On November 16 2015 05:04 disformation wrote:
Fecalfeat you just got out of bed?
Fecalfeat you just got out of bed?
sorta, was up about 10 mins before day post, why?
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Fecalfeast
Canada11355 Posts
On November 16 2015 05:04 disformation wrote: Fecalfeat you just got out of bed? sorta, was up about 10 mins before day post, why? | ||
disformation
Germany8352 Posts
On November 16 2015 05:34 The Shining wrote: Farrah your logic is flawed. I rolled scum a few games ago which means I'm due for another 10 town games, which this is. Your instant vote is pretty uncalled for so early, with so many people missing but I'll chalk it up to interesting entrance. How far you plan on pushing this obvious policy lynch? Actually all the entrances so far suck. No TRs, town Y u make this so hard? Meh. TBH I didn't read any of the stuff happening so far as serious. It is the start of day one after all. *shrugs* + Show Spoiler + No my scott vote is not in the least bit serious. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
The Shining
United States2406 Posts
On November 16 2015 05:33 VisceraEyes wrote: Show nested quote + On November 16 2015 05:13 Eversince wrote: On November 16 2015 05:04 FarahBlackwing wrote: Hello. I think the proper use of our time is ##vote shining Statistically it has to be time 100% townread based on nothing last game I play with you. Last game: Farah town, hard read based on not much, Shining obvious town. This game: Farah ?, Shining mafia. 180 in gameplay = 180 in alignment Obviously mafia. ##vote: Farahblackwing Soooo mafia. Lynch today! I actually like this a lot. ##Vote: Farahblackwing What about it do you like? I see a short meta read based off of one newbie game, from a newbie. I wouldn't be nearly this confident in meta reading someone after just one game. And how do you know its even accurate? Did you check the last game or are you just blindly trusting to get on a wagon here? | ||
FarahBlackwing
270 Posts
| ||
The Shining
United States2406 Posts
On November 16 2015 05:37 VisceraEyes wrote: Like statistically speaking you could just close your eyes and point at a townie, so the fact that you can't trust ANYONE with so many having posted is a huge red flag for me. I'm here to find scum, not town. Answer my question | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On November 16 2015 05:38 The Shining wrote: Show nested quote + On November 16 2015 05:33 VisceraEyes wrote: On November 16 2015 05:13 Eversince wrote: On November 16 2015 05:04 FarahBlackwing wrote: Hello. I think the proper use of our time is ##vote shining Statistically it has to be time 100% townread based on nothing last game I play with you. Last game: Farah town, hard read based on not much, Shining obvious town. This game: Farah ?, Shining mafia. 180 in gameplay = 180 in alignment Obviously mafia. ##vote: Farahblackwing Soooo mafia. Lynch today! I actually like this a lot. ##Vote: Farahblackwing What about it do you like? I see a short meta read based off of one newbie game, from a newbie. I wouldn't be nearly this confident in meta reading someone after just one game. And how do you know its even accurate? Did you check the last game or are you just blindly trusting to get on a wagon here? I don't care if it's accurate - if they're mafia and lying someone will come in and say "Hey that's a lie" and I'll reevaluate then. At this point I'm taking the short meta read at face value, assuming it's true and taking the attempt as a townie attempt to find mafia - one that has possibly borne fruit. So no, I'm not just "blindly" jumping on a wagon. I like this particular wagon for the reasons given and I like the person who started it, as indicated in my post. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
The Shining
United States2406 Posts
Farrah why do you think the game is boring less than an hour after it started? That feels pretty ñonsensical. Things have to happen for it to be exciting, or boring. Deciding its boring on the 3rd post of the game is pretty weird. | ||
disformation
Germany8352 Posts
On November 16 2015 05:36 Fecalfeast wrote: sorta, was up about 10 mins before day post, why? Ah, no real reason. Remembered that you mentioned getting up for EoD time pre-game and was looking for something to say since we were the first two in thread. Didn't expect the thread to fill up this fast. ... I suck at small talk xD | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On November 16 2015 05:44 The Shining wrote: If you want me to explain, the logic of closing your eyes and finding a town less than an hour to d1 by just pointing means statistically you have a higher chance of finding town by being random. By that same logic, snap voting this early on D1 means it has a higher chance of landing on town. Farrah why do you think the game is boring less than an hour after it started? That feels pretty ñonsensical. Things have to happen for it to be exciting, or boring. Deciding its boring on the 3rd post of the game is pretty weird. And AS I said, it wasn't a random snap vote. It's a vote placed with reason. You may or may not agree with the reason, that's your prerogative and should affect whether or not you place your vote. Not mine. <3 | ||
The Shining
United States2406 Posts
On November 16 2015 05:42 VisceraEyes wrote: Show nested quote + On November 16 2015 05:38 The Shining wrote: On November 16 2015 05:33 VisceraEyes wrote: On November 16 2015 05:13 Eversince wrote: On November 16 2015 05:04 FarahBlackwing wrote: Hello. I think the proper use of our time is ##vote shining Statistically it has to be time 100% townread based on nothing last game I play with you. Last game: Farah town, hard read based on not much, Shining obvious town. This game: Farah ?, Shining mafia. 180 in gameplay = 180 in alignment Obviously mafia. ##vote: Farahblackwing Soooo mafia. Lynch today! I actually like this a lot. ##Vote: Farahblackwing What about it do you like? I see a short meta read based off of one newbie game, from a newbie. I wouldn't be nearly this confident in meta reading someone after just one game. And how do you know its even accurate? Did you check the last game or are you just blindly trusting to get on a wagon here? I don't care if it's accurate - if they're mafia and lying someone will come in and say "Hey that's a lie" and I'll reevaluate then. At this point I'm taking the short meta read at face value, assuming it's true and taking the attempt as a townie attempt to find mafia - one that has possibly borne fruit. So no, I'm not just "blindly" jumping on a wagon. I like this particular wagon for the reasons given and I like the person who started it, as indicated in my post. So in other words, you're being lazy and following the word of someone that you've never played with before about someone youve never played with before. Got it. Now if I go and say that I have a meta read on Eversince because as scum last game she just enters the thread and finds the scummiest looking thing she can and just hammers it into oblivion, which I think she could be doing here, what would you make of that? I want to see more than a short meta read on one person and no talk of other players before I even remotely believe she is town. | ||
FarahBlackwing
270 Posts
| ||
geript
10024 Posts
| ||
The Shining
United States2406 Posts
On November 16 2015 05:45 VisceraEyes wrote: Show nested quote + On November 16 2015 05:44 The Shining wrote: If you want me to explain, the logic of closing your eyes and finding a town less than an hour to d1 by just pointing means statistically you have a higher chance of finding town by being random. By that same logic, snap voting this early on D1 means it has a higher chance of landing on town. Farrah why do you think the game is boring less than an hour after it started? That feels pretty ñonsensical. Things have to happen for it to be exciting, or boring. Deciding its boring on the 3rd post of the game is pretty weird. And AS I said, it wasn't a random snap vote. It's a vote placed with reason. You may or may not agree with the reason, that's your prerogative and should affect whether or not you place your vote. Not mine. <3 Yep and I tend to flesh out my reads before I sheep a 1-game metaread. That's why I'm questioning both. But you not questioning either just felt really off to me. | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
geript
10024 Posts
| ||
The Shining
United States2406 Posts
On November 16 2015 05:50 FarahBlackwing wrote: Nobody had tried to talk yet made anything interesting, entrances were boring so I did something different What entrances were boring? You were the 3rd post. And of all things to enter with, you picked on something that I mentioned about myself pregame. That statistically I roll town a LOT. But each game is rngd and different so why is it any more likely for me to roll scum this game instead of town? It's bad logic, unless you were just looking for reactions. | ||
The Shining
United States2406 Posts
On November 16 2015 05:50 VisceraEyes wrote: You're getting awfully anxious about me trusting someone so early Shining, I have to say it looks really scummy to me. Why are you so against me having a townread on someone and a scumread on someone else? I'm not against it. I'm trying to figure out HOW you got to those reads because you seem to have done so in record time with reasons I dont agree with. So I'm interested in how you got there. | ||
geript
10024 Posts
| ||
| ||
Next event in 4h 48m
[ Submit Event ] |
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Super Smash Bros Other Games Organizations Other Games StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War
StarCraft 2 • Berry_CruncH172 StarCraft: Brood War• Light_VIP 52 • AfreecaTV YouTube • intothetv • Kozan • IndyKCrew • LaughNgamezSOOP • Laughngamez YouTube • Migwel • sooper7s League of Legends |
Wardi Open
StarCraft2.fi
PiGosaur Monday
OlimoLeague
StarCraft2.fi
StarCraft2.fi
The PondCast
|
|