On June 14 2023 05:31 raynpelikoneet wrote: I mean like especially TTT's last game D2 was really amazing, he considers new evidence and comes to very reasonable and correct conclusions. This game is like he downgraded himself like 50 levels.
Why though ? Do you have the information to be the judge of that ?
Last game was good, but he also overperformed my expectations that game.
On June 14 2023 08:03 Vayoletta wrote: Like, DP, if rayn, Slam and Vivax all came into the thread with the worldview that you’d fit well as my scumpartner? What would you instinctively do?
On June 14 2023 08:18 Chezinu wrote: Reminder, statistically speaking, I'm more likely to be one role than another. What if we assumed most people were the statistically more likely role?
On June 14 2023 08:03 Vayoletta wrote: Like, DP, if rayn, Slam and Vivax all came into the thread with the worldview that you’d fit well as my scumpartner? What would you instinctively do?
On June 14 2023 08:03 Vayoletta wrote: Like, DP, if rayn, Slam and Vivax all came into the thread with the worldview that you’d fit well as my scumpartner? What would you instinctively do?
Call them idiots probably.
On June 13 2023 08:53 TankTopTiger wrote: Re: Vayoletta+TTT I'm against policy lynching. This was a policy lynch. I've given my reasons and I think it's genuinely absurd to suspect someone for not wanting a policy lynch.
TTT’s reaction was not to even contest the pairing (note that he does not say anything about pairings and alingments) but to reduce the argument to be about policy lunching.
He’s not saying that I should be eliminated over him here even though he has said he suspects me.
It’s like TTT found the way to contest the pairing where he needs to say the least about me.
On June 14 2023 08:03 Vayoletta wrote: Like, DP, if rayn, Slam and Vivax all came into the thread with the worldview that you’d fit well as my scumpartner? What would you instinctively do?
On June 13 2023 08:53 TankTopTiger wrote: Re: Vayoletta+TTT I'm against policy lynching. This was a policy lynch. I've given my reasons and I think it's genuinely absurd to suspect someone for not wanting a policy lynch.
TTT’s reaction was not to even contest the pairing (note that he does not say anything about pairings and alingments) but to reduce the argument to be about policy lunching.
He’s not saying that I should be eliminated over him here even though he has said he suspects me.
It’s like TTT found the way to contest the pairing where he needs to say the least about me.
Or he literally only didn't vote for you over DMB because of his views on policy.
I don't even know why I'm defending him here, I literally think it possible he is mafia.
On June 14 2023 08:03 Vayoletta wrote: Like, DP, if rayn, Slam and Vivax all came into the thread with the worldview that you’d fit well as my scumpartner? What would you instinctively do?
Call them idiots probably.
On June 13 2023 08:53 TankTopTiger wrote: Re: Vayoletta+TTT I'm against policy lynching. This was a policy lynch. I've given my reasons and I think it's genuinely absurd to suspect someone for not wanting a policy lynch.
TTT’s reaction was not to even contest the pairing (note that he does not say anything about pairings and alingments) but to reduce the argument to be about policy lunching.
He’s not saying that I should be eliminated over him here even though he has said he suspects me.
It’s like TTT found the way to contest the pairing where he needs to say the least about me.
Or he literally only didn't vote for you over DMB because of his views on policy.
I don't even know why I'm defending him here, I literally think it possible he is mafia.
I just don't want to lynch him this phase.
Whether or not he did not vote me for his view on policy, the reaction here is lacking towny vibes. It’s not about the reason, but about his handling of the pairing.
On June 14 2023 02:07 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: I'll tell ya what doesn't sit right with me. It's LightingStrike going afk the second pressure is off of him. If the last scum isn't Chez I might take another look at our "tracker"
I'm going to vote Vayo and not just because my survival depends on it. This is how I see them chronologically: 1) They lurk 2) I refuse to policy lynch them 3) They finally give reads after the lynch 4) The reads have very little justification. Spefically, Hap and Marv have poor jutsification. 5) I ask them to expand on their read 6) They ignore me 7) Other shit happens, I get overwhelmed and leave 8) They begin to suspect me based on me leaving, when in fact I am absent, after I tried to engage, and they ignored me.
On June 13 2023 13:34 DarthPunk wrote: I advocate a vig shot on chez btw. If we have one.
If we do, kill LS.
If there was a Vig they would of shot me already Night 1 so doubt we have a Vig at all if we do got a 3rd blue for some reason given last game we had only 2 blues there (Vig and Doctor).