|
On February 12 2011 16:22 gryffindor wrote:Show nested quote +On February 12 2011 16:02 Node wrote:
Yeah, this game is ridiculously lenient activity-wise. Usually I'm not a huge supporter of lynching inactives, but since they're basically never going to die off on their own we're going to have to use the lynch to either scare them out or kill them. Otherwise it'll be far, far too easy for mafia to hide among them. However, sometimes people are simply just inactive. It is not always the best to just gun for the easy targets; it is not efficient to always look low. Ace can be scum, just the same as someone who is lurking, so it is proper to analyze everyone somehow.
Of course I don't believe that we should abandon analysis in favor of killing an inactive every day. Analysis always will be the town's strongest weapon, and there's no reason not to call out scummy behavior when you see it.
On February 12 2011 16:22 gryffindor wrote:
I like that you are kind of doing this, though you could actually do something about it, as opposed to complaining.
My vote is on Insanious. What more would you like from me?
|
Alrighty so, I'm finally settled in with my net on. Was at work in the morning, then on a train to come back to see the rents. Now that I have time to actually sit down and read the thread, the fun can begin.
As a start, I would like to simply
Vote: Insanious
There now that this is out of the way time to read up on what has happened so far.
|
On February 12 2011 16:36 Node wrote:
My vote is on Insanious. What more would you like from me?
On February 12 2011 16:36 Insanious wrote:
Alrighty so, I'm finally settled in with my net on. Was at work in the morning, then on a train to come back to see the rents. Now that I have time to actually sit down and read the thread, the fun can begin.
As a start, I would like to simply
Vote: Insanious
There now that this is out of the way time to read up on what has happened so far.
Your timing is impeccable.
|
Now its a race to make one post! Even a post with nothing (but a vote hopefully) will probably be enough to save you from a lynch at this point...
|
hell his single post with his vote on himself alone has pretty much bumped his contribution level above 50% of players in this game.
|
On February 12 2011 16:36 Node wrote:
My vote is on Insanious. What more would you like from me?
I'd like to hear your thoughts on possible scumteam pairings. Who do you feel Insanious is scum with? He doesn't feel that scummy to me. Why do you suspect him?
|
On February 12 2011 16:50 Coagulation wrote:
hell his single post with his vote on himself alone has pretty much bumped his contribution level above 50% of players in this game.
that's his only post?
like i said, he hasn't been very scummy.
I feel like you're just out for an easy mislynch, Node.
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On February 12 2011 16:51 gryffindor wrote:Show nested quote +On February 12 2011 16:36 Node wrote:
My vote is on Insanious. What more would you like from me? I'd like to hear your thoughts on possible scumteam pairings. Who do you feel Insanious is scum with? He doesn't feel that scummy to me. Why do you suspect him?
He doesn't feel that scummy to you? Did you manage to get a read off his one post?
|
On February 12 2011 12:41 thefluffyone93 wrote:
OK.
Unvote; Vote: aidnai
On February 12 2011 13:37 Misder wrote:Well, there really hasn't been much pressure in terms of voting. The inactives are still winning the vote count by a decent amount. I like pressure though. And as such, Unvote Ace
Vote AidnaiYay for bandwagoning? How is PM land going for everyone btw? I'm lonely. 
Now that Kitaman has proven his insanity, you two mind taking your votes off me?
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On February 12 2011 16:54 aidnai wrote:Show nested quote +On February 12 2011 13:37 Misder wrote:Well, there really hasn't been much pressure in terms of voting. The inactives are still winning the vote count by a decent amount. I like pressure though. And as such, Unvote Ace
Vote AidnaiYay for bandwagoning? How is PM land going for everyone btw? I'm lonely. Now that Kitaman has proven his insanity, you two mind taking your votes off me?
He asked nicely. That must mean he's town.
|
On February 12 2011 16:53 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 12 2011 16:51 gryffindor wrote:On February 12 2011 16:36 Node wrote:
My vote is on Insanious. What more would you like from me? I'd like to hear your thoughts on possible scumteam pairings. Who do you feel Insanious is scum with? He doesn't feel that scummy to me. Why do you suspect him? He doesn't feel that scummy to you? Did you manage to get a read off his one post?
he rode the train home from work and thinks Insanious is scum.
|
On February 12 2011 16:51 gryffindor wrote:Show nested quote +On February 12 2011 16:36 Node wrote:
My vote is on Insanious. What more would you like from me? I'd like to hear your thoughts on possible scumteam pairings. Who do you feel Insanious is scum with? He doesn't feel that scummy to me. Why do you suspect him?
He was inactive. I wanted to see him post. I placed a vote on him. I'm not really sure how else I could pressure someone who had yet to say anything in relation to the game.
As for active posters, I'm more suspicious of bumatlarge than anyone else:
On February 12 2011 11:47 Node wrote:
And for the record, FOS on bumatlarge. He seemed far too eager to egg on gryffindor's (fake) argument against me.
The post I was referring to:
On February 11 2011 17:04 bumatlarge wrote:
Fantastic point. Coag has definitely shown us no indication of at least trying to help town. He's an easy choice. Present a better candidate, Node, or just inform coagulation that he needs to change his meta. Who needs RNG?
I also disliked his "refutation" of Coagulation's post on how he was acting scummy:
On February 11 2011 19:02 bumatlarge wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On February 11 2011 17:38 Coagulation wrote:Show nested quote +On February 11 2011 17:04 bumatlarge wrote:On February 11 2011 16:56 gryffindor wrote:
So, let me get this straight, you're defending him by saying he plays the same way as both town and scum? Fantastic point. Coag has definitely shown us no indication of at least trying to help town. He's an easy choice. Present a better candidate, Node, or just inform coagulation that he needs to change his meta. Who needs RNG? really man? Show nested quote +On February 11 2011 13:50 Coagulation wrote:
We should lynch zerroth
because the last game
completely inactive
only posted/vote to avoid modkill etc
Lets get the inactives out now lets look at your contributions so far in this game Show nested quote +On January 23 2011 01:09 bumatlarge wrote:Once you are dead, you are free from any guidelines or constraints your role may have placed on you. Ohhh a penalty-esque game? I do have to redeem myself for the last one for Ace -_- /In! Awesome you joined the game! Show nested quote +On February 11 2011 15:29 bumatlarge wrote:
Alright time to get started.
Yep
Hopefully I can make good use of this role, as I have to do the character justice.
Filler
Coagulation has already spouted off to his random tangents, so we might be better off without him.
shows willingness to jump on the easy bandwagon. cause scum love easy bandwagons. that makes town sit around and not analyze people.
I still want to see what everyone is posting like, because I am seeing a good number of sentence long posts with nothing in it.
similar to this post.
Too be expected. I'm not putting my vote anywhere yet until I see what I want to see.
what is this? theres nothing of any value to your post so far for town.
"im not gonna vote"
awesome thanks for letting us know. Show nested quote +On February 11 2011 17:04 bumatlarge wrote:On February 11 2011 16:56 gryffindor wrote:
So, let me get this straight, you're defending him by saying he plays the same way as both town and scum? Fantastic point. Coag has definitely shown us no indication of at least trying to help town. He's an easy choice. Present a better candidate, Node, or just inform coagulation that he needs to change his meta. Who needs RNG? So wait.. i clearly showed you my indication of trying to help town. you disregarded that to blow out of proportion that i am anti town for your own purposes clearly. If you need an example of me trying to help town with info go ahead an read up top again. your last post you decided your not gonna vote...OK......And now im the EASY Choice? What changed your mind? What did you see? Sounds wishy washy to me. I dont think you seen anything but an easy lynch. And mafia love easy lynches. because it makes town not focus on scumhunting. is that what you seen? if your mafia im going to hand your ass to town on a silver platter. I will be watching you. You are right, I am mafia.
|
On February 12 2011 16:55 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 12 2011 16:54 aidnai wrote:On February 12 2011 12:41 thefluffyone93 wrote:
OK.
Unvote; Vote: aidnai On February 12 2011 13:37 Misder wrote:Well, there really hasn't been much pressure in terms of voting. The inactives are still winning the vote count by a decent amount. I like pressure though. And as such, Unvote Ace
Vote AidnaiYay for bandwagoning? How is PM land going for everyone btw? I'm lonely. Now that Kitaman has proven his insanity, you two mind taking your votes off me? He asked nicely. That must mean he's town.
I am fairly suspicious of him as well. I was leaning town on him before he started pming me.
|
@Node+ Show Spoiler +On February 12 2011 17:13 Node wrote:Show nested quote +On February 12 2011 16:51 gryffindor wrote:On February 12 2011 16:36 Node wrote:
My vote is on Insanious. What more would you like from me? I'd like to hear your thoughts on possible scumteam pairings. Who do you feel Insanious is scum with? He doesn't feel that scummy to me. Why do you suspect him? He was inactive. I wanted to see him post. I placed a vote on him. I'm not really sure how else I could pressure someone who had yet to say anything in relation to the game. As for active posters, I'm more suspicious of bumatlarge than anyone else: Show nested quote +On February 12 2011 11:47 Node wrote:
And for the record, FOS on bumatlarge. He seemed far too eager to egg on gryffindor's (fake) argument against me.
The post I was referring to: Show nested quote +On February 11 2011 17:04 bumatlarge wrote:
Fantastic point. Coag has definitely shown us no indication of at least trying to help town. He's an easy choice. Present a better candidate, Node, or just inform coagulation that he needs to change his meta. Who needs RNG? I also disliked his "refutation" of Coagulation's post on how he was acting scummy: Show nested quote +On February 11 2011 19:02 bumatlarge wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On February 11 2011 17:38 Coagulation wrote:Show nested quote +On February 11 2011 17:04 bumatlarge wrote:On February 11 2011 16:56 gryffindor wrote:
So, let me get this straight, you're defending him by saying he plays the same way as both town and scum? Fantastic point. Coag has definitely shown us no indication of at least trying to help town. He's an easy choice. Present a better candidate, Node, or just inform coagulation that he needs to change his meta. Who needs RNG? really man? Show nested quote +On February 11 2011 13:50 Coagulation wrote:
We should lynch zerroth
because the last game
completely inactive
only posted/vote to avoid modkill etc
Lets get the inactives out now lets look at your contributions so far in this game Show nested quote +On January 23 2011 01:09 bumatlarge wrote:Once you are dead, you are free from any guidelines or constraints your role may have placed on you. Ohhh a penalty-esque game? I do have to redeem myself for the last one for Ace -_- /In! Awesome you joined the game! Show nested quote +On February 11 2011 15:29 bumatlarge wrote:
Alright time to get started.
Yep
Hopefully I can make good use of this role, as I have to do the character justice.
Filler
Coagulation has already spouted off to his random tangents, so we might be better off without him.
shows willingness to jump on the easy bandwagon. cause scum love easy bandwagons. that makes town sit around and not analyze people.
I still want to see what everyone is posting like, because I am seeing a good number of sentence long posts with nothing in it.
similar to this post.
Too be expected. I'm not putting my vote anywhere yet until I see what I want to see.
what is this? theres nothing of any value to your post so far for town.
"im not gonna vote"
awesome thanks for letting us know. Show nested quote +On February 11 2011 17:04 bumatlarge wrote:On February 11 2011 16:56 gryffindor wrote:
So, let me get this straight, you're defending him by saying he plays the same way as both town and scum? Fantastic point. Coag has definitely shown us no indication of at least trying to help town. He's an easy choice. Present a better candidate, Node, or just inform coagulation that he needs to change his meta. Who needs RNG? So wait.. i clearly showed you my indication of trying to help town. you disregarded that to blow out of proportion that i am anti town for your own purposes clearly. If you need an example of me trying to help town with info go ahead an read up top again. your last post you decided your not gonna vote...OK......And now im the EASY Choice? What changed your mind? What did you see? Sounds wishy washy to me. I dont think you seen anything but an easy lynch. And mafia love easy lynches. because it makes town not focus on scumhunting. is that what you seen? if your mafia im going to hand your ass to town on a silver platter. I will be watching you. You are right, I am mafia.
That's a fair point, actually. I also don't like how he is telling him to change his meta. That just seems rude. Is this the extent of your case on bum?
|
Let's not be too hasty. We have to be careful with our lynches, since that's our only killing power. Or at least, it's my only killing power QQ
And since apparently people get mad at me no matter whom I vote
unvote Zerroth
vote GGQ
|
On February 12 2011 18:08 GGQ wrote:
Let's not be too hasty. We have to be careful with our lynches, since that's our only killing power. Or at least, it's my only killing power QQ
And since apparently people get mad at me no matter whom I vote
unvote Zerroth
vote GGQ
anyone else see what i see?
|
On February 12 2011 17:13 Node wrote:Show nested quote +On February 12 2011 16:51 gryffindor wrote:On February 12 2011 16:36 Node wrote:
My vote is on Insanious. What more would you like from me? I'd like to hear your thoughts on possible scumteam pairings. Who do you feel Insanious is scum with? He doesn't feel that scummy to me. Why do you suspect him? He was inactive. I wanted to see him post. I placed a vote on him. I'm not really sure how else I could pressure someone who had yet to say anything in relation to the game. As for active posters, I'm more suspicious of bumatlarge than anyone else: Show nested quote +On February 12 2011 11:47 Node wrote:
And for the record, FOS on bumatlarge. He seemed far too eager to egg on gryffindor's (fake) argument against me.
The post I was referring to: Show nested quote +On February 11 2011 17:04 bumatlarge wrote:
Fantastic point. Coag has definitely shown us no indication of at least trying to help town. He's an easy choice. Present a better candidate, Node, or just inform coagulation that he needs to change his meta. Who needs RNG? I also disliked his "refutation" of Coagulation's post on how he was acting scummy: Show nested quote +On February 11 2011 19:02 bumatlarge wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On February 11 2011 17:38 Coagulation wrote:Show nested quote +On February 11 2011 17:04 bumatlarge wrote:On February 11 2011 16:56 gryffindor wrote:
So, let me get this straight, you're defending him by saying he plays the same way as both town and scum? Fantastic point. Coag has definitely shown us no indication of at least trying to help town. He's an easy choice. Present a better candidate, Node, or just inform coagulation that he needs to change his meta. Who needs RNG? really man? Show nested quote +On February 11 2011 13:50 Coagulation wrote:
We should lynch zerroth
because the last game
completely inactive
only posted/vote to avoid modkill etc
Lets get the inactives out now lets look at your contributions so far in this game Show nested quote +On January 23 2011 01:09 bumatlarge wrote:Once you are dead, you are free from any guidelines or constraints your role may have placed on you. Ohhh a penalty-esque game? I do have to redeem myself for the last one for Ace -_- /In! Awesome you joined the game! Show nested quote +On February 11 2011 15:29 bumatlarge wrote:
Alright time to get started.
Yep
Hopefully I can make good use of this role, as I have to do the character justice.
Filler
Coagulation has already spouted off to his random tangents, so we might be better off without him.
shows willingness to jump on the easy bandwagon. cause scum love easy bandwagons. that makes town sit around and not analyze people.
I still want to see what everyone is posting like, because I am seeing a good number of sentence long posts with nothing in it.
similar to this post.
Too be expected. I'm not putting my vote anywhere yet until I see what I want to see.
what is this? theres nothing of any value to your post so far for town.
"im not gonna vote"
awesome thanks for letting us know. Show nested quote +On February 11 2011 17:04 bumatlarge wrote:On February 11 2011 16:56 gryffindor wrote:
So, let me get this straight, you're defending him by saying he plays the same way as both town and scum? Fantastic point. Coag has definitely shown us no indication of at least trying to help town. He's an easy choice. Present a better candidate, Node, or just inform coagulation that he needs to change his meta. Who needs RNG? So wait.. i clearly showed you my indication of trying to help town. you disregarded that to blow out of proportion that i am anti town for your own purposes clearly. If you need an example of me trying to help town with info go ahead an read up top again. your last post you decided your not gonna vote...OK......And now im the EASY Choice? What changed your mind? What did you see? Sounds wishy washy to me. I dont think you seen anything but an easy lynch. And mafia love easy lynches. because it makes town not focus on scumhunting. is that what you seen? if your mafia im going to hand your ass to town on a silver platter. I will be watching you. You are right, I am mafia.
You should be suspicious of me. You don't want me claiming fake DT behind your back now.
But I don't think it warrants any drastic measures being taken out on me at the moment.
|
On February 12 2011 15:36 gryffindor wrote:Show nested quote +On February 12 2011 14:15 beefy187 wrote:
Vote: Ace
Its my policy to vote for people who votes for me. I'll make them pay...
Now I don't know most of you, but I'm glad that fluffy is behaving well... His my responsibility and its nice to see him playing properly. vote: beefy187test
That helps.
Unvote, Vote: gryffindor
I didn't think Ace is that guilty either. And I don't plan to get him lynched.
|
I do think time is up for the first day, right?
On February 12 2011 15:43 gryffindor wrote:
I really disliked Believer's vote a page ago, with absolutely no content with it whatsoever. I also didn't like seeing someone having a post edited earlier, and I was just informed that it was him in PM. I don't want to just go with the mold. I don't want to bandwagon. I want to lynch scum.
Vote: Believer
Try to keep a level head mate, voting for me won't do you any good.
|
Vote: Zerroth
Just woke up and don't have time to read what happened when I was in bed before work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
