edit: NVM. those diamondbacks look like terran versions of immortals though.
[SC2B] Blizzard HQ Visit - Page 2
Forum Index > News |
k!llua
Australia895 Posts
edit: NVM. those diamondbacks look like terran versions of immortals though. | ||
hordeau
United States157 Posts
| ||
Integra
Sweden5626 Posts
WHY!!!!! | ||
404.Delirium
United States1190 Posts
| ||
sacrife
Norway26 Posts
| ||
motbob
United States12546 Posts
On April 23 2010 16:26 Integra wrote: Playing on different gateways: Blizzard is not planning on allowing players to play on different server upon release, so things will be the same as they are in beta right now. WHY!!!!! They say it right in the article. Latency issues. | ||
jodogohoo
Canada2533 Posts
| ||
Brad
2754 Posts
| ||
anch
United States5457 Posts
| ||
ArvickHero
10387 Posts
| ||
speedphlux
Bulgaria962 Posts
| ||
Shurimpu
United States50 Posts
| ||
space_yes
United States548 Posts
On April 23 2010 16:02 LosingID8 wrote: High ground mechanic: They like how it is now. According to Dustin Browder, it gives a clear advantage at first and then it eventually disappears. What? Often you get zero advantage b/c your opponent already has vision whereas in a hit/miss system the high ground is always advantageous. Why Blizzard why? | ||
FragKrag
United States11538 Posts
<3<3<3 TeamLiquid | ||
hi19hi19
United States163 Posts
nerf mining laser imo | ||
onihunter
United States515 Posts
On April 23 2010 16:03 R0YAL wrote: holy crap awesome stuff! great read hard to believe that you really read all that in the span of a minute | ||
Beaudereck
Canada140 Posts
On April 23 2010 16:03 R0YAL wrote: holy crap awesome stuff! great read Haha, great 1 minute read ? You have extremely powerfull eyes, do you know that ?! | ||
Carnivorous Sheep
Baa?21242 Posts
I'm pretty excited for the campaign TBH, it looks nice. | ||
Naf
Denmark68 Posts
When the security guard uses an orc as a landmark, you know that you’ve arrived at the right place. QFT :D can't wait to get home and read the rest... | ||
Integra
Sweden5626 Posts
On April 23 2010 16:28 motbob wrote: They say it right in the article. Latency issues. It doesn't explain a damn thing, Is it that a list of available gateways that it will lag, even on your closest server, and if So why. Or is it that they just think that just because someone from Europe tries to connect to a server in USA it will lag more and therefore let's not allow people to connect at all? If so, why didn't they do it like this in SC1 or Warcraft 3? | ||
| ||