|
#1
An airplane is on a treadmill and they move in opposite directions. When the airplane's engines are running at full power the airplane's speed is the same as the treadmill's speed. Will the airplane be able to take off? Or will it simply stay in place?
#2
A helicopter is on a turn-table. When the helicopter's blades are at full speed the turn-table rotates in the opposite direction at the same speed. Will the helicopter be able to take off? Or will it simply stay in place?
|
|
United States1966 Posts
#1 airplane should be able to take off, though probably wouldn't be a smooth take off :p The speed of the airplane is still the same regardless of the speed/direction of the ground its on, and whatever effect it might have on the takeoff as far as traction or w/e doesn't matter once its off the ground.
not sure on #2... but I'm thinking it will take off, because there will still be an updraft force lifting the helicopter, but I can easily see it spinning out of control on takeoff...
|
#1 was tested on myth busters.
#2 i don't know but its probably he same answer
|
To generate lift doesn't the plane have to actually be moving through air? If it's stationary it doesn't really matter how fast it's moving there'll never be any lift generated.
|
On February 21 2009 12:49 SnowFantasy wrote: #1 was tested on myth busters.
#2 i don't know but its probably he same answer My friend said that the experiment for #1 was really bad
|
On February 21 2009 12:49 LuckyFool wrote: To generate lift doesn't the plane have to actually be moving through air? If it's stationary it doesn't really matter how fast it's moving there'll never be any lift generated. That's what I thought. Since the plane isn't moving relative to the Earth, there's no wind passing under the plane.
My friends and I were discussing this for a while and we couldn't reach a solid conclusion.
|
No, and no. The air flowing around the wings/rotors is what creates lift. If the wing/rotor is in place relative to the air, nothing's going to happen.
Fancy pic to prove my point.
|
United States24497 Posts
On February 21 2009 12:12 BanZu wrote: #1
An airplane is on a treadmill and they move in opposite directions. When the airplane's engines are running at full power the airplane's speed is the same as the treadmill's speed. Will the airplane be able to take off? Or will it simply stay in place? This doesn't make sense to me. The plane's motion is dictated by the engines... the wheels have nothing to do with it... if the engines are running full blast... the plane will move at the same speed relative to the air, regardless of if the ground is moving backwards or not.
#2
A helicopter is on a turn-table. When the helicopter's blades are at full speed the turn-table rotates in the opposite direction at the same speed. Will the helicopter be able to take off? Or will it simply stay in place? This doesn't seem clearly defined. First of all, is the helicopter in the center of the turntable? I'll assume so. I assume you mean the angular velocity of the rotors is the same as the turntable (except opposite). In this case, the rotors are not moving relative to the air and nothing happens.
|
United States24497 Posts
Let me propose an alternate #1 perhaps...
#1b: A plane is trying to take off. The speed that the plane normally travels to take off is 500 miles per hour. There is a steady 500 mph headwind. Will the plane be able to take off even though it is initially stationary in the horizontal direction?
|
On February 21 2009 12:55 micronesia wrote:Show nested quote +On February 21 2009 12:12 BanZu wrote: #1
An airplane is on a treadmill and they move in opposite directions. When the airplane's engines are running at full power the airplane's speed is the same as the treadmill's speed. Will the airplane be able to take off? Or will it simply stay in place? This doesn't make sense to me. The plane's motion is dictated by the engines... the wheels have nothing to do with it... if the engines are running full blast... the plane will move at the same speed relative to the air, regardless of if the ground is moving backwards or not. I thought that if an engine was running at full power it still isn't enough to lift the airplane. Therefore the plane could only move forward on it's wheels like a car. And since it's running at the same speed as the treadmill it stays in the same place relative to the treadmill/Earth, which means there's no airflow under the wings to lift it up.
???
|
On February 21 2009 12:58 micronesia wrote: Let me propose an alternate #1 perhaps...
#1b: A plane is trying to take off. The speed that the plane normally travels to take off is 500 miles per hour. There is a steady 500 mph headwind. Will the plane be able to take off even though it is initially stationary in the horizontal direction?
I love you micronesia. Not only reiterating these completely unrealistic riddles into truth, and then bringing physics into it all.
And no for both of them anyways. We need more of these.
|
On February 21 2009 13:04 Archaic wrote:Show nested quote +On February 21 2009 12:58 micronesia wrote: Let me propose an alternate #1 perhaps...
#1b: A plane is trying to take off. The speed that the plane normally travels to take off is 500 miles per hour. There is a steady 500 mph headwind. Will the plane be able to take off even though it is initially stationary in the horizontal direction? I love you micronesia. Not only reiterating these completely unrealistic riddles into truth, and then bringing physics into it all. And no for both of them anyways. We need more of these. Can you explain why? I tried to explain why they couldn't buy my friends wouldn't buy into it.
EDIT: I mean the first one
|
On February 21 2009 13:07 BanZu wrote:Show nested quote +On February 21 2009 13:04 Archaic wrote:On February 21 2009 12:58 micronesia wrote: Let me propose an alternate #1 perhaps...
#1b: A plane is trying to take off. The speed that the plane normally travels to take off is 500 miles per hour. There is a steady 500 mph headwind. Will the plane be able to take off even though it is initially stationary in the horizontal direction? I love you micronesia. Not only reiterating these completely unrealistic riddles into truth, and then bringing physics into it all. And no for both of them anyways. We need more of these. Can you explain why? I tried to explain why they couldn't buy my friends wouldn't buy into it. EDIT: I mean the first one
Think about what actually gives life to the airplane, is it the speed of the wheels?
Of course not, it is the wing interacting with the matter in the air, so if the interaction between those two things is the same as if the wheels weren't moving at all, you aren't getting off the ground.
|
United States24497 Posts
On February 21 2009 13:02 BanZu wrote:Show nested quote +On February 21 2009 12:55 micronesia wrote:On February 21 2009 12:12 BanZu wrote: #1
An airplane is on a treadmill and they move in opposite directions. When the airplane's engines are running at full power the airplane's speed is the same as the treadmill's speed. Will the airplane be able to take off? Or will it simply stay in place? This doesn't make sense to me. The plane's motion is dictated by the engines... the wheels have nothing to do with it... if the engines are running full blast... the plane will move at the same speed relative to the air, regardless of if the ground is moving backwards or not. I thought that if an engine was running at full power it still isn't enough to lift the airplane. Therefore the plane could only move forward on it's wheels like a car. And since it's running at the same speed as the treadmill it stays in the same place relative to the treadmill/Earth, which means there's no airflow under the wings to lift it up. ??? I don't totally understand your confusion, but let me point out that a car uses engine power to turn wheels... and that is what makes the car go forward. Unlike a car, a plane uses engines to pull air through them and propel the plane forwards.
|
On February 21 2009 13:13 micronesia wrote:Show nested quote +On February 21 2009 13:02 BanZu wrote:On February 21 2009 12:55 micronesia wrote:On February 21 2009 12:12 BanZu wrote: #1
An airplane is on a treadmill and they move in opposite directions. When the airplane's engines are running at full power the airplane's speed is the same as the treadmill's speed. Will the airplane be able to take off? Or will it simply stay in place? This doesn't make sense to me. The plane's motion is dictated by the engines... the wheels have nothing to do with it... if the engines are running full blast... the plane will move at the same speed relative to the air, regardless of if the ground is moving backwards or not. I thought that if an engine was running at full power it still isn't enough to lift the airplane. Therefore the plane could only move forward on it's wheels like a car. And since it's running at the same speed as the treadmill it stays in the same place relative to the treadmill/Earth, which means there's no airflow under the wings to lift it up. ??? I don't totally understand your confusion, but let me point out that a car uses engine power to turn wheels... and that is what makes the car go forward. Unlike a car, a plane uses engines to pull air through them and propel the plane forwards. Yea, but I thought that the wind pulled by the engine itself wasn't enough. Is it?
|
United States24497 Posts
On February 21 2009 13:17 BanZu wrote:Show nested quote +On February 21 2009 13:13 micronesia wrote:On February 21 2009 13:02 BanZu wrote:On February 21 2009 12:55 micronesia wrote:On February 21 2009 12:12 BanZu wrote: #1
An airplane is on a treadmill and they move in opposite directions. When the airplane's engines are running at full power the airplane's speed is the same as the treadmill's speed. Will the airplane be able to take off? Or will it simply stay in place? This doesn't make sense to me. The plane's motion is dictated by the engines... the wheels have nothing to do with it... if the engines are running full blast... the plane will move at the same speed relative to the air, regardless of if the ground is moving backwards or not. I thought that if an engine was running at full power it still isn't enough to lift the airplane. Therefore the plane could only move forward on it's wheels like a car. And since it's running at the same speed as the treadmill it stays in the same place relative to the treadmill/Earth, which means there's no airflow under the wings to lift it up. ??? I don't totally understand your confusion, but let me point out that a car uses engine power to turn wheels... and that is what makes the car go forward. Unlike a car, a plane uses engines to pull air through them and propel the plane forwards. Yea, but I thought that the wind pulled by the engine itself wasn't enough. Is it? If you think the plane applies a torque the wheels, which helps to accelerate the plane, then you are not correct.
|
The treadmill version also suggests that the wheels have a very high friction coefficient. For example, since the plane's velocity is created being unrelated to the wheels, the treadmill had no area to pull the plane back except for the wheels.
Given the high speeds, the treadmill would simply turn the wheels, but not actually move the plane back significantly, assuming the plane was moving forward from the engines.
I retract my statement about it not working. The plane would take off.
|
On February 21 2009 12:58 micronesia wrote: Let me propose an alternate #1 perhaps...
#1b: A plane is trying to take off. The speed that the plane normally travels to take off is 500 miles per hour. There is a steady 500 mph headwind. Will the plane be able to take off even though it is initially stationary in the horizontal direction? it seems like the plane should just move vertically, since the way the wings are designed causes higher pressure below the wing, forcing the plane up. but since the plane isnt continuing in a forward motion, the plane will only stay in the air as long as there is a 500 mph wind. and the plane wont move forward or backward either, only up or down (assuming the 500mph wind doesnt push the plane).
|
On February 21 2009 13:18 micronesia wrote:Show nested quote +On February 21 2009 13:17 BanZu wrote:On February 21 2009 13:13 micronesia wrote:On February 21 2009 13:02 BanZu wrote:On February 21 2009 12:55 micronesia wrote:On February 21 2009 12:12 BanZu wrote: #1
An airplane is on a treadmill and they move in opposite directions. When the airplane's engines are running at full power the airplane's speed is the same as the treadmill's speed. Will the airplane be able to take off? Or will it simply stay in place? This doesn't make sense to me. The plane's motion is dictated by the engines... the wheels have nothing to do with it... if the engines are running full blast... the plane will move at the same speed relative to the air, regardless of if the ground is moving backwards or not. I thought that if an engine was running at full power it still isn't enough to lift the airplane. Therefore the plane could only move forward on it's wheels like a car. And since it's running at the same speed as the treadmill it stays in the same place relative to the treadmill/Earth, which means there's no airflow under the wings to lift it up. ??? I don't totally understand your confusion, but let me point out that a car uses engine power to turn wheels... and that is what makes the car go forward. Unlike a car, a plane uses engines to pull air through them and propel the plane forwards. Yea, but I thought that the wind pulled by the engine itself wasn't enough. Is it? If you think the plane applies a torque the wheels, which helps to accelerate the plane, then you are not correct. No, I know that's not how a plane works. So what you're saying is that if a giant clamp was holding a plane in mid-air and only let go when the engines were at full power the plane would automatically be able to fly because there's enough air flow under the wings?
|
|
|
|