EPTCoach-Pupil League - Page 10
| Forum Index > BW General |
|
Zurles
United Kingdom1659 Posts
| ||
|
Pokebunny
United States10654 Posts
| ||
|
Zurles
United Kingdom1659 Posts
| ||
|
kOre
Canada3642 Posts
On December 04 2009 11:55 thunk wrote: Why don't you just mandate that everyone who wants to participate has play a set number of games in the TSL. Then, you don't have to assess their skill levels, their race, they're active enough to put in enough games, all that good stuff. I cannot stress this enough. Like thunk says in his reply, each player that is going to join should have minimum of "x games". This is to weed out all those "no shows" who say they will play but rarely end up showing up for matches. I would say something around a hundred or so games on their iCCup account would suffice? | ||
|
Pokebunny
United States10654 Posts
On December 05 2009 04:10 kOre wrote: I cannot stress this enough. Like thunk says in his reply, each player that is going to join should have minimum of "x games". This is to weed out all those "no shows" who say they will play but rarely end up showing up for matches. I would say something around a hundred or so games on their iCCup account would suffice? You can't make a fair judgment just on whether or not they like laddering. | ||
|
Megalisk
United States6095 Posts
On December 05 2009 04:10 kOre wrote: I would say something around a hundred or so games on their iCCup account would suffice? I can do that  | ||
|
lac29
United States1485 Posts
I say make this on the smaller scale and have a bunch of D players as backups in case one of the selected D players isn't active enough or doesn't show. | ||
|
kOre
Canada3642 Posts
On December 05 2009 04:14 Pokebunny wrote: You can't make a fair judgment just on whether or not they like laddering. I know you can't exactly judge commitment based on laddering, but what are the chances that someone who has 1 post on TL and is unknown in the community, and has 1 game on iCCup in the past 6 months and says they want to join, is actually going to show up? Like people have said, SC2GG did something like this and the main problem was people not showing up. | ||
|
EsX_Raptor
United States2801 Posts
On December 05 2009 04:05 Pokebunny wrote: EsX_Raptor is it still ok for me and spritelove to co-coach one team? If it isn't, I'll do it anyways. that seems ok | ||
|
Zozma
United States1626 Posts
On December 05 2009 04:20 kOre wrote: The problem is that there are probably some new players who would be motivated to start because of an opportunity like this. They can't just ladder up 100 games overnight.I know you can't exactly judge commitment based on laddering, but what are the chances that someone who has 1 post on TL and is unknown in the community, and has 1 game on iCCup in the past 6 months and says they want to join, is actually going to show up? Like people have said, SC2GG did something like this and the main problem was people not showing up. | ||
|
Gruv
United Kingdom379 Posts
On December 05 2009 04:20 kOre wrote: I know you can't exactly judge commitment based on laddering, but what are the chances that someone who has 1 post on TL and is unknown in the community, and has 1 game on iCCup in the past 6 months and says they want to join, is actually going to show up? Like people have said, SC2GG did something like this and the main problem was people not showing up. To be fair you're also forgetting about the people who have just come back to SC. I myself just got back into what 3 days ago maybe and signed upto ICCUP this morning but haven't had chance to play a game at all today. So just because I haven't had the chance to play a few games you instantly assume i'm not going to play? I know I know you're just trying to make it run as smooth as possible but it's a bit unfair and presumptuous(sp) on people. My personal opinion is that it should maybe be one strike and you're out and that the coach gets the final say unless it's actually a good reason like you've died or something. But just my 2 cents or pence as i'm from the UK :p. | ||
|
kOre
Canada3642 Posts
On December 05 2009 04:25 Gruv wrote: To be fair you're also forgetting about the people who have just come back to SC. I myself just got back into what 3 days ago maybe and signed upto ICCUP this morning but haven't had chance to play a game at all today. So just because I haven't had the chance to play a few games you instantly assume i'm not going to play? I know I know you're just trying to make it run as smooth as possible but it's a bit unfair and presumptuous(sp) on people. My personal opinion is that it should maybe be one strike and you're out and that the coach gets the final say unless it's actually a good reason like you've died or something. But just my 2 cents or pence as i'm from the UK :p. Yeah, I guess you guys are right, the 1 shot and you get cut thing seems fair. | ||
|
Pokebunny
United States10654 Posts
| ||
|
besiger
Croatia2452 Posts
| ||
TheFallofTroy
Canada780 Posts
On December 05 2009 04:29 Pokebunny wrote: I agree, I was just saying a ladder requirement is unfair. I have like 300+ so it wouldnt effect me... I agree, there shouldn't be a ladder requirement, but it should be if you miss a match or don't practice with your team enough, then your out. | ||
|
Wala.Revolution
7579 Posts
Also, for those who are concerned about people being no-shows: I don't like to ladder, and I rarely do. However, if I do like to play against people I know (clanmates, etc) and I show up if I can. I'm probably back to C- now... but I considered myself a C/C+ a month or so ago. | ||
l10f
United States3241 Posts
| ||
|
numLoCK
Canada1416 Posts
| ||
|
TeMiL
Peru545 Posts
count with me ^^ | ||
|
Cerumo
United States40 Posts
| ||
| ||
