EPT[POLL] What race is the hardest to master - Page 4
| Forum Index > BW General |
|
BadBinky
Finland649 Posts
| ||
|
Vharox
United States1037 Posts
On June 24 2004 15:58 Chobohobo wrote: I vote zerg: As a zerg player I always feel cheated because I have to macro my ass off. And then still I need to micro my units as much as other races(fu terrans). Its hard because unlike terran and toss who just move in a straight line a zerg has to be a lot more mobile and always keep tabs on the opposing army so that you can position in just the right manner to perform a flank, and if it fails you lose. And most zerg need to achieve this with 3-4 hotkeys for units(unless you dont hotkey hatcheries). And while I am doing all this micro I still need to have 2x the bases of the opponent and do harass micro just so I can buy enough time to make a few more drones or start a hatchery. And then theres the Drone/War Unit balance. Essentially a good zerg needs intuition to when to drone, how much to drone and how many units to make. If you make too little drones then your economy will never keep up with the opponent and you wont produce enough units to defend your base and expansions. Make too many drones and you won't have enough units to defend yourself. At the base its a race of how many drones can you make without getting creamed. I agree =[ fu terrans :p | ||
|
hasuwar
7365 Posts
| ||
|
Milzo
France656 Posts
On June 24 2004 17:40 green-tea. wrote: Protoss have it easy in pvp. ahah funny one ^^ | ||
|
Cambium
United States16368 Posts
On June 24 2004 08:40 iamke55 wrote: First serious game I tried with Zerg, got zealot rushed and lost. Second game, beat a newb but constantly had 1k minerals. In the first serious games I tried toss, I got up to 200/200 very quickly, secured many expansions(and still lost the games), and didn't have many excess minerals until 3-5 expansions and 200/200. So I would say zerg is hardest and protoss is easiest. Where is Terran? | ||
|
RuGbUg
United States2347 Posts
i think speed is more easily accomplished that perfect timing | ||
|
krzych113
United Kingdom547 Posts
| ||
|
RuGbUg
United States2347 Posts
| ||
|
Hoops
417 Posts
Still, the game is balanced relatively folks. So since there are to level tos players and terran players and a few zerg players it's hard to really say any oneis more balanced then others. On that thought I do have to say there really hasn't been many great zergs so it apears at the pro level zerg might be showing signs of being the hardest to master. Then again maybe maps hate zerg and it's all because of the maps  | ||
|
Day[9]
United States7366 Posts
 but at high levels, i would definitely say protoss. its very difficult for many strong protosses to play on mineral only expoes vs zerg i've seen kingdom do it very well, while most other protosses get raped plus PvT isn't getting any easier at the pro-levels these days | ||
|
EvilTeletubby
Baltimore, USA22258 Posts
On June 24 2004 18:38 RuGbUg wrote: like drone said, zerg is alot about micro and strategy, whereas toss is almost all about timing. i think toss (in a perfect sc world) would be the hardest, simply because small changes in timing by the opponent would have to be noted and adjusted to in order to not die i think speed is more easily accomplished that perfect timing Zerg is way more about timing than Toss IMO. | ||
|
kroko
Finland2136 Posts
| ||
|
Eatme
Switzerland3919 Posts
| ||
|
NonYold
United States2814 Posts
if toss is easy, then why dont people play it and top off wgtour and ngi, cuz there's shit for toss players on the top of either of those ladders ;o | ||
|
suxN
Finland1167 Posts
| ||
| ||
