|
On March 20 2018 16:15 Mocsta wrote:Show nested quote +On March 20 2018 16:02 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Gonna look into it in 15mins when i am home, igot into middle of something rn. In the meantime any thoughts on my post 291? Last post for a bit. Need to reserve some for influx of people waking up. In short, I find #291 to be a serious post. I think it demonstrates a lack of care to read the thread. Does this make Ex0_ mafia or town... well, whilst both parties do this, I think town is more likely than mafia to NOT read closely early game; and mafia is more likely than town to do this as the game progresses and becomes a waiting match.
Yup.
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
I caught up.
I am going to change my opinion of Mocsta, his first posts were pretty pointless but he has added some decent content. He made a good point about exo just after I had posted it and went ot bed so we were thinking on the same lines, his post about noobking appearing just to defend and I really like the scum read on ticktock.
For ticktock I have a few questions. You accused me of jumping on everything can you say what I jumped on exactly and which of those were bad reads? as for ticktock making his push on exo. It has the feeling of trying to get on a bandwagon, like there were some good things against exo but it was like he jumped on a post and tried to paint it scummy when it wasn't actually that bad.
For exo himself, I do have a scum lean I guess I would want to know if his read on me has changed. Some of exo's posts seem plausible like his defence of his moosy read was possibly ok..im rambling on this.
I want to read the noobkin, conversion, rayn hf stuff again because it feels important and I want to understand it, posting this to get my ideas out.
Oh and I don't like Slam but can't say anymoer than "feels"
want to ask vivax on how he feels about ticktock and NK
|
On March 20 2018 17:00 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On March 20 2018 11:55 n00bKing wrote:On March 20 2018 11:44 Tictock wrote:On March 20 2018 11:38 ExO_ wrote:On March 20 2018 11:22 Vivax wrote:On March 20 2018 11:12 ExO_ wrote:On March 20 2018 11:04 Vivax wrote:On March 20 2018 10:57 ExO_ wrote:On March 20 2018 08:44 KelsierSC wrote:On March 20 2018 08:41 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Now you got me even more confused. point 1. Your question of holyflares "read" on me is the best thing so far. point 2. mocsta is making bad "fucktard" posts. Rayn never made that second point did he? You’re putting words in his mouth and then agreeing with them....what I dont understand is why. I don’t like it — Scum reading Kelsier. Though I’ll admit I’m not a fan of HF’s posts...I think HF is either VT or scum — not sure which. ????????? What a contrived way of saying nothing Either he’s VT and doesn’t care enough to try, or scum and not saying much And how does that further your goal of finding scum if that can be said for anyone else in the game? IE he's town or mafia. That much is obvious. Anyone is town or mafia. The addendums you just put there don't change the fact that it's a completely pointless statement to make? He’s VT or mafia — not blue. That’s the distinction here First off, I have no idea how on earth you believe that you can tell if HF is a role or not based on his ~4 posts. Second, there is literally no reason why town should be concerned about someone being a role or not in the first few hours of the game. Third, even IF you did somehow have a god read about HF's role status you should realize it is only in Mafia's interest to point that out. ##Vote: ExoI just can't believe you actually have this "role read", and can be this bothered by Vivax pinging you to hard defend it as town. This is a super-terrible reason to vote against someone. It is only in Mafia's interest for a TOWN player to point it out. It's not really in Mafia's interest at all for Mafia to point it out. What is the Mafia motivation supposed to be, for making such an observation? Not really true. Mafia want to post anything they can under the guise of scum hunting. Posting that I'm not a role isn't helping mafia in ANY way, it doesn't further any kind of scum read since I'm vt or mafia and it's just a completely empty read with nothing said. Good scum read.
For one, saying you're not a power role does not fall "under the guise of scum hunting." Meanwhile, if you don't think saying you aren't a role helps Mafia in ANY way, then you must be completely disagreeing with what Ticktock said here?
|
On March 20 2018 16:38 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On March 20 2018 16:36 disformation wrote:
not sure what to about mocsta. I like that he is like looking at ppl that are not much talked about (tocktock).
but then both tocktock and ylk look like okayish to me, so I am not sure if he is just making stuff up to post. Can you please not do this....
What are you asking him not to do?
|
On March 20 2018 16:37 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On March 20 2018 16:15 Mocsta wrote:On March 20 2018 16:02 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Gonna look into it in 15mins when i am home, igot into middle of something rn. In the meantime any thoughts on my post 291? Last post for a bit. Need to reserve some for influx of people waking up. In short, I find #291 to be a serious post. I think it demonstrates a lack of care to read the thread. Does this make Ex0_ mafia or town... well, whilst both parties do this, I think town is more likely than mafia to NOT read closely early game; and mafia is more likely than town to do this as the game progresses and becomes a waiting match. I get what you are saying here but my problem is that the FIRST and pretty much the ONLY thing Exo focused on at that point in the game was the Kelsier "read" from Holyflare. I literally gave him the answer he was looking for and Kelsier commented on THAT post. Exo reads Kelsier's post but somehow he has managed to completely miss the post Kelsier is commenting on (aka my post) when it is pretty much the ONLY thing he has focused in the game so far. I find it quite hard to believe a townie picks up something they find interesting and then either: 1) completely forget it was interesting the next moment, or 2) completely "miss" the point made on the fact that he found interesting and even question the dude who basically points out the post again.
I’m pretty confused here. Kelsier made a comment your post was the beat in the game so far, and implied it was because you agreed mocsta was being a fucktard. You never said this.
Re-reading just now, he’s trying to claim these were two separate statements (your post was best, mocsta is a fucktard) but It didn’t read that way to me.
|
On March 20 2018 17:39 KelsierSC wrote:
I caught up.
I am going to change my opinion of Mocsta, his first posts were pretty pointless but he has added some decent content. He made a good point about exo just after I had posted it and went ot bed so we were thinking on the same lines, his post about noobking appearing just to defend and I really like the scum read on ticktock.
For ticktock I have a few questions. You accused me of jumping on everything can you say what I jumped on exactly and which of those were bad reads? as for ticktock making his push on exo. It has the feeling of trying to get on a bandwagon, like there were some good things against exo but it was like he jumped on a post and tried to paint it scummy when it wasn't actually that bad.
For exo himself, I do have a scum lean I guess I would want to know if his read on me has changed. Some of exo's posts seem plausible like his defence of his moosy read was possibly ok..im rambling on this.
I want to read the noobkin, conversion, rayn hf stuff again because it feels important and I want to understand it, posting this to get my ideas out.
Oh and I don't like Slam but can't say anymoer than "feels"
want to ask vivax on how he feels about ticktock and NK
Before I answer whether or not my read on you has changed — can you tell me why this is such a determining factor for figuring out your read on me?
|
On March 20 2018 17:47 ExO_ wrote:Show nested quote +On March 20 2018 16:37 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 20 2018 16:15 Mocsta wrote:On March 20 2018 16:02 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Gonna look into it in 15mins when i am home, igot into middle of something rn. In the meantime any thoughts on my post 291? Last post for a bit. Need to reserve some for influx of people waking up. In short, I find #291 to be a serious post. I think it demonstrates a lack of care to read the thread. Does this make Ex0_ mafia or town... well, whilst both parties do this, I think town is more likely than mafia to NOT read closely early game; and mafia is more likely than town to do this as the game progresses and becomes a waiting match. I get what you are saying here but my problem is that the FIRST and pretty much the ONLY thing Exo focused on at that point in the game was the Kelsier "read" from Holyflare. I literally gave him the answer he was looking for and Kelsier commented on THAT post. Exo reads Kelsier's post but somehow he has managed to completely miss the post Kelsier is commenting on (aka my post) when it is pretty much the ONLY thing he has focused in the game so far. I find it quite hard to believe a townie picks up something they find interesting and then either: 1) completely forget it was interesting the next moment, or 2) completely "miss" the point made on the fact that he found interesting and even question the dude who basically points out the post again. I’m pretty confused here. Kelsier made a comment your post was the beat in the game so far, and implied it was because you agreed mocsta was being a fucktard. You never said this. Re-reading just now, he’s trying to claim these were two separate statements (your post was best, mocsta is a fucktard) but It didn’t read that way to me.
His "best point" was a comment to me telling Holyflare's Kelsier read is completely crap, something you were interested in earlier but somehow managed to miss this, twice.......
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On March 20 2018 17:51 ExO_ wrote:Show nested quote +On March 20 2018 17:39 KelsierSC wrote:
I caught up.
I am going to change my opinion of Mocsta, his first posts were pretty pointless but he has added some decent content. He made a good point about exo just after I had posted it and went ot bed so we were thinking on the same lines, his post about noobking appearing just to defend and I really like the scum read on ticktock.
For ticktock I have a few questions. You accused me of jumping on everything can you say what I jumped on exactly and which of those were bad reads? as for ticktock making his push on exo. It has the feeling of trying to get on a bandwagon, like there were some good things against exo but it was like he jumped on a post and tried to paint it scummy when it wasn't actually that bad.
For exo himself, I do have a scum lean I guess I would want to know if his read on me has changed. Some of exo's posts seem plausible like his defence of his moosy read was possibly ok..im rambling on this.
I want to read the noobkin, conversion, rayn hf stuff again because it feels important and I want to understand it, posting this to get my ideas out.
Oh and I don't like Slam but can't say anymoer than "feels"
want to ask vivax on how he feels about ticktock and NK Before I answer whether or not my read on you has changed — can you tell me why this is such a determining factor for figuring out your read on me?
Someone makes a read based on not reading the thread/bad comprehension, I am interested in the direction they take after having things explained to them again.
|
On March 20 2018 08:35 KelsierSC wrote:
I think rayn has the best point so far by a long way,
mocsta has posted dumb shit and is definitely failing the fucktard test
This is his post — by the time he posted this you had said nothing about HF, or am I missing something here?
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On March 20 2018 17:54 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On March 20 2018 17:47 ExO_ wrote:On March 20 2018 16:37 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 20 2018 16:15 Mocsta wrote:On March 20 2018 16:02 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Gonna look into it in 15mins when i am home, igot into middle of something rn. In the meantime any thoughts on my post 291? Last post for a bit. Need to reserve some for influx of people waking up. In short, I find #291 to be a serious post. I think it demonstrates a lack of care to read the thread. Does this make Ex0_ mafia or town... well, whilst both parties do this, I think town is more likely than mafia to NOT read closely early game; and mafia is more likely than town to do this as the game progresses and becomes a waiting match. I get what you are saying here but my problem is that the FIRST and pretty much the ONLY thing Exo focused on at that point in the game was the Kelsier "read" from Holyflare. I literally gave him the answer he was looking for and Kelsier commented on THAT post. Exo reads Kelsier's post but somehow he has managed to completely miss the post Kelsier is commenting on (aka my post) when it is pretty much the ONLY thing he has focused in the game so far. I find it quite hard to believe a townie picks up something they find interesting and then either: 1) completely forget it was interesting the next moment, or 2) completely "miss" the point made on the fact that he found interesting and even question the dude who basically points out the post again. I’m pretty confused here. Kelsier made a comment your post was the beat in the game so far, and implied it was because you agreed mocsta was being a fucktard. You never said this. Re-reading just now, he’s trying to claim these were two separate statements (your post was best, mocsta is a fucktard) but It didn’t read that way to me. His "best point" was a comment to me telling Holyflare's Kelsier read is completely crap, something you were interested in earlier but somehow managed to miss this, twice.......
haha this is such a good point
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On March 20 2018 17:42 n00bKing wrote:Show nested quote +On March 20 2018 17:00 Holyflare wrote:On March 20 2018 11:55 n00bKing wrote:On March 20 2018 11:44 Tictock wrote:On March 20 2018 11:38 ExO_ wrote:On March 20 2018 11:22 Vivax wrote:On March 20 2018 11:12 ExO_ wrote:On March 20 2018 11:04 Vivax wrote:On March 20 2018 10:57 ExO_ wrote:On March 20 2018 08:44 KelsierSC wrote:
[quote]
point 1. Your question of holyflares "read" on me is the best thing so far.
point 2. mocsta is making bad "fucktard" posts.
Rayn never made that second point did he? You’re putting words in his mouth and then agreeing with them....what I dont understand is why. I don’t like it — Scum reading Kelsier. Though I’ll admit I’m not a fan of HF’s posts...I think HF is either VT or scum — not sure which. ????????? What a contrived way of saying nothing Either he’s VT and doesn’t care enough to try, or scum and not saying much And how does that further your goal of finding scum if that can be said for anyone else in the game? IE he's town or mafia. That much is obvious. Anyone is town or mafia. The addendums you just put there don't change the fact that it's a completely pointless statement to make? He’s VT or mafia — not blue. That’s the distinction here First off, I have no idea how on earth you believe that you can tell if HF is a role or not based on his ~4 posts. Second, there is literally no reason why town should be concerned about someone being a role or not in the first few hours of the game. Third, even IF you did somehow have a god read about HF's role status you should realize it is only in Mafia's interest to point that out. ##Vote: ExoI just can't believe you actually have this "role read", and can be this bothered by Vivax pinging you to hard defend it as town. This is a super-terrible reason to vote against someone. It is only in Mafia's interest for a TOWN player to point it out. It's not really in Mafia's interest at all for Mafia to point it out. What is the Mafia motivation supposed to be, for making such an observation? Not really true. Mafia want to post anything they can under the guise of scum hunting. Posting that I'm not a role isn't helping mafia in ANY way, it doesn't further any kind of scum read since I'm vt or mafia and it's just a completely empty read with nothing said. Good scum read. For one, saying you're not a power role does not fall "under the guise of scum hunting." Meanwhile, if you don't think saying you aren't a role helps Mafia in ANY way, then you must be completely disagreeing with what Ticktock said here?
I don't think it helps mafia if he's town because he can't know what I am. It's pointless. It helps mafia if he's mafia because he uses this pointless post to try and fit in with scum hunting.
I don't think town makes a pointless post to say nothing like that simply put. You're not gonna sway me by just saying the opposite thing everyone says.
Even last game when someone said I'm mafia medic or town medic had some thought process behind it.
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On March 20 2018 08:23 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On March 20 2018 08:21 Holyflare wrote:On March 20 2018 08:17 ExO_ wrote:On March 20 2018 08:15 Holyflare wrote:
I scum read kelsier for actually giving a shit Is this joke or serious? if serious, can you give me some context? Bit of both really. Already at double the filter length that he gets as town now. Not true though.
On March 20 2018 08:29 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On March 20 2018 08:26 Holyflare wrote:On March 20 2018 08:23 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 20 2018 08:21 Holyflare wrote:On March 20 2018 08:17 ExO_ wrote:On March 20 2018 08:15 Holyflare wrote:
I scum read kelsier for actually giving a shit Is this joke or serious? if serious, can you give me some context? Bit of both really. Already at double the filter length that he gets as town now. Not true though. Fite me Normally i wouldn't bother but i don't wanna read pages of useless discussion when the game before the last one Kelsier had ~30 posts D1, managed to find 2 mafia in his 2 mafia reads, shot mafia on N1 and got shot on N1 so he is perfectly capable of trying and also playing well doing so. I don't know where you get what you're smoking since you played that game.
On March 20 2018 08:35 KelsierSC wrote:
I think rayn has the best point so far by a long way,
mocsta has posted dumb shit and is definitely failing the fucktard test
8:23, 8:29, 8:35...which way does time go?
all of this was proceeded by.
On March 20 2018 08:17 ExO_ wrote:Show nested quote +On March 20 2018 08:15 Holyflare wrote:
I scum read kelsier for actually giving a shit Is this joke or serious? if serious, can you give me some context?
are you even trying kid
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On March 20 2018 17:54 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On March 20 2018 17:47 ExO_ wrote:On March 20 2018 16:37 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 20 2018 16:15 Mocsta wrote:On March 20 2018 16:02 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Gonna look into it in 15mins when i am home, igot into middle of something rn. In the meantime any thoughts on my post 291? Last post for a bit. Need to reserve some for influx of people waking up. In short, I find #291 to be a serious post. I think it demonstrates a lack of care to read the thread. Does this make Ex0_ mafia or town... well, whilst both parties do this, I think town is more likely than mafia to NOT read closely early game; and mafia is more likely than town to do this as the game progresses and becomes a waiting match. I get what you are saying here but my problem is that the FIRST and pretty much the ONLY thing Exo focused on at that point in the game was the Kelsier "read" from Holyflare. I literally gave him the answer he was looking for and Kelsier commented on THAT post. Exo reads Kelsier's post but somehow he has managed to completely miss the post Kelsier is commenting on (aka my post) when it is pretty much the ONLY thing he has focused in the game so far. I find it quite hard to believe a townie picks up something they find interesting and then either: 1) completely forget it was interesting the next moment, or 2) completely "miss" the point made on the fact that he found interesting and even question the dude who basically points out the post again. I’m pretty confused here. Kelsier made a comment your post was the beat in the game so far, and implied it was because you agreed mocsta was being a fucktard. You never said this. Re-reading just now, he’s trying to claim these were two separate statements (your post was best, mocsta is a fucktard) but It didn’t read that way to me. His "best point" was a comment to me telling Holyflare's Kelsier read is completely crap, something you were interested in earlier but somehow managed to miss this, twice.......
I also thought he was referencing your mocsta point. You apparently did too because you said "what mocsta point"
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On March 20 2018 08:35 KelsierSC wrote:
I think rayn has the best point so far by a long way,
mocsta has posted dumb shit and is definitely failing the fucktard test
There's a giant comma. If it's a separate point I would at least expect a full stop.
-channels noobking-
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On March 20 2018 18:02 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On March 20 2018 17:54 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 20 2018 17:47 ExO_ wrote:On March 20 2018 16:37 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 20 2018 16:15 Mocsta wrote:On March 20 2018 16:02 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Gonna look into it in 15mins when i am home, igot into middle of something rn. In the meantime any thoughts on my post 291? Last post for a bit. Need to reserve some for influx of people waking up. In short, I find #291 to be a serious post. I think it demonstrates a lack of care to read the thread. Does this make Ex0_ mafia or town... well, whilst both parties do this, I think town is more likely than mafia to NOT read closely early game; and mafia is more likely than town to do this as the game progresses and becomes a waiting match. I get what you are saying here but my problem is that the FIRST and pretty much the ONLY thing Exo focused on at that point in the game was the Kelsier "read" from Holyflare. I literally gave him the answer he was looking for and Kelsier commented on THAT post. Exo reads Kelsier's post but somehow he has managed to completely miss the post Kelsier is commenting on (aka my post) when it is pretty much the ONLY thing he has focused in the game so far. I find it quite hard to believe a townie picks up something they find interesting and then either: 1) completely forget it was interesting the next moment, or 2) completely "miss" the point made on the fact that he found interesting and even question the dude who basically points out the post again. I’m pretty confused here. Kelsier made a comment your post was the beat in the game so far, and implied it was because you agreed mocsta was being a fucktard. You never said this. Re-reading just now, he’s trying to claim these were two separate statements (your post was best, mocsta is a fucktard) but It didn’t read that way to me. His "best point" was a comment to me telling Holyflare's Kelsier read is completely crap, something you were interested in earlier but somehow managed to miss this, twice....... I also thought he was referencing your mocsta point. You apparently did too because you said "what mocsta point"
Which I clarified about 2 minutes later.
|
On March 20 2018 18:02 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On March 20 2018 17:54 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 20 2018 17:47 ExO_ wrote:On March 20 2018 16:37 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 20 2018 16:15 Mocsta wrote:On March 20 2018 16:02 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Gonna look into it in 15mins when i am home, igot into middle of something rn. In the meantime any thoughts on my post 291? Last post for a bit. Need to reserve some for influx of people waking up. In short, I find #291 to be a serious post. I think it demonstrates a lack of care to read the thread. Does this make Ex0_ mafia or town... well, whilst both parties do this, I think town is more likely than mafia to NOT read closely early game; and mafia is more likely than town to do this as the game progresses and becomes a waiting match. I get what you are saying here but my problem is that the FIRST and pretty much the ONLY thing Exo focused on at that point in the game was the Kelsier "read" from Holyflare. I literally gave him the answer he was looking for and Kelsier commented on THAT post. Exo reads Kelsier's post but somehow he has managed to completely miss the post Kelsier is commenting on (aka my post) when it is pretty much the ONLY thing he has focused in the game so far. I find it quite hard to believe a townie picks up something they find interesting and then either: 1) completely forget it was interesting the next moment, or 2) completely "miss" the point made on the fact that he found interesting and even question the dude who basically points out the post again. I’m pretty confused here. Kelsier made a comment your post was the beat in the game so far, and implied it was because you agreed mocsta was being a fucktard. You never said this. Re-reading just now, he’s trying to claim these were two separate statements (your post was best, mocsta is a fucktard) but It didn’t read that way to me. His "best point" was a comment to me telling Holyflare's Kelsier read is completely crap, something you were interested in earlier but somehow managed to miss this, twice....... I also thought he was referencing your mocsta point. You apparently did too because you said "what mocsta point"
The thing is if he really cared about this he would go read my filter and maybe he missed my post on Kelsier earlier but there is no way he goes read my filter and misses it the second time around.
|
Okay I see now. Though the way your post read it did seem like you were trying to call mocsta bad but hide behind rayn for something he never said.
I have to re-evaluate my read on you with this in mind.
|
I also dont understand why someone refers to my Mocsta "point" because i never had one and clearly said so.
|
On March 20 2018 08:39 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On March 20 2018 08:35 KelsierSC wrote:
I think rayn has the best point so far by a long way,
mocsta has posted dumb shit and is definitely failing the fucktard test Am i missing something because i don't know what my point you are referring to is? I don't think anything Mocsta has posted makes him anything.
So if my point is not Mocsta, what could it be?
|
On March 20 2018 18:04 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On March 20 2018 18:02 Holyflare wrote:On March 20 2018 17:54 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 20 2018 17:47 ExO_ wrote:On March 20 2018 16:37 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 20 2018 16:15 Mocsta wrote:On March 20 2018 16:02 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Gonna look into it in 15mins when i am home, igot into middle of something rn. In the meantime any thoughts on my post 291? Last post for a bit. Need to reserve some for influx of people waking up. In short, I find #291 to be a serious post. I think it demonstrates a lack of care to read the thread. Does this make Ex0_ mafia or town... well, whilst both parties do this, I think town is more likely than mafia to NOT read closely early game; and mafia is more likely than town to do this as the game progresses and becomes a waiting match. I get what you are saying here but my problem is that the FIRST and pretty much the ONLY thing Exo focused on at that point in the game was the Kelsier "read" from Holyflare. I literally gave him the answer he was looking for and Kelsier commented on THAT post. Exo reads Kelsier's post but somehow he has managed to completely miss the post Kelsier is commenting on (aka my post) when it is pretty much the ONLY thing he has focused in the game so far. I find it quite hard to believe a townie picks up something they find interesting and then either: 1) completely forget it was interesting the next moment, or 2) completely "miss" the point made on the fact that he found interesting and even question the dude who basically points out the post again. I’m pretty confused here. Kelsier made a comment your post was the beat in the game so far, and implied it was because you agreed mocsta was being a fucktard. You never said this. Re-reading just now, he’s trying to claim these were two separate statements (your post was best, mocsta is a fucktard) but It didn’t read that way to me. His "best point" was a comment to me telling Holyflare's Kelsier read is completely crap, something you were interested in earlier but somehow managed to miss this, twice....... I also thought he was referencing your mocsta point. You apparently did too because you said "what mocsta point" The thing is if he really cared about this he would go read my filter and maybe he missed my post on Kelsier earlier but there is no way he goes read my filter and misses it the second time around.
I did reread your filter. However I didn’t make the connection here.
That being said, Kelsier, as of right now what’s your read on HF?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
