Balance Update - April 28, 2020 - Page 2
Forum Index > SC2 General |
StabiloBoss20
313 Posts
| ||
Elentos
55454 Posts
I'd trade the queen nerf for a nydus change. | ||
Morbidius
Brazil3449 Posts
On April 29 2020 06:45 Elentos wrote: I also would have liked them to change the nydus in some way. In its current form it just feels awful because you get the feeling that the worm supply is never-ending and especially in conjunction with swarm hosts it feels like the first time you mess up the game completely spirals out of control with basically no hope of recovery. Swarm host is fine, but its just a painful unit to deal with. Its made to make your death painful and slow. | ||
Elentos
55454 Posts
On April 29 2020 06:47 Morbidius wrote: Swarm host is fine, but its just a painful unit to deal with. Its made to make your death painful and slow. That's why I want to see the nydus changed. I think SH without nydus aren't game breaking but the combination is just no fun to watch or play against. | ||
ZigguratOfUr
Iraq16955 Posts
Well at least Blizz is talking to us again. | ||
Vindicare605
United States15749 Posts
On April 29 2020 06:58 ZigguratOfUr wrote: Zerg is probably still quite favored in ZvP with these changes, but will also get absolutely slaughtered in ZvT. And the widow mine change just makes TvP more miserable and revolving around Terran ending it early. Well at least Blizz is talking to us again. I fail to see how after Protoss gets a significant late game buff in the High Templar and the Queen got nerfed which is a significant nerf for the entire game in addition to the Baneling nerf, that Protoss is still complaining. These are the biggest changes I've seen for a single match up in a LONG time. The fact people are saying "it's not enough" without testing them is frankly laughable. | ||
SC-Shield
Bulgaria768 Posts
On April 29 2020 06:58 ZigguratOfUr wrote: Zerg is probably still quite favored in ZvP with these changes, but will also get absolutely slaughtered in ZvT. And the widow mine change just makes TvP more miserable and revolving around Terran ending it early. Well at least Blizz is talking to us again. How is it going to make PvT more difficult if you open robo first? | ||
Zaros
United Kingdom3673 Posts
| ||
blooblooblahblah
Australia4163 Posts
Really like the queen and bane changes. The bane change is huge and I think that might actually tip the scales for once since I feel like Terran will finally be able to hold their fourth easier. But even if that's the case, I think we'd all rather that they address the matchup with other tools and keep the baneling in its nerfed state. I'm kind of skeptical about the battery overcharge but it's so hard to predict its strength, just based on numbers alone. I'm also wondering how strong the visual indication is, is it something the opponent can recognise really quickly and snipe off? | ||
TelecoM
United States10583 Posts
| ||
Rubicant1
115 Posts
Also good luck to ladder players defending mines, haha. Seems odd how Blizzard does these sweeping changes all at once, instead of incremental tweaks. | ||
Scarlett`
Canada2366 Posts
| ||
ZigguratOfUr
Iraq16955 Posts
On April 29 2020 07:04 Vindicare605 wrote: I fail to see how after Protoss gets a significant late game buff in the High Templar and the Queen got nerfed which is a significant nerf for the entire game in addition to the Baneling nerf, that Protoss is still complaining. These are the biggest changes I've seen for a single match up in a LONG time. The fact people are saying "it's not enough" without testing them is frankly laughable. I think you underestimate how deep in a hole Protoss is in ZvP. Infested terrans got removed leading people to think skytoss is viable? Oh it turns out zerg can still deal with it very easily. Nydus/Swarmhost looks crushing against Protoss each time we see it (and is mostly untouched by this patch), and yet it doesn't get played that often since ling/bane/ravager can overrun Protoss with less effort currently. I do think the changes to creep tumors/baneling and queens are significant. But also that terran is so much better placed to exploit them currently--to the point that I'm not sure how Blizzard can balance both ZvP and ZvT. | ||
stilt
France2633 Posts
On April 29 2020 07:07 Zaros wrote: Seems there is also a stealth buff to batteries which lets more than one battery heal a unit simultaneously https://twitter.com/i/status/1255246884597268489 It cannot be intended... It looks ridiculous | ||
struct__
14 Posts
On April 29 2020 07:26 Scarlett` wrote: Time to become a streamer )) finally. | ||
vyzion
306 Posts
| ||
Haku
Germany545 Posts
On April 29 2020 06:20 Fango wrote: Queen -1 range, baneling -5 hp, widow mines invis again. HotS TvZ is back? Don't think so because Thors delete Mutas (they did not back then) and probably some other changes i don't have in mind right now^^ Would love to have that Matchup back though. | ||
mishimaBeef
Canada2259 Posts
unless you get extremely creative, you will not be able to offensively Battery Overcharge rush your opponents. translation: unless you're clowning so hard and proxy a nexus in range | ||
blooblooblahblah
Australia4163 Posts
On April 29 2020 08:18 mishimaBeef wrote: translation: unless you're clowning so hard and proxy a nexus in range Can't wait to see sOs use his proxy nexus to superpower a shield battery in the opponent's mineral line | ||
seemsgood
5527 Posts
oracle buff feels like a nerf tho | ||
| ||