|
On July 14 2016 06:19 KelsierSC wrote: Probably Kush or snickers are good lynches at this point. I'm pretty happy sheeping my town reads for d1
To sheep Kruppe (lol): your reads on prpl, dc and damdred haven't changed at all?
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On July 14 2016 06:29 emperorchampion wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 06:19 KelsierSC wrote: Probably Kush or snickers are good lynches at this point. I'm pretty happy sheeping my town reads for d1 To sheep Kruppe (lol): your reads on prpl, dc and damdred haven't changed at all?
no
|
Is kush just a straight up policy lynch as well?
|
On July 14 2016 05:21 emperorchampion wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 04:46 Damdred wrote: Well scum read is probably to extreme you say at one point you don't know what to make of me, you don't mention me much. Ask a question to me that there isn't much follow-up to and then I'm in your no Lynch list why? I don't think that you're a good lynch candidate today since you've been pretty active. That's not to say that there are a lot of things that I don't like, especially your soft push of me all game. I think I would def look into it tomorrow though. What I would like to see now is for you, as one of the most experienced players in this game atm, to step up and make some calls and convince me that you aren't just sheeping vivax all game.
I don't think you know what soft pushing is.
I haven't been softly pushing you, I have made known to the thread a few times that I think you are scum. If I was soft pushing you it would be very hidden and I would be pushing suspicion on you without actually saying you are scum.
Neither am I sheeping vivax basically at all, I have my own thoughts and what I feel like is going on. It is documented in my filter.
|
@emperorchampion How do you feel about lynching this Snickers person?
|
Plynching snickers though isn't the worst idea. I was hoping he would show back up and do things.
|
Well I'm here will be on a laptop in 30
|
We have like an hour to go and still no majority, whether we lynch snickers isn't important or not.
Whats important is we have a lynch today. So if anyone has a strong lynch idea its important that its in thread so we can discuss it and move our votes if need be, but right now a plynch is what we have so we need to make it majority.
|
On July 14 2016 06:41 Damdred wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 05:21 emperorchampion wrote:On July 14 2016 04:46 Damdred wrote: Well scum read is probably to extreme you say at one point you don't know what to make of me, you don't mention me much. Ask a question to me that there isn't much follow-up to and then I'm in your no Lynch list why? I don't think that you're a good lynch candidate today since you've been pretty active. That's not to say that there are a lot of things that I don't like, especially your soft push of me all game. I think I would def look into it tomorrow though. What I would like to see now is for you, as one of the most experienced players in this game atm, to step up and make some calls and convince me that you aren't just sheeping vivax all game. I don't think you know what soft pushing is. I haven't been softly pushing you, I have made known to the thread a few times that I think you are scum. If I was soft pushing you it would be very hidden and I would be pushing suspicion on you without actually saying you are scum. Neither am I sheeping vivax basically at all, I have my own thoughts and what I feel like is going on. It is documented in my filter.
OK medium push then . Since yeah you've been vocal, but you haven't really done anything with it.
What's happening here + Show Spoiler +On July 13 2016 03:19 Damdred wrote:Show nested quote +On July 13 2016 03:13 Vivax wrote:On July 13 2016 03:09 LightningStrike wrote:On July 13 2016 03:03 Vivax wrote: LS how did you know I was town in the posts after you asked me if my vote on you was a scumclaim? I didn't call you town I just said I was going to ignore you. On July 13 2016 01:35 LightningStrike wrote: BTW I am mostly relaxed because Vivax is probably one of the worst players in terms of keeping the same reads over a period of time as he just changes his read every 5 mins. And you think this is a description of my scum play or my town play? Your taunts are clearly showing that you were thinking of me as town. I think vivax you can be town for today. It's interesting catch so far, though generally as I've said scum slips are kinda meh.
and here + Show Spoiler +On July 13 2016 07:36 Damdred wrote: I honestly don't know prp it's kinda frustrating, got any reads currently?
Also vivax I have talked about the reasons I have said ls bothers me, I've agreed with several of your points. I'm just not voting him atm and trying to evaluate others.
And it seems kinda moot atm
and here + Show Spoiler +On July 13 2016 08:21 Damdred wrote:Show nested quote +On July 13 2016 08:15 Vivax wrote:On July 12 2016 15:04 DCWasabi wrote:On July 12 2016 09:06 prplhz wrote:On July 12 2016 09:04 emperorchampion wrote:On July 12 2016 09:02 prplhz wrote: Who do I talk to to get someone lynched in this town? Just gotta muster up a big enough mob to get majority Yea but my problem is that I couldn't get someone lynched to save my life, I'd much rather someone else be the whip and do the brow beating. Usually I find a townie with a name but this game doesn't seem to have that. Wait a sec here, so this time all of the townies are no-names... How do you know who is a townie in this game? Is this a slip? This post shows he's reading and thinking between the lines so I'm willing to give DCW a D1 freepass. I like that we had the same thought process on that post.
then?
|
Deciding to town read Vivax,
Telling vivax that I have 100% given my reasons in thread for not liking LS before he complained about me not talking about why i didn't like LS
Commenting that I liked his thought process on a post that I had like an hour into d1 and posted about it before?
Cherry picking from my filter to try to make a montage of posts that seem to be sheeping someone when its just not the case is scummy. And I don't really see the point of it especially when context shows a different side of the story.
|
On July 14 2016 06:43 prplhz wrote: @emperorchampion How do you feel about lynching this Snickers person?
Personally I think that kush would be a better lynch since I didn't like his posts and I've found that snickers is straight up null so far. Like I would expect more from kush even from his low effort games.
kush > snickers > vorono >> no-lynch are my thoughts atm
I guess you meta'd snickers saying that he's active tho?
|
On July 14 2016 06:53 Damdred wrote: Deciding to town read Vivax,
Telling vivax that I have 100% given my reasons in thread for not liking LS before he complained about me not talking about why i didn't like LS
Commenting that I liked his thought process on a post that I had like an hour into d1 and posted about it before?
Cherry picking from my filter to try to make a montage of posts that seem to be sheeping someone when its just not the case is scummy. And I don't really see the point of it especially when context shows a different side of the story.
I guess I especially don't like the third one since it's such a nebulous reason for town reading someone to me
|
@Prp also I noticed your meta about snickers being more active as town as scum.
I checked his last scum game was like over 2 years ago. I don't think you can drag a useful meta out of that where he would be more active as town now.
How did you come to tis conclussion has he been scum somewhere I haven't seen?
|
On July 14 2016 06:56 emperorchampion wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 06:53 Damdred wrote: Deciding to town read Vivax,
Telling vivax that I have 100% given my reasons in thread for not liking LS before he complained about me not talking about why i didn't like LS
Commenting that I liked his thought process on a post that I had like an hour into d1 and posted about it before?
Cherry picking from my filter to try to make a montage of posts that seem to be sheeping someone when its just not the case is scummy. And I don't really see the point of it especially when context shows a different side of the story. I guess I especially don't like the third one since it's such a nebulous reason for town reading someone to me
Nebulous reasons when its firmly stated that he can be town read for actually reading peoples posts and bringing conclusions?
How in the hell is that nebulous?
Also thats quite hypocritical of you when your initial town read of prp was quite... forced to say the least
|
On July 14 2016 06:56 Damdred wrote: @Prp also I noticed your meta about snickers being more active as town as scum.
I checked his last scum game was like over 2 years ago. I don't think you can drag a useful meta out of that where he would be more active as town now.
How did you come to tis conclussion has he been scum somewhere I haven't seen? No, I just checked his database entry, didn't notice his last (and only?) scum game was 2 years ago.
|
On July 14 2016 06:58 Damdred wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 06:56 emperorchampion wrote:On July 14 2016 06:53 Damdred wrote: Deciding to town read Vivax,
Telling vivax that I have 100% given my reasons in thread for not liking LS before he complained about me not talking about why i didn't like LS
Commenting that I liked his thought process on a post that I had like an hour into d1 and posted about it before?
Cherry picking from my filter to try to make a montage of posts that seem to be sheeping someone when its just not the case is scummy. And I don't really see the point of it especially when context shows a different side of the story. I guess I especially don't like the third one since it's such a nebulous reason for town reading someone to me Nebulous reasons when its firmly stated that he can be town read for actually reading peoples posts and bringing conclusions? How in the hell is that nebulous? Also thats quite hypocritical of you when your initial town read of prp was quite... forced to say the least
It's because the reason is "he read between the lines". How come a maf member couldn't make those same points, wouldn't it actually be easier for them? I guess I'm salty cause it's the exact same as the argument that so many people have been making about my read against prpl... which wait... there it is again
|
Honestly, the meta is pretty meh. But that doesn't mean Snickers isn't scum for seemingly not caring about the game.
|
On July 14 2016 06:58 prplhz wrote:Show nested quote +On July 14 2016 06:56 Damdred wrote: @Prp also I noticed your meta about snickers being more active as town as scum.
I checked his last scum game was like over 2 years ago. I don't think you can drag a useful meta out of that where he would be more active as town now.
How did you come to tis conclussion has he been scum somewhere I haven't seen? No, I just checked his database entry, didn't notice his last (and only?) scum game was 2 years ago.
Well he has an hour to wow us anyway,
What do you think about emc? I still think hes scum and hes goign pretty far to try to discredit me at this point.
|
Anyways, we still need to consolidate on someone
|
I want to lynch whoever brought my meta up first cause I'm active as scum and town. Looking at post count isn't hard to do.
|
|
|
|