EPTI dont think that anyone who has posted in the last 5 or so pages is mafia
I feel like we got a pretty good textbook example of mafia sitting back and watching town take turns fucking each other in the ass.
Orgah Mafia - Page 17
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Coagulation
United States9633 Posts
I dont think that anyone who has posted in the last 5 or so pages is mafia I feel like we got a pretty good textbook example of mafia sitting back and watching town take turns fucking each other in the ass. | ||
|
Misder
United States1557 Posts
And as such, Unvote Ace Vote Aidnai Yay for bandwagoning? How is PM land going for everyone btw? I'm lonely.  | ||
GMarshal
United States22154 Posts
On February 12 2011 13:29 Coagulation wrote: To be honest I dont think that anyone who has posted in the last 5 or so pages is mafia I feel like we got a pretty good textbook example of mafia sitting back and watching town take turns fucking each other in the ass. I can´t agree more with this, I have a strong feeling mafia is just sitting back laughing their asses off as we try to rip each others head off, for this reason I propose we stick with lynching a lurker/inactive, if mafia *is* being inactive then its likely that that will at least gallivant them into posting something which we can analyze | ||
|
Coagulation
United States9633 Posts
On February 12 2011 13:37 Misder wrote: How is PM land going for everyone btw? I'm lonely. PM Kita he needs a friend. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On February 12 2011 13:13 aidnai wrote: You know what, this really feels like an Annul vs LSB situation from, uh, what mafia was hmm.. it's slipped my mind. You remember, when Annul was godfather and tunneled LSB to his day one lynch with the expectation of not being held accountable later. Look at his defense. Rather than address the situation, he refers us to a completely unrelated game by putting himself in the place of the innocent victim, while I'm the scum aggressor. Don't fall for this nonsense. On February 12 2011 13:37 GMarshal wrote: I can´t agree more with this, I have a strong feeling mafia is just sitting back laughing their asses off as we try to rip each others head off, for this reason I propose we stick with lynching a lurker/inactive, if mafia *is* being inactive then its likely that that will at least gallivant them into posting something which we can analyze Do you honestly believe that if zerroth was scum, that he wouldn't even respond before being lynched? The problem with lynching an inactive is that the mafia can manipulate which inactive to lynch. Do you really think zerroth is more likely scum than aidnai? | ||
|
Believer
Sweden212 Posts
Vote: Zerroth | ||
|
aidnai
United States1159 Posts
On February 12 2011 13:43 kitaman27 wrote: Look at his defense. Rather than address the situation, he refers us to a completely unrelated game by putting himself in the place of the innocent victim, while I'm the scum aggressor. Don't fall for this nonsense. Do you honestly believe that if zerroth was scum, that he wouldn't even respond before being lynched? The problem with lynching an inactive is that the mafia can manipulate which inactive to lynch. Do you really think zerroth is more likely scum than aidnai? How many times are you going selectively crop my quotes so that you can misconstrue what I said? In the whole quote, I did address your 'analysis', ridiculous as it was. You did it in your original analysis as well, looks like you're grasping at straws. Not to mention your bizarre behaviour in the thread earlier, lashing out randomly, I really believe you must be acting out a very strange role, a role that is forcing you to target me for some reason. On February 12 2011 12:36 kitaman27 wrote: Jumps on the day one Coag bandwagon. Yet doesn't place his vote on him until the lynch gains more steam. His reason for the lynch is because he doesn't like his name? What kind of excuse is that? See, both of these quotes are actually the same post, yet you pick one part to show me hopping on Coag's bandwagon and another part to show me "pushing" a lynch on elitecubwarman8. That's so far fetched...it's impossible for you to be this bad without any ulterior motives... So tell us Kitaman, are you scum, or is it a pro-town role that is making you behave this way? | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On February 12 2011 14:04 aidnai wrote: So tell us Kitaman, are you scum, or is it a pro-town role that is making you behave this way? Yes, I strong reason for wanting to kill you. + Show Spoiler + Victory condition: You win when all anti-town forces have been eliminated. | ||
|
beefy187
Japan39 Posts
Its my policy to vote for people who votes for me. I'll make them pay... Now I don't know most of you, but I'm glad that fluffy is behaving well... His my responsibility and its nice to see him playing properly. | ||
|
beefy187
Japan39 Posts
| ||
|
Coagulation
United States9633 Posts
thanks for the omgus i dont think ace is scum btw just a jerk. | ||
|
gryffindor
United States524 Posts
On February 12 2011 12:48 Ace wrote: I'm not worried about getting lynched. Hell I dont really care. But it's Day 1, a 30 player game with 3 Scum and not many people have been posting much. Your read on aidnai looks weak when taking this into context. Especially when nothing he has posted shows any strong Scum reading. What exactly is your case against him? Ace is using reverse psychology here. He is saying "I don't care if I'm lynched one bit, bro", when in fact, he really gives a damn. I was null on Ace up to this point, but I am going to have to lean towards him being scum right now. | ||
JBright
Vancouver14381 Posts
| ||
|
GMarshal
United States22154 Posts
On February 12 2011 14:43 JBright wrote: Right now Zerroth has a clear lead in the votes, but have we confirmed what will happen if we get a tie in the votes? Something predetermined by the mod will occur, as to what "something" is I have no idea, I am kind of curious though | ||
|
pevergreen
Australia252 Posts
On February 12 2011 14:45 GMarshal wrote: Something predetermined by the mod will occur, as to what "something" is I have no idea, I am kind of curious though It follows a pre-determined order that has been set out. Do some research into the last few games I've done and you should be able to figure the possibilities out. | ||
|
Mr. Wiggles
Canada5894 Posts
Mod, are there any rules on activity, and what does vote in 3/4ths of lynches mean? I'm interested in knowing this, to determine if Zerroth would be modkilled or not ever. If he won't be modkilled, then he isn't really doing anything to help town, and that could be a possible day 1 lynch. It will stop mafia from hiding in the never post never die group of people too if they can get away with that. My thoughts on: (aidnai and kitaman) I think kitaman is trying to tunnel aidnai a little too hard. It's very early in the game though, so I'm not sure if this is bad town play, or scum play, or maybe even part of his red text. kitaman's accusation doesn't seem very strong, especially for the conviction he's throwing behind it, and I'm not convinced by it. (ace and coag) It looks like it's cooled off somewhat already, but this just seems like two experienced players going at each other a bit. Based on what they've posted though, I get the feeling they're probably both town. | ||
|
JBright
Vancouver14381 Posts
Oh well, there is that 75% voting safety net for them. | ||
|
pevergreen
Australia252 Posts
On February 12 2011 14:58 Mr. Wiggles wrote: Mod, are there any rules on activity, and what does vote in 3/4ths of lynches mean? This is as harsh as I've been in activity requirements, ever. If you don't have a valid vote registered in 75% of day phases, you will be modkilled. So you can skim by with 3 posts over 4 days phases with just a vote. Lurking is a strategy, up to you if you punish a player for not posting a lot. | ||
|
Node
United States2159 Posts
On February 12 2011 14:15 beefy187 wrote: Vote: Ace Its my policy to vote for people who votes for me. I'll make them pay... Now I don't know most of you, but I'm glad that fluffy is behaving well... His my responsibility and its nice to see him playing properly. I don't understand this post at all. First off, I hope the first part about voting Ace isn't serious. If it is, worst policy ever. Secondly, what is your relation to fluffy? Aidnai and kitaman are probably both town. The things kitaman quoted really aren't scummy in the least. It's just a player wandering around and applying pressure . And I can't see a mafia trying to tunnel aidnai out of the blue... he's just not important enough. That's not to say he's a bad player, but he's not a high-priority veteran the way, say, RoL seems to be every time he plays. What I find most curious is this post: On February 12 2011 12:10 kitaman27 wrote: WHOA!!!!! THIS GUY NEEDS TO DIE. NOW! I can't believe no one else caught on to this. Everyone should change their vote to this guy in the next 6 hours or I'm going to become extremely suspicious. Analysis coming shortly. Unvote Vote aidnai Why the hell did that post in particular make you think aidnai is scum? Makes no sense to me. I don't think you're scum, but you're definitely misguided if you think that was a scummy post. | ||
|
Mr. Wiggles
Canada5894 Posts
| ||
| ||
