World Cyber Games to officially retire StarCraft 1 - Page 17
Forum Index > BW General |
NEgroidZerg
United States244 Posts
| ||
legaton
France1763 Posts
| ||
mevshero
911 Posts
On March 07 2011 12:32 arQ wrote: And wow, the elitism of some people in here is just... wow. You want to be the old-times-are-better guy than go right ahead. The rest of us evolves meanwhile if you dont mind. bw was such a big big part in our all youth and it's not that easy to see the most personal favorite computergame for so many years dying out outside korea. i don't have a problem with blizzard moving on, i'm just pissed about that newcomer-kids that keep saying "hahah your old game is dead go sc2 go sc2!" well, hopefully bw will move on in korea many more years, than everything is ok ![]() bw will never die | ||
![]()
c3rberUs
Japan11285 Posts
This (removal of BW) wouldn't really harm broodwar in anyway, because the scene is watched, played and organized in Korea. | ||
Garrl
Scotland1970 Posts
On March 07 2011 12:32 arQ wrote: And wow, the elitism of some people in here is just... wow. You want to be the old-times-are-better guy than go right ahead. The rest of us evolves meanwhile if you dont mind. ahem. | ||
Firereaver
India1701 Posts
| ||
gryffindor
United States524 Posts
| ||
evilfatsh1t
Australia8606 Posts
| ||
s.a.y
Croatia3840 Posts
| ||
shucklesors
Singapore1176 Posts
isnt it so frickin obvious that they are 2 games so far apart in so many things? i loved the wcg fpvods, im sure many who appreciate high apm and macro apart from just the stormuu and plaguu or micro love it too, i think sc1's requirement of such apm is what makes up its beauty, by maybe about 50%. sc2 is for the.. strategy appreciaters? i dont know, because i dont see sc2 coming close to sc1 in strategic planning, or in being an rts game in any way close for that matter. (just a side opinion) my point: there is seriously no need to not have both sc1 and sc2 coexisting at the same time, THEY ARE ALMOST COMPLETELY DIFFERENT GAMES, JUST RELATED. | ||
Arkqn
France589 Posts
Anyway, who needs WCG whe nwe have MSL/OSL/PL :o ? | ||
Garrl
Scotland1970 Posts
sc2 is for the.. strategy appreciaters? i dont know, because i dont see sc2 coming close to sc1 in strategic planning, Just because you can't see the strategical depth in BW doesn't mean it doesn't exist. BW is far deeper than SC2, strategically, because there's game mechanics and units that allow for terrain control. | ||
IamBach
United States1059 Posts
On March 07 2011 19:55 Garrl wrote: Just because you can't see the strategical depth in BW doesn't mean it doesn't exist. BW is far deeper than SC2, strategically, because there's game mechanics and units that allow for terrain control. Thats basically what he meant. | ||
Garrl
Scotland1970 Posts
| ||
Garmer
1286 Posts
| ||
Black Gun
Germany4482 Posts
it wouldnt have made sense anymore. | ||
wow.raptor
Poland6 Posts
| ||
Furaha
Germany271 Posts
On March 07 2011 20:07 wow.raptor wrote: So there be nothing to watch now @ wcg. Sad ;/ Haha I had exactly the same thought. No reason anymore for watching or visiting WCG... | ||
[sc1f]eonzerg
Belgium6504 Posts
| ||
biskit
Australia355 Posts
| ||
| ||