EPTLiquipedia Feedback Thread - Page 19
| Forum Index > Website Feedback |
|
xtfftc
United Kingdom2343 Posts
| ||
|
pdd
Australia9933 Posts
| ||
tofucake
Hyrule19259 Posts
On June 18 2011 22:01 xtfftc wrote: Is American English the "official" Liquipedia language? When someone edits my contributions to change every S to a Z and to remove all the Us, I cry. :/ The official language is English. People who change it exist, and their edits are typically approved because they aren't incorrect. | ||
|
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
On June 22 2011 01:08 pdd wrote: Hey just wondering why I don't stay logged in to Liquipedia and why there's no option to stay logged in at the log in page anymore. I coulda sworn there used to be one. Was wondering this too, you used to be able to stay logged in, but now I keep getting logged out. | ||
|
xtfftc
United Kingdom2343 Posts
On June 22 2011 02:20 tofucake wrote: The official language is English. People who change it exist, and their edits are typically approved because they aren't incorrect. Erm. ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/jgwL2.jpg) vs ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/4cwJY.jpg) | ||
|
Kralic
Canada2628 Posts
On June 22 2011 02:32 Torte de Lini wrote: Was wondering this too, you used to be able to stay logged in, but now I keep getting logged out. Step 1) Log in Step 2) My Preferences Step 3) Check the "Remember my login on this computer" box. Step 4) Click "Save" button. Looks like they changed the interface around a bit lately. | ||
|
tofucake
Hyrule19259 Posts
Once again, neither is incorrect. | ||
|
xtfftc
United Kingdom2343 Posts
| ||
Burpies
Canada409 Posts
On June 22 2011 23:15 Kralic wrote: Step 1) Log in Step 2) My Preferences Step 3) Check the "Remember my login on this computer" box. Step 4) Click "Save" button. Looks like they changed the interface around a bit lately. It's still logging me out even after doing that. I really hope that this isn't an intended change. :/ | ||
|
Torte de Lini
Germany38463 Posts
No idea if it stays. Guess not. | ||
|
iMAniaC
Norway703 Posts
I'm, too, constantly being logged off, so I experimented a little. I usually use Firefox, but I tried to log in with Safari as well and when I used Safari, Liquipedia remembered my log in. Moreover, in Safari, the URL showed as wiki.teamliquid.net:80/starcraft2, whileas in Firefox, it showed as wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2. When I tried to write wiki.teamliquid.net:80 in Firefox, I'd get redirected to wiki.teamliquid.net and when I wrote plain wiki.teamliquid.net in Safari, it would forget my log in! So it seems to me that the problem is that the cookie remembers your login for wiki.teamliquid.net:80, and not for wiki.teamliquid.net, and that some browsers keep redirecting you from wiki.teamliquid.net:80 to wiki.teamliquid.net, in which case the cookie doesn't understand that it's still the same site and you're supposed to be logged in. ... Or something along those lines. I'm not too tech savvy, so my guess might be a little off, but I'm sure that's an important clue. | ||
|
Aurdon
United States2007 Posts
I was expecting to see one of those cool menu bars across the top like other tournament series have. One page to hold all the tournaments and linked to the individual pages would be cool. | ||
Noam
Israel2209 Posts
 Team Liquid SC2 Open. The individual tourneys do not link back to it and that is something that is easily fixed, but the tabs system that GSL and many other tourneys use won't work well with so many sub pages. | ||
|
movac
Canada494 Posts
| ||
ZodaSoda
Australia1191 Posts
On July 15 2011 21:00 movac wrote: When looking at the team results page, in the section for GSL results. Is there a reason why the GSL WC isn't listed along with the GSL1-7 and ST? It wasn't in the Original cause it took up a whole bar for 1 player on a team for most teams, but now that i split results into a tab It can be added, I'll prolly get around to doing it eventually, anyone else who wants to add it in, can feel free to do so. ^^ | ||
|
movac
Canada494 Posts
it's been added and only for the teams that had players in it. | ||
|
BlasiuS
United States2405 Posts
I'd like to expand the ones that don't current meet the Strategy Article Policy. Some of the builds are not up-to-date and many of the more recent builds are not present. Also some builds are labeled for a specific matchup where they could apply to more than one matchup (one such example is the Dark Templar Fast Expand build, which only appears in the PvT section but is also viable vs Zerg as well). However I have no idea what is specifically not up to standards on each build. Most of the stub builds look complete and some even appear to meet the Strategy Article Policy as far as I can tell. However there's no discussion page on most of these builds, and no explanation anywhere of why it was put into the stub builds section and not the regular builds section. | ||
|
tofucake
Hyrule19259 Posts
Dark Templar Rush to Dark Templar Fast Expand (vs. Terran). | ||
|
BlasiuS
United States2405 Posts
Let's start at the beginning: What specifically is preventing this build from being listed in the builds section? | ||
|
Stijx
United States804 Posts
| ||
| ||
