• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 04:50
CEST 10:50
KST 17:50
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Siren's Call8[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Summer's End9Serral wins HomeStory Cup 2915Serral wins Maestros of the Game 244ByuL, and the Limitations of Standard Play3
Community News
New 3v3 BGH Ladder (and more) on ShieldBattery!29Weekly Cups (August 17-23): Zerg dominate the week5Weekly Cups (August 10-16): SHIN doubles2GSTL Returns in 2026!45Weekly Cups (Aug 3-9): Protoss get shut out7
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (August 17-23): Zerg dominate the week Starcraft2 player guess game is Coming~! How would you feel about frequent/monthly balance patches for SC2? SC4ALL II: SC2 Player Announcement 6/8 - Maru PhD study /w SC2 - help with a survey!
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament 2026 GSTL Announcement IntoTheTV X SOOP SC2 League : Weekly & Monthly PIG STY FESTIVAL 8.0! (13 - 23 August) WORTEX 2026 - Hungarian SC2 Finals Budapest
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
Nexus Wars 2021 GUIDE [M] (2) Industrial Park
External Content
Mutation # 540 Dodge This The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 539 Thunder Dome Mutation # 538 Media Blackout
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion New 3v3 BGH Ladder (and more) on ShieldBattery! [ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Siren's Call Farewell Beloved Starcraft (Youtube Videos) BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[ASL22] Ro24 Group F [ASL22] Ro24 Group E [ASL22] Ro24 Group D Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Game Theory for Starcraft Replay Review Process - What do you do? Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation Fighting Spirit mining rates
Other Games
General Games
General RTS Discussion Thread Nintendo Switch Thread Anyone here play Quakeworld back in the day? Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread EVE Corporation
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish TSM pausing esports and CLG Dead
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Power Rank TL Mafia Community Thread NeO.D_StephenKing vs This Guy From 1 Million Dance
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Dating: How's your luck? Artificial Intelligence Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The Creator Fan Club MarineLorD Fan Club The ShoWTimE Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Northern Ireland Global Starcraft
Blogs
Violent Games and Crime Rate…
TrAiDoS
LOCKPICKING NOOB
LUCKY_NOOB
Cathedral Of CS And NY pizza a…
FuDDx
Please support my new stand…
Peanutsc
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 7137 users

15 OC vs 16 OC - Page 2

Blogs > darthcaesar
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 Next All
MrCash
Profile Joined October 2011
United States1504 Posts
December 31 2011 05:58 GMT
#21
I'm curious to see how much impact the maps and positioning of SCVs affects this as well.
Most maps have different mineral lay out and angle to the CC and have very minor differences in mining speed.
Also focusing your SCVs on closest mineral has an impact on the numbers.
All of those are quite small, but when you are comparing such tiny differences already, it seems like they can skew the results somewhat.

If you could be more specific on your testing method and process, it would be interesting.
darthcaesar
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States475 Posts
December 31 2011 05:58 GMT
#22
On December 31 2011 14:25 Sadistx wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 31 2011 14:05 darthcaesar wrote:
On December 31 2011 13:38 nttea wrote:
how did you test this? might need confirmation cause of possible variances still awesome.


I touched SCVs only once - when I did my 3/3 split. Then I just kept the CC rallied on the same spot. I rallied my 9th scv to make a depot, then a rax, then another depot, then back to mining. Other than that, I just made SCVs and let them do whatever - no mineral stacking, etc.


Unfortunately, most builds do not work like that until 7 minutes.



The most important thing is for the two tests to be consistent to one another. Anything you do to one you do do the other and so on. That's the philosophy I used. As long as the two tests are consistent with one another, then you can still tell which one is better relative to the other.
He is wisest who knows he does not know. | (┛OДO)┛彡┻━┻
MrCash
Profile Joined October 2011
United States1504 Posts
December 31 2011 06:04 GMT
#23
I tried it out a little bit.
Another thing that comes into the equation is the actual build you are doing.
While this might open up an option for newer and different builds, it also delays tech builds like banshee, which a 10-20 second delay can be very devastating to, regardless of how many extra mineral you might get.

At least this is trying to do the same standard builds, just delaying the OC. There might even be better ways to do existing builds with this, just a question of which ones.
For example Gas first cloak banshee has always been pretty standard 16 OC and works out very well as such (even before the 5 extra seconds to rax build time).
gogogadgetflow
Profile Joined March 2010
United States2583 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-31 06:11:12
December 31 2011 06:08 GMT
#24
On December 31 2011 15:04 MrCash wrote:
I tried it out a little bit.
Another thing that comes into the equation is the actual build you are doing.
While this might open up an option for newer and different builds, it also delays tech builds like banshee, which a 10-20 second delay can be very devastating to, regardless of how many extra mineral you might get.

At least this is trying to do the same standard builds, just delaying the OC. There might even be better ways to do existing builds with this, just a question of which ones.
For example Gas first cloak banshee has always been pretty standard 16 OC and works out very well as such (even before the 5 extra seconds to rax build time).


well any gas first build you're gonna get a 13 rax and 16 OC. actually the rax change time smoothed this out a bit.
As for the OP, the results are intuitive, like he said its quicker Mule vs greater income. I may keep doing 15 OC in a high pressure bunkering 2rax.. those 30 mineral returns make all the difference and getting each one of them 22 seconds sooner is huge.
MrCash
Profile Joined October 2011
United States1504 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-31 06:13:37
December 31 2011 06:13 GMT
#25
On December 31 2011 15:08 gogogadgetflow wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 31 2011 15:04 MrCash wrote:
I tried it out a little bit.
Another thing that comes into the equation is the actual build you are doing.
While this might open up an option for newer and different builds, it also delays tech builds like banshee, which a 10-20 second delay can be very devastating to, regardless of how many extra mineral you might get.

At least this is trying to do the same standard builds, just delaying the OC. There might even be better ways to do existing builds with this, just a question of which ones.
For example Gas first cloak banshee has always been pretty standard 16 OC and works out very well as such (even before the 5 extra seconds to rax build time).


well any gas first build you're gonna get a 13 rax and 16 OC. actually the rax change time smoothed this out a bit.
As for the OP, the results are intuitive, like he said its quicker Mule vs greater income. I may keep doing 15 OC in a high pressure bunkering 2rax.. those 30 mineral returns make all the difference and getting each one of them 22 seconds sooner is huge.


In that case, this would be my explanation to the OP as to why it never became standardized to either 15 or 16 OC, which is, the slightly better income did not justify delaying the tech or expo for some builds.
darthcaesar
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States475 Posts
December 31 2011 06:20 GMT
#26
On December 31 2011 15:13 MrCash wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 31 2011 15:08 gogogadgetflow wrote:
On December 31 2011 15:04 MrCash wrote:
I tried it out a little bit.
Another thing that comes into the equation is the actual build you are doing.
While this might open up an option for newer and different builds, it also delays tech builds like banshee, which a 10-20 second delay can be very devastating to, regardless of how many extra mineral you might get.

At least this is trying to do the same standard builds, just delaying the OC. There might even be better ways to do existing builds with this, just a question of which ones.
For example Gas first cloak banshee has always been pretty standard 16 OC and works out very well as such (even before the 5 extra seconds to rax build time).



well any gas first build you're gonna get a 13 rax and 16 OC. actually the rax change time smoothed this out a bit.
As for the OP, the results are intuitive, like he said its quicker Mule vs greater income. I may keep doing 15 OC in a high pressure bunkering 2rax.. those 30 mineral returns make all the difference and getting each one of them 22 seconds sooner is huge.

In that case, this would be my explanation to the OP as to why it never became standardized to either 15 or 16 OC, which is, the slightly better income did not justify delaying the tech or expo for some builds.


I've tried to see if players do the build for a certain reason, but I've only seen players sticking to the same timing in all of their builds. I don't think anyone actually plans to use it one way or another yet. It seems that players just prefer one style over the other.
He is wisest who knows he does not know. | (┛OДO)┛彡┻━┻
Crowned
Profile Joined August 2011
United States368 Posts
December 31 2011 06:21 GMT
#27
15 for cheese 16 for standard game. Got it.
It's cool to love to win, but it's better to hate to lose.
jtp118
Profile Joined November 2010
United States137 Posts
December 31 2011 06:29 GMT
#28
sick, good work
Riot Janook
Profile Joined August 2010
United States112 Posts
December 31 2011 06:44 GMT
#29
bout time someone explored this.
Thanks!
aeoliant
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Canada361 Posts
December 31 2011 07:00 GMT
#30
what explains the sharp drop around 280? is that when the 16OC mule dies but the 15OC mule is still going?
sikyon
Profile Joined June 2010
Canada1045 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-31 07:06:23
December 31 2011 07:05 GMT
#31
Can you include a second graph where you normalize the data in difference against the total number of minerals mined at that time? Basically take the mineral difference and divide it by the total number of minerals collected by whichever method has collected the most minerals in total at that time.

This will give a graph which is more representative of the game impact of the two different methods at each time, as obviously 20 extra minerals at 1 minute is worth more than 50 extra minerals at 5 minutes.

If you want to be more accurate, you can normalize it instead against the number of "free" minerals at that time, taking into consideration only the mandatory buildings each build must produce (orbital, depot, rax). Technically there is a difference between different builds but that's probably too minor to consider.
vectorix108
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
United States4633 Posts
December 31 2011 07:16 GMT
#32
whoa, that's cool. I need to keep this in mind then.
Aka XephyR/Shaneyesss
Seeker *
Profile Blog Joined April 2005
Where dat snitch at?37103 Posts
December 31 2011 07:45 GMT
#33
16 OC it is. Awesome blog!!!

Why did they extend Barracks timing by 5 seconds though? Seems like an unnecessary change....
ModeratorPeople ask me, "Seeker, what are you seeking?" My answer? "Sleep, damn it! Always sleep!"
TL+ Member
xmShake
Profile Blog Joined February 2007
United States1100 Posts
December 31 2011 08:11 GMT
#34
On December 31 2011 16:45 Seeker wrote:
16 OC it is. Awesome blog!!!

Why did they extend Barracks timing by 5 seconds though? Seems like an unnecessary change....

They change bunker rushes somehow in every patch because they still think it's too strong.
namste
Profile Joined October 2010
Finland2292 Posts
December 31 2011 08:14 GMT
#35
On December 31 2011 17:11 xmShake wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 31 2011 16:45 Seeker wrote:
16 OC it is. Awesome blog!!!

Why did they extend Barracks timing by 5 seconds though? Seems like an unnecessary change....

They change bunker rushes somehow in every patch because they still think it's too strong.


No one would notice the difference if we changed back, well except the terran players who'd have perfectly lined rax and cc timings :p
IM hwaitiing ~ IMMvp #1 | Bang Min Ah <3<3
Mip
Profile Joined June 2010
United States63 Posts
December 31 2011 08:19 GMT
#36
*Puts on statistician hat* What methods did you use? Did you get a bot to replicate the results over and over? Did you do the build yourself over and over? Did you do it with and without optimal mining? I see the graphs, but I don't know what information produced the graphs, you didn't say how you got it or why I should trust it to hold up when I do it.

There is more I could say, but I'm not convinced that this debate is well settled based on these graphs with the accompanying explanation. There should be more information describing why your conclusion is valid based on your data gathering methods because I'm not convinced it's thoroughly analyzed. Especially not to the point to say unilaterally that 16OC is the best and should be the standard.

<3 Mip (MS Statistics)
Disquiet
Profile Joined January 2011
Australia628 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-31 08:31:38
December 31 2011 08:26 GMT
#37
16 OC might be slightly better in the long run but you're not looking at the complete picture. The 15 OC is probably better for defending rushes or putting on early pressure as you can get those first marines and hellions out a little faster. Also you might be able to get your FE up sooner with 15 OC, so its not clear cut.
Belial88
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5217 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-12-31 08:42:01
December 31 2011 08:41 GMT
#38
Nice, but the change won't happen overnight.

Only in the most recent season of GSL has Nestea/Losira/Korean Zergs started to go 14 hatch instead of 15 and 16 hatch, and Nestea was extractor tricking every single time even well into this year (Losira learned 9 overlord was better earlier than he did, it seems, but he used to extractor trick too).

So I suppose that means you are saying that you know better than pro players?!? Post reported!
How to build a $500 i7-3770K Ultimate Computer:http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/viewblog.php?topic_id=392709 ******** 100% Safe Razorless Delid Method! http://www.overclock.net/t/1376206/how-to-delid-your-ivy-bridge-cpu-with-out-a-razor-blade/0_100
Temporarykid
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Canada362 Posts
December 31 2011 08:49 GMT
#39
Thanks, I will do this.

But is the main reason for the long-term investment because of the timed-life of the mule? I think a small decision like this should only really be considered for the first 10~ minutes of the game... 15OC is better, right?
ㅈㅈ
Mowr
Profile Joined November 2010
Sweden791 Posts
December 31 2011 08:50 GMT
#40
Nicely done! Just a thought though on supply timings for various builds. I have to test this but say you go 2rax with reactor after the first marine. Here the second supply depot is built after the second barracks and you just barely don't get supply blocket at 19. With an extra SCV I think you do, but again, this needs testing.
Kill one man and they'll call you a murderer. Kill an army of men and they'll call you a general. But kill all men and they'll call you a god.
Prev 1 2 3 4 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 10m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
WinterStarcraft515
SortOf 23
StarCraft: Brood War
Hyuk 597
Leta 99
Dewaltoss 83
ToSsGirL 58
Mind 51
Killer 40
hero 31
Bale 22
ZergMaN 9
NotJumperer 7
[ Show more ]
firebathero 0
League of Legends
JimRising 529
Counter-Strike
olofmeister659
ceh9626
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King200
Westballz6
Other Games
gofns10912
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH333
• StrangeGG 55
• LUISG 13
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2132
League of Legends
• Rush964
• Jankos727
Other Games
• WagamamaTV236
Upcoming Events
The PondCast
1h 10m
Replay Cast
15h 10m
Escore
1d 1h
IntoTheTV X SOOP
1d 2h
Korean StarCraft League
1d 17h
GSL
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
WardiTV Weekly
3 days
Afreeca Starleague
4 days
[ Show More ]
GSL
5 days
PiGosaur Cup
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 22: Qualifier 1
PiG Sty Festival 8.0
META DYMY #4

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3
K-JUNGMAN
ASL Season 22
Super Anchor Qualifying S3
CSL Season 22: Qualifier 2
RSL Revival: Season 6
Light Tournament 2026
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
Esports World Cup 2026: LCQ
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026

Upcoming

BSL 2026 LAN: Kraków
CSL 2026 AUTUMN (S22)
Acropolis #5
Acropolis #5 - TRS
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Acropolis #5 - GSA
Acropolis #5 - GSB
HSC XXX
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Calamity Invitational
Big Dog Cup 2026 Div 1
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.