EPT[PL] 09-10 Round 4 - New Maps - Page 9
| Forum Index > BW General |
|
haster27
Taiwan809 Posts
| ||
|
Deleted User 31060
3788 Posts
| ||
|
MuffinDude
United States3837 Posts
| ||
|
Vestige
United States303 Posts
| ||
|
bITt.mAN
Switzerland3693 Posts
I'm really surprised that Grand Line's rush-distances are actually all the same (except diagonal ofc), that right there is an impressive bit of map-making Does anyone know when the maps will be released to the public?? (want to play them want to play them) | ||
|
IceCube
Croatia1403 Posts
On March 15 2010 00:57 Sunyveil wrote: these maps look awful, I hope they play out alright +1 I mean I though it was some kind of a joke when my browser loaded them | ||
|
LunarDestiny
United States4177 Posts
| ||
|
arb
Noobville17921 Posts
| ||
|
hifriend
China7935 Posts
edit: Actually Polaris Rhapsody looks pretty good and Ghost path might make for some interesting games. But really, Checkmate?? It looks like a sieged tank behind the natural could potentially reach natural and 3d gas expo mineral line, as well as main gas & buildings all at once. And Fortress must be some kind of bad joke. What were they thinking? | ||
|
leejas
United States440 Posts
| ||
|
Severedevil
United States4839 Posts
On March 15 2010 04:06 arb wrote: does anyone else think that inferno will be tardedly for terran? i mena right outside the natural you can siege up a pretty short distance and have access to 2 more gas.. I don't see that at all. It looks perfectly fine for the Protoss in PvT to me, though it might depend on which parts of the map are buildable. Terran has to expand counterclockwise, while Protoss expands in whichever direction the Terran isn't. The center of the map is very open, so it's tricky for Terran to defend many expansions or slow push anything. | ||
|
jalstar
United States8198 Posts
On March 15 2010 04:06 arb wrote: does anyone else think that inferno will be tardedly for terran? i mena right outside the natural you can siege up a pretty short distance and have access to 2 more gas.. i think the distance is bigger than it looks, anyway you'd have to control 1/3 of the center to control 1/3 of the expansions, seems pretty fair | ||
|
Mikilatov
United States3897 Posts
| ||
|
mOnion
United States5657 Posts
is every ramp on these maps too wide for one zealot? or is it just me? | ||
|
On_Slaught
United States12190 Posts
I'm looking foward to it! | ||
|
Two_DoWn
United States13684 Posts
| ||
|
meegrean
Thailand7699 Posts
| ||
|
dasanivan
United States532 Posts
| ||
|
Djabanete
United States2786 Posts
 | ||
|
konadora
Singapore66358 Posts
On March 15 2010 00:52 haster27 wrote: When there be games played to test them out like they did with last batch of map pool? If it's so, does anyone have idea about when it will be taking place? Probably not. These maps are 'nominees' for the next round's map pool, that means there's a high possibility of not all the maps making it. And there's no time for tests, since after the WL finals, R4 should start soon. Not enough time for map testing + decision making + map balancing and stuff imo. | ||
| ||
