|
On May 27 2011 04:48 Norseman wrote:That joke wasn't funny the first time it was said in this thread either... Still trying to track down who this guy is, but having no luck. I doubt it's someone training for anything, I think it's a player just having some fun here, maybe just seeing what strategies are going on on the NA server. Still, it's definitely turning into a fun mystery.
I know, I'm to deeply invested now to not figure this out. LoL. I'm planning on messaging him tonight if he comes on.
P.s. I totally just submitted a report on that EGIdra guy "Reason: Fed up with dumb people"
|
Inference from the hotkey charts is really silly. It's like people have never seen a hotkey graph before. My advice, go to the BW replays section of this website (very bottom, lower left), download 10 terran replays from 10 different terran players and load them up in BW Charts and you'll see something exactly like what was posted 10 times. There is nothing remotely unique in those graphs.
As a former BW terran player, and terran player in SC2, I'm tempted to screenshot some of my own hotkey graphs and troll you guys.
|
I forgot to add the one comparing anonymous and mvp to the OP. We can see that the 3 that are not alike which is MVP and two other korean terrans MMA and Bomber but he's one of MVP compared to anonymous.
On May 26 2011 12:17 jalstar wrote:anonymous is, almost without a doubt, IMMVP. Nearly identical hotkey map.
You can dispute the evidence as much as you want, it doesn't matter. What I said in the OP is that's what we're working with at this time. So far our theory is that its MVP but obviously we cannot prove it at this point in time,
|
Pretty cool if it is MVP, only way to find out is to get columbo on the case!
|
On May 27 2011 05:22 hasuterrans wrote: Inference from the hotkey charts is really silly. It's like people have never seen a hotkey graph before. My advice, go to the BW replays section of this website (very bottom, lower left), download 10 terran replays from 10 different terran players and load them up in BW Charts and you'll see something exactly like what was posted 10 times. There is nothing remotely unique in those graphs.
As a former BW terran player, and terran player in SC2, I'm tempted to screenshot some of my own hotkey graphs and troll you guys.
This is completely incorrect. Hotkey signatures are like fingerprints, almost impossible to change and still be able to play at a high level. Romad was able to identify almost every smurf on iccup/pgtour/wgtour based on their hotkey signatures and literally never be wrong.
|
|
It has to be a korean...not even europeans are this good. Could be MVP...could be MarineKingPrime....could be scfou....who knows? There are a many insanely good terran players in korea.
|
do people like not read the thread at all before posting?
|
already posted heard from a reliable source its Bomber...
|
On May 27 2011 10:32 Itsmedudeman wrote: do people like not read the thread at all before posting? Reading's for losers, apparently.
|
|
Insert comment about how easy NA ladder is :p
|
On May 27 2011 16:28 Kantutan wrote: Insert comment about how easy NA ladder is :p Well I'd assume his win rate would drop once he gets over 200 games, I would think it takes a long time to start matching up with the top grandmaster players every game.
|
On May 27 2011 20:58 Disquiet wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2011 16:28 Kantutan wrote: Insert comment about how easy NA ladder is :p Well I'd assume his win rate would drop once he gets over 200 games, I would think it takes a long time to start matching up with the top grandmaster players every game.
According to his match history, he played his first GM player on game 20. So he's been playing GM level MMR opponents for 60 games, with a 94% winrate against them.
Whether he plays against top GM players or not is I guess just dependent on what time he/they play.
|
On May 27 2011 22:40 leviathan20 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2011 20:58 Disquiet wrote:On May 27 2011 16:28 Kantutan wrote: Insert comment about how easy NA ladder is :p Well I'd assume his win rate would drop once he gets over 200 games, I would think it takes a long time to start matching up with the top grandmaster players every game. According to his match history, he played his first GM player on game 20. So he's been playing GM level MMR opponents for 60 games, with a 94% winrate against them. Whether he plays against top GM players or not is I guess just dependent on what time he/they play.
Exactly, you start playing GM players quite fast if your winning 100% of your games.
|
And looking at the APM on the replay, we can see it's not extremely high, that suits Mvp well.
|
On May 27 2011 05:22 hasuterrans wrote: Inference from the hotkey charts is really silly. It's like people have never seen a hotkey graph before. My advice, go to the BW replays section of this website (very bottom, lower left), download 10 terran replays from 10 different terran players and load them up in BW Charts and you'll see something exactly like what was posted 10 times. There is nothing remotely unique in those graphs.
As a former BW terran player, and terran player in SC2, I'm tempted to screenshot some of my own hotkey graphs and troll you guys. What. You know finding smurfs' main by hotkey/apm is a way to find who they are nearly 100% of the time in broodwar, right ? There is even a thread here about that in the bw section. And they're like never wrong.
|
I like how the graph is like a sc2 DNA display And we're like CSI:SC2 and we matched the DNA!
|
Wow that is amazing you can look at hotkeys like that xD is this what people mean when they check peoples' hotkeys to find out a progamer's ID? Or usually do they do it manually? (load up a replay)
And yes I agree it is possibly MVP's, the hotkey setup is very similar.
|
On May 28 2011 03:30 -Zoda- wrote: And looking at the APM on the replay, we can see it's not extremely high, that suits Mvp well.
? Mvp has around 260 average apm, spiking up to 350+ in battles
So the hotkey setup is "kinda similar" and not exactly? Why would he be using different hotkeys? I honestly doubt it's him.
|
|
|
|