EPTLiquipedia Feedback Thread - Page 18
| Forum Index > Website Feedback |
|
Nivoh
Norway259 Posts
| ||
|
Tppz!
Germany1449 Posts
Before Patch 1.3.3 PDD blocked the attack of Broodlords. Patch 1.3.3 "fixed" that. Additional info, Strategy Thread about this: Click me edit: Just wanted to make sure this will be recognised as a real change :> | ||
tofucake
Hyrule19083 Posts
Don't worry. | ||
|
xaeiu
432 Posts
and i hope so far it's ok  however, apart from the protoss units that i'll add within the next 2 or 3 days, i'm just missing the upgrades and abilities... now, since i don't really wanna bring more chaos into liquipedia i just would like to know where i should take all the stuff (and it's quite a bit of stuff, especially the abilities)? because i couldn't really find a alpha/beta section for the ability/upgrade (also units and buildings). should i just keep them in the campaign section as i did with the units and buildings? just feels kinda strange since especially the zerg stuff doesn't appear in the campaign at all | ||
|
tofucake
Hyrule19083 Posts
| ||
|
iamke55
United States2806 Posts
Should it be removed? I have a much better build of the same concept sitting in the strategy forum somewhere so why don't we just replace it with that... | ||
|
tofucake
Hyrule19083 Posts
On May 20 2011 19:22 iamke55 wrote: This build is unbelievably bad: http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/One_Base_Colossus_(vs._Terran) Should it be removed? I have a much better build of the same concept sitting in the strategy forum somewhere so why don't we just replace it with that... Go ahead! | ||
|
Mr.X
Spain115 Posts
I would like to translate the encyclopedia in its entirety into Spanish, would that be possible? with whom I have to talk to get permits and facilities for the editing? Thanks a lot! | ||
|
tofucake
Hyrule19083 Posts
| ||
|
Mr.X
Spain115 Posts
EDIT: Watching the Brazilian version i understand know the procedure. But i think adding a link in every article will going to be an obstacle to the design. If someone wants to add another language in the future, he needs to put ANOTHER link in the title? There should be a language bar as in wikipedia, not to hinder the reading of the article itself Just my opinion. | ||
|
AxelTVx
Canada916 Posts
| ||
|
Mr.X
Spain115 Posts
Little by little ... http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Estrategia_Protoss http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Normas_de_Artículo_de_Estrategia http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Plantilla_de_Estrategia http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Aceleración_Cronos http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/SCAbility/Tranformar_en_Portal_de_Distorsión http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Portal_de_Distorsión http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/SCUpgrade/Transformar_en_Portal_de_Distorsión http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Armas_Aéreas http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Blindaje_Aéreo http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Núcleo_Cibernético http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/SCUpgrade/Alucinación I think everything is going great so far. In some cases it is impossible to translate. For example in information cards, tags are in English to define the parameters. No new parameters could be added in Spanish to facilitate the translation? Once the work is done ... I would like to do well and not have to change after 10000 items. Thanks. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25552 Posts
I made some edits to the Siege Tank article that I'd like someone to review/check when they have a moment:  Siege TankSomeone made some edits to the Reactor Hellion Expand article a while back, and I'd like to make some edits as well, so if someone could review/check the pending edits that would be great: Reactor Hellion Expand (vs. Zerg) | ||
|
Mr.X
Spain115 Posts
http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Pylon http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Fanático http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/SCAbility/Carga http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/SCUpgrade/Carga | ||
|
Kambing
United States1176 Posts
There's several pages I want to add on fundamental gameplay mechanics on topics that come up a lot in strategy forums's simple q&a thread, e.g., on group selection, commands, and target priorities. A lot of information of this sort can be found in a bunch of un-linked places, e.g., http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Category:Game_Mechanic http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Strategy It would be nice to have a top-level portal for fundamental mechanics (either under Strategy or General) so that people know where to go to for this information. | ||
|
DeltruS
Canada2214 Posts
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=228443 into the liquipedia, but I was met with a clunky interface that has very little similarity to normal TL post interface. There should be simple "add article" buttons next to strategy stubs, and the interface should be almost exactly the same as Teamliquid's. I doubt that many people will contribute otherwise. After making a guide in the strategy forum, there is very little benefit considering more people read the strategy forum. | ||
|
dBandit
Australia7 Posts
- "Starcraft" vs "StarCraft". I've been using "StarCraft" since its the official name, but usage across the Wiki is woefully inconsistent. - Names of the GSL tournaments. I'm of the belief that "GSL1, GSL2... GSL7, GSL8" is probably the easiest and most sustainable naming scheme, but at the moment its all over the place (i.e. GSL1, GSL2, GSL3, then GSL Jan, GSL March...). I'm tempted to edit the GSL tab template to change this, but its a pretty radical move so I want some feedback. - On player pages, I've been removing the "Overview" and "Playstyle" headings and just combining them into a general intro paragraph, since not only is the content so short not really to warrant a new heading, but the Wikipedia manual of style suggests having a general intro paragraph over breaking things up like that. Should we go with the Wikipedia style here? Feedback would be great ^^ | ||
Noam
Israel2209 Posts
On June 01 2011 12:30 DeltruS wrote: + Show Spoiler + I wanted to implement my guide http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=228443 into the liquipedia, but I was met with a clunky interface that has very little similarity to normal TL post interface. There should be simple "add article" buttons next to strategy stubs, and the interface should be almost exactly the same as Teamliquid's. I doubt that many people will contribute otherwise. After making a guide in the strategy forum, there is very little benefit considering more people read the strategy forum. While it may not be possible to change LP to be quite as easy to use as you suggest, it is actually not that complicated to write a Strategy article from an already existing Strategy. The first step of writing a Strategy article is to first make sure it doesn't already exist by searching for its name and checking the appropriate race Strategy hub, in this case Zerg Strategy.The next step is reading the fairly short Strategy Article Policy.After that use this page: http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/index.php?title=StrategyTemplate&action=edit , copy the entire text in the box and go to your user space(http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/User:DeltruS ) and then 'create' or 'edit this page', paste the template and start editing. Inside the actual wikicode the <!-- and --> denote the beginning and end of a comment which will not not appear in the page. After you read the text inside the comment I recommend deleting it to get a clear view of what you're writing. From this point on it should be pretty straight forward, just write the text and use the buttons for styling. The preview button is your best friend When you are done it's time to move the article out of the Userspace and in to the Main space and linking to it from all relevant locations. Its also highly recommended to visit the LP IRC channel if you have any questions or just feel like chatting  | ||
DivinO
United States4796 Posts
So. Any rivalries you guys would suggest? | ||
|
Rabiator
Germany3948 Posts
| ||
| ||
