|
On December 28 2015 03:30 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On December 28 2015 03:27 N e s s wrote:On December 28 2015 03:25 raynpelikoneet wrote:On December 28 2015 03:23 N e s s wrote:On December 28 2015 03:21 raynpelikoneet wrote:On December 28 2015 03:19 N e s s wrote:
@rayn
how the hell am i not even trying, i did fucking try but you said i'm full of shit. so could you answer what sharing reads in you opinion meant? Well i see the word sharing so i know what that means. I can tell from context clues it means "sharing reads with another person" but i didn't even know i was sharing reads with you. So, again... Why did you then decide to say i am wrong on everything. In my opinion that means all of my reads are bad, no? But then, after that, you said that you don't know what my reads are (which was already confirmed). How can you say that? It's not like if i am wrong on you all my other reads are shit aswell, is it? What i meant when i said that was you're wrong about me being scum and that your perspective on me saying that exchange between me and GB was wrong in your eyes. Okay. I still can't understand why you asked people on bandwagoning on Moosy (which wasn't exactly bandwagoning since exactly one person voted on him). You know what voting people for either RVS or pressure at the start of the game is, right? Like... the way you approached to the situation -- based on where you come from, doesn't make sense to me. So could you explain these things: 1) Why did you were actually concerned on people RVS'ing/"wagoning" on Moosy at the start of the game, when it is completely normal play regardless of anyone's affiliation on almost any forum that plays mafia? 2) Why did it seem like it was a reason to suspect the guy who voted? Did you really think that guy is a suspect for it? If not, again -- why (1)?
1)I still have no clue as to why everyone voted for moose at the start, am i missing something? Because it doesn't matter alignment or not when voting someone, why would you vote for someone with no reason to at the start?
2) I don't understand what you're asking here, i didn't think anyone who called someone scum in the start would be mafia in a sense, i mean that i don't understand why someone would bother to vote for a person with little or no reason to.
|
On December 28 2015 03:27 N e s s wrote:
i never said you were wrong about your reads on other people.
I understand this can be the case. If you are telling the truth here you should maybe choose your words more carefully in the future. Because i am not even the only person who read your post literally... People here tend to actually read post literally because we expect people to mean what they say and not something else.
If everything can be brushed off with "oh i didn't actually mean this" there is always an out for mafia on anything they ever say. So please. If you say something, be precise.
|
On December 28 2015 03:05 N e s s wrote:Show nested quote +On December 28 2015 03:03 Holyflare wrote:
can we leave ness alone, I'm pretty sure he's town at this juncture apparently every time i play mafia people call me out and fuck with me until i get pissed, case proven right now.
You play aggressive as well. fyi.
|
On December 28 2015 03:36 N e s s wrote:Show nested quote +On December 28 2015 03:30 raynpelikoneet wrote:On December 28 2015 03:27 N e s s wrote:On December 28 2015 03:25 raynpelikoneet wrote:On December 28 2015 03:23 N e s s wrote:On December 28 2015 03:21 raynpelikoneet wrote:On December 28 2015 03:19 N e s s wrote:
@rayn
how the hell am i not even trying, i did fucking try but you said i'm full of shit. so could you answer what sharing reads in you opinion meant? Well i see the word sharing so i know what that means. I can tell from context clues it means "sharing reads with another person" but i didn't even know i was sharing reads with you. So, again... Why did you then decide to say i am wrong on everything. In my opinion that means all of my reads are bad, no? But then, after that, you said that you don't know what my reads are (which was already confirmed). How can you say that? It's not like if i am wrong on you all my other reads are shit aswell, is it? What i meant when i said that was you're wrong about me being scum and that your perspective on me saying that exchange between me and GB was wrong in your eyes. Okay. I still can't understand why you asked people on bandwagoning on Moosy (which wasn't exactly bandwagoning since exactly one person voted on him). You know what voting people for either RVS or pressure at the start of the game is, right? Like... the way you approached to the situation -- based on where you come from, doesn't make sense to me. So could you explain these things: 1) Why did you were actually concerned on people RVS'ing/"wagoning" on Moosy at the start of the game, when it is completely normal play regardless of anyone's affiliation on almost any forum that plays mafia? 2) Why did it seem like it was a reason to suspect the guy who voted? Did you really think that guy is a suspect for it? If not, again -- why (1)? 1)I still have no clue as to why everyone voted for moose at the start, am i missing something? Because it doesn't matter alignment or not when voting someone, why would you vote for someone with no reason to at the start? 2) I don't understand what you're asking here, i didn't think anyone who called someone scum in the start would be mafia in a sense, i mean that i don't understand why someone would bother to vote for a person with little or no reason to.
Ugh.... can someone else with better english skills reword the question in case it is unclear because i don't think this answers -- or even tries to -- anything i asked.....
And i don't know if it is my fault or not...
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On December 28 2015 03:34 ExO_ wrote:
HF this is a game, a game of deception. It's not like we're having a business meeting. I understand he's new, but you have got to be willing to play the game. ness needs to calm down and explain himself, instead of just irrationally lashing out.
You were rude and it was uncalled for. You don't have to tell me how this game works but you were degrading and antagonistic when it was uncalled for, don't blame the game for your bad manners when you yourself get angry for the same exact things.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On December 28 2015 03:38 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On December 28 2015 03:36 N e s s wrote:On December 28 2015 03:30 raynpelikoneet wrote:On December 28 2015 03:27 N e s s wrote:On December 28 2015 03:25 raynpelikoneet wrote:On December 28 2015 03:23 N e s s wrote:On December 28 2015 03:21 raynpelikoneet wrote:On December 28 2015 03:19 N e s s wrote:
@rayn
how the hell am i not even trying, i did fucking try but you said i'm full of shit. so could you answer what sharing reads in you opinion meant? Well i see the word sharing so i know what that means. I can tell from context clues it means "sharing reads with another person" but i didn't even know i was sharing reads with you. So, again... Why did you then decide to say i am wrong on everything. In my opinion that means all of my reads are bad, no? But then, after that, you said that you don't know what my reads are (which was already confirmed). How can you say that? It's not like if i am wrong on you all my other reads are shit aswell, is it? What i meant when i said that was you're wrong about me being scum and that your perspective on me saying that exchange between me and GB was wrong in your eyes. Okay. I still can't understand why you asked people on bandwagoning on Moosy (which wasn't exactly bandwagoning since exactly one person voted on him). You know what voting people for either RVS or pressure at the start of the game is, right? Like... the way you approached to the situation -- based on where you come from, doesn't make sense to me. So could you explain these things: 1) Why did you were actually concerned on people RVS'ing/"wagoning" on Moosy at the start of the game, when it is completely normal play regardless of anyone's affiliation on almost any forum that plays mafia? 2) Why did it seem like it was a reason to suspect the guy who voted? Did you really think that guy is a suspect for it? If not, again -- why (1)? 1)I still have no clue as to why everyone voted for moose at the start, am i missing something? Because it doesn't matter alignment or not when voting someone, why would you vote for someone with no reason to at the start? 2) I don't understand what you're asking here, i didn't think anyone who called someone scum in the start would be mafia in a sense, i mean that i don't understand why someone would bother to vote for a person with little or no reason to. Ugh.... can someone else with better english skills reword the question in case it is unclear because i don't think this answers -- or even tries to -- anything i asked..... And i don't know if it is my fault or not...
You're using acronyms he doesn't understand I think, just explain what RVS means?
|
On December 28 2015 03:39 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On December 28 2015 03:38 raynpelikoneet wrote:On December 28 2015 03:36 N e s s wrote:On December 28 2015 03:30 raynpelikoneet wrote:On December 28 2015 03:27 N e s s wrote:On December 28 2015 03:25 raynpelikoneet wrote:On December 28 2015 03:23 N e s s wrote:On December 28 2015 03:21 raynpelikoneet wrote:On December 28 2015 03:19 N e s s wrote:
@rayn
how the hell am i not even trying, i did fucking try but you said i'm full of shit. so could you answer what sharing reads in you opinion meant? Well i see the word sharing so i know what that means. I can tell from context clues it means "sharing reads with another person" but i didn't even know i was sharing reads with you. So, again... Why did you then decide to say i am wrong on everything. In my opinion that means all of my reads are bad, no? But then, after that, you said that you don't know what my reads are (which was already confirmed). How can you say that? It's not like if i am wrong on you all my other reads are shit aswell, is it? What i meant when i said that was you're wrong about me being scum and that your perspective on me saying that exchange between me and GB was wrong in your eyes. Okay. I still can't understand why you asked people on bandwagoning on Moosy (which wasn't exactly bandwagoning since exactly one person voted on him). You know what voting people for either RVS or pressure at the start of the game is, right? Like... the way you approached to the situation -- based on where you come from, doesn't make sense to me. So could you explain these things: 1) Why did you were actually concerned on people RVS'ing/"wagoning" on Moosy at the start of the game, when it is completely normal play regardless of anyone's affiliation on almost any forum that plays mafia? 2) Why did it seem like it was a reason to suspect the guy who voted? Did you really think that guy is a suspect for it? If not, again -- why (1)? 1)I still have no clue as to why everyone voted for moose at the start, am i missing something? Because it doesn't matter alignment or not when voting someone, why would you vote for someone with no reason to at the start? 2) I don't understand what you're asking here, i didn't think anyone who called someone scum in the start would be mafia in a sense, i mean that i don't understand why someone would bother to vote for a person with little or no reason to. Ugh.... can someone else with better english skills reword the question in case it is unclear because i don't think this answers -- or even tries to -- anything i asked..... And i don't know if it is my fault or not... You're using acronyms he doesn't understand I think, just explain what RVS means?
The thing is i went to his forum and looked at games and they random vote there -- or pressure, just like everywhere else. They even call it RVS..... Which is the problem i can't understand why he doesn't understand what RVS stands for...
|
I'm just going to leave for now, this game is too much.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Ok Ness, rayn is saying that in your forum there is a stage at the beginning of the game where everyone votes randomly for no reason. Rayn is questioning why you were concerned with people voting for Moosy randomly when it happens in your forum just the same way and means nothing.
|
On December 28 2015 03:41 N e s s wrote:
I'm just going to leave for now, this game is too much.
This is true. It is a clusterfuck and nobody should really care till D3.
|
Random voting stage, yes i know what it stands for.
|
On December 28 2015 03:42 Koshi wrote:Show nested quote +On December 28 2015 03:41 N e s s wrote:
I'm just going to leave for now, this game is too much. This is true. It is a clusterfuck and nobody should really care till D3.
Really odd post coming from you
|
On December 28 2015 03:41 Holyflare wrote:
Ok Ness, rayn is saying that in your forum there is a stage at the beginning of the game where everyone votes randomly for no reason. Rayn is questioning why you were concerned with people voting for Moosy randomly when it happens in your forum just the same way and means nothing.
i'm not an idiot. I've played mafia plenty of times.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On December 28 2015 03:42 N e s s wrote:Show nested quote +On December 28 2015 03:41 Holyflare wrote:
Ok Ness, rayn is saying that in your forum there is a stage at the beginning of the game where everyone votes randomly for no reason. Rayn is questioning why you were concerned with people voting for Moosy randomly when it happens in your forum just the same way and means nothing.
i'm not an idiot. I've played mafia plenty of times.
Yes but that doesn't answer the question.
|
On December 28 2015 03:42 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On December 28 2015 03:42 Koshi wrote:On December 28 2015 03:41 N e s s wrote:
I'm just going to leave for now, this game is too much. This is true. It is a clusterfuck and nobody should really care till D3. Really odd post coming from you
I am a totally different Koshi.
Really. Trying to read 15 people D1 is pretty dumb. Just find 1 person who is mafia and roll the dice.
While building a filter that screams "I am town" when the game starts on on D3.
Having +5 pages of filter on D1 is pure madness.
|
WHY i thought voting moose is idiotic because there was nothing to go off of from it.
Honestly why can't people realize that, come the hell on people! You realize that we were voting for someone with no reason to.
THATS why i was keen on not understanding why people were voting for him. I know that RVS means Random voting stage, but come on. I don't even use RVS that often.
|
On December 28 2015 03:47 N e s s wrote:
WHY i thought voting moose is idiotic because there was nothing to go off of from it.
Honestly why can't people realize that, come the hell on people! You realize that we were voting for someone with no reason to.
THATS why i was keen on not understanding why people were voting for him. I know that RVS means Random voting stage, but come on. I don't even use RVS that often.
People were voting Moosy because he is lynchbait and it is an inside joke. Nothing special.
|
On December 28 2015 03:47 N e s s wrote:
WHY i thought voting moose is idiotic because there was nothing to go off of from it.
Honestly why can't people realize that, come the hell on people! You realize that we were voting for someone with no reason to.
THATS why i was keen on not understanding why people were voting for him. I know that RVS means Random voting stage, but come on. I don't even use RVS that often.
I don't know who moosey is, but I was able to figure out that it was a policy lynch joke vote. They were talking about it pre game. I don't see why you shouldn't have been able to figure that out as well. If you were reading the thread. Quite honestly I think you aren't reading the thread, and to make up for that you are yelling a bunch.
Also fuck off HF with your holier than thou bullshit. I can expect people to read the thread, or be treated poorly for not doing so.
|
On December 28 2015 03:47 N e s s wrote:
WHY i thought voting moose is idiotic because there was nothing to go off of from it.
Honestly why can't people realize that, come the hell on people! You realize that we were voting for someone with no reason to.
THATS why i was keen on not understanding why people were voting for him. I know that RVS means Random voting stage, but come on. I don't even use RVS that often.
That's not the point. The point is you at least implied Artanis is suspicious of it when you should know it's not actually suspicious at all (considering you know what RVS is and why people do that).
|
Like i could totally understand it if you said:
"In the same way Artanis voted for Moosy i wanted to pressure him to get the game started and i understand that's what he was trying to do -- regardless of his affiliation".
But you didn't...
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
