On March 12 2020 16:48 tilupeza wrote:
will all major sporting events in the world be canceled?
will all major sporting events in the world be canceled?
No. Premier League will keep playing. So does Bundesliga
Forum Index > General Forum |
Harris1st
Germany6162 Posts
March 12 2020 09:58 GMT
#15181
On March 12 2020 16:48 tilupeza wrote: will all major sporting events in the world be canceled? No. Premier League will keep playing. So does Bundesliga | ||
Velr
Switzerland10419 Posts
March 12 2020 10:03 GMT
#15182
| ||
IgnE
United States7681 Posts
March 12 2020 13:38 GMT
#15183
On March 12 2020 16:43 Acrofales wrote: Show nested quote + On March 12 2020 15:22 Harris1st wrote: On March 12 2020 03:08 Starlightsun wrote: Is there anything you can do after ingesting harmful bacteria? We ate some enoki mushrooms for dinner and on that very same day there was CDC recall due to listeria. FML You could make it go through faster with some laxative before it gets fully digested. Probably not the solution you are looking for The actual advice here should be: go to the emergency room. Or the earlier advice of phoning the CDC first and asking them what to do. Don't just take laxatives, which seem like speeding it out of the wrong orifice anyway: an emetic would be the better option. But medics in the emergency room can no doubt make better decisions than the internet! why would you go to the emergency room with no symptoms and no assurances that anything you ate was even infected? | ||
Simberto
Germany11032 Posts
March 12 2020 13:59 GMT
#15184
| ||
Starlightsun
United States1405 Posts
March 12 2020 18:25 GMT
#15185
| ||
Sent.
Poland8968 Posts
March 27 2020 19:39 GMT
#15186
https://www.reddit.com/r/MapPorn/comments/8vriuq/share_of_people_aged_2534_living_with_parents_in/ I remembered that lots of Italians live in multigenerational homes, and thought elders in the north might be safer than their southern peers because they're less exposed to mobile young people who should be more likely to catch the virus. A closer look at the map linked above shows my idea is weak because countries like Greece, Bulgaria and Poland are doing relatively fine. During my research I stumbled onto this map: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/images/a/ac/Share_of_young_people_(aged_16-29_years)_living_with_their_parents,_2018_(%)-fig01.png And it's this graph that brought me here to ask my stupid question. Why are young women more likely to move out of their homes than young men? | ||
Uldridge
Belgium4255 Posts
March 27 2020 19:51 GMT
#15187
Part of it is biological (innate desire to care for children yourself -- because you've grown a baby in your belly for 9 months). Part of it is societal -- girls are supposed to be good mannered, tidy, ... because that's not lady-like. I guess it's more and more an obsolete way of thinking (gender roles in general), but these good ol' Judeo-Christian values will still persist for quite a while before they're completely wiped. The merit of certain Judeo-Christian values is a completely different discussion obviously. | ||
Simberto
Germany11032 Posts
March 27 2020 19:53 GMT
#15188
Maybe women tend to be the younger partner in romantic relationships, especially for the first major relationship? I think one of the classical reasons to move out is that you are marrying. If women marry at a younger age on average, that could be a factor. If there is mandatory military service, that tends to delay the whole life of the man by 1-2 years, and thus might also delay having a large enough income to afford your own place. Maybe men still pursue jobs which require more education on average? Once again, the longer you spend on education, the later you have enough income to afford your own place. | ||
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
March 27 2020 20:06 GMT
#15189
| ||
KwarK
United States40785 Posts
March 27 2020 20:21 GMT
#15190
On March 28 2020 04:51 Uldridge wrote: Men are children for a looooooooooong time (40 is where most of them become truly responsible). It takes them generally years more than women (a lot are deeply responsible already in childhood) to develop the same amount of responsibility. Part of it is biological (innate desire to care for children yourself -- because you've grown a baby in your belly for 9 months). Part of it is societal -- girls are supposed to be good mannered, tidy, ... because that's not lady-like. I guess it's more and more an obsolete way of thinking (gender roles in general), but these good ol' Judeo-Christian values will still persist for quite a while before they're completely wiped. The merit of certain Judeo-Christian values is a completely different discussion obviously. Citation needed. | ||
Uldridge
Belgium4255 Posts
March 27 2020 20:28 GMT
#15191
On March 28 2020 05:21 KwarK wrote: Show nested quote + On March 28 2020 04:51 Uldridge wrote: Men are children for a looooooooooong time (40 is where most of them become truly responsible). It takes them generally years more than women (a lot are deeply responsible already in childhood) to develop the same amount of responsibility. Part of it is biological (innate desire to care for children yourself -- because you've grown a baby in your belly for 9 months). Part of it is societal -- girls are supposed to be good mannered, tidy, ... because that's not lady-like. I guess it's more and more an obsolete way of thinking (gender roles in general), but these good ol' Judeo-Christian values will still persist for quite a while before they're completely wiped. The merit of certain Judeo-Christian values is a completely different discussion obviously. Citation needed. I know there's a citation needed here. Definitely fully anecdotal/train of thought. But men are pigs and children 100% FACT. | ||
Yurie
11536 Posts
March 28 2020 11:55 GMT
#15192
On March 28 2020 05:06 JimmiC wrote: I would check to see average age of women getting married compared to men. I would presume women marry at younger ages often to older men and perhaps people don't move out until they are married. Age when getting your first child is probably getting more relevant over time. At least here at lot of people never marry any longer. No tax breaks for being married is probably a big reason. | ||
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
March 28 2020 13:22 GMT
#15193
On March 28 2020 20:55 Yurie wrote: Show nested quote + On March 28 2020 05:06 JimmiC wrote: I would check to see average age of women getting married compared to men. I would presume women marry at younger ages often to older men and perhaps people don't move out until they are married. Age when getting your first child is probably getting more relevant over time. At least here at lot of people never marry any longer. No tax breaks for being married is probably a big reason. Good point, it would be interesting to look up some of these stats and see if they are close to the move out age. | ||
GreenHorizons
United States21793 Posts
March 30 2020 13:33 GMT
#15194
am I right? Anyone know another country that would have a service like tax preparation advertised in this way? | ||
naughtDE
158 Posts
March 30 2020 13:49 GMT
#15195
Then there are sayings like, not all men are geniuses, but all geniuses are men, since women in general outperform men in educational tasks (I think there was an icelandic study somewhere). If you combine this with access to cheaper credits for students, a high rate of unemployment in the youth, a bias for poor parents (i.e. the majority) to favour their daughters when investing into their children https://www.jstor.org/stable/3598271?seq=1 ... and I could image young women are more willing to considered flat-sharing than young men, but I don't have a statistic for that. Plus the things mentioned above of older men and younger women, I think you find your answer. | ||
sedohonu
United States1 Post
March 31 2020 10:40 GMT
#15196
| ||
domane
Canada1606 Posts
April 02 2020 19:48 GMT
#15197
Let's say a smartphone is connected to both the internet and cellular data network (WIFI and 3G/4G/LTE) (1) Would a hacker be able to use the device's connections to covertly infect the smartphone with malware (ex: insert malicious code/files/software/program targeting the phone/texting apps or device information) that reports back SIM card information to the hacker? (2) Then use the information to create a clone of the SIM card that will function/pass/evade the cellular provider's security verification protocols? | ||
Oshuy
Netherlands529 Posts
April 03 2020 09:37 GMT
#15198
On April 03 2020 04:48 domane wrote: A couple of questions about remote smartphone hacking / SIM card cloning. Let's say a smartphone is connected to both the internet and cellular data network (WIFI and 3G/4G/LTE) (1) Would a hacker be able to use the device's connections to covertly infect the smartphone with malware (ex: insert malicious code/files/software/program targeting the phone/texting apps or device information) that reports back SIM card information to the hacker? (2) Then use the information to create a clone of the SIM card that will function/pass/evade the cellular provider's security verification protocols? (1) If there is a vulnerable application running on the smartphone or a flaw in the operating system known to the attacker, he may have an exploit to execute arbitrary code on the phone. Usually, it will be at application level, meaning it will be able to use the application's data or data available through the permissions set for that application. One example would be the MP4 sent to Jeff Bezos phone to install a malware through a vulnerability in WhatsApp. (although usually easier to get a user to install a malware than hacking into an existing app) (2) From the system, you can retrieve public information from the sim card through the sim's toolkit. A pure clone of the simcard still cannot be done since the keys used to authenticate to the provider are protected by the card itself and cannot be accessed. (attacks on a smartcard exist, but more of a lab job directly connecting to the card than a software hack) | ||
Sent.
Poland8968 Posts
April 11 2020 13:40 GMT
#15199
| ||
Simberto
Germany11032 Posts
April 12 2020 10:38 GMT
#15200
My thoughts so far: Probably nothing changes at the elemental level, as gravitational forces are neglectable there anyways. But (main sequence) stars of the same size should burn hotter and thus burn out quicker. Also, more black holes, because smaller stars can form a black hole now. I have no idea how that would influence other things, especially life. What else would an increased gravitational constant change? | ||
| ||
Next event in 19h 35m
[ Submit Event ] |
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Britney 36395 Dota 2Sea 9073 Calm 4516 Bisu 2021 Horang2 1425 ggaemo 947 BeSt 677 Mini 654 Shuttle 634 Light 490 [ Show more ] Counter-Strike Other Games hiko1935 Liquid`RaSZi1274 DeMusliM864 crisheroes586 Lowko391 ArmadaUGS313 NuckleDu140 XaKoH 119 Trikslyr67 KnowMe37 Organizations
StarCraft 2 • aXEnki StarCraft: Brood War• intothetv • Gussbus • Kozan • IndyKCrew • LaughNgamez Trovo • Laughngamez YouTube • Migwel • Poblha League of Legends Other Games |
Kung Fu Cup
H.4.0.S
OSC
GSL Code S
herO vs Reynor
soO vs GuMiho
OSC
World Team League
Korean StarCraft League
Replay Cast
World Team League
Chat StarLeague
[ Show More ] H.4.0.S
BSL
Chat StarLeague
Sparkling Tuna Cup
World Team League
BSL
ForJumy Cup
|
|