On March 28 2017 14:22 ejac wrote:
This is somewhat more debatable, but would I humor automine. I probably wouldn't do it, but I'd be up for debate/testing.

NOPE.

L_Master

United States8017 Posts

March 28 2017 20:25 GMT

#42

On March 28 2017 23:24 ninazerg wrote:

Show nested quote +

NOPE.

What Nina said.

Automine is going wayyyy beyond this "quality of life" concept and deep into gameplay. Time allocation and managing workers over multiple bases is absolutely not a trivial thing.

ejac

United States1195 Posts

March 28 2017 21:23 GMT

#43

On March 29 2017 05:25 L_Master wrote:

Show nested quote +

What Nina said.

Automine is going wayyyy beyond this "quality of life" concept and deep into gameplay. Time allocation and managing workers over multiple bases is absolutely not a trivial thing.

I agree that it does go into gameplay, and as I said I probably wouldn't do it, but of all "macro mechanics" it is the only one that I would give any consideration. More food for thought than anything else.

ninazerg

United States7291 Posts

March 29 2017 00:53 GMT

#44

On March 29 2017 06:23 ejac wrote:

Show nested quote +

Just click the workers and click the minerals. Macro achieved.

ejac

United States1195 Posts

March 29 2017 01:38 GMT

#45

On March 29 2017 09:53 ninazerg wrote:

Show nested quote +

Just click the workers and click the minerals. Macro achieved.

Your responses have been enlightening and have encouraged discussion, thank you for your input and promptly fuck off.

Jealous

10395 Posts

March 29 2017 02:51 GMT

#46

On March 29 2017 10:38 ejac wrote:

Show nested quote +

Your responses have been enlightening and have encouraged discussion, thank you for your input and promptly fuck off.

Your contributions to the Brood War scene being as great and illustrious as they are, I find it surprising that you sink to such a low level as to tell a worthless noob poster who has done nothing for the scene and been around like 2 minutes simply due to BW:HD coming out to "fuck off."

ninazerg

United States7291 Posts

March 29 2017 21:13 GMT

#47

On March 29 2017 11:51 Jealous wrote:

Show nested quote +

I think you may have made a mistake. ejac told me to "fuck off". Unless I'm the worthless noob poster. Frowny face. BUT, if it's the other way around, and you thought I was saying 'fuck off', then I'd have to ask: is the 'great and illustrious contributions' sarcasm? Or is it NOT sarcasm?

Either way, if you're surprised to find me just saying "fucc off" to someone right off the bat, your surprised would be justified because I wouldn't do that, and I did not. Here's the convo so far:

ejac: I'd like to humor the thought of automine. I won't say why.
me: No automine.
ejac: I agree that it does go into gameplay, and as I said I probably wouldn't do it, but of all "macro mechanics" it is the only one that I would give any consideration. More food for thought than anything else. [Note: This sounds to me like he's really saying "I want automine, but I think the BW community is gonna jump me for saying it, so I'm gonna pretend to be reluctantly considering it."]
me: "Just do it." - Nike
ejac: fuck off

Jealous

10395 Posts

March 30 2017 00:02 GMT

#48

Everything was written as it should be, but I'll start adding /s more often.

ninazerg

United States7291 Posts

March 30 2017 04:08 GMT

#49

On March 30 2017 09:02 Jealous wrote:
Everything was written as it should be, but I'll start adding /s more often.

You don't even know how confused I was. lol...

QuanticHawk

United States32159 Posts

March 30 2017 15:24 GMT

#50

2 YO.

BigFan

TLADT24920 Posts

March 30 2017 17:06 GMT

#51

ok, guys, let's be nice and take it down a notch. Otherwise, this whole battle.net chat bit is interesting. Lots of problems with PTR, more than I thought but I'm ok overall with how it looks. Maybe change fonts and made the background a solid color but I think it's a nice interface overall.