|
On March 25 2010 03:31 Phrujbaz wrote: LOL
is there a feature to be emailed if you get a pm?
No, why don't you check the thread everyday instead? If you say you can't, why did you even bother signing up?
|
With 22 alive, it is 12 to lynch.
L(7) tree.hugger Versatile Abenson Fishball RebirthofLegend ~Opz~ d3_crescentia
~Opz~(4) Xelin Nikon Elemenope iNfuNdiBuLuM
Abenson(7) Iaaan Zona haster27 johnnyspazz JeeJee meeple Amber[LighT]
Bill Murray(2) Caller nemY
Amount of Nukes Fired: 0 Radiation levels - very low
Day ends at 12 AM ET at the current time
|
############ vote Abenson ^^
|
On March 25 2010 03:32 Fishball wrote:Show nested quote +On March 25 2010 03:31 Phrujbaz wrote: LOL
is there a feature to be emailed if you get a pm? No, why don't you check the thread everyday instead? If you say you can't, why did you even bother signing up? I definitely can. Thought it hadn't started yet. >_>
|
On March 25 2010 03:39 Phrujbaz wrote:Show nested quote +On March 25 2010 03:32 Fishball wrote:On March 25 2010 03:31 Phrujbaz wrote: LOL
is there a feature to be emailed if you get a pm? No, why don't you check the thread everyday instead? If you say you can't, why did you even bother signing up? I definitely can. Thought it hadn't started yet. >_>
It is theme game run by ACE. You should have expected the slot to fill up ridiculously fast. Oh well, there shall be always next time (I think).
|
:/
Thread was up for over 36 hours from game start, and even more if you count the time of you posting and the minute I said the game might start at 12AM. Thats a lot of time you missed, pretty much 48hours easily.
|
And now you have wrought forth.... BILL MURRAY! My god, am I scared of nukes
|
you got caller and amber and opz on that list twice
|
yea, updating the vote count too
|
Hooray I'm back and I basically find that I'm gonna end up dying if I don’t post anything soon :O Anyways, I think I have proven myself quite active in the past few games, even if the post are all crap not very useful, I still am active in terms of posting. Therefore I think that we shouldn’t just simply lynch me on day 1 because I was inactive for the first few hours of the game.
|
OK. First, I'd like to address what has been going on, and what I feel about it. I REALLY like the no nuke plan, but I have seen that some people are differing on the retaliation of it. Some want anti nuking, some want anti lynching, and some want retaliatory nuking. I am one to side with anti-nuking followed by a consensus lynch. If we have multiple offenders in the same or near the same time period, we will nuke the shit out of them.
I am going to withhold my vote until it becomes clear that there is a real reason for a lynch. I agree that there could be a policy lynch on Abenson for post-style, but that would probably be detrimental to myself as well as I am not the best poster on this forum.
I am going to actively try to be helpful, and if anyone has any questions, feel free to direct them my way!
thanks!
|
p.s. I would also like to state that, even if I DO have a/some nuke(s), I will not be using it/them. One thing people underestimate about me is my will to win. I love winning, and I hate losing. If everyone goes nuke crazy, noone wins... therefore I lose. I wouldn't like that.
Assuming I have nukes, I will not use them first. I will use them in retaliation if at all. Assuming I don't have nukes, you all have nothing to worry about from me.
|
On March 25 2010 05:20 Abenson wrote: Hooray I'm back and I basically find that I'm gonna end up dying if I don’t post anything soon :O Anyways, I think I have proven myself quite active in the past few games, even if the post are all crap not very useful, I still am active in terms of posting. Therefore I think that we shouldn’t just simply lynch me on day 1 because I was inactive for the first few hours of the game.
first few hours huh. or maybe we could look at your history instead so, when the game started, you post /confirm then 18 hours later you make a one-liner post, voting for L (we all know how i feel about that) now 24 hours later (that's 42 in total for those keeping track) you come out with this.
For you to sway people's votes, you'd have to at least come out of lurking, name some suspects, analyze the plans, give us content. you've had almost two full days to do this. that's a tad more than "first few hours". hell, L is almost unbanned by now.
|
On March 25 2010 05:37 JeeJee wrote:Show nested quote +On March 25 2010 05:20 Abenson wrote: Hooray I'm back and I basically find that I'm gonna end up dying if I don’t post anything soon :O Anyways, I think I have proven myself quite active in the past few games, even if the post are all crap not very useful, I still am active in terms of posting. Therefore I think that we shouldn’t just simply lynch me on day 1 because I was inactive for the first few hours of the game.
first few hours huh. or maybe we could look at your history instead so, when the game started, you post /confirm then 18 hours later you make a one-liner post, voting for L (we all know how i feel about that) now 24 hours later (that's 42 in total for those keeping track) you come out with this. For you to sway people's votes, you'd have to at least come out of lurking, name some suspects, analyze the plans, give us content. you've had almost two full days to do this. that's a tad more than "first few hours". hell, L is almost unbanned by now.
and you folks still think it's a good idea to lynch somebody who's almost unbanned? Pure genius on the following: tree.hugger Versatile Abenson Fishball RebirthofLegend ~Opz~ d3_crescentia
|
My suspect list: Xelin and haster27 It is standard scum behaviour to jump on a new bandwagon. Suppose that L is mafia, and they don't want him to get lynched (obviously). When iaaan randomly voted for me due to inactivity, they were quick to jump on it and propose that I get lynched. I find this suspicious, as he has been switching votes for a while, seemingly trying to get a bandwagon going. I am not stating that L is mafia, but I was surprised at how fast Xelin and haster27 were quick to start voting for me once it seems that I have garnered some votes.
|
I hereby ##Unvote L Since his ban is almost up
|
BM: The town needs to reach a majority vote (12 votes) on someone in just over 7 hours, so don't without your vote too long. The lynching setup is different from other games on TL.
Abenson: You have a grand total of 2 posts. Among the least of all players. The same amount as someone who's been banned for most of the game. And the 2 posts contain nothing of value, unlike L's revision of my initial plan. Sure, you might be town or mafia, but you're deadweight to the town, and if you are in fact town, you are allowing mafia to hide among people like you. This is the day 1 lynch, a crapshoot, so you're a good choice. And getting rid of inactive town members, while not ideal, reduces the number of inactives that the inactive mafia can use to blend in and hide.
|
I just got done reading the entirety of the thread in the time that I just posted, so noone has any reason to have not done so. I also have finished an essay on the five Poetical Books in the Old Testament, and read four short stories for Literature, filling out writing journals on all of them.
I am not saying I am perfect, but I can manage to balance school, this game, and two mafia games on mafiascum.
##Vote: Abenson
I like you, but I do not like your inattentiveness or your lack of a willingness to help the town
|
On March 25 2010 05:56 nemY wrote:Show nested quote +On March 25 2010 05:37 JeeJee wrote:On March 25 2010 05:20 Abenson wrote: Hooray I'm back and I basically find that I'm gonna end up dying if I don’t post anything soon :O Anyways, I think I have proven myself quite active in the past few games, even if the post are all crap not very useful, I still am active in terms of posting. Therefore I think that we shouldn’t just simply lynch me on day 1 because I was inactive for the first few hours of the game.
first few hours huh. or maybe we could look at your history instead so, when the game started, you post /confirm then 18 hours later you make a one-liner post, voting for L (we all know how i feel about that) now 24 hours later (that's 42 in total for those keeping track) you come out with this. For you to sway people's votes, you'd have to at least come out of lurking, name some suspects, analyze the plans, give us content. you've had almost two full days to do this. that's a tad more than "first few hours". hell, L is almost unbanned by now. and you folks still think it's a good idea to lynch somebody who's almost unbanned? Pure genius on the following: tree.hugger Versatile Abenson Fishball RebirthofLegend ~Opz~ d3_crescentia
careful now. i get kinda sensitive when i'm grouped up with a bunch of other people. i'm far superior. don't forget it.
|
+ Show Spoiler +On March 24 2010 03:14 Zona wrote: Current version of proposed plan 1. No one is to initiate a nuke. 2. Anyone who initiates a nuke should be revenge-nuked by TWO players with real nukes. To ensure only TWO revenge-nuke, those with real nukes need to refresh the thread, and see if two have already been launched. If not, shoot one. 3. If any of the revenge-nukes turn out to be fake, the faker needs to be lynched or nuked as well. 4. Do not launch fake nukes. This only serves to muddy the picture for the town and gives an opportunity for the target to get another nuke in the air. 5. Anti-nukes should be used at their owner's discretion. However, save some for the late game, so that at that stage, the mafia can't simply nuke a large proportion of the remaining town members and win.
6. If the town COLLECTIVELY (not by some individual thought) feels that they're probably close to losing, start using nukes as daytime vigilante hits.
I support 1, 3, and 4 from this. I would support 2 if it wasn't two nukes. I feel like wasting multiple nukes as such could potentially end the game for all parties.
|
|
|
|