|
On June 12 2015 22:05 n00bKing wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2015 17:46 Rels wrote:On June 12 2015 12:50 n00bKing wrote: [...]
On Page 9, batsnacks posts some philosophy about the nature of danger [...] Hahaha But really this post is exactly what you're saying not to do. Agree with oats completly: On June 12 2015 12:58 Oatsmaster wrote: oh man thats a horrific post.... ARGH.
Like it doesnt scumhunt at all.
Its just advice.
I don't think that's a post you want to be agreeing with. We should not disparage the idea of posts that give advice, most especially in a Newbie game. I certainly hope that the other Town players will give me some good advice, at some point in the game. And if they aren't scumhunting in that same moment, it won't make good advice any less good. Kickstart has said (and then re-emphasized) that: "the #1 goal of town should always be to show that they are town through their actions, and coming in a close second is helping to find scum." Firstly, I'm not sure I agree with him. If I could only look Town or find Scum, I would probably rather find Scum. If I then get mislynched (because I didn't convince enough people that I was Town) then the work I did finding Scum could still get that player lynched soon afterward. But what's more relevant to this conversation is: IF looking Town is more important than finding Scum, then how does one show themselves to be Town WITHOUT scumhunting? Well, one good way is definitely "by giving helpful advice." This was explained before you got here. If you read the whole thread before you post, then you won't end up clogging the pages with questions that were already answered. There's some "advice" for you. Cool. I suppose the explanation you're talking about is this one.
On June 12 2015 14:40 n00bKing wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2015 08:57 batsnacks wrote: I don't think it would be productive for town for me to defend ruxxar. He's a big boy. It's productive for Town for you to defend him, IF he is also Town. We can expect that at some point a few of the Newbies will need help with defending themselves (I could easily end up being one of them). And no, that shouldn't be your primary focus, but we all have a responsibility to try and prevent a mislynch when possible. Two posts later is when you told us all about repetition of danger. Was that productive for the Town? Side note: I don't know if there are any female players in the game, so if I refer to a "her" as a "him" please correct me.
I feel that you're spending a lot of times giving "advices" and defending people. That's it.
|
On June 12 2015 22:16 n00bKing wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2015 18:31 Rels wrote:On June 12 2015 17:12 n00bKing wrote: [...] 3) I think his "quick and easy how to play town guide" contains at least one bit of bad advice, and maybe more.
Could you expand on that ? Saying "don't claim your role" is far too much of an overgeneralization. It doesn't account for the player's role, and it doesn't account for timing. And there's at least 1 Town role in this setup that I think should probably claim, and should probably do so early in the game. I am also not sure it's wise to be telling Newbies to find only one player they think is Mafia. You're not always going to be able to convince people that your target is a good lynch. Having a secondary target could help you inspire people to make a lynch that would also be good. Having two suspects doesn't always mean you're relying on unflipped associations. Looking for more than one target helps a player keep an open mind. Rules 2 and 3 of batsnacks' advice are basically "a guide on how to tunnel." Again, there's nothing wrong with giving advice. But I think his advice is bad.
OK I agree his guide is over simplified. (=
|
Anyway n00bking, all you're saying makes sense. You give good advices and your defenses are good. But two things: - you should let newbies defend themselves, espacially early day 1. - your only scumread is based on a bad case. batsnacks hasn't done anything townie this game, but his deflection of your case is spot on.
|
The guide was meant for people who are so inexperienced they haven't figured out that power roles claiming early in the game is not good. Seriously though it's all good advice. Find 1 person you think is scum, say why, go through motions, re-evaluate based on responses, repeat if necessary.
|
On June 12 2015 21:16 batsnacks wrote: This isn't a very good case. I didn't say it was a "very good case." It's very early in the game for there to be a good case. Are you proud of your case against the player you voted for?
What I did was give reasons for why I am voting against you. Do you want people to stop explaining their votes?
[b]batsnacks wrote:[/b ]if you understand why I'm upset about rux's claim then you don't have a problem with me voting him. I'm not sure why you said you do have a problem with me voting rux if you understand that the claim hurts town and that hurting town makes me upset. I can understand why you're upset and still be able to have a problem with the vote. It's a Newbie game. Someone doing something that hurts Town doesn't make them scum. Additionally, IF he's scum, then his claim doesn't actually hurt the Town. It only hurts the Town if HE'S Town. So you can't say "I'm voting against him because his claim hurts the Town" without believing he is Town. And if you believe he's Town...then...
|
>.>
Anyway... I don't feel like talking about this anymore. I changed my mind noobking you can find 2 scum reads. Keep your vote on me and find another another mafia.
|
On June 12 2015 22:17 Rels wrote: I feel that you're spending a lot of times giving "advices" and defending people. That's it. I understand what you're saying. And trust me, if there were more people sounding suspicious to me, I would be talking about that. But so far, batsnacks is the only player that has more than one post that rubs me the wrong way. People like Moosy and FakePlants have only made one post apiece that struck me odd.
So I've been talking some about batsnacks, since that's who I'm voting against. But in the absence of other good targets, I thought it would be better to give some advice and defend some people, than to do nothing. If no one here has played the game with me before, you don't want me lurking. It's better to have me on the record with some opinions than not.
Rels wrote: Anyway n00bking, all you're saying makes sense. You give good advices and your defenses are good. But two things: - you should let newbies defend themselves, espacially early day 1. I defended non-newbies too. I was just concerned that in a Newbie game, a bandwagon on a bad lynch target could get rolling pretty easily, if no one points out flaws in the reasoning being used against that player. But okay, I will let people do more of their own work. Thanks for the "advice."
|
I think I'm going to sheep geript now he was making sense about moose.
##unvote ##vote moosygoosy
|
On June 12 2015 11:41 Kickstart wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2015 11:33 MoosyDoosy wrote: ^ Also Kickstart, I wouldn't read too much into ruXx's initial post where he's rambling about slapping/daydreaming about Mafia. It might have been from an attempt to identify himself as a non-aggressor to the Mafia so that when night time comes around, they don't kill him. If the game went on for longer, people would also suspect ruXx more giving the Mafia an easy kill. This actually happens a ton in real life Mafia but it's clear it's totally different online at this point.
Also, going back to his post where he "misses the interaction" which is right after his rambling, it's pretty clear that ruXx is not paying attention whatsoever. As a newbie he was probably just as excited as I was about remaining passive which is why he didn't notice the err in his post. Just the fact that it seems he has no idea whatsoever about what he's saying during his rambling just shows this too.
I'll look through the rest of your points, but I'll try and provide a "newbie perspective." Either way, it looks like he wised up real fast and stopped being as frantic and energetic in his posts. You could be right, and as I said I usually do give players I don't know and new players the benefit of the doubt, but as I said the fact that he has done several things that I think are scummy and none that I deem towny is why I presented this and asked for peoples thought. Also, the goal of town is not to protect themselves from a mafia nightkill. This doesn't matter in the slightest unless you are a blue role or something, and even then, the #1 goal of town should always be to show that they are town through their actions, and coming in a close second is helping to find scum. Sitting back and not being a target is literally the last thing you want to do as town because it makes it hard to read you, which is shit for town but good for scum because they already know your alignment while town doesn't.
You're trying to make a case against me, but then you make this point and your argument falls apart.
" Sitting back and not being a target is literally the last thing you want to do as town because it makes it hard to read you, which is shit for town but good for scum because they already know your alignment while town doesn't."
I would argue that I did just the opposite of this. I exposed myself in a way that made me very vulnerable and painted a target on my back. It created a lot of discussion with me at the center of it.
I don't think a mafia would draw attention to themselves like that, especially a newbie.
|
On June 12 2015 11:33 MoosyDoosy wrote: ^ Also Kickstart, I wouldn't read too much into ruXx's initial post where he's rambling about slapping/daydreaming about Mafia. It might have been from an attempt to identify himself as a non-aggressor to the Mafia so that when night time comes around, they don't kill him. If the game went on for longer, people would also suspect ruXx more giving the Mafia an easy kill. This actually happens a ton in real life Mafia but it's clear it's totally different online at this point.
Also, going back to his post where he "misses the interaction" which is right after his rambling, it's pretty clear that ruXx is not paying attention whatsoever. As a newbie he was probably just as excited as I was about remaining passive which is why he didn't notice the err in his post. Just the fact that it seems he has no idea whatsoever about what he's saying during his rambling just shows this too.
I'll look through the rest of your points, but I'll try and provide a "newbie perspective." Either way, it looks like he wised up real fast and stopped being as frantic and energetic in his posts.
On June 12 2015 11:38 MoosyDoosy wrote: Yeah, the more I read of ruXx's initial posts, the more it seems he's thinking in terms of a real life Mafia game as well as tryharding a bit.
Him intercepting a question was him tryharding a basic read and him supporting lying is from a real life Mafia mindset since lying is much more common in real life.
The last two posts that you point out are kind of shady but even then they err on the side of newbie to online Mafia. Overall I wouldn't vote him just yet until we get more evidence.
Wow moosy.
I have to give you 5 stars for this read. It's like you're inside my head or something. I had goosebumps reading this since it was so spot on.
You are absolutely right that my only exposure to mafia has been through watching the TI qualifiers hub, and later watching all stars mafia on youtube.
I really wanted to emulate the dynamic of a live environment, and went in trying to actively counter some of the things i picked up that a mafia would do.
From watching those live mafia games I learned that the number 1 trait of a mafia is to be silent. They would bide their time and look for arguments to bandwagon onto, often avoid getting into heated arguments if possible, and when attacked they would try to deflect onto another person.
I admit I am very excited to go out playing my first mafia game, and overracted by claiming my role before day 1 post(I did not know that this was frowned upon).
Another thing that I learned is that it doesn't matter if you are mafia or not, as long as you contribute to try solving the case, then it's good to keep people around just in case they are town, because then in the largest portion of games they would be a boon to you as a town.
|
Alright ruxxar I was unsure how to read you. But with this post I now believe you're a super excited townie. I too believe that we should not let mafia the ability to stay silent.
So. What do you think of plants first and only post ?
|
On June 12 2015 22:54 batsnacks wrote: I think I'm going to sheep geript now he was making sense about moose.
##unvote ##vote moosygoosy Wait, so people who are voting for me. Why exactly do you guys think I'm Mafia?
|
On June 12 2015 22:39 n00bKing wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2015 22:17 Rels wrote: I feel that you're spending a lot of times giving "advices" and defending people. That's it. I understand what you're saying. And trust me, if there were more people sounding suspicious to me, I would be talking about that. But so far, batsnacks is the only player that has more than one post that rubs me the wrong way. People like Moosy and FakePlants have only made one post apiece that struck me odd. So I've been talking some about batsnacks, since that's who I'm voting against. But in the absence of other good targets, I thought it would be better to give some advice and defend some people, than to do nothing. If no one here has played the game with me before, you don't want me lurking. It's better to have me on the record with some opinions than not. Show nested quote +Rels wrote: Anyway n00bking, all you're saying makes sense. You give good advices and your defenses are good. But two things: - you should let newbies defend themselves, espacially early day 1. I defended non-newbies too. I was just concerned that in a Newbie game, a bandwagon on a bad lynch target could get rolling pretty easily, if no one points out flaws in the reasoning being used against that player. But okay, I will let people do more of their own work. Thanks for the "advice."
I want to say that after reading through n00bKing's posts I get a slight town read on him. He might be playing a very strong mafia, but either way I think keeping him around makes sense.
It seems to me that he's somewhat experienced in mafia, despite this being his first game here on TL. I like the way he thinks and further pushes on opinions of other people that makes himself vulnerable. He was not afraid to put himself in the crossfire of what could've easily been a bandwagon situation on me.
Either he's trying to get me in his pocket, but more likely I feel like he just enjoys taking logical arguments and breaking them apart, exposing their flaws.
On June 12 2015 09:36 batsnacks wrote: Through repetition of danger we grow accustomed to it. Water sets the example for the right conduct under such circumstances. It flows on and on, and merely fills up all the places through which it flows; it does not shrink from any dangerous spot nor from any plunge, and nothing can make it lose its own essential nature. It remains true to itself under all conditions. Thus likewise, if one is sincere when confronted with difficulties, the heart can penetrate the meaning of the situation. And once we have gained inner mastery of a problem, it will come about naturally that the action we take will succeed. In danger all that counts is really carrying out all that has to be done.
Properly used, danger can have an important meaning as a protective measure. Thus heaven has its perilous height protecting it against every attempt at invasion, and earth has its mountains and bodies of water, separating countries by their dangers. Thus also rulers make use of danger to protect themselves against attacks from without and against turmoil within.
On June 12 2015 08:42 batsnacks wrote:I'm going to make a quick and easy how to play town guide: - don't claim your role
- find exactly 1 person who you think is mafia
- say why this 1 person is mafia
- do not form reads based on unflipped associations e.g. player X AND player Y could be mafia together because Z.
On June 12 2015 22:32 batsnacks wrote: >.>
Anyway... I don't feel like talking about this anymore. I changed my mind noobking you can find 2 scum reads. Keep your vote on me and find another another mafia.
On June 12 2015 22:54 batsnacks wrote: I think I'm going to sheep geript now he was making sense about moose.
##unvote ##vote moosygoosy
On June 12 2015 21:25 batsnacks wrote: I'm bored
Assumin that batsnacks i actually trying to win, this seems to me like an extremely poor way of helping town.
Through these posts he display :
Nonsense fillers content that doesn't contribute. Showing disinterest. Throwing out information as facts when they they are just an opinion.
Whether he's town trying to pretend he's mafira or actually is mafia, I don't like his attitude towards the game.
Of all the posts I've read so far batsnacks is the most scummy to me.
##vote batsnacks
|
On June 12 2015 22:54 batsnacks wrote: I think I'm going to sheep geript now he was making sense about moose.
##unvote ##vote moosygoosy So you're voting along with scum? Interesting.
|
On June 13 2015 00:39 WaveofShadow wrote:Show nested quote +On June 12 2015 22:54 batsnacks wrote: I think I'm going to sheep geript now he was making sense about moose.
##unvote ##vote moosygoosy So you're voting along with scum? Interesting.
I thought what he said was pretty reasonable. If I were mafia I would have gone after moose's post.
|
On June 12 2015 14:39 WaveofShadow wrote: Back from streaming
Town tier: Oats, Kickstart, Moosy Blergh tier: Almost everybody Scum tier: Geript, noobking
2 ez
Why do you read noobking as scum? You didn't comment on any of his posts and out of the blue he's scum?
|
On June 13 2015 00:49 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On June 13 2015 00:39 WaveofShadow wrote:On June 12 2015 22:54 batsnacks wrote: I think I'm going to sheep geript now he was making sense about moose.
##unvote ##vote moosygoosy So you're voting along with scum? Interesting. I thought what he said was pretty reasonable. If I were mafia I would have gone after moose's post. So now we base reads on what mafia was supposed to do and didnt?
Dont like that at all. Dont like that you peaced out and dont care about the game either. You came back here and did nothing but defend yourself. You didnt scumhunt, you didnt advance the thread.
Geript too btw.
I kinda think noob is town because he just keeps on giving advice even after people tell him to stop.
|
What I want to do is find out why geript stopped posting after WaveofShadow had a scumread on him.
@batsnacks, I mean, I'm pretty sure I made it clear I was a town but sure, go ahead and waste your vote.
|
On June 13 2015 00:49 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On June 13 2015 00:39 WaveofShadow wrote:On June 12 2015 22:54 batsnacks wrote: I think I'm going to sheep geript now he was making sense about moose.
##unvote ##vote moosygoosy So you're voting along with scum? Interesting. I thought what he said was pretty reasonable. If I were mafia I would have gone after moose's post. You don't see anything wrong with him first pinpointing moose as scum, then coming up with an excuse to having voted (without admitting to it being a lure when I prodded him, despite me still assuming as such) later on when it contradicts his entire point of voting in the first place?
Even were you to ignore that, there's an inherently bigger problem with his logic surrounding the mafia going after moose. Maybe if you think about it for a minute you can figure it out but I'll give you a hint: only scum would be thinking this way.
|
On June 13 2015 00:57 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On June 13 2015 00:49 batsnacks wrote:On June 13 2015 00:39 WaveofShadow wrote:On June 12 2015 22:54 batsnacks wrote: I think I'm going to sheep geript now he was making sense about moose.
##unvote ##vote moosygoosy So you're voting along with scum? Interesting. I thought what he said was pretty reasonable. If I were mafia I would have gone after moose's post. So now we base reads on what mafia was supposed to do and didnt? Dont like that at all. Dont like that you peaced out and dont care about the game either. You came back here and did nothing but defend yourself. You didnt scumhunt, you didnt advance the thread. Geript too btw. I kinda think noob is town because he just keeps on giving advice even after people tell him to stop.
I don't feel like there's anything I need to defend against.
But yeah I do like the idea of basing reads off of what mafia should and shouldn't do. That's why I'm voting moosegoose.
|
|
|
|