• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 13:59
CEST 19:59
KST 02:59
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy4Code S RO8 Preview: herO, Zoun, Bunny, Classic7Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru3BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview27Code S RO12 Preview: GuMiho, Bunny, SHIN, ByuN3
Community News
Code S RO8 Results + RO4 Bracket (2025 Season 2)10BGE Stara Zagora 2025 - Replay Pack2Weekly Cups (June 2-8): herO doubles down1[BSL20] ProLeague: Bracket Stage & Dates9GSL Ro4 and Finals moved to Sunday June 15th13
StarCraft 2
General
Code S RO8 Results + RO4 Bracket (2025 Season 2) feardragon: Blizzards biggest blunder with SC was… TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation How herO can make history in the Code S S2 finals
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series [GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Ro8 - Group A [GSL 2025] Code S: Season 2 - Ro8 - Group B SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
[G] Darkgrid Layout Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance
Brood War
General
BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion Recent recommended BW games FlaSh Witnesses SCV Pull Off the Impossible vs Shu StarCraft & BroodWar Campaign Speedrun Quest
Tourneys
Small VOD Thread 2.0 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - Day 4 [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - Day 3
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Beyond All Reason What do you want from future RTS games?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread UK Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Vape Nation Thread
Fan Clubs
Maru Fan Club Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread NHL Playoffs 2024 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
A Better Routine For Progame…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 27931 users

Thoughts on PvZ

Blogs > cwjalex
Post a Reply
1 2 Next All
cwjalex
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
United States49 Posts
October 19 2009 12:03 GMT
#1
I'm just kidding. I don't want to talk about match up specifics but I do want to share some thoughts about all the PvZ imba shouts lately. Setting aside all the arguments that have been rehashed over and over again one thing is clear to me: The people who are shouting imba the loudest are only hurting their own gameplay. The people who "know" that zerg has a huge advantage over protoss aren't going to put in nearly as much effort as the moderates who aren't really sure.

I played zerg years ago before this recent influx of swarm domination and had strong feelings of zerg imbalance, especially against terran. I'd focus so much on how impossible it was stop the terran deathball of m&m/tanks/vessel that my zerg play stagnated. It would almost become a self-fulfilling prophecy. I would get through early game, die to the mid game push, and mentally comfort myself knowing that it wasn't my lack of skill that made me lose but an imbalance of TvZ. When all the Z started dominating I stopped focusing on how strong the T was and started thinking about all the things that I could have done better and my gameplay drastically improved. I was using relatively the same builds, but I began to approach the match up with a new mentality.

For the sake of argument let's say that suddenly the Almighty God appears to Bisu through a burning bush and announces that indeed Zerg has a huge advantage over Protoss, silencing all ZvP imba arguments forever. Even so, the vast majority of the PvZ losses that a lot of these disgruntled T.L. Protoss users are dwelling on can be attributed to simple things such as poor micro, macro, game sense, timing, etc. It is delusional to think that you, the protoss player, are playing at a Bisu-like level and still losing. Focusing on race imbalance does nothing but waste time, create mental obstacles, and stagnate gameplay.

***
lazz
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
Australia3119 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-10-19 12:19:55
October 19 2009 12:16 GMT
#2
There seems to be two different arguments going - pro level imba, and foriegn level imba. the latter of course doesn't matter because everyone sucks. pro-level imbalance is a concern though.

PvZ does appear imba if you look at the stats from this season. if you assume PvZ is fundamentally balanced, then there are only two possible sources of the imbalanced statistics; either the maps must be imbalanced, or there must not be a significant enough sample size from which the statistics are being drawn from.

You, and many zerg users, seem to be arguing that protoss users aren't trying hard enough, which is, to be quite honest, completely absurd when you look at the conditions that pro teams practice at (8+ hours practice a day).
cwjalex
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
United States49 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-10-19 12:19:51
October 19 2009 12:19 GMT
#3
I'm not talking about the pro scene at all. I just mentioned pro zergs because it allowed me to overcome my mental hurdle...and I think you missed the point of my entire post.
Sadistx
Profile Blog Joined February 2009
Zimbabwe5568 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-10-19 12:27:47
October 19 2009 12:19 GMT
#4
Focusing on race imbalance does nothing but waste time, create mental obstacles, and stagnate gameplay.

That's very true for starcraft, because right now races are so polished that maps actually affect balance more than unit stats and maps define most viable strategies (like is it possible to cheese, FE, 14CC, ZvZ BOs), but I hate it when people can't acknowledge unit imbalance in other RTS.

PvZ is not imbalanced, if you think it is, you're just not storming well enough.

or there must not be a significant enough sample size from which the statistics are being drawn from.

Of course it's not enough. The absolute minimum to claim imba is at least N=30 as in the central limit theorem, and I'm not entirely sure 30 is even enough Sometimes stat junkies say N must be at least 100. I know if you add up the leagues, you'll get more than 30 games with a pretty bad Z advantage, but I bet it will even out a lot more into the season.
I'd wait until the number of games at least doubles.
lazz
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
Australia3119 Posts
October 19 2009 12:22 GMT
#5
On October 19 2009 21:19 cwjalex wrote:
I'm not talking about the pro scene at all. I just mentioned pro zergs because it allowed me to overcome my mental hurdle...and I think you missed the point of my entire post.


well if you're talking about foreign level imbalance in ZvP then yes arguing about imbalance isn't the best way to improve, I agree with you. That's what I mean about two different arguments going - it causes a lot of confusion. People should be more clear about what they're arguing.
spinesheath
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Germany8679 Posts
October 19 2009 12:24 GMT
#6
As long as a map can be used to reverse the balance of a matchup, the matchup isn't imbalanced. The map is. And since I can easly construct a 100% p > t or z map, I blame the maps. That doesn't change the fact the protoss has stagnated lately, and could use some innovation.
If you have a good reason to disagree with the above, please tell me. Thank you.
Ota Solgryn
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
Denmark2011 Posts
October 19 2009 12:39 GMT
#7
On October 19 2009 21:22 lazz wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 19 2009 21:19 cwjalex wrote:
I'm not talking about the pro scene at all. I just mentioned pro zergs because it allowed me to overcome my mental hurdle...and I think you missed the point of my entire post.


well if you're talking about foreign level imbalance in ZvP then yes arguing about imbalance isn't the best way to improve, I agree with you. That's what I mean about two different arguments going - it causes a lot of confusion. People should be more clear about what they're arguing.


Seems like you still misses the point of his post.
He is not arguing wether it is imbalanced or not. He is arguing that it is a self-fulfilling prophecy.

At OP, I think you nailed it spot on. I myself had the exact same problems with terran bio ball of death and never engaged it and thereby always lost to terrans.
After some time I learned that with good micro it could easely be beaten (until some point where it just really is too big) without defilers and even without lurkers.

It seems right now, even at pro level, that players think ht snipes are imposible to stop are therefore never punishes zergs for making them. They simply try to avoid getting ht's until later in the game (just like I avoided attacking the terran ball all game long (Yes I know I'm making a comparison between me and pros)).
So it seems at least, but I might be completely wrong.
ihasaKAROT: "Wish people would stop wasting their lives on finding flaws in others"
PH
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
United States6173 Posts
October 19 2009 12:43 GMT
#8
On October 19 2009 21:16 lazz wrote:
There seems to be two different arguments going - pro level imba, and foriegn level imba. the latter of course doesn't matter because everyone sucks. pro-level imbalance is a concern though.

PvZ does appear imba if you look at the stats from this season. if you assume PvZ is fundamentally balanced, then there are only two possible sources of the imbalanced statistics; either the maps must be imbalanced, or there must not be a significant enough sample size from which the statistics are being drawn from.

You, and many zerg users, seem to be arguing that protoss users aren't trying hard enough, which is, to be quite honest, completely absurd when you look at the conditions that pro teams practice at (8+ hours practice a day).

This post pretty much sums everything up.

There are a shocking number of people complaining about imbalance at their own level of play...and I really don't think ANYONE who posts on this website plays at a high enough level where true imbalance can be observed.


However, you have to admit that P really hasn't done very much to significantly update its play in a while...Zs have improved their mechanics across the board, it seems.
Hello
lazz
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
Australia3119 Posts
October 19 2009 12:56 GMT
#9
On October 19 2009 21:39 Ota Solgryn wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 19 2009 21:22 lazz wrote:
On October 19 2009 21:19 cwjalex wrote:
I'm not talking about the pro scene at all. I just mentioned pro zergs because it allowed me to overcome my mental hurdle...and I think you missed the point of my entire post.


well if you're talking about foreign level imbalance in ZvP then yes arguing about imbalance isn't the best way to improve, I agree with you. That's what I mean about two different arguments going - it causes a lot of confusion. People should be more clear about what they're arguing.


Seems like you still misses the point of his post.
He is not arguing wether it is imbalanced or not. He is arguing that it is a self-fulfilling prophecy.

At OP, I think you nailed it spot on. I myself had the exact same problems with terran bio ball of death and never engaged it and thereby always lost to terrans.
After some time I learned that with good micro it could easely be beaten (until some point where it just really is too big) without defilers and even without lurkers.

It seems right now, even at pro level, that players think ht snipes are imposible to stop are therefore never punishes zergs for making them. They simply try to avoid getting ht's until later in the game (just like I avoided attacking the terran ball all game long (Yes I know I'm making a comparison between me and pros)).
So it seems at least, but I might be completely wrong.


wait, what? I think you're missing the point of my post. I'm saying that people should be more clear about which argument they're making: that they're arguing pro level ZvP is imba, or foriegn level ZvP is imba. the difference is absolutely essential.

foriegn-level ZvP really doesn't matter, because both players suck and don't even come close to playing their respective races at their potential, so there's no point discussing race balance. pro level ZvP imba IS a concern, foriegn-level isn't.

and you're doing exactly what I'm saying is a concern: you're talking about ZvP imba at the foriegn level, and then you're sort of vaguely in a way twisting it and applying it to pro-level ZvP. this is exactly the sort of thing that's causing a lot of rage and trolling on the forums about ZvP imbalance. not clarifying arguments.
Hot_Bid
Profile Blog Joined October 2003
Braavos36374 Posts
October 19 2009 12:58 GMT
#10
I changed the title of your blog post, please don't make intentionally misleading or deceptive titles just to get more views.
@Hot_Bid on Twitter - ESPORTS life since 2010 - http://i.imgur.com/U2psw.png
disciple
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
9070 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-10-19 13:00:53
October 19 2009 12:59 GMT
#11
its really easy. To make things even again KeSPa should just release like 2 maps, one in MSL and one in OSL, where the 3 base 5 hatch hydra builds are impossible. Make the 3rd gas further away and dont put a ramp...ezpz. Zerg players are just playing by default. The problem is not protoss and reinventing protoss strategies. Its rather limiting the zerg.

ToTM did the same thing for protoss, it hasnt offered different possibilities for the zerg, it forced protoss not to play FE... Each individual league needs only one anti-zerg map. Lets see how ppl like shine, kwanro, and even calm will fare when they start a Bo3 from 0-1 by default
Administrator"I'm a big deal." - ixmike88
nttea
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
Sweden4353 Posts
October 19 2009 13:01 GMT
#12
you all seem to be arguing that because you could just play better to win, that the race = imba discussion is useless. Discussing whether two equal players (on effort/time put into the game as well as talent) playing different races would win or lose based on their race being balanced is an interesting discussion. Of course this balance changes depending on the equal players skill level, from newbie to pro level.
cwjalex
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
United States49 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-10-19 13:15:13
October 19 2009 13:05 GMT
#13
On October 19 2009 21:58 Hot_Bid wrote:
I changed the title of your blog post, please don't make intentionally misleading or deceptive titles just to get more views.


There are plenty of Blog titles that are intentionally misleading and deceptive just to get more views...like "Goodbye Jaedong" which is even more intentionally misleading and deceptive. If you take offense to me using the word stupid then please say so. I'm kind of new here and it's hard to figure out rules when they arent being enforced consistently.
lazz
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
Australia3119 Posts
October 19 2009 13:08 GMT
#14
On October 19 2009 22:01 nttea wrote:
you all seem to be arguing that because you could just play better to win, that the race = imba discussion is useless. Discussing whether two equal players (on effort/time put into the game as well as talent) playing different races would win or lose based on their race being balanced is an interesting discussion. Of course this balance changes depending on the equal players skill level, from newbie to pro level.


the discussion of imbalance is much more insightful at pro level, because
a) it's the skill level that starcraft is played professionally, aka where things actually matter
b) there are less relative skill level differences, aka a more homogenized skill level, aka people playing each other are of relatively similar skill levels because they all practice 8+ hours a day
c) the races are played closer to their true potential than, for example, foreigner level, because the players are simply better, a lot better.
Hot_Bid
Profile Blog Joined October 2003
Braavos36374 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-10-19 13:15:35
October 19 2009 13:15 GMT
#15
On October 19 2009 22:05 cwjalex wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 19 2009 21:58 Hot_Bid wrote:
I changed the title of your blog post, please don't make intentionally misleading or deceptive titles just to get more views.


The title that you changed it to is just as intentionally misleading and deceptive (before it was "u stupid? PvZ is so imba"). I actually tried to change it for this very reason but I couldn't figure out how to change the name of the blog title.

How is "Thoughts on PvZ" just as misleading as "u stupid? PvZ is imba"? You wrote thoughts on PvZ. That alone makes it more accurate than your other title, which was written intentionally to mislead people to click and read. Are you arguing that this is not a blog with thoughts on PvZ?

I agree it wasn't the best title name but the reasons you give are completely bogus. There are many intentionally misleading and deceptive titles of blogs that don't get changed. If you have a problem with me using the word stupid that is fine but at least say so. Don't give a bogus reason.

You argue here that the reasons I give are "bogus" because there are many intentionally misleading and deceptive titles of other blogs. This is incorrect logic, because my reason is completely legitimate -- we don't want misleading or deceptive titles. If your argument is that other blogs have misleading titles, then fine, I'll try to do better by closing more of them (or you can help by linking to them).

The fact that other some other blogs exist with misleading titles doesn't change anything about your specific title. It's like you getting a speeding ticket and telling the cop that his "reasons are bogus" because some other guy was speeding too. The fact that others do it and we miss it sometimes doesn't magically correct your error.
@Hot_Bid on Twitter - ESPORTS life since 2010 - http://i.imgur.com/U2psw.png
cwjalex
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
United States49 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-10-19 13:21:16
October 19 2009 13:15 GMT
#16
ahh, u didn't let me edit fast enough, i looked real fast on the left side and saw "PvZ is imbalanced" under brood war and thought that was the changed title...i changed my post and i agree with your speeding ticket analogy...except the rules there are specifically stated. I didn't know you couldn't have a satirical blog title...I read that goodbye jaedong thread and just figured it was okay...like if i were from another planet i would think j-walking is okay cause i saw someone else do it...
Hot_Bid
Profile Blog Joined October 2003
Braavos36374 Posts
October 19 2009 13:20 GMT
#17
On October 19 2009 22:05 cwjalex wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 19 2009 21:58 Hot_Bid wrote:
I changed the title of your blog post, please don't make intentionally misleading or deceptive titles just to get more views.

There are plenty of Blog titles that are intentionally misleading and deceptive just to get more views...like "Goodbye Jaedong" which is even more intentionally misleading and deceptive. If you take offense to me using the word stupid then please say so. I'm kind of new here and it's hard to figure out rules when they arent being enforced consistently.

First, the "Goodbye Jaedong" blog is actually semi-accurate. Yes, it's misleading, but there's actually a "Jaedong" leaving. In your blog, you really don't talk about imbalance, especially not in the incendiary way you titled the blog. That alone separates your blog from the one GTR made.

Second, there's a fundamental difference in the way "PVZ IMBA" threads are treated here. They are annoying. They are inflammatory. They cause flame wars. "Goodbye Jaedong" is not nearly as frustrating or annoying to deal with. Obviously, we don't want thread titles that "use" the ridiculous nature of PvZ arguments just to get views. We hate PvZ imbalance discussions as a whole. We don't want these kind of threads. If you want to post coherent thoughts about PvZ, that's fine. But putting a title like that only adds to an already annoying situation.
@Hot_Bid on Twitter - ESPORTS life since 2010 - http://i.imgur.com/U2psw.png
Hot_Bid
Profile Blog Joined October 2003
Braavos36374 Posts
October 19 2009 13:22 GMT
#18
On October 19 2009 22:15 cwjalex wrote:
ahh, u didn't let me edit fast enough, i looked real fast on the left side and saw "PvZ is imbalanced" under brood war and thought that was the changed title...i changed my post and i agree with your speeding ticket analogy...except the rules there are specifically stated. I didn't know you couldn't have a satirical blog title...I read that goodbye jaedong thread and just figured it was okay

You can have a satirical title, the Goodbye Jaedong is a good example. We even had a ridiculous one where it was titled "ANALYSIS OF OSL" where the title was pushed so it only read "......ANAL...". But like I said, you can't lead with something like "u stupid??" or with something as inflammatory as "PvZ is imba."
@Hot_Bid on Twitter - ESPORTS life since 2010 - http://i.imgur.com/U2psw.png
cwjalex
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
United States49 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-10-19 13:30:36
October 19 2009 13:26 GMT
#19
AIthough I do agree it was a crappy title, I still don't think it was bad enough that needed to be changed. It was supposed to be over the top inflammatory so that the vast majority of people will realize it's a joke...and for those that don't...my first sentence says that i'm joking...but regardless...kind of pointless at this point. You are right I chose the title to get people to click on it...it was a crappy title....new one is more accurate (but less exciting =\ ) and thats that.
cwjalex
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
United States49 Posts
October 19 2009 13:33 GMT
#20
[QUOTE]On October 19 2009 22:01 nttea wrote:
you all seem to be arguing that because you could just play better to win, that the race = imba discussion is useless. QUOTE]

No, I'm arguing that focusing too much on the imbalance can bring your gameplay down...regardless of whether there is an imbalance or not.
1 2 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 1m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
EnDerr 97
BRAT_OK 78
NoRegreT_ 44
MindelVK 38
UpATreeSC 15
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 26004
Calm 3585
firebathero 348
Hyuk 202
sas.Sziky 42
Dewaltoss 42
sSak 41
scan(afreeca) 25
IntoTheRainbow 7
Dota 2
Gorgc5644
qojqva2053
Counter-Strike
fl0m5670
Super Smash Bros
C9.Mang0573
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu386
Other Games
tarik_tv59734
gofns43431
Grubby1801
FrodaN1443
Beastyqt335
crisheroes329
B2W.Neo326
Lowko208
ArmadaUGS125
XaKoH 82
Trikslyr66
FunKaTv 24
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream7705
Other Games
BasetradeTV7
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 21 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• 3DClanTV 49
• Adnapsc2 33
• HeavenSC 17
• IndyKCrew
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Migwel
• intothetv
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Kozan
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 16
• Michael_bg 8
• FirePhoenix3
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 2514
League of Legends
• Nemesis8465
• TFBlade1011
Other Games
• imaqtpie636
• Shiphtur264
Upcoming Events
BSL 2v2 ProLeague S3
1h 1m
Korean StarCraft League
9h 1m
SOOP
15h 1m
sOs vs Percival
CranKy Ducklings
16h 1m
WardiTV Invitational
17h 1m
ByuN vs MaNa
MaxPax vs Solar
Reynor vs Creator
Gerald vs Spirit
Cheesadelphia
21h 1m
CSO Cup
23h 1m
BSL: ProLeague
1d
Hawk vs UltrA
Sziky vs spx
TerrOr vs JDConan
GSL Code S
1d 14h
Rogue vs herO
Classic vs GuMiho
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 16h
[ Show More ]
BSL: ProLeague
2 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
Cross vs Doodle
MadiNho vs Dragon
Replay Cast
2 days
Wardi Open
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Cure vs Percival
ByuN vs Spirit
RSL Revival
4 days
herO vs sOs
Zoun vs Clem
Replay Cast
5 days
The PondCast
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
Serral vs SHIN
Solar vs Cham
Replay Cast
6 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Reynor vs Scarlett
ShoWTimE vs Classic
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 17: Qualifier 2
BGE Stara Zagora 2025
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
2025 GSL S2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025

Upcoming

Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.