote:

Show nested quote +

lLOL yea.. they look like maps from the beginnings of BW. or worse.

You have to give it to the editor too... ofc. the maps look bad without doodads and detailed mapping.

Edit: I am a really good mapmaker but I don't see why converting SC2 maps into BW is a good idea unless they start producing some interesting maps for SC2(in comparison to BW mapping.)

sheaRZerg

United States613 Posts

January 22 2012 11:56 GMT

#38

lol...SC2 maps have such tiny bases, it would suck playing bw terran on almost all of these.

Also....isnt remaking lost temple a little redundant ;P

Boundz(DarKo)

5311 Posts

January 22 2012 12:01 GMT

#39

On January 22 2012 20:56 sheaRZerg wrote:
lol...SC2 maps have such tiny bases, it would suck playing bw terran on almost all of these.

Also....isnt remaking lost temple a little redundant ;P

You'd have to fix a lot of tiny things to make it work, but that doesn't have to change the maps structure. But there are no interesting SC2 mapping concepts as of yet... I mean compare it to the BW mapping scene, there is no reason to start converting maps at all.

BrosephBrostar

United States445 Posts

January 22 2012 12:33 GMT

#40

When you compare the SC2 maps to current BW ones it really makes you wonder what happened to the SC2 mapmakers' creativity. It's like they all caught some kind of disease from Blizzard.