Blizzard to cease negotiations with KeSPA - Page 25
Forum Index > BW General |
Zlasher
United States9129 Posts
| ||
nimoraca
Serbia84 Posts
On April 27 2010 17:30 igotmyown wrote: You guys have it backwards. Blizzard isn't removing LAN, locking regions, and such to control the SC scene. What happens is Kespa's making however much millions or billions or whatever on their product. Blizzard says, you know, since we made it, you're making ridiculous profit, don't you think you owe us something or have some say? Kespa gives them the finger and stonewalls them for the last few years. They claim that broadcasting isn't violating blizzard's intellectual property and therefore they don't owe anything. Blizzard: hmmm, we could either keep these bs loopholes in our new game and allow them exploit them or close them overly thoroughly. They were perfectly fine with anti-hack and chaoslauncher even though they probably violate the EULA; they're willing to overlook just about everything as long as it's clear that they have the right to do so. They've never fined people. I doubt Blizzard would put in any of these restrictions if Kespa agreed to cooperate. They don't care at all how Kespa runs their leagues, they probably just want Kespa to get permission from them, probably for some nominal sum or small percentage. If there's a way to enable LAN and maintain intellectual property, I'm sure they'd be willing to do it. They would probably overlook it if someone finds a way to create a 3rd party LAN system, and only want the illegal part as IP leverage against kespa clones. Do you really know what nominal sum of money is Blizz asking for. I bet you don't. The point is KeSPA doesn't need SC2. There are a lot of good RTS games out there if they ever want to replace BW, which I seriously doubt they do. Just because the name of the game is Starcraft X doesn't automatically makes it anywhere close to being good as SCBW. Imagine NBA replacing basketball with something else. | ||
hacpee
United States752 Posts
On April 27 2010 17:51 ZlaSHeR wrote: I can't say how much they make exactly, the billions is a completely arbitrary number, but the money you can make from merchandising and advertising is a good amount. The most obscure sports in america can make money, even if its not a lot. Blizzard is the rightful owner to SCBW and SC2 and they have the legal and ethical rights to charge kespa for making money off of their game. I don't know how much kespa makes, but if it is a large company with hundreds of employees, they ARE making money. merchandising? Are you serious? Do you think Starcraft is THAT big in korea? No it isn't. Basically here is the deal. Blizzard is known to choke tournament organizers with fees. It happened in wow, up to the point that some tourneys dropped the game because the licensing fee was too high. I don't want that to happen. More blizzard involvement=higher chance this new game will not live long in terms of Esports. | ||
Kwanroller
Afghanistan459 Posts
Everything I've seen suggests that progaming isn't really that "massive" in Korea and that its reputation is overblown. Big enough to fill a stadium during the finals but not large enough to call it the national sport of Korea. | ||
![]()
TheYango
United States47024 Posts
On April 27 2010 17:56 nimoraca wrote: Do you really know what nominal sum of money is Blizz asking for. I bet you don't. The point is KeSPA doesn't need SC2. There are a lot of good RTS games out there if they ever want to replace BW, which I seriously doubt they do. Just because the name of the game is Starcraft X doesn't automatically makes it anywhere close to being good as SCBW. Imagine NBA replacing basketball with something else. No, no there aren't. | ||
Polis
Poland1292 Posts
On April 27 2010 16:20 xBillehx wrote:KeSPA isn't making too much themselves? They basically never lose money. They put no investment into the development of the game and broadcast it on TV collecting a ton of money from it. You seriously think that running a pro team don't cost any money? There was more money put into Esports then it had cost to develop SC:BW, even if you would only add up the players salaries, and there is obviously much more costs then that. On April 27 2010 16:20 xBillehx wrote:Starcraft 2 already has the hype it needs to surpass BW. KeSPA had nothing to do with that. Since KeSPA acted like a spoiled child, Blizzard will just find a new group who wants to make money by investing in their product and broadcasting. How would they make profit if Blizzard would have a right to take as much from as it would want? Serious SC2 pro gaming looks like hi risk, low reward deal now. I don't see any pro gaming with those terms (on the SC:BW scale with competing teams/leagues that run for almost full year), they will just be separated tournaments that way. | ||
roymarthyup
1442 Posts
if theres a chess or football tournament, do you have to pay the creator of chess or football money. well no because those people are dead.... however... whats to stop KESPA from creating their own RTS game called "superstarchess" and its exactly like starcraft BW in every way except the units are all called different name. such a video game project would actually not be expensive.... if kespa did that, they could still have starcraft tournaments but it would be called "superstarchess tournaments". the only difference is blizzard would make no money off the free advertising starcraft gets in starcraft tournaments so blizzard can go F themselves to be honest. rts games are just a advances real time boardgame that programmers have coded to play out and be interfaced a certain way between the player and his controlls. starcraft tournaments do not illegally sell starcraft, they only broadcast games on it..... blizzard should not have rights to the playing or the broadcasts | ||
SturmAddict
Malaysia176 Posts
will it have LAN? Will it have free single player? I dont think thats very accurate. Name is QUITE important. im pretty sure if some random netizen released "superstarchess 2" 1 year ago, with the exact same units and the exact same interface as the final product of SC2 is, probably only 0.5-1.0% of the people will say its a "good product" Just like how cnc3 , and some Rts are called of as bad products. Mostly because they dont have the NAME starcraft bought to it. | ||
Zlasher
United States9129 Posts
On April 27 2010 18:32 roymarthyup wrote: starcraft is like chess or football if theres a chess or football tournament, do you have to pay the creator of chess or football money. well no because those people are dead.... however... whats to stop KESPA from creating their own RTS game called "superstarchess" and its exactly like starcraft BW in every way except the units are all called different name. such a video game project would actually not be expensive.... if kespa did that, they could still have starcraft tournaments but it would be called "superstarchess tournaments". the only difference is blizzard would make no money off the free advertising starcraft gets in starcraft tournaments so blizzard can go F themselves to be honest. rts games are just a advances real time boardgame that programmers have coded to play out and be interfaced a certain way between the player and his controlls. starcraft tournaments do not illegally sell starcraft, they only broadcast games on it..... blizzard should not have rights to the playing or the broadcasts If you knew anything about law, you'd know that if they literally had archons but called them elephants, same skin, same EVERYTHING, same map decals every unit and structure looks the same, then blizzard can still sue. If they made a whole new RTS with similar gameplay, as in the same damage and splash and hp, that is allowed. But if you think kespa is as poor as you make them out to be, they won't be able to make this game. They don't have the artists and engineers that blizzard has. | ||
purgerinho
Croatia919 Posts
| ||
Feefee
Canada556 Posts
On April 27 2010 19:12 purgerinho wrote: ppl, you don't understand one thing.. SC (and SC2) is a game like every other.. england invented a game (football), usa invented a game (basketball) and would you agree if they were asking money from everyone who plays football/basketball profesionally??? ofcourse you wouldn't agree.. well, blizzard is doing that. they want money for something it's not their ground. Kespa made SC goind for more then ten yrs and blizzard should be thankful for that. kespa is progaming organisation and it is like FIFA/NBA .. blizzard is here to invent games not to control who plays it and in which level Totally different. Football and Starcraft are both games, but if I tell you what's involved in football you can recreate your own field and ball and have at it. If I tell you what's involved in starcraft then sure, go ahead and program your own game and play that and noone will sue you. If you want to play BLIZZARD's starcraft then you better pay them for it. It's the equivalent of playing football in a stadium you don't own. You have to rent it on a game by game basis, or get out. There's no "I bought my own ball already, you better let me use this stadium for free" | ||
purgerinho
Croatia919 Posts
| ||
Feefee
Canada556 Posts
| ||
Phrujbaz
Netherlands512 Posts
I think that's where the basis for asking royalties lies. Of course, if somebody could bring together the talent and resources to develop an open source/free culture game of similar quality as starcraft II, we'd have a much bigger e-sports scene =) | ||
purgerinho
Croatia919 Posts
everybody could do the same thing.. ok, you want to play on my computer, keyboard, mouse? you will pay every time you do that.. ohh, you want to watch broadcast on my stream? pay for it! etc, etc.... kespa made starcraft/broodwar, e-sport made blizzard and now they want to destroy everything.. they have enough money with wow shit.. | ||
Feefee
Canada556 Posts
And yes, everybody could say "if you want to play on my computer you have to pay for it" (internet cafe's?). And all stream websites make revenue from forcing you to watch ads on them (much like korean starcraft TV channels force you to watch ads). Let's not pretend. Both Kespa and Blizzard are just trying to get as much money as they can. Which one of them you call greedy and which one you don't is personal opinion =P. | ||
Djin)ftw(
Germany3357 Posts
On April 27 2010 07:51 LxRogue wrote: Blizzard has done virtually nothing over the years to help competitive SC. - Maps and balance - LAN latency - Other launcher features - Tournaments - Ladders All of this has been done by the Korean and foreign communities. Blizzard should be thanking fans of SC for the sales and publicity, not punishing them by attacking KeSPA. This is just bullshit, seriously. I mean, lets even forget things like Blizzards World Wide Invitationals or the fact that they sponsored GomTV's first league with $10.000 or so, I'm too lazy to look it up. What do you think was one of the main reasons why StarCraft became so popular in the first place, besides the game play? The battle.net, that's right. And that was for free all the time, maybe you forgot that. What do you think, how much money did Blizzard make by providing and maintaining an infrastructure like that not only for SC/BW, but also for the Diablo and Warcraft 2+ series? To say Blizzard "did nothing over the years to help competitive SC" is just.. wow nvm. I mean, you actually realize that Blizzard is there to sell computer games? ... Besides that, I dont really understand why people care about KeSPa or e-Sports as it is. To be honest, I think E-Sport as it is sucks big time. Why? Because the non-Korean scene is only semi-pro. Personally, I would like to see a morrow, kolll, lzgamer, ret sc2 pro gaming team much more than some random Korean company hosted team with some random Korean players. So there is SC/BW. Its popular, there is evolving a broadcasting infrastructure. Companies come and sponsor teams, it all gets professional. The sponsoring companies organize themselves in KeSPa, make their own pro-league and own all the players/licenses. That's how I understood it. Where is the problem if KeSPa "dies"? Blizzard will make a deal with GomTV or Ongamenet/MBCgame without Kespa, who cares (someone already linked an article saying they negoiate with CJ entus). And if SC2 becomes a success, do you really think that the KeSPa companies or OGN/MBC wont adept? Just because they will have to pay a certain percentage of their revenue to Blizzard? This is just ridiculously stupid. As long as there is money to be made, there will be E-Sport. If Blizzard is too greedy and wants too much, people will just play something else because there are higher price moneys or whatever. If OGN/MBC dont support SC2, there will be a GomTV to do so. I seriously dont see a problem. I just hope that there will be non-Korean progaming teams who can compete with them. I'm sick of having to watch Korean commercials or not being able to understand the commentators. It was funny for some time (PLAGGGGGGGUUUUUUUEEEEEEE), but not anymore. €: when I come to think of it, maybe I'll sit here in 3 years watching Chinese TV seeing Chinese players playing professional SC2 instead of Korean.... omg no pls ![]() | ||
purgerinho
Croatia919 Posts
feefee - SC is made from what? progamers in blizzard made tools to make a game? ofcourse they didn't, they use products made by someone else and they are earning XXXXXX more then ppl invented that tools.. blizzard's job is to MAKE games, KeSPA's job is to take them to proffesional lvl, our job is to play it.. only thing KeSPA needs is to buy license and that is it, no more fees | ||
GoDannY
Germany442 Posts
On April 27 2010 20:22 Djin)ftw( wrote: well, I dont get it. I dont know how people can elobarate in such ways. This is just bullshit, seriously. I mean, lets even forget things like Blizzards World Wide Invitationals or the fact that they sponsored GomTV's first league with $10.000 or so, I'm too lazy to look it up. What do you think was one of the main reasons why StarCraft became so popular in the first place, besides the game play? The battle.net, that's right. And that was for free all the time, maybe you forgot that. What do you think, how much money did Blizzard make by providing and maintaining an infrastructure like that not only for SC/BW, but also for the Diablo and Warcraft 2+ series? To say Blizzard "did nothing over the years to help competitive SC" is just.. wow nvm. I mean, you actually realize that Blizzard is there to sell computer games? ... Besides that, I dont really understand why people care about KeSPa or e-Sports as it is. To be honest, I think E-Sport as it is sucks big time. Why? Because the non-Korean scene is only semi-pro. Personally, I would like to see a morrow, kolll, lzgamer, ret sc2 pro gaming team much more than some random Korean company hosted team with some random Korean players. So there is SC/BW. Its popular, there is evolving a broadcasting infrastructure. Companies come and sponsor teams, it all gets professional. The sponsoring companies organize themselves in KeSPa, make their own pro-league and own all the players/licenses. That's how I understood it. Where is the problem if KeSPa "dies"? Blizzard will make a deal with GomTV or Ongamenet/MBCgame without Kespa, who cares (someone already linked an article saying they negoiate with CJ entus). And if SC2 becomes a success, do you really think that the KeSPa companies or OGN/MBC wont adept? Just because they will have to pay a certain percentage of their revenue to Blizzard? This is just ridiculously stupid. As long as there is money to be made, there will be E-Sport. If Blizzard is too greedy and wants too much, people will just play something else because there are higher price moneys or whatever. If OGN/MBC dont support SC2, there will be a GomTV to do so. I seriously dont see a problem. I just hope that there will be non-Korean progaming teams who can compete with them. I'm sick of having to watch Korean commercials or not being able to understand the commentators. It was funny for some time (PLAGGGGGGGUUUUUUUEEEEEEE), but not anymore. €: when I come to think of it, maybe I'll sit here in 3 years watching Chinese TV seeing Chinese players playing professional SC2 instead of Korean.... omg no pls ![]() I think this seriously sums it up best if you ask me. I'd also like to see a world wide ESPA instead of just a korean one and I seriously hope that'll become true. | ||
Radiomouse
Netherlands209 Posts
Also, korean e-sports is not flawless by far. I'd much rather have a players association, instead of an organisation like KeSPA. | ||
| ||