• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 23:32
CEST 05:32
KST 12:32
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Team TLMC #5 - Finalists & Open Tournaments0[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt2: Turbulence10Classic Games #3: Rogue vs Serral at BlizzCon9[ASL20] Ro16 Preview Pt1: Ascent10Maestros of the Game: Week 1/Play-in Preview12
Community News
StarCraft II 5.0.15 PTR Patch Notes66BSL 2025 Warsaw LAN + Legends Showmatch0Weekly Cups (Sept 8-14): herO & MaxPax split cups4WardiTV TL Team Map Contest #5 Tournaments1SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia8
StarCraft 2
General
StarCraft II 5.0.15 PTR Patch Notes #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Weekly Cups (Sept 8-14): herO & MaxPax split cups Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy SpeCial on The Tasteless Podcast
Tourneys
SC2's Safe House 2 - October 18 & 19 RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament SC4ALL $6,000 Open LAN in Philadelphia
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 491 Night Drive Mutation # 490 Masters of Midnight Mutation # 489 Bannable Offense Mutation # 488 What Goes Around
Brood War
General
Soulkey on ASL S20 ASL20 General Discussion BW General Discussion ASL TICKET LIVE help! :D NaDa's Body
Tourneys
[ASL20] Ro16 Group D [ASL20] Ro16 Group C Small VOD Thread 2.0 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Muta micro map competition Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Borderlands 3 Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread General RTS Discussion Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion LiquidDota to reintegrate into TL.net
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread UK Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The Happy Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread High temperatures on bridge(s)
TL Community
BarCraft in Tokyo Japan for ASL Season5 Final The Automated Ban List
Blogs
i'm really bored guys
Peanutsc
I <=> 9
KrillinFromwales
The Personality of a Spender…
TrAiDoS
A very expensive lesson on ma…
Garnet
hello world
radishsoup
Lemme tell you a thing o…
JoinTheRain
RTS Design in Hypercoven
a11
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 3562 users

15 OC vs 16 OC - Page 2

Blogs > darthcaesar
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 Next All
MrCash
Profile Joined October 2011
United States1504 Posts
December 31 2011 05:58 GMT
#21
I'm curious to see how much impact the maps and positioning of SCVs affects this as well.
Most maps have different mineral lay out and angle to the CC and have very minor differences in mining speed.
Also focusing your SCVs on closest mineral has an impact on the numbers.
All of those are quite small, but when you are comparing such tiny differences already, it seems like they can skew the results somewhat.

If you could be more specific on your testing method and process, it would be interesting.
darthcaesar
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States475 Posts
December 31 2011 05:58 GMT
#22
On December 31 2011 14:25 Sadistx wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 31 2011 14:05 darthcaesar wrote:
On December 31 2011 13:38 nttea wrote:
how did you test this? might need confirmation cause of possible variances still awesome.


I touched SCVs only once - when I did my 3/3 split. Then I just kept the CC rallied on the same spot. I rallied my 9th scv to make a depot, then a rax, then another depot, then back to mining. Other than that, I just made SCVs and let them do whatever - no mineral stacking, etc.


Unfortunately, most builds do not work like that until 7 minutes.



The most important thing is for the two tests to be consistent to one another. Anything you do to one you do do the other and so on. That's the philosophy I used. As long as the two tests are consistent with one another, then you can still tell which one is better relative to the other.
He is wisest who knows he does not know. | (┛OДO)┛彡┻━┻
MrCash
Profile Joined October 2011
United States1504 Posts
December 31 2011 06:04 GMT
#23
I tried it out a little bit.
Another thing that comes into the equation is the actual build you are doing.
While this might open up an option for newer and different builds, it also delays tech builds like banshee, which a 10-20 second delay can be very devastating to, regardless of how many extra mineral you might get.

At least this is trying to do the same standard builds, just delaying the OC. There might even be better ways to do existing builds with this, just a question of which ones.
For example Gas first cloak banshee has always been pretty standard 16 OC and works out very well as such (even before the 5 extra seconds to rax build time).
gogogadgetflow
Profile Joined March 2010
United States2583 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-31 06:11:12
December 31 2011 06:08 GMT
#24
On December 31 2011 15:04 MrCash wrote:
I tried it out a little bit.
Another thing that comes into the equation is the actual build you are doing.
While this might open up an option for newer and different builds, it also delays tech builds like banshee, which a 10-20 second delay can be very devastating to, regardless of how many extra mineral you might get.

At least this is trying to do the same standard builds, just delaying the OC. There might even be better ways to do existing builds with this, just a question of which ones.
For example Gas first cloak banshee has always been pretty standard 16 OC and works out very well as such (even before the 5 extra seconds to rax build time).


well any gas first build you're gonna get a 13 rax and 16 OC. actually the rax change time smoothed this out a bit.
As for the OP, the results are intuitive, like he said its quicker Mule vs greater income. I may keep doing 15 OC in a high pressure bunkering 2rax.. those 30 mineral returns make all the difference and getting each one of them 22 seconds sooner is huge.
MrCash
Profile Joined October 2011
United States1504 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-31 06:13:37
December 31 2011 06:13 GMT
#25
On December 31 2011 15:08 gogogadgetflow wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 31 2011 15:04 MrCash wrote:
I tried it out a little bit.
Another thing that comes into the equation is the actual build you are doing.
While this might open up an option for newer and different builds, it also delays tech builds like banshee, which a 10-20 second delay can be very devastating to, regardless of how many extra mineral you might get.

At least this is trying to do the same standard builds, just delaying the OC. There might even be better ways to do existing builds with this, just a question of which ones.
For example Gas first cloak banshee has always been pretty standard 16 OC and works out very well as such (even before the 5 extra seconds to rax build time).


well any gas first build you're gonna get a 13 rax and 16 OC. actually the rax change time smoothed this out a bit.
As for the OP, the results are intuitive, like he said its quicker Mule vs greater income. I may keep doing 15 OC in a high pressure bunkering 2rax.. those 30 mineral returns make all the difference and getting each one of them 22 seconds sooner is huge.


In that case, this would be my explanation to the OP as to why it never became standardized to either 15 or 16 OC, which is, the slightly better income did not justify delaying the tech or expo for some builds.
darthcaesar
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States475 Posts
December 31 2011 06:20 GMT
#26
On December 31 2011 15:13 MrCash wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 31 2011 15:08 gogogadgetflow wrote:
On December 31 2011 15:04 MrCash wrote:
I tried it out a little bit.
Another thing that comes into the equation is the actual build you are doing.
While this might open up an option for newer and different builds, it also delays tech builds like banshee, which a 10-20 second delay can be very devastating to, regardless of how many extra mineral you might get.

At least this is trying to do the same standard builds, just delaying the OC. There might even be better ways to do existing builds with this, just a question of which ones.
For example Gas first cloak banshee has always been pretty standard 16 OC and works out very well as such (even before the 5 extra seconds to rax build time).



well any gas first build you're gonna get a 13 rax and 16 OC. actually the rax change time smoothed this out a bit.
As for the OP, the results are intuitive, like he said its quicker Mule vs greater income. I may keep doing 15 OC in a high pressure bunkering 2rax.. those 30 mineral returns make all the difference and getting each one of them 22 seconds sooner is huge.

In that case, this would be my explanation to the OP as to why it never became standardized to either 15 or 16 OC, which is, the slightly better income did not justify delaying the tech or expo for some builds.


I've tried to see if players do the build for a certain reason, but I've only seen players sticking to the same timing in all of their builds. I don't think anyone actually plans to use it one way or another yet. It seems that players just prefer one style over the other.
He is wisest who knows he does not know. | (┛OДO)┛彡┻━┻
Crowned
Profile Joined August 2011
United States368 Posts
December 31 2011 06:21 GMT
#27
15 for cheese 16 for standard game. Got it.
It's cool to love to win, but it's better to hate to lose.
jtp118
Profile Joined November 2010
United States137 Posts
December 31 2011 06:29 GMT
#28
sick, good work
Riot Janook
Profile Joined August 2010
United States112 Posts
December 31 2011 06:44 GMT
#29
bout time someone explored this.
Thanks!
aeoliant
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Canada361 Posts
December 31 2011 07:00 GMT
#30
what explains the sharp drop around 280? is that when the 16OC mule dies but the 15OC mule is still going?
sikyon
Profile Joined June 2010
Canada1045 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-31 07:06:23
December 31 2011 07:05 GMT
#31
Can you include a second graph where you normalize the data in difference against the total number of minerals mined at that time? Basically take the mineral difference and divide it by the total number of minerals collected by whichever method has collected the most minerals in total at that time.

This will give a graph which is more representative of the game impact of the two different methods at each time, as obviously 20 extra minerals at 1 minute is worth more than 50 extra minerals at 5 minutes.

If you want to be more accurate, you can normalize it instead against the number of "free" minerals at that time, taking into consideration only the mandatory buildings each build must produce (orbital, depot, rax). Technically there is a difference between different builds but that's probably too minor to consider.
vectorix108
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
United States4633 Posts
December 31 2011 07:16 GMT
#32
whoa, that's cool. I need to keep this in mind then.
Aka XephyR/Shaneyesss
Seeker *
Profile Blog Joined April 2005
Where dat snitch at?37032 Posts
December 31 2011 07:45 GMT
#33
16 OC it is. Awesome blog!!!

Why did they extend Barracks timing by 5 seconds though? Seems like an unnecessary change....
ModeratorPeople ask me, "Seeker, what are you seeking?" My answer? "Sleep, damn it! Always sleep!"
TL+ Member
xmShake
Profile Blog Joined February 2007
United States1100 Posts
December 31 2011 08:11 GMT
#34
On December 31 2011 16:45 Seeker wrote:
16 OC it is. Awesome blog!!!

Why did they extend Barracks timing by 5 seconds though? Seems like an unnecessary change....

They change bunker rushes somehow in every patch because they still think it's too strong.
namste
Profile Joined October 2010
Finland2292 Posts
December 31 2011 08:14 GMT
#35
On December 31 2011 17:11 xmShake wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 31 2011 16:45 Seeker wrote:
16 OC it is. Awesome blog!!!

Why did they extend Barracks timing by 5 seconds though? Seems like an unnecessary change....

They change bunker rushes somehow in every patch because they still think it's too strong.


No one would notice the difference if we changed back, well except the terran players who'd have perfectly lined rax and cc timings :p
IM hwaitiing ~ IMMvp #1 | Bang Min Ah <3<3
Mip
Profile Joined June 2010
United States63 Posts
December 31 2011 08:19 GMT
#36
*Puts on statistician hat* What methods did you use? Did you get a bot to replicate the results over and over? Did you do the build yourself over and over? Did you do it with and without optimal mining? I see the graphs, but I don't know what information produced the graphs, you didn't say how you got it or why I should trust it to hold up when I do it.

There is more I could say, but I'm not convinced that this debate is well settled based on these graphs with the accompanying explanation. There should be more information describing why your conclusion is valid based on your data gathering methods because I'm not convinced it's thoroughly analyzed. Especially not to the point to say unilaterally that 16OC is the best and should be the standard.

<3 Mip (MS Statistics)
Disquiet
Profile Joined January 2011
Australia628 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-31 08:31:38
December 31 2011 08:26 GMT
#37
16 OC might be slightly better in the long run but you're not looking at the complete picture. The 15 OC is probably better for defending rushes or putting on early pressure as you can get those first marines and hellions out a little faster. Also you might be able to get your FE up sooner with 15 OC, so its not clear cut.
Belial88
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5217 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-31 08:42:01
December 31 2011 08:41 GMT
#38
Nice, but the change won't happen overnight.

Only in the most recent season of GSL has Nestea/Losira/Korean Zergs started to go 14 hatch instead of 15 and 16 hatch, and Nestea was extractor tricking every single time even well into this year (Losira learned 9 overlord was better earlier than he did, it seems, but he used to extractor trick too).

So I suppose that means you are saying that you know better than pro players?!? Post reported!
How to build a $500 i7-3770K Ultimate Computer:http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/viewblog.php?topic_id=392709 ******** 100% Safe Razorless Delid Method! http://www.overclock.net/t/1376206/how-to-delid-your-ivy-bridge-cpu-with-out-a-razor-blade/0_100
Temporarykid
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Canada362 Posts
December 31 2011 08:49 GMT
#39
Thanks, I will do this.

But is the main reason for the long-term investment because of the timed-life of the mule? I think a small decision like this should only really be considered for the first 10~ minutes of the game... 15OC is better, right?
ㅈㅈ
Mowr
Profile Joined November 2010
Sweden791 Posts
December 31 2011 08:50 GMT
#40
Nicely done! Just a thought though on supply timings for various builds. I have to test this but say you go 2rax with reactor after the first marine. Here the second supply depot is built after the second barracks and you just barely don't get supply blocket at 19. With an extra SCV I think you do, but again, this needs testing.
Kill one man and they'll call you a murderer. Kill an army of men and they'll call you a general. But kill all men and they'll call you a god.
Prev 1 2 3 4 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 6h 28m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
WinterStarcraft602
RuFF_SC2 150
Nina 69
StarCraft: Brood War
Shuttle 606
PianO 284
NaDa 30
ajuk12(nOOB) 20
JulyZerg 16
Icarus 10
SilentControl 6
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K445
Fnx 323
m0e_tv166
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King58
Other Games
summit1g8209
JimRising 603
C9.Mang0343
ViBE129
NeuroSwarm124
Trikslyr56
CosmosSc2 18
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH254
• davetesta57
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• RayReign 16
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Other Games
• Scarra1187
Upcoming Events
RSL Revival
6h 28m
Zoun vs Classic
Map Test Tournament
7h 28m
Korean StarCraft League
23h 28m
BSL Open LAN 2025 - War…
1d 4h
RSL Revival
1d 6h
Reynor vs Cure
BSL Open LAN 2025 - War…
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
Online Event
2 days
Wardi Open
3 days
Monday Night Weeklies
3 days
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
LiuLi Cup
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-09-10
Chzzk MurlocKing SC1 vs SC2 Cup #2
HCC Europe

Ongoing

BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Points
ASL Season 20
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
LASL Season 20
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1

Upcoming

2025 Chongqing Offline CUP
BSL World Championship of Poland 2025
IPSL Winter 2025-26
BSL Season 21
SC4ALL: Brood War
BSL 21 Team A
Stellar Fest
SC4ALL: StarCraft II
EC S1
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.