|
Anyone have a clue who that guy is:
His nick is skyster4. I have replay playing him in a d-/d game, he average 512 apm with 449 eapm. Not only that his apm stays around 150-200 for the first 8 minutes than skyrockets to 2000 and stays above 1000 for about 4 minutes. EAPM that is.
http://www.iccup.com/replays/9715.html is the replay
|
On May 07 2009 05:50 RubiksCube wrote:Anyone have a clue who that guy is: His nick is skyster4. I have replay playing him in a d-/d game, he average 512 apm with 449 eapm. Not only that his apm stays around 150-200 for the first 8 minutes than skyrockets to 2000 and stays above 1000 for about 4 minutes. EAPM that is. http://www.iccup.com/replays/9715.html is the replay
Link does not exist btw.
|
On May 07 2009 05:15 arb wrote:Show nested quote +On May 07 2009 02:38 MachineHead wrote:On May 05 2009 03:41 oovv wrote:Does anyone played this guy? GOL-Black I would say its black man. I played him. Not sure about what Blackman's apm used to be, but I remember his "unorthodox" hotkeys, and they were the same. So it's pretty safe to say it is him. post the replay? also : is lux playing on demisoda again? does anyone have a rep
http://repdepot.net/replay.php?id=12015
Anytime someone uses infested terrans against you, it can't be a "gg" from your perspective.
|
|
On May 07 2009 05:29 littlechava wrote: demisoda is orion ack didnt think to look under cj
|
On May 07 2009 05:50 RubiksCube wrote:Anyone have a clue who that guy is: His nick is skyster4. I have replay playing him in a d-/d game, he average 512 apm with 449 eapm. Not only that his apm stays around 150-200 for the first 8 minutes than skyrockets to 2000 and stays above 1000 for about 4 minutes. EAPM that is. http://www.iccup.com/replays/9715.html is the replay
Did you play without AH?
|
On May 07 2009 07:15 Nytefish wrote:Show nested quote +On May 07 2009 05:50 RubiksCube wrote:Anyone have a clue who that guy is: His nick is skyster4. I have replay playing him in a d-/d game, he average 512 apm with 449 eapm. Not only that his apm stays around 150-200 for the first 8 minutes than skyrockets to 2000 and stays above 1000 for about 4 minutes. EAPM that is. http://www.iccup.com/replays/9715.html is the replay Did you play without AH?
I was about to say this. Even spamming at the start my apm is only like 600, I can't imagine it being over 1000 for 4 minutes straight, while actually doing shit
|
On May 07 2009 06:02 Sadistx wrote:Show nested quote +On May 07 2009 05:50 RubiksCube wrote:Anyone have a clue who that guy is: His nick is skyster4. I have replay playing him in a d-/d game, he average 512 apm with 449 eapm. Not only that his apm stays around 150-200 for the first 8 minutes than skyrockets to 2000 and stays above 1000 for about 4 minutes. EAPM that is. http://www.iccup.com/replays/9715.html is the replay Link does not exist btw. fixed
|
Yeah i was gonna say, he was probably either holding a hotkey down or using multicommand hacks or sumthin like that
Edit: AntiHack 0-3-0 (0%)
Try reporting him or something
|
He has a ridiculous amount of move/selects per second around 11 minutes it's a pretty blatant hack.
|
no gosu just hacker
btw pj 1-2 vs boxer wow he won 22min game i WANT REPLAY
|
that guy had autosplit on as well. Report that mofo
|
why would it be suprising for pj to beat boxer?
|
i wouldn't call it surprising, but definitely impressive
|
ya its nice that pj beat boxer rly good work
|
heres your daily drama
yan got penalised with -1500 points for going over the consecutive game rule when he was B- but the admins removed the points when he was A-(quality of points is obviously different), after making a forum complaint and not being able to get his points back yan reset his stats along with his friend forge who was 12 800 A+ in 2vs2 http://www.iccup.com/starcraft/forum/iccup_help_forum/{lang_f_c_admin}/68153.html?1241765027
the worst part is that some of the players got pissed and are now starting to find all the high ranked players who've broken the same rule(including Jangseonhee): http://www.iccup.com/starcraft/forum/iccup_help_forum/{lang_f_rep_s_a}/68250.html?1241822289 obviously iccup cant back down from penalysing the players now or it would look bad for them but doing this might risk in them losing these players, the only reason progamers even play on this server is just for practice(and they are the only reason iccup has gained the popularity that it has now has), they dont give a shit about how many games you could play in a row at D or whatever other rank
and what the fuck is all this selective penalysation? how is it possible that an admin wouldnt be able to notice by themselves that the top 1 player on iccup broke a rule but hes able to notice the same infraction on another player like 1 month after the rule was broken when the games are like in the middle of his matchlist
anyways i know that double standards suck but in situations like this i wouldnt mind in turning a blind eye and giving them the benifit of the doubt.. let the progamers be
|
bisu = homealone? just a thought
|
On May 09 2009 09:04 iamtt1 wrote: anyways i know that double standards suck but in situations like this i wouldnt mind in turning a blind eye and giving them the benifit of the doubt.. let the progamers be
yeah i agree, punishing progamers is really stupid. why punish them for training against a player excessively on iccup? they should be rewarded points for playing on iccup if anything =p i really wish the yan supporters hadn't gone as far as trying to get progamers/future progamers punished, but what can you do.
|
On May 09 2009 09:14 Disintegrate wrote: bisu = homealone? just a thought
did you play against him? can post replay?
|
|
|
|
|