• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 09:00
CEST 15:00
KST 22:00
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week2[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall10HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation14$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced6Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles6[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China9Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL67
StarCraft 2
General
RSL Season 1 - Final Week Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation TL Team Map Contest #4: Winners Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament $25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL [G] Progamer Settings ASL20 Preliminary Maps
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China [BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET CSL Xiamen International Invitational
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Positive Thoughts on Setting Up a Dual-Caliber FX
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Summer Games Done Quick 2025! Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Men Take Risks, Women Win Ga…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 746 users

Image Copyright Question

Blogs > Jaso
Post a Reply
Normal
Jaso
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States2147 Posts
September 19 2011 21:01 GMT
#1
Hi TL! :D

I'm sure there's plenty of legal experts on tl.net, so I'm coming to you guys first with my problem.

So today my dad got a letter from an image provider company claiming that an image on the website I designed for his company was licensed by them and that we were using it without a license, so we had to pay a $780 settlement (and no, we wouldn't be able to use it after).

The thing is, I found this in Google images, and it's actually used on some other websites (one significant one: the SFDA's English website; that's basically the Chinese FDA). The image also includes no registration or license details in the properties and has no watermarks.

Then my question is: are we actually required to pay anything, or can we just remove the image?

*
derp
Blazinghand *
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States25551 Posts
September 19 2011 21:09 GMT
#2
You'll need to talk to a lawyer, I believe. However, regardless as to whether or not other people were stealing the image, or whether or not you found it via google images, the result in the same: you can't use that content without permission.

An IP lawyer may give you a free consultation on this. Don't go non-paying or anything based on people's advice here-- most of us aren't lawyers.
When you stare into the iCCup, the iCCup stares back.
TL+ Member
awu25
Profile Joined April 2010
United States2003 Posts
September 19 2011 21:12 GMT
#3
Doubt some Chinese website is going to get sued. Just because you found it on Google images doesn't mean you can use it. Consult a lawyer
Kralic
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
Canada2628 Posts
September 19 2011 21:12 GMT
#4
How do you know the other websites did not get the same letter? It is kind of like getting a speeding ticket while everyone else around you was breaking the same law. You got caught. Ask a lawyer it is much easier.
Brood War forever!
JingleHell
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States11308 Posts
September 19 2011 21:12 GMT
#5
Well, lets face it, and this is by no means an insult or country bashing, but most of eastern Asia isn't exactly known around the world for considering copyright inviolate. Finding it on that website doesn't mean much.

With that cheap of a settlement, they're probably just trying to scare you to make money, figuring you'd realize that hiring a lawyer is more expensive than just paying up. Unfortunately, your best bet is to talk to a lawyer, but I'd suggest asking them to prove it, shouldn't be too hard.

My dad had something similar to this happen... shit, back in '90 or '91, I think. He had a joke website set up called Roadkills-R-Us, and a certain toy company contacted him threatening to sue if he didn't remove the R-Us from letterheads, website, etc.

They ended up losing a lot of money to returns after he mentioned it on his web site, and enough people told them why they were returning stuff that it got dropped.

But then, parody is protected, so that's probably a terrible example.
mmp
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States2130 Posts
September 19 2011 21:42 GMT
#6
You should probably make sure that they actually own the rights to that image, and that the people suing you are legit.

Otherwise, it sounds like you stole their work.
I (λ (foo) (and (<3 foo) ( T_T foo) (RAGE foo) )) Starcraft
Jaso
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States2147 Posts
September 19 2011 21:46 GMT
#7
I'm almost 100% sure that Chinese websites didn't purchase rights to the image (being Chinese myself).

I'm pretty sure the people suing are legit (actually it's not even a lawsuit.. they're just demanding money - that's different, right?) by their website.

But anyhow, thanks for the advice/info. Dad's prob gonna talk with a lawyer.
derp
ShadowDrgn
Profile Blog Joined July 2007
United States2497 Posts
September 19 2011 21:51 GMT
#8
On September 20 2011 06:42 mmp wrote:
You should probably make sure that they actually own the rights to that image, and that the people suing you are legit.


This, plus check to see if the image is actually registered with the US Copyright Office: http://cocatalog.loc.gov/ Searching for an image can be tough; if you can't find it, you might want to ask the people claiming infringement for a registration number.

If it's not registered, they can't sue you for infringement, although you should stop using their image to avoid a lawsuit in the future.
Of course, you only live one life, and you make all your mistakes, and learn what not to do, and that’s the end of you.
itsjustatank
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Hong Kong9153 Posts
September 19 2011 21:58 GMT
#9
On September 20 2011 06:51 ShadowDrgn wrote:
If it's not registered, they can't sue you for infringement, although you should stop using their image to avoid a lawsuit in the future.


Registration is not necessary to protect one's copyright, it just makes it much easier to do so.

https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Copyright_registration
Photographer"nosotros estamos backamos" - setsuko
Jaso
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States2147 Posts
September 19 2011 22:00 GMT
#10
Well, it's definitely not registered.

I've already removed the image from the website; if the copyright isn't "registered" can they pursue monetary compensation?
derp
ShadowDrgn
Profile Blog Joined July 2007
United States2497 Posts
September 19 2011 22:13 GMT
#11
On September 20 2011 06:58 itsjustatank wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 20 2011 06:51 ShadowDrgn wrote:
If it's not registered, they can't sue you for infringement, although you should stop using their image to avoid a lawsuit in the future.


Registration is not necessary to protect one's copyright, it just makes it much easier to do so.

https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Copyright_registration


One of those advantages is the ability to sue.

Check out 17 USC 411.
Of course, you only live one life, and you make all your mistakes, and learn what not to do, and that’s the end of you.
Phtes
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States370 Posts
September 19 2011 22:17 GMT
#12
If you took the image of Google then you can be pursued for monetary compensation, in fact a stock company is suing my friend for over $5,000 cause of a Google image, just because it does not have a water mark does not mean it is not copyrighted, There are logos all over the place that are copyrighted and no water mark.



On a side note for future reference (basically common knowledge for any Web Designer), if you take from Google you must modify the images, Google does not have to because it directs you to the page owners page then extracts the image just like View Image.

I'm Your Phtes o.0 **SKT1 For Life!**
mmp
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States2130 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-09-19 22:36:38
September 19 2011 22:24 GMT
#13
More likely than not, they are trolls hoping to scare people out of their money by threatening litigation.
I (λ (foo) (and (<3 foo) ( T_T foo) (RAGE foo) )) Starcraft
HornyHerring
Profile Joined March 2011
Papua New Guinea1059 Posts
September 19 2011 22:55 GMT
#14
Image on internet is usually somebody's intelectual property. And you're not allowed to use it unless stated otherwise.
oh, hai
Jaso
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States2147 Posts
September 19 2011 23:22 GMT
#15
On September 20 2011 07:17 Phtes wrote:
If you took the image of Google then you can be pursued for monetary compensation, in fact a stock company is suing my friend for over $5,000 cause of a Google image, just because it does not have a water mark does not mean it is not copyrighted, There are logos all over the place that are copyrighted and no water mark.



On a side note for future reference (basically common knowledge for any Web Designer), if you take from Google you must modify the images, Google does not have to because it directs you to the page owners page then extracts the image just like View Image.



So then, if I changed the color it should be alright?

derp
Phtes
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States370 Posts
September 19 2011 23:41 GMT
#16
On September 20 2011 08:22 Jaso wrote:

So then, if I changed the color it should be alright?



Lol no, when you take an image and modify it the original image has to be so change it cannot be considered the same piece. Something around 70% of the image must be changes so that the two do not look alike

Ex. I take a picture of a burger on Google, I fade parts of the burger, take a texture, give a texture background, add font, modify the burger more with cropping / fading and other things I would do for a banner, now it looks like a completely different image and is legal.
I'm Your Phtes o.0 **SKT1 For Life!**
ShadowDrgn
Profile Blog Joined July 2007
United States2497 Posts
September 19 2011 23:41 GMT
#17
Changing the color will still be a copyright violation (unauthorized derivative work), but it will be more difficult for the copyright holder to discover you in the first place. That's not really a solution though.

I've already removed the image from the website; if the copyright isn't "registered" can they pursue monetary compensation?


It's a bit complicated. Check out 17 USC 411 and 412.
Of course, you only live one life, and you make all your mistakes, and learn what not to do, and that’s the end of you.
Phtes
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States370 Posts
September 19 2011 23:44 GMT
#18
On September 20 2011 08:41 ShadowDrgn wrote:
Changing the color will still be a copyright violation (unauthorized derivative work), but it will be more difficult for the copyright holder to discover you in the first place. That's not really a solution though.

Show nested quote +
I've already removed the image from the website; if the copyright isn't "registered" can they pursue monetary compensation?


It's a bit complicated. Check out 17 USC 411 and 412.



He is perfectly within bounds to take an image and modify it as long as he makes it unrecognizable to the original image.


Removing the image does nothing for you as the website is already cached and logged with the image from earlier, which is still reachable.
I'm Your Phtes o.0 **SKT1 For Life!**
Jaso
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States2147 Posts
September 19 2011 23:51 GMT
#19
I realize that they have access to the image; but shouldn't there be something where they give a warning to remove the image instead of just send a letter saying, "sup that picture's ours, give us money"?

And I read through 17 USC 412; if I understood properly, they can't make any claims if it's not registered?
derp
ShadowDrgn
Profile Blog Joined July 2007
United States2497 Posts
September 19 2011 23:55 GMT
#20
On September 20 2011 08:44 Phtes wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 20 2011 08:41 ShadowDrgn wrote:
Changing the color will still be a copyright violation (unauthorized derivative work), but it will be more difficult for the copyright holder to discover you in the first place. That's not really a solution though.

I've already removed the image from the website; if the copyright isn't "registered" can they pursue monetary compensation?


It's a bit complicated. Check out 17 USC 411 and 412.



He is perfectly within bounds to take an image and modify it as long as he makes it unrecognizable to the original image.


We agree.

Removing the image does nothing for you as the website is already cached and logged with the image from earlier, which is still reachable.


The point of removing the image is to stop violating copyright. If the image wasn't registered during the period it was shown on his website, he isn't liable for any damages (some limited exceptions apply!). If the owner registers the copyright and he's still using the image on his website, he's then liable for damages.

Like others have said, this is 99% some asshole that finds images being used by lots of websites, buys the image from the owner (maybe?), then threatens to sue everyone using it unless they settle.
Of course, you only live one life, and you make all your mistakes, and learn what not to do, and that’s the end of you.
Jaso
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States2147 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-09-20 00:00:01
September 19 2011 23:57 GMT
#21
Actually.. it appears to be a pretty big company and has a partnership with Flickr (not sure about details) and has it's own Wikipedia page. Not sure if I can link or not.
edit: sold in 2008 for 2.4b.. seems legit lol.

edit2: apparently, they've sent out millions of these letters usually asking for >$1,000, but almost never take people to court because they rarely win cases.. as long as the image isn't registered with US copyright office, some court decision in NYC makes it really hard for them to win anything in court.

derp
Phtes
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States370 Posts
September 20 2011 00:45 GMT
#22
On September 20 2011 08:57 Jaso wrote:
Actually.. it appears to be a pretty big company and has a partnership with Flickr (not sure about details) and has it's own Wikipedia page. Not sure if I can link or not.
edit: sold in 2008 for 2.4b.. seems legit lol.

edit2: apparently, they've sent out millions of these letters usually asking for >$1,000, but almost never take people to court because they rarely win cases.. as long as the image isn't registered with US copyright office, some court decision in NYC makes it really hard for them to win anything in court.




Take the image down, as you did, ignore there letter, if they continue to pursue it hten you will know it' serious.


All in all take this as a lesson and don't just Google image anymore without doing the proper modifications. Taking images like that can lead to serious trouble if it turns out it came from a Stock Company (Very aggressive companies when it comes to this) and if this is your profession it writes you off with a very bad rep.
I'm Your Phtes o.0 **SKT1 For Life!**
Jaso
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States2147 Posts
September 20 2011 01:23 GMT
#23
On September 20 2011 09:45 Phtes wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 20 2011 08:57 Jaso wrote:
Actually.. it appears to be a pretty big company and has a partnership with Flickr (not sure about details) and has it's own Wikipedia page. Not sure if I can link or not.
edit: sold in 2008 for 2.4b.. seems legit lol.

edit2: apparently, they've sent out millions of these letters usually asking for >$1,000, but almost never take people to court because they rarely win cases.. as long as the image isn't registered with US copyright office, some court decision in NYC makes it really hard for them to win anything in court.




Take the image down, as you did, ignore there letter, if they continue to pursue it hten you will know it' serious.


All in all take this as a lesson and don't just Google image anymore without doing the proper modifications. Taking images like that can lead to serious trouble if it turns out it came from a Stock Company (Very aggressive companies when it comes to this) and if this is your profession it writes you off with a very bad rep.


Good thing I'm 15 .

By stock company, do you mean one that has stock photos, or trades on the market? This one used to but was delisted.. so I guess that's good.
derp
brian
Profile Blog Joined August 2004
United States9617 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-09-20 01:42:32
September 20 2011 01:40 GMT
#24
yeah its hard to win a copyright lawsuit over something so frivolous.

an entire course over entertainment law and all i learned is without registering your work its impossible to win, and even after still difficult. exceptions to books movies and other such detailed works.
Phtes
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States370 Posts
September 20 2011 03:05 GMT
#25
On September 20 2011 10:23 Jaso wrote:


Good thing I'm 15 .

By stock company, do you mean one that has stock photos, or trades on the market? This one used to but was delisted.. so I guess that's good.


Yes stock companies are organizations that have pictures for sale (usually absurdly priced but extremely high quality) and can sometimes have the Google Image not display the watermark (or a 3rd party removed it) which can lead into very serious legal problems for someone who "steals" it
I'm Your Phtes o.0 **SKT1 For Life!**
itsjustatank
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Hong Kong9153 Posts
September 20 2011 04:41 GMT
#26
On September 20 2011 07:13 ShadowDrgn wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 20 2011 06:58 itsjustatank wrote:
On September 20 2011 06:51 ShadowDrgn wrote:
If it's not registered, they can't sue you for infringement, although you should stop using their image to avoid a lawsuit in the future.


Registration is not necessary to protect one's copyright, it just makes it much easier to do so.

https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Copyright_registration


One of those advantages is the ability to sue.

Check out 17 USC 411.


You are right. I sorta misread what you typed as "no copyright without registration."
Photographer"nosotros estamos backamos" - setsuko
SpoR
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States1542 Posts
September 20 2011 06:25 GMT
#27
Wait so someone just mailed an official looking letter to your house and claimed something and you settled with them asap? What is your address please.
A man is what he thinks about all day long.
Normal
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Lowko276
IndyStarCraft 180
SC2Nice 66
Reynor 14
StarCraft: Brood War
Sea 28835
Calm 21601
Rain 6051
Bisu 3097
Jaedong 2698
Light 928
firebathero 605
Pusan 528
Zeus 458
actioN 453
[ Show more ]
Mini 368
EffOrt 302
Stork 277
Backho 136
Hyun 136
ToSsGirL 131
Snow 84
hero 63
sas.Sziky 46
Mind 44
Rush 39
Shinee 38
JYJ35
JulyZerg 32
Sea.KH 31
Aegong 30
sSak 27
Sharp 23
sorry 17
Sacsri 15
Icarus 15
yabsab 15
Noble 13
Movie 11
ajuk12(nOOB) 11
IntoTheRainbow 11
SilentControl 8
Hm[arnc] 5
ivOry 3
Dota 2
Gorgc8703
XaKoH 546
qojqva383
XcaliburYe288
syndereN142
League of Legends
singsing1948
Counter-Strike
x6flipin536
flusha291
markeloff69
edward29
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor157
Other Games
tarik_tv27465
B2W.Neo1384
DeMusliM709
shahzam625
crisheroes612
Fuzer 298
Liquid`RaSZi257
RotterdaM175
Pyrionflax157
QueenE34
ArmadaUGS0
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick31181
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 12 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 1641
League of Legends
• Nemesis3680
Upcoming Events
OSC
1m
Replay Cast
11h 1m
RSL Revival
21h 1m
Classic vs Cure
FEL
1d 3h
OSC
1d 7h
RSL Revival
1d 21h
SHIN vs Clem
FEL
1d 23h
FEL
2 days
CSO Cup
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
FEL
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Replay Cast
4 days
Replay Cast
6 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-07-07
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.