On February 18 2009 13:06 Lurker wrote:
/unburrow
/unburrow
hahahahaha
Blogs > Shiverfish |
LosingID8
CA10824 Posts
On February 18 2009 13:06 Lurker wrote: /unburrow hahahahaha | ||
KOFgokuon
United States14886 Posts
welcome | ||
AttackZerg
United States7453 Posts
Good to meet ya! | ||
ruXxar
Norway5668 Posts
| ||
theonemephisto
United States409 Posts
I mean, what? | ||
b3h47pte
United States1317 Posts
On February 18 2009 19:58 CharlieMurphy wrote: Do i want to even know what a shiverfish is? There's a silverfish but no shiverfish | ||
kawoq
Guatemala357 Posts
I am coming out of the lurkering phase I had so I feel emphaty for you =P... see you around. | ||
Shiverfish
Canada95 Posts
On February 18 2009 14:24 Etherone wrote: I understand the notion, and welcome you wholeheartedly to TL posting. All thoughts are a contribution to this society ( yes even trolls) and you have now entered a symbiotic relationship with us, but fret not, as evolution has shown us a relationship of mutual benefit is more often than not a more successful one than a parasitic relationship. I too am adept to the line of thinking that you adhere to, in which you do not reread posts before emitting them. i gained this habit in the 4th grade in the realization that it transmits the message I want more effectively than if i had proof read my writing. I, as you can all tell, give a huge emphasis on originality, i prefer my posts speak my emotions along with my messages as o posed to a robotic informative manner, as such i tend to rant.. i do not have the editing stigma though. And will edit mainly due to blatant misspellings, or to add post scripts. One rule of editing i have is that, when it is done i do nothing to manipulate the idea presented in the original post ( yes even if I realize i made a glaring mistake I.E the discussion about proposition 8 where i thought ( wrongly so) that INcontrol was defending a point of view opposite to mine, and i proceeded to introduce a line of questioning which would have made him contradict himself, had i read his post correctly but alas i didn't.) /end rant Edit: changed so to do ( it's in bold (this is also one of the flaws of not proof reading)) One of the things I find very cool about the internet is that it enables us to connect with people out there who actually understand exactly some of the things I am thinking. It is certainly encouraging to know we are not alone. I had a very stong sense of this feeling on TL a while back. It was a post talking about what kind of ideal dream home/environment we would want to live in. Someone mentioned living in a castle on a snowy mountain. I immediately knew that this person understood exactly many of the sentiments I had. | ||
stack
Canada348 Posts
On February 21 2009 12:43 Shiverfish wrote: Thanks for the warm welcome. I didn't even realize how much I might appreciate having an impact on what others think, or to evoke responses intended for me. Show nested quote + On February 18 2009 14:24 Etherone wrote: I understand the notion, and welcome you wholeheartedly to TL posting. All thoughts are a contribution to this society ( yes even trolls) and you have now entered a symbiotic relationship with us, but fret not, as evolution has shown us a relationship of mutual benefit is more often than not a more successful one than a parasitic relationship. I too am adept to the line of thinking that you adhere to, in which you do not reread posts before emitting them. i gained this habit in the 4th grade in the realization that it transmits the message I want more effectively than if i had proof read my writing. I, as you can all tell, give a huge emphasis on originality, i prefer my posts speak my emotions along with my messages as o posed to a robotic informative manner, as such i tend to rant.. i do not have the editing stigma though. And will edit mainly due to blatant misspellings, or to add post scripts. One rule of editing i have is that, when it is done i do nothing to manipulate the idea presented in the original post ( yes even if I realize i made a glaring mistake I.E the discussion about proposition 8 where i thought ( wrongly so) that INcontrol was defending a point of view opposite to mine, and i proceeded to introduce a line of questioning which would have made him contradict himself, had i read his post correctly but alas i didn't.) /end rant Edit: changed so to do ( it's in bold (this is also one of the flaws of not proof reading)) One of the things I find very cool about the internet is that it enables us to connect with people out there who actually understand exactly some of the things I am thinking. It is certainly encouraging to know we are not alone. I had a very stong sense of this feeling on TL a while back. It was a post talking about what kind of ideal dream home/environment we would want to live in. Someone mentioned living in a castle on a snowy mountain. I immediately knew that this person understood exactly many of the sentiments I had. I shared the same sentiment until I realized that the KKK as well as other extremist groups used the internet to organize themselves. | ||
EvilTeletubby
Baltimore, USA22245 Posts
| ||
29 fps
United States5718 Posts
| ||
ilovezil
United States4143 Posts
| ||
Physician
United States4146 Posts
| ||
| ||
PiGosaur Monday
Weekly #8
[ Submit Event ] |
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 Counter-Strike Other Games Organizations
StarCraft 2 • Hupsaiya 51 StarCraft: Brood War• gosughost_ 19 • IndyKCrew • sooper7s • intothetv • Kozan • AfreecaTV YouTube • LaughNgamezSOOP • Laughngamez YouTube • Migwel League of Legends |
OlimoLeague
StarCraft2.fi
StarCraft2.fi
The PondCast
StarCraft2.fi
|
|