|
On May 10 2011 16:27 Fruscainte wrote:Show nested quote +On May 10 2011 16:20 Looky wrote:On May 10 2011 16:15 maartendq wrote: Gametrailer summary about the console version: "If you're looking for a team-based game that isn't Team Fortress 2, Brink might be the right game for you." yeah... but atleast in tf2 you can go off by yourself and be fine. this game looks like if you run off alone you would just die. from what i seen its doesnt look great at all "WAAAAAAAAAH I CANT RUN OFF AND KILL THE ENTIRE TEAM BY MYSELF IN A GAME MADE SPECIFICALLY TO ENFORCE TEAMWORK" Show nested quote +The game is getting KILLED in reviews. In this day and age of reviewers giving crazy high scores for any derp; this is very alarming. This is a day in age where, as I said earlier, glorious games like Stalker gets a 4 and Metro 2033 gets a 6. And CoD and Homefront get 10/10's. What the hell do you expect? Do people honestly look at reviews still? Enforcing team play is not always a good thing. In Wolfeinstein ET you could go own your own and be a real pain for the other team if you were good enough. One sniper was able to keep a team from advancing if he was good enough..
|
On May 10 2011 16:27 Fruscainte wrote:Show nested quote +On May 10 2011 16:20 Looky wrote:On May 10 2011 16:15 maartendq wrote: Gametrailer summary about the console version: "If you're looking for a team-based game that isn't Team Fortress 2, Brink might be the right game for you." yeah... but atleast in tf2 you can go off by yourself and be fine. this game looks like if you run off alone you would just die. from what i seen its doesnt look great at all "WAAAAAAAAAH I CANT RUN OFF AND KILL THE ENTIRE TEAM BY MYSELF IN A GAME MADE SPECIFICALLY TO ENFORCE TEAMWORK"
I haven't really paid any attention to this game or even know if this is the case but FPS games are not usually very fun if there can be no aspect of 'clutch' or being able to make a large impact on a game by yourself. If the game is just solely based around who's team is more coordinated or whatever then I don't see the game being fun to play in pubs or without friends. Plus I don't really play FPS games to 'win', I just play for a bit to get some frags and have fun (I mostly play Quake and TF2) & I think it's a bad idea for games to not let you play it how you want.
|
On May 10 2011 16:27 Fruscainte wrote:Show nested quote +On May 10 2011 16:20 Looky wrote:On May 10 2011 16:15 maartendq wrote: Gametrailer summary about the console version: "If you're looking for a team-based game that isn't Team Fortress 2, Brink might be the right game for you." yeah... but atleast in tf2 you can go off by yourself and be fine. this game looks like if you run off alone you would just die. from what i seen its doesnt look great at all "WAAAAAAAAAH I CANT RUN OFF AND KILL THE ENTIRE TEAM BY MYSELF IN A GAME MADE SPECIFICALLY TO ENFORCE TEAMWORK" Show nested quote +The game is getting KILLED in reviews. In this day and age of reviewers giving crazy high scores for any derp; this is very alarming. This is a day in age where, as I said earlier, glorious games like Stalker gets a 4 and Metro 2033 gets a 6. And CoD and Homefront get 10/10's. What the hell do you expect? Do people honestly look at reviews still?
Neither Stalker and Metro were highly anticipated games. When a highly anticipated game like Brink gets panned by reviewers (when they all have early copies from the publisher) it's never a good sign. You just said it yourself. CoD and Homefront got 10's.
|
On May 10 2011 16:27 Fruscainte wrote:Show nested quote +On May 10 2011 16:20 Looky wrote:On May 10 2011 16:15 maartendq wrote: Gametrailer summary about the console version: "If you're looking for a team-based game that isn't Team Fortress 2, Brink might be the right game for you." yeah... but atleast in tf2 you can go off by yourself and be fine. this game looks like if you run off alone you would just die. from what i seen its doesnt look great at all "WAAAAAAAAAH I CANT RUN OFF AND KILL THE ENTIRE TEAM BY MYSELF IN A GAME MADE SPECIFICALLY TO ENFORCE TEAMWORK" Show nested quote +The game is getting KILLED in reviews. In this day and age of reviewers giving crazy high scores for any derp; this is very alarming. This is a day in age where, as I said earlier, glorious games like Stalker gets a 4 and Metro 2033 gets a 6. And CoD and Homefront get 10/10's. What the hell do you expect? Do people honestly look at reviews still?
are you watching jp stream? im not impress. it doesnt look like there would be any impressive kills you can have. and there are no stats wtf? there's some weird crap that show XP. i wanna feel like i accomplish something if i get a head shot or like they explode or something. but they lay on the ground waiting to get revive just looks so lacklustered.
|
Now that is a MUCH better review.
|
On May 10 2011 13:27 floor exercise wrote:Well I played like 15 minutes and it looks like total dogshit. Turning on AA doesn't save it at all, it looks fucking broken and runs at about 20 fps for some reason. I don't think it even works at all on ATI cards even though I have the 11.5a drivers that came out today for Brink. Apparently a bunch of reviews came out giving it horrible scores. I can't even play so I don't know but they are probably right. Fucking nostalgia for ET screws me again
I run on an ati card an no problem with me. The game looks great, it's like borderlands and the cut scenes are actually incredible. No idea why you're getting 20 fps =(
|
If the devs fix the lobby and chockepoint-map issues I'll definately get this game. Otherwise it depends on what my friends are going to do.
|
On May 10 2011 16:57 Fiercegore wrote:Show nested quote +On May 10 2011 13:27 floor exercise wrote:Well I played like 15 minutes and it looks like total dogshit. Turning on AA doesn't save it at all, it looks fucking broken and runs at about 20 fps for some reason. I don't think it even works at all on ATI cards even though I have the 11.5a drivers that came out today for Brink. Apparently a bunch of reviews came out giving it horrible scores. I can't even play so I don't know but they are probably right. Fucking nostalgia for ET screws me again I run on an ati card an no problem with me. The game looks great, it's like borderlands and the cut scenes are actually incredible. No idea why you're getting 20 fps =(
Ati cards have the fantastic feature where if your drivers are too new your card starts to fail. I think that's the issue here. Try downgrading your driver version to 7 or so, that'll usually fix it.
|
watching jp stream...doesnt look too hot from what i am seeing...darn
|
On May 10 2011 16:38 JohnStorm wrote:Now that is a MUCH better review.
After playing Brink for a little while, I can definitely get on board with that review. The mechanics are brilliant -- the parkour, the class design, the way objectives and teamwork are emphasized, the art style, even the shooting. It's just brought down by horrid map design, the questionable unlock system (get all the guns in 45 minutes! get all the clothing in a day!), and other bits and pieces that leave me scratching my head.
And for god's sake don't even bother trying to play the "single player".
|
Not sure how the game expects to remain popular if you can full unlock everything within a couple days and reach the level cap. Seems like it will appeal to a niche crowd at best, but that crowd is probably more satisfied with other FPS.
I guess, enjoy it while it lasts, I wouldn't buy it unless you have money to throw away. Perfect game to rent it seems, which is the exact opposite of how they were hyping it.
|
On May 10 2011 17:24 Pufftrees wrote: Not sure how the game expects to remain popular if you can full unlock everything within a couple days and reach the level cap. Seems like it will appeal to a niche crowd at best, but that crowd is probably more satisfied with other FPS.
I guess, enjoy it while it lasts, I wouldn't buy it unless you have money to throw away. Perfect game to rent it seems, which is the exact opposite of how they were hyping it.
Not that I think this game is actually good, it looks really generic and boring, but why are people so obsessed with XP/unlocking/stats and stuff like that? Do people not remember when you could play a multiplayer FPS and use any gun you want if it was in the level or available for your class? A game should expect to remain popular by the fact that it is fun to play, not how long it takes to unlock all the guns... I wish FPS games hadn't tried to add all this RPG grinding stuff to pretend like the game is worth playing.
|
On May 10 2011 17:27 BasedSwag wrote:Show nested quote +On May 10 2011 17:24 Pufftrees wrote: Not sure how the game expects to remain popular if you can full unlock everything within a couple days and reach the level cap. Seems like it will appeal to a niche crowd at best, but that crowd is probably more satisfied with other FPS.
I guess, enjoy it while it lasts, I wouldn't buy it unless you have money to throw away. Perfect game to rent it seems, which is the exact opposite of how they were hyping it. Not that I think this game is actually good, it looks really generic and boring, but why are people so obsessed with XP/unlocking/stats and stuff like that?
That's just how it is now a days. StarCraft 2 would probably have half the people playing it if there wasn't icons to unlock. Not to mention the lack of statistics in Brink, I mean seriously how can they not at least record kills and deaths.
|
On May 10 2011 16:36 Looky wrote:Show nested quote +On May 10 2011 16:27 Fruscainte wrote:On May 10 2011 16:20 Looky wrote:On May 10 2011 16:15 maartendq wrote: Gametrailer summary about the console version: "If you're looking for a team-based game that isn't Team Fortress 2, Brink might be the right game for you." yeah... but atleast in tf2 you can go off by yourself and be fine. this game looks like if you run off alone you would just die. from what i seen its doesnt look great at all "WAAAAAAAAAH I CANT RUN OFF AND KILL THE ENTIRE TEAM BY MYSELF IN A GAME MADE SPECIFICALLY TO ENFORCE TEAMWORK" The game is getting KILLED in reviews. In this day and age of reviewers giving crazy high scores for any derp; this is very alarming. This is a day in age where, as I said earlier, glorious games like Stalker gets a 4 and Metro 2033 gets a 6. And CoD and Homefront get 10/10's. What the hell do you expect? Do people honestly look at reviews still? are you watching jp stream? im not impress. it doesnt look like there would be any impressive kills you can have. and there are no stats wtf? there's some weird crap that show XP. i wanna feel like i accomplish something if i get a head shot or like they explode or something. but they lay on the ground waiting to get revive just looks so lacklustered.
Yea I was watching jps stream as well and frankly my opinion of the game right now is that it's pretty garbage for a variety of reasons. Lots of ideas but the overall game just doesn't seem very well polished at all.
|
On May 10 2011 17:24 Pufftrees wrote: Not sure how the game expects to remain popular if you can full unlock everything within a couple days and reach the level cap. Seems like it will appeal to a niche crowd at best, but that crowd is probably more satisfied with other FPS..
lol, complaints like this...
Can't you just play the game for fun and not for unlocking shit and getting XP? I mean, great MP titles like Quake, CS, Starcraft, Warcraft,.. never had stuff to unlock. Splash Damage just doesn't want this to be WoW.
|
This game looks a lot like Wolf: ET except not as fun :S
|
On May 10 2011 17:27 BasedSwag wrote:Show nested quote +On May 10 2011 17:24 Pufftrees wrote: Not sure how the game expects to remain popular if you can full unlock everything within a couple days and reach the level cap. Seems like it will appeal to a niche crowd at best, but that crowd is probably more satisfied with other FPS.
I guess, enjoy it while it lasts, I wouldn't buy it unless you have money to throw away. Perfect game to rent it seems, which is the exact opposite of how they were hyping it. Not that I think this game is actually good, it looks really generic and boring, but why are people so obsessed with XP/unlocking/stats and stuff like that? Do people not remember when you could play a multiplayer FPS and use any gun you want if it was in the level or available for your class? A game should expect to remain popular by the fact that it is fun to play, not how long it takes to unlock all the guns... I wish FPS games hadn't tried to add all this RPG grinding stuff to pretend like the game is worth playing.
back when tf2 had one set of weapons for each class and no stupid hats... those were the days
|
I'm loving the game so far. I guess if you think FPS games should be RPGS you wouldn't like it but I'm in the camp that hates everything COD4 did to the genre.
|
does the netcode feel really terrible for anyone else? movement is really glitchy online forme
|
On May 10 2011 18:20 cmgillett wrote: does the netcode feel really terrible for anyone else? movement is really glitchy online forme Ye would be cool to know how the engine/netcode feels on a "good" server.
|
|
|
|