• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 14:09
CEST 20:09
KST 03:09
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202560RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 What tournaments are world championships? RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion Dewalt's Show Matches in China [Update] ShieldBattery: 2025 Redesign Ginuda's JaeDong Interview Series
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Does 1 second matter in StarCraft? [G] Mineral Boosting Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Post Pic of your Favorite Food!
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Eight Anniversary as a TL…
Mizenhauer
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1049 users

Capitalsim

Blogs > thrawn2112
Post a Reply
1 2 3 Next All
thrawn2112
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States6918 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-21 07:20:28
July 21 2012 07:19 GMT
#1
I've seen a lot of hate for capitalism lately but I haven't seen any arguments against it other than people pointing towards the generally downhill direction our country is going as evidence that capitalism is bad. To me that seems intellectually very lazy; you shouldn't rely on vague cynicism to win an argument. From my limited knowledge it looks like the examples people use to show the failures of capitalism are really just the failures of recent US policies concerning the relationship between the government and the economy, and the moral failures of the people most in charge of the economy. If I were trying to argue against capitalism I would say the problem with it is that it allows, and not necessarily promotes, personal greed to cause decisions to be made that only consider the interests of the people with the most economic power. Is that a strong enough reason to condemn capitalism? I'm undecided about that because I don't trust people with power to not abuse their power, however I don't like accepting a arbitrary set of economic restrictions just to prevent too much power from going into the wrong hands.

So, what are your thoughts? Capitalism, good/bad? Reasons why? Is it worth removing in favor of a more regulated system where wealth is distributed more evenly at the cost of such regulations?


If something I said is factually incorrect and you are POSITIVE that you know the correct information please correct me.

edit: lol spelling

*
"People think they know all these things about other people, and if you ask them why they think they know that, it'd be hard for them to be convincing." ES
zalz
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Netherlands3704 Posts
July 21 2012 07:27 GMT
#2
Capitalism at its most basic form is almost universally accepted:

Allowing individuals to own and operate the means to production for the purpose of earning personal wealth.


The capitalism that people have a problem with is the socialist-hybrid where banks privatize their gains and collectivize the losses. There is a limit to how much the average worker is going to put up with seeing his hard work being literally stolen by people who are not only better at the market game, but are actively rigging it in their favor.

Meanwhile they have so much money that they club any attempt to hinder their ridiculous position to death with an army of lawyers that earn 10x what you can earn when working for the government.


People aren't sick with the idea of being able to start their own business, they are sick and tired of seeing their hard work be destroyed by 30-yeard old yuppies that couldn't contribute to the economy in a positive fashion if their life depended on it.

Meanwhile those people will never see the inside of a jail whilst tons of people lost their homes over this shit.

Capitalism just gets ingrained with bankers. They stole the world blind and not a soul went to jail for it. Meanwhile it is the average person that ends up paying for the screw up, and just a few years after, the bankers are hauling giant bonusses.

People have trouble accepting that someone can live so big on the profits of others, literally being too big to fail too big to go to jail.
thrawn2112
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States6918 Posts
July 21 2012 07:36 GMT
#3
so you would agree with what i said about how people are placing blame on capitalism when the blame should be placed on greed and the strong involvement of the government in the economy? and in your opinion are those good enough reasons to condemn capitalism, because humans have proven too immoral for the freedoms of capitalism?
"People think they know all these things about other people, and if you ask them why they think they know that, it'd be hard for them to be convincing." ES
zalz
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Netherlands3704 Posts
July 21 2012 08:12 GMT
#4
On July 21 2012 16:36 thrawn2112 wrote:
so you would agree with what i said about how people are placing blame on capitalism when the blame should be placed on greed and the strong involvement of the government in the economy? and in your opinion are those good enough reasons to condemn capitalism, because humans have proven too immoral for the freedoms of capitalism?


I think that it is hard to deny that an economy that is run from the bottom-up is superior to one that is dictated by the government. It promotes risk taking and innovation, both of which are crucial if you want to outperform other companies.

The problem isn't greed, that is putting it too simple. It sells well in papers because people recognize it is a sin, but in reality the problem is far greater, and the rot runs deeper.

The problem is that we have a class of super rich bankers which not only add nothing to the economy, but they are in fact detrimental to the economy. There is a need for someone to bring together the people that need money and the people that want to put their money up for investment.

Despite what some may say, the banking sector does serve a purpose, but I don't remember anyone ever asking for all these idiotic economical constructs that they are selling. These creations are not only too complex for the average person to understand, they are so complex and obscure that nobody has a clue what is in them. Then you get rigging where the people trusted to inspect these things are giving false ratings to rake in more money themselves.

The entire industry is just corrupt from top to bottom. Any industry that is that corrupt would crumble, and eventually it did. Ooh, surprise, turns out we are so integrated into the world economy that you are going to have to pay for our fuckups.


People haven't proven to be too immoral for the freedom of capitalism. The banking sector is a poluted industry filled with people that promote this insane culture where they are actively seeking to rig the game in any way possible.

Is the guy down the road that owns a pizza shop too immoral for capitalism? No, he never did anything wrong, but it is him that is paying for this shit whilst the people on wall street are holding their hands up for their yearly bonus.

There is too much money flowing through that industry for it to become anything other than corrupt.

The solution is simply holding these people responsible. Start throwing people in jail for life. If you rob a bank you get 20 years, so why doesn't the banker that robs a million people have to see the inside of a cell? I'd even support death penalties for the leading people that were responsible for that whole subprime mortgage mess.

But what do they get? Right now they are sitting in a house that the average person couldn't even rent for a month if he worked his whole life. They are riding high and what are they adding to the economy? Why are they earning so much money whilst being a drain on the economy?


No, capitalism isn't the problem. The entire banking sector needs to be garroted and bled out.

It's the bankers that are giving capitalism a bad name. It should be made obvious that such corruption has nothing to do with capitalism, but people only see that money reigns and these criminals are literally untouchable by the law.

The government should act against it before capitalism, the best system, loses too much face.
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25551 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-21 08:17:01
July 21 2012 08:14 GMT
#5
The proletariat is docile and refuses to rise up... the 99% movement shall seize the means of production as the vanguard of the revolution... change is coming and with it the withering-away of the police industrofinancialmilitary state.

People don't understand that the 1% will take and take. The trickle down is a lie. Mainstream media distract you with the false choice of electing 2 groups of the same politicians..

When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
Roe
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Canada6002 Posts
July 21 2012 08:15 GMT
#6
On July 21 2012 16:27 zalz wrote:

Allowing individuals to own and operate the means to production for the purpose of earning personal wealth.
.

isn't that the definition of socialism?
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25551 Posts
July 21 2012 08:20 GMT
#7
I think zalz hits the nail on the head I agree with a lot of his ideas
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
zalz
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Netherlands3704 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-21 08:37:23
July 21 2012 08:36 GMT
#8
On July 21 2012 17:14 Blazinghand wrote:
The proletariat is docile and refuses to rise up... the 99% movement shall seize the means of production as the vanguard of the revolution... change is coming and with it the withering-away of the police industrofinancialmilitary state.

People don't understand that the 1% will take and take. The trickle down is a lie. Mainstream media distract you with the false choice of electing 2 groups of the same politicians..



The proles will never revolt.

Isn't that the definition of socialism?


No.

Socialism is just redistributing the wealth from rich to poor, believing that that is either economically wise, or morally demanded. The degree to which this is done can vary, though on average the goal is not to destroy the rich class, only to make life easier for those who have least.

Socialism and capitalism are not, despite what people sometimes claim, on directly opposing ends of the spectrum. It is perfectly possible to have a capitalist/socialist society, like Sweden (and really most of the Scandinavian region).

Socialism stands directly oppossed to laissez faire capitalism, but not ordinary capitalism.

Communism, which abolishes private property, is not compatible with capitalism.
Roe
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Canada6002 Posts
July 21 2012 08:51 GMT
#9
On July 21 2012 17:36 zalz wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 21 2012 17:14 Blazinghand wrote:
The proletariat is docile and refuses to rise up... the 99% movement shall seize the means of production as the vanguard of the revolution... change is coming and with it the withering-away of the police industrofinancialmilitary state.

People don't understand that the 1% will take and take. The trickle down is a lie. Mainstream media distract you with the false choice of electing 2 groups of the same politicians..



The proles will never revolt.

Show nested quote +
Isn't that the definition of socialism?


No.

Socialism is just redistributing the wealth from rich to poor, believing that that is either economically wise, or morally demanded. The degree to which this is done can vary, though on average the goal is not to destroy the rich class, only to make life easier for those who have least.

Socialism and capitalism are not, despite what people sometimes claim, on directly opposing ends of the spectrum. It is perfectly possible to have a capitalist/socialist society, like Sweden (and really most of the Scandinavian region).

Socialism stands directly oppossed to laissez faire capitalism, but not ordinary capitalism.

Communism, which abolishes private property, is not compatible with capitalism.

Well I took my definition from Noam Chomsky among others, but I guess we can all just move around the definition in whatever way we like, just how we do with conservatism and liberalism. I'm not really sure what would be the best way to pin down one definition of a political ideology.
PH
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
United States6173 Posts
July 21 2012 08:56 GMT
#10
Capitalism fundamentally and inseparably promotes inequality and oppression. That's alleviated by government regulation so it never becomes heinous. There are always winners and losers with the system. On the flip side, when regulated, controlled capitalism manifests more as a meritocracy.

As long as capitalism is properly regulated so that the individuals at the bottom are reasonably protected, I think it's good. It promotes growth and rewards ambition and progress. I don't think that balance has been hit right now, however.
Hello
BreakfastBurrito
Profile Joined November 2011
United States893 Posts
July 21 2012 10:34 GMT
#11
Adding on to the bank points, which I agree with, another thing that hurts capitalism and our economy is credit. Irresponsible credit / lending practices have caused problems in the US all the way back to around the founding of our country.
in 1797, 1857, 1929, and just a few years ago, debt, speculation, and lending have caused some serious problems.

twitch.tv/jaytherey | Yapper891 if you are reading this, PM me. its Twisty.
Vivax
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
21972 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-21 10:53:53
July 21 2012 10:49 GMT
#12
The problem is rather the high dependance of our economies on individual consumption (U.S. GDP roughly made of 70 % private consumption, german of ~60 %), making the production of durable, sustainable goods not suitable for this system (the companies would just die). You need to create goods that break quickly and are costly to repair, but cheap to buy newly.

Then the option for private banks to create money through debt. Money creation should be task of a national institution imo, not a right for private organizations.


These are just a few reasons ofc. But I think that solving them, especially point 1, would fix a lot of things. But the implementation of point 1 needs a pretty hardcore form of socialism providing enough subsidies for it to work, since you don't produce these goods to compete on the global market, but to satisfy an individuals' interests within a nation.#

Just imagine if you buy one cell phone at your national high-tech-store, and it gets repaired throughout your whole life, for really small fees. As it is now most people get a new phone every year, so you have an idea of what I'm talking about.

Implementation of option 1 would require the government to care for people who don't have a job, since you are destroying the competitive economy in favor of a sustainable national monopoly.
FrogOfWar
Profile Joined March 2010
Germany1406 Posts
July 21 2012 10:50 GMT
#13
On July 21 2012 17:36 zalz wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 21 2012 17:14 Blazinghand wrote:
The proletariat is docile and refuses to rise up... the 99% movement shall seize the means of production as the vanguard of the revolution... change is coming and with it the withering-away of the police industrofinancialmilitary state.

People don't understand that the 1% will take and take. The trickle down is a lie. Mainstream media distract you with the false choice of electing 2 groups of the same politicians..



The proles will never revolt.

Show nested quote +
Isn't that the definition of socialism?


No.

Socialism is just redistributing the wealth from rich to poor, believing that that is either economically wise, or morally demanded. The degree to which this is done can vary, though on average the goal is not to destroy the rich class, only to make life easier for those who have least.

Socialism and capitalism are not, despite what people sometimes claim, on directly opposing ends of the spectrum. It is perfectly possible to have a capitalist/socialist society, like Sweden (and really most of the Scandinavian region).

Socialism stands directly oppossed to laissez faire capitalism, but not ordinary capitalism.

Communism, which abolishes private property, is not compatible with capitalism.


Nonsense. You're using a definition of socialism that right-wingers use as an insult but which has nothing to do with the political theory of socialism. Sweden is not a socialist country. And socialism does not mean re-distribution of wealth because it would mean that wealth wouldn't be distributed so unevenly in the first place. The mechanisms that allow for the accumulation of wealth in private hands being in place in a given country is a clear indicator of it not being socialist. However, of course there may be people, including politicians, in such a country who would like socialism and promote redistribution of wealth because it is the best (in their eyes) they can realistically do.

Communism does not abolish private property. It abolishes private ownership of means of production. Huge difference.
ParkwayDrive
Profile Joined July 2011
United States328 Posts
July 21 2012 10:57 GMT
#14
its objectively the best economic system. people have to have choices and freedom to flourish. they need reward for motivation.

the problem people have with capitalism is that it cannot fix our evil human tendencies and like any system it can be abused. this is very shortsighted. get mad art awful people, not the system that has taken us this far
HallBregg
Profile Joined November 2010
134 Posts
July 21 2012 11:59 GMT
#15
Capitalism and free market are ok, but it needs to be regularized so things don't go out of control, i.e we don't want monopolies, or or companies of the same sector pacting prices. However in a globalized economy local goberments are losing the ability to efectively regulate capitalism. What we need are global institutions, but that is very difficuld, see for example the difficulties of the EU to create joint financial/fiscal institutions even facing the thread of an iminemt colapse of the eurozone.
proves and pilons
Iyerbeth
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
England2410 Posts
July 21 2012 13:44 GMT
#16
I'm opposed to capitalism not because of it's failures and contradictions (which are numerous, and not all the result of US policy, in fact one could argue much US policy is a result of them) but because even if it could somehow overcome all of them, it is still a diseased system of unfairness in which the working class are exploited by the rich.
♥ Liquid`Sheth ♥ Liquid`TLO ♥
Djzapz
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Canada10681 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-21 14:24:07
July 21 2012 14:22 GMT
#17
On July 21 2012 22:44 Iyerbeth wrote:
I'm opposed to capitalism not because of it's failures and contradictions (which are numerous, and not all the result of US policy, in fact one could argue much US policy is a result of them) but because even if it could somehow overcome all of them, it is still a diseased system of unfairness in which the working class are exploited by the rich.

It's easy to be opposed to stuff because of its imperfections if you don't bring anything to replace it. All the other systems have failures and contradictions - more so than capitalism, I would say.

And if you can think of the perfect system, don't forget that hypothetical societies are hypothetical. There are plenty of arguments against communism and anarchy, even though some people like to make those look good on paper by omitting a bunch of facts.
"My incompetence with power tools had been increasing exponentially over the course of 20 years spent inhaling experimental oven cleaners"
Caller
Profile Blog Joined September 2007
Poland8075 Posts
July 21 2012 15:15 GMT
#18
[image loading]
Capitalsim

[image loading]
Communsim

[image loading]
Capitalsin

[image loading]
Thundercats
Watch me fail at Paradox: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=397564
koreasilver
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
9109 Posts
July 21 2012 16:27 GMT
#19
On July 21 2012 23:22 Djzapz wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 21 2012 22:44 Iyerbeth wrote:
I'm opposed to capitalism not because of it's failures and contradictions (which are numerous, and not all the result of US policy, in fact one could argue much US policy is a result of them) but because even if it could somehow overcome all of them, it is still a diseased system of unfairness in which the working class are exploited by the rich.

It's easy to be opposed to stuff because of its imperfections if you don't bring anything to replace it. All the other systems have failures and contradictions - more so than capitalism, I would say.

And if you can think of the perfect system, don't forget that hypothetical societies are hypothetical. There are plenty of arguments against communism and anarchy, even though some people like to make those look good on paper by omitting a bunch of facts.

I suppose this is kinda where I am. I dislike capitalism as far as I hate communism, in the sense that the "pure" forms of both are absolutely insane, not to mention unrealistic.
Djzapz
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Canada10681 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-21 17:27:32
July 21 2012 17:08 GMT
#20
On July 22 2012 01:27 koreasilver wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 21 2012 23:22 Djzapz wrote:
On July 21 2012 22:44 Iyerbeth wrote:
I'm opposed to capitalism not because of it's failures and contradictions (which are numerous, and not all the result of US policy, in fact one could argue much US policy is a result of them) but because even if it could somehow overcome all of them, it is still a diseased system of unfairness in which the working class are exploited by the rich.

It's easy to be opposed to stuff because of its imperfections if you don't bring anything to replace it. All the other systems have failures and contradictions - more so than capitalism, I would say.

And if you can think of the perfect system, don't forget that hypothetical societies are hypothetical. There are plenty of arguments against communism and anarchy, even though some people like to make those look good on paper by omitting a bunch of facts.

I suppose this is kinda where I am. I dislike capitalism as far as I hate communism, in the sense that the "pure" forms of both are absolutely insane, not to mention unrealistic.

I don't see the relevance in disliking "pure" forms of economic systems when we all know that those are, like you said, unrealistic. They don't actually happen anywhere in the world. Every country in the world runs an heavily modified form of some "ism" which sometimes poorly represents the system,

I personally don't hate capitalism or communism at all. Capitalism is in large part what allows me to have a high standard of living, thanks in large part to Canada and its economic system. I absolutely love the spirit of communism, the idea behind it - but I don't think it can work in today's materialistic world.

So to the people who hate the forms of capitalism that we have in the West, understand that this economic system allows us to have the highest standard of living ever reached by people. The middle class lives better than kings and nobles did hundreds of years ago.

Capitalism may very well be unfair, but as much as I'd prefer an egalitarian society, we can't deny what it did for us. I for one don't believe that any other system could lead to as much technological progress - the progress which allows us to have all this shit. I consider myself to be a liberal, and many of my friends like to hate rich entrepreneurs. Many of them do suck, but many of them, admittedly greed-driven in most cases, do give us good stuff... Capitalism plays on that greed and gets those people to do big things.

Would people have as much of an incentive to get shit done in a communist society or in any other kind of society? I personally don't think so.
"My incompetence with power tools had been increasing exponentially over the course of 20 years spent inhaling experimental oven cleaners"
1 2 3 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
OSC
14:00
King of the Hill #219
davetesta25
Liquipedia
Esports World Cup
11:00
2025 - Final Day
Serral vs ClassicLIVE!
EWC_Arena32492
ComeBackTV 5048
TaKeTV 1355
JimRising 960
Hui .766
3DClanTV 642
Fuzer 473
EnkiAlexander 338
Rex266
CranKy Ducklings180
Reynor149
SpeCial84
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
EWC_Arena32492
JimRising 957
Hui .788
Fuzer 454
Rex 266
UpATreeSC 152
Reynor 149
SpeCial 96
JuggernautJason14
StarCraft: Brood War
Shuttle 2977
Bisu 2657
Mini 913
Larva 800
Soma 392
actioN 339
EffOrt 257
Rush 128
TY 102
JYJ77
[ Show more ]
Shine 68
sorry 32
Aegong 26
yabsab 24
sas.Sziky 22
zelot 19
Terrorterran 14
JulyZerg 11
Sacsri 9
NaDa 6
soO 5
Dota 2
420jenkins706
League of Legends
Trikslyr61
Counter-Strike
fl0m3752
sgares489
oskar211
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu51
Other Games
gofns8880
FrodaN2318
tarik_tv2078
Beastyqt748
KnowMe191
crisheroes108
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• IndyKCrew
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• intothetv
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• FirePhoenix3
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV961
League of Legends
• Nemesis4220
Other Games
• imaqtpie757
• Shiphtur350
Upcoming Events
CranKy Ducklings
15h 51m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
19h 51m
CSO Cup
21h 51m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
23h 51m
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
1d 14h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 19h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 23h
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
Online Event
3 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4 days
[ Show More ]
The PondCast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.