EPTI dont hold personal grudges from game to game.
theres not a single person in this game that i dislike.
+ Show Spoiler +
![[image loading]](http://www.kodiakguideservice.com/kodiakhunts/bear14.jpg)
the majority of players here i actually love very much.
including both people i have did analysis on so far.
Orgah Mafia - Page 16
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Coagulation
United States9633 Posts
I dont hold personal grudges from game to game. theres not a single person in this game that i dislike. + Show Spoiler + the majority of players here i actually love very much. including both people i have did analysis on so far. | ||
|
thefluffyone93
26 Posts
Unvote; Vote: aidnai | ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On February 12 2011 12:22 Coagulation wrote: Also i would like to point out that i never gave a Scum verdict at the end of my analysis because i didnt feel it was warranted its still far too early to properly get a read on you. however i think you are the first person i have ever seen post "stop doing post by post analysis on players" I recall last mafia game everyone pissing and moaning that i "wasnt trying hard enough" (brownbear/node can verify this) Now im getting the "your trying too hard" Fuck my life. Mind = blown. I don't usually support PBPA. You're looking at someone's post trying to find scum qualities instead of reading them with an objective head. Look at the terrible justifications you have for the posts I made. You aren't scum hunting you're just posting shit. | ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On February 12 2011 12:42 Ace wrote: kitaman you can't be serious. With the couple of votes on yourself, certainly you would feel better going to sleep knowing we agreed on a candidate. No? Last thing we need is to wake up and find 5 votes against yourself because of Coag's posts. | ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
Your read on aidnai looks weak when taking this into context. Especially when nothing he has posted shows any strong Scum reading. What exactly is your case against him? | ||
|
why
United States215 Posts
On February 12 2011 12:32 Misder wrote: Nice of you to single me out  I wonder why I stood out to you instead of the others?Unvote thefluffyone93 Vote Ace Unfortunately, I don't get to vote for thefluffyone93 anymore  , cause I feel that Coagulation has a point. Ace just feels scummy, esp. stop analysis? Reminds me of Fishball last game tbh.So I ask you who you find scummy, and you basically scroll up the page, find an analysis you can piggyback on, and say that you agree with it. It feels to me like you were just looking for the first possibly scummy person you could find so that you could say you were scum hunting. I don't know if you are just lazy or you haven't been looking for scum (because it's a low activity day and you didn't think you would need analysis to survive), but I'm keeping my vote on you for now. | ||
|
aidnai
United States1159 Posts
On February 12 2011 12:10 kitaman27 wrote: WHOA!!!!! THIS GUY NEEDS TO DIE. NOW! I can't believe no one else caught on to this. Everyone should change their vote to this guy in the next 6 hours or I'm going to become extremely suspicious. Analysis coming shortly. Unvote Vote aidnai Rofl dude... Well, I'm hoping that you just got excited because you misread, or perhaps it's just your role... you got ants in your pants or something? On February 12 2011 07:34 Coagulation wrote: CHECK ACE FOR TRYING TO REDIRECT DT CHECKS IMO. FEEL FREE TO CHECK ME AFTER. Also, coag, I want to point out to you why Ace's directions to DT's were good. A pressure vote on zerroth that was started rather trivially was rapidly turning into a legit bandwagon. Now, is zerroth a scum? Who knows, he hasn't posted yet. Only the mafia know if he's one of them or not. Now the point is, if zerroth is town (or just non-mafia), then he represents a 'safe' lynch target for scum to vote on. He won't fight back, there won't be repercussions when he's lynched because he was not pro-town etc. So, as a townie, should you defend zerroth and try to stop the lynch? If you do, you might end up defending a mafia, a third party, or a lurker that gets modkilled, and you'll look suspicious yourself later. So do you just let zerroth die? that lets mafia pick off a random townie, leave no associations to follow up on, and no day 1 discussion about the lynch. So the correct answer in this situation is, check the sheep who voted zerroth to get an easy 'safe' lynch. Now the supposedly safe lynch for scum puts them at risk of being DT'ed. If DT's RNG their target, they have a 3/29 chance of hitting mafia. If there is even 1 scum on a list of 5 people voting for zerroth, the odds of finding scum are almost double. And if there's 2 scum, now that list is looking pretty unsafe for scum, don't you think? | ||
|
Misder
United States1557 Posts
On February 12 2011 12:50 why wrote: So I ask you who you find scummy, and you basically scroll up the page, find an analysis you can piggyback on, and say that you agree with it. It feels to me like you were just looking for the first possibly scummy person you could find so that you could say you were scum hunting. I don't know if you are just lazy or you haven't been looking for scum (because it's a low activity day and you didn't think you would need analysis to survive), but I'm keeping my vote on you for now. I will disagree on the point that all I did was scroll up to find analysis on someone. That can be debated, but I don't see you being able to prove that that's all I did. TBH, that vote wasn't even answering your question. I decided to not even specifically address your question. I will also disagree with your second point. I don't feel like I'm being lazy (well maybe I am compared to like BC or the likes) by my standards. "Haven't been looking for scum" is wrong too. I just don't have a strong case against anyone yet. Sure, maybe I never posted on who I think is scum out in the open, but I am keeping an eye out for specific people (maybe a bit of tunneling xD) Third point I can live with. Your vote is justified I suppose. | ||
|
Believer
Sweden212 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + On February 12 2011 12:11 Coagulation wrote: Analysis of ACE + Show Spoiler + ok so game hasnt even started yet. no day post or anything i havnt even posted a seriouse post regarding the game and boom hes out the gates trying to get someone lynched + Show Spoiler + people try to reason with him about his pretty lame vote attempt how its a bad start etc. pretty much ignores anyones opinion on it as shown here. + Show Spoiler + On February 11 2011 13:24 Ace wrote: cool so you aren't actually trying to help us find Scum then are you? twists my words to make them sound negative. maybe it was a bad phrasing on my part but im pretty sure anyone who reads that with a town outlook would read "i dont know where you get this "i dont wanna convince people" shit. Hounding me about lack of scumhunting. lets see how much scumhunting he has contributed as the game goes on shall we. + Show Spoiler + Ok no scumhunting here lets move on On February 11 2011 14:10 Ace wrote: 3 Scum vs 27 Townies is pretty much auto loss for Scum. So expect multiple Scum factions, Cults(ughh) or some really strong Scum powers. pretty obvious statement here. anyone who has played more than 2 games of mafia will realize this right away. doesnt help us find scum at all. + Show Spoiler + On February 11 2011 15:27 Ace wrote: well people get accused all of the time. Why panic? Besides I don't see what the voting rules are in the OP. Is it Majority lynch or most votes to lynch? zero scumhunting. and heres a little bit of what is commonly known as a scum tactic. ask general and irrelevent questions regarding the game in a attempt to look like your providing content to the town. + Show Spoiler + On February 11 2011 17:37 Ace wrote: actually gryffindor he answered your question - even though if it was terrible since he never defended Coagulation. What he did wasn't even buddying. Why so jumpy sir? And it only took you 2 minutes between reading Misder's post and voting to come firm to this conclusion? Are you voting just to vote or do you honestly think Node is scummy? pretty much the only real post he has made so far with any substance. however notice it is slightly tinted in a negative contrast. far from solid analysis or scumhunting that i would expect from a vet player like him. + Show Spoiler + On February 11 2011 17:47 Ace wrote: Actually a hard to read player is still bad If you don't appear Pro-Town to me why would I want to keep you alive? more contentless smalltalk. Zero scumhunting here folks. + Show Spoiler + Another Zero content fluff post with general conversation to make it look like hes contributing. no suprise there is Zero scumhunting here + Show Spoiler + On February 12 2011 06:54 Ace wrote: The people voting for Zerroth should be DT checked on Night 1 for sure. Anyway since our characters are based on what went on in the Totalwar forums, players from the totalwar website can you post and give us the characteristics or play style of some of the players there? ALARM BELLS GOING OFF YEAH SURE WE WILL CHECK WHOEVER YOU SAY. CAUSE CLEARLY JUDGING FROM YOUR POST HISTORY YOU HAVE AN INVESTED INTEREST IN FINDING SCUM. WE BETTER LISTEN. also asking other people to scumhunt. Fantastic work ace. zero scumhunting here. MORE ALARM BELLS. was so fucking dedicated to vote me that he couldnt even wait for the fucking day post to get my name on the board. now he unvotes me and doesnt say a word about it. You know what kind of players dont feel compelled to explain their reasoning behind their decision making. If you guessed scum you are correct. I call massive bullshit. Vote: Coagulation | ||
|
Coagulation
United States9633 Posts
On February 12 2011 12:41 Ace wrote: I don't usually support PBPA. You're looking at someone's post trying to find scum qualities instead of reading them with an objective head. Look at the terrible justifications you have for the posts I made. You aren't scum hunting you're just posting shit. just one question Have you posted any scumhunting related content or any analysis on anyone? | ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
I don't usually post long analysis on people unless I'm sure they are 100% Scum, or they got caught in multiple, strong Scum reads. It's day and we're on page 16. Don't be ridiculous. | ||
|
Misder
United States1557 Posts
On February 12 2011 13:01 Believer wrote: Spoiler tag for long post. + Show Spoiler + On February 12 2011 12:11 Coagulation wrote: Analysis of ACE + Show Spoiler + ok so game hasnt even started yet. no day post or anything i havnt even posted a seriouse post regarding the game and boom hes out the gates trying to get someone lynched + Show Spoiler + people try to reason with him about his pretty lame vote attempt how its a bad start etc. pretty much ignores anyones opinion on it as shown here. + Show Spoiler + On February 11 2011 13:24 Ace wrote: cool so you aren't actually trying to help us find Scum then are you? twists my words to make them sound negative. maybe it was a bad phrasing on my part but im pretty sure anyone who reads that with a town outlook would read "i dont know where you get this "i dont wanna convince people" shit. Hounding me about lack of scumhunting. lets see how much scumhunting he has contributed as the game goes on shall we. + Show Spoiler + Ok no scumhunting here lets move on On February 11 2011 14:10 Ace wrote: 3 Scum vs 27 Townies is pretty much auto loss for Scum. So expect multiple Scum factions, Cults(ughh) or some really strong Scum powers. pretty obvious statement here. anyone who has played more than 2 games of mafia will realize this right away. doesnt help us find scum at all. + Show Spoiler + On February 11 2011 15:27 Ace wrote: well people get accused all of the time. Why panic? Besides I don't see what the voting rules are in the OP. Is it Majority lynch or most votes to lynch? zero scumhunting. and heres a little bit of what is commonly known as a scum tactic. ask general and irrelevent questions regarding the game in a attempt to look like your providing content to the town. + Show Spoiler + On February 11 2011 17:37 Ace wrote: actually gryffindor he answered your question - even though if it was terrible since he never defended Coagulation. What he did wasn't even buddying. Why so jumpy sir? And it only took you 2 minutes between reading Misder's post and voting to come firm to this conclusion? Are you voting just to vote or do you honestly think Node is scummy? pretty much the only real post he has made so far with any substance. however notice it is slightly tinted in a negative contrast. far from solid analysis or scumhunting that i would expect from a vet player like him. + Show Spoiler + On February 11 2011 17:47 Ace wrote: Actually a hard to read player is still bad If you don't appear Pro-Town to me why would I want to keep you alive? more contentless smalltalk. Zero scumhunting here folks. + Show Spoiler + Another Zero content fluff post with general conversation to make it look like hes contributing. no suprise there is Zero scumhunting here + Show Spoiler + On February 12 2011 06:54 Ace wrote: The people voting for Zerroth should be DT checked on Night 1 for sure. Anyway since our characters are based on what went on in the Totalwar forums, players from the totalwar website can you post and give us the characteristics or play style of some of the players there? ALARM BELLS GOING OFF YEAH SURE WE WILL CHECK WHOEVER YOU SAY. CAUSE CLEARLY JUDGING FROM YOUR POST HISTORY YOU HAVE AN INVESTED INTEREST IN FINDING SCUM. WE BETTER LISTEN. also asking other people to scumhunt. Fantastic work ace. zero scumhunting here. MORE ALARM BELLS. was so fucking dedicated to vote me that he couldnt even wait for the fucking day post to get my name on the board. now he unvotes me and doesnt say a word about it. You know what kind of players dont feel compelled to explain their reasoning behind their decision making. If you guessed scum you are correct. I call massive bullshit. Vote: Coagulation Why, may I ask? | ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
| ||
|
Coagulation
United States9633 Posts
dont try to tell me there is no value in that. | ||
|
aidnai
United States1159 Posts
On February 12 2011 12:36 kitaman27 wrote: Jumps on the day one Coag bandwagon. Yet doesn't place his vote on him until the lynch gains more steam. His reason for the lynch is because he doesn't like his name? What kind of excuse is that? What does this post even mean? "Hey guys, I was thinking of doing something, but I just want to let you all know that I'm not" Thanks for the info! Again, pushes the Coag bandwagon based on the fact that he is a tough player to read. While we are at it, why not lynch Ace too? In other words: Leave coag alone! He has done nothing wrong this game. Why are people pushing for his lynch? Meaning: I won't change my vote.......until its safe enough to do so. Calls out SouthRawrea for giving generic advice to the town and then does so himself. Comes off hypocritical. Lets lynch this scum. If you are unsure about the day one vote, then here is our best option. Most people on the Eastern Coast will be going to bed soon so its important we all agree on a target before night. Otherwise, 3 votes might be enough to get someone lynched. VOTE FOR THE SCUM VOTE aidnai This is rich Kita, really rich... Let's summarize your case, if that's possible. 1) Jumps on the lynch Coag day 1 bandwagon with an obvious joke post that is followed by me later saying 'Coag is hard to read, don't waste your time defending him' and 'Coag is within his normal meta'. 2) gives generic town advice actually saying DT's should check the zerroth vote list is pretty specific, but unfortunately I can't take credit for the idea :/ 3) FoSing and pressuring people is a bad thing? I should be vote hopping instead? lol... You know what, this really feels like an Annul vs LSB situation from, uh, what mafia was hmm.. it's slipped my mind. You remember, when Annul was godfather and tunneled LSB to his day one lynch with the expectation of not being held accountable later. | ||
|
Ace
United States16096 Posts
On February 12 2011 13:12 Coagulation wrote: regardless of whether you personaly think my analysis has any merit. you cant deny the fact that it is making you post with substance and conviction that is otherwise lacking from you so far giving us more to read. dont try to tell me there is no value in that. *yawn* | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On February 12 2011 13:13 aidnai wrote: You know what, this really feels like an Annul vs LSB situation from, uh, what mafia was hmm.. it's slipped my mind. You remember, when Annul was godfather and tunneled LSB to his day one lynch with the expectation of not being held accountable later. You calling me the godfather? | ||
|
Misder
United States1557 Posts
On February 11 2011 21:42 gryffindor wrote: I don't like your OMGUS, and I don't like your response to me, you're my top scumspect. Misder, can you give me a reference to your best town and best scum game? IGMEOY Little late on this, but I'll answer as it will help scumhunting if people read previous games, and that you haven't been on lately either, so technically its not "late". I've only played one game as scum, and that was Mafia XXX. I'll warn you that that was a really bad game for me. I don't really have a "best" town game. Maybe the most recent one I played in, PYP3? idk, you can look at any of my games and you'd probably get the same read on me. | ||
|
Coagulation
United States9633 Posts
On February 12 2011 13:13 aidnai wrote: This is rich Kita, really rich... Let's summarize your case, if that's possible. 1) Jumps on the lynch Coag day 1 bandwagon with an obvious joke post that is followed by me later saying 'Coag is hard to read, don't waste your time defending him' and 'Coag is within his normal meta'. 2) gives generic town advice actually saying DT's should check the zerroth vote list is pretty specific, but unfortunately I can't take credit for the idea :/ 3) FoSing and pressuring people is a bad thing? I should be vote hopping instead? lol... You know what, this really feels like an Annul vs LSB situation from, uh, what mafia was hmm.. it's slipped my mind. You remember, when Annul was godfather and tunneled LSB to his day one lynch with the expectation of not being held accountable later. i am also extremely perplexed how he had come to the conclusion that you are a good lynch target from his analysis and to make matters even more intriguing he is going to what i would consider extreme lengths in PM land to see your ass hang tonight. cant say im too inclined to step my ass in the line of fire to save you from his apparently out of nowhere vendetta considering you previously seemed to find it logical to policy lynch me day one. but i doubt your mafia.. at least i doubt theres enough substantial evidence to justify lynching you. | ||
| ||
