|
On May 27 2015 00:19 batsnacks wrote: Scum or not I'm much more interested in bunnies vs BM right now.
I'm getting a feeling that today will be interesting. Good that this time I'll be here for EoD. I was skimming BM's filter and didn't he do a 180° turn on ticktoc? Will need to look at that again. But I am kinda getting sick of reading through filters now...
|
Hum I hope they do things too but dont get your hopes up
|
Hm.... From:
On May 25 2015 09:19 Bill Murray wrote: 2) Tictock - scumlean 4) plotspot - townlean 5) boxerfred - null slight town 6) disformation - fairly strong town read 9/10 would fuck 7) Barakos - who? i dont remember anything from this guy 8) Sulfurus - VI, townlean Open slots (マフィアの経験がある程度の能力 / the ability of having experience in mafia) 9) 27ninjabunnies - null 10) Bill Murray - town 11) Breshke - townlean 12) sicklucker - scumlean 13) batsnacks - townlean
To:
On May 25 2015 09:48 Bill Murray wrote: thats actually nice town work if youve found an associative tell...
can you merely highlight it? it will take me awhile to find the exact quote wont it? youve posted a lot
On May 25 2015 09:48 Bill Murray wrote: thats actually nice town work if youve found an associative tell...
can you merely highlight it? it will take me awhile to find the exact quote wont it? youve posted a lot
On May 26 2015 01:14 Bill Murray wrote: omg tictock may have broken the game on page 46
hes so smart
i didnt want to say anything though, ive been kind of wanting to watch how this plays out So has a scum lean on him and changes that after reading an association case by ticktoc? Doesn't look too bad. Or am I missing something?
|
EBWOP: But the "I didn't want to say anything" can be read as: "I am mafia and wanted to lurk to see if this wagon could work out".
|
i think thats talking about me and plots being partners? thats terrible from my pov
|
On May 27 2015 00:51 sicklucker wrote: i think thats talking about me and plots being partners? thats terrible from my pov
Oh, shit. You are right. I thought that had something to do with bunnies. So he really loves tictock for his association stuff between plotspot and you and then goes ahead and randomly votes bunnies without explanation? That looks super bad.
##unvote ##vote: Bill Murray
|
|
~ Vote Count ~ 27ninjabunnies (5) : batsnacks (X), sicklucker (X), Breshke (X), disformation (X), Bill Murray, Breshke, Tictock, plotspot, sicklucker, boxerfred (X) Bill Murray (4) : sicklucker (X), 27ninjabunnies, batsnacks, boxerfred, disformation sicklucker (2) : Breshke (X), Tictock (X), disformation (X), Bill Murray (X), boxerfred (X), Sulfurus, Breshke (X), Barakos Barakos (0) : sicklucker (X) batsnacks (0) : sicklucker (X) Currently, 27ninjabunnies is set to be lynched! The cycle will end at Tuesday, May 26 10:00pm GMT (GMT+00:00), less than 6 hours from this post. remain as you are reading this. Remember, voting is mandatory! Place your votes in this thread. If you see any vote out of place, yell at us or something.
|
So let us see, what bunnies and Bill Murray have to say about that... Also curious to see what Sulfurus does when he finally shows up...
|
I think I can use this "partners" thing to explain quantum mechanics. "Hey, you see if someone accuses you of being partners with another person, the none of you can make excuses or both of you know it's ridiculous. There nothing in between like one thinks it's true and other thing thinks it's bs. That's quantum mechanics."
|
My vote could change depending on whether activity picks up in the next 4 hours. 27nb giving more reads would help keep my vote where it's at.
|
On May 27 2015 03:02 batsnacks wrote: My vote could change depending on whether activity picks up in the next 4 hours. 27nb giving more reads would help keep my vote where it's at.
Yup, I really hope that Bill Murray and 27ninjabunnies show up and give us more to work with.
|
i might go sleep for 20 hours
|
SL are you going to wsop this year?
|
|
Ok, who actually read my case on 27nb?
Like, I find it very funny that I posted this here.
On May 26 2015 18:25 Tictock wrote:
Point 3: 27nb has CLEARLY been around today. Pops in makes a promise of a big push. I think she does that when she asks why BM lurker voted her. Then she pops in later to ask if we've solved the game, implying there is work yet to do.
|
On May 27 2015 03:25 Tictock wrote:Ok, who actually read my case on 27nb? Like, I find it very funny that I posted this here. Show nested quote +On May 26 2015 18:25 Tictock wrote:
Point 3: 27nb has CLEARLY been around today. Pops in makes a promise of a big push. I think she does that when she asks why BM lurker voted her. Then she pops in later to ask if we've solved the game, implying there is work yet to do.
I have a life outside of mafia. I post where I can.
My big push is on BM.
What do you think about it?
|
On May 27 2015 00:19 batsnacks wrote: Scum or not I'm much more interested in bunnies vs BM right now.
Why are you voting BM then?
What are you reasonings on me?
|
On May 27 2015 03:54 27ninjabunnies wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2015 00:19 batsnacks wrote: Scum or not I'm much more interested in bunnies vs BM right now. Why are you voting BM then? What are you reasonings on me?
I'm sheeping you in the hopes that doing so will increase the chances of bill responding to you. It's sort of a weird situation because you, bill and sulfur are my 3 scum reads but I think it's an okay way of doing things.
|
I still say the way plots acts towards SL is pretty strange.
His latest read on SL.
He starts by taking about a post SL make, says he likes Bre's and Barak's reaction to it, but still seems to support. Here are the reactions he likes even though he seems to be supporting SL's point. Says SL's point is the plausible way of doing things without risk.
On May 24 2015 19:02 Breshke wrote:Show nested quote +On May 24 2015 18:59 sicklucker wrote: If i was mafia partners with scott heres what I would do. I would come into the thread near the vote, tell everyone that scott did not vote and will probably be mod killed ( which is acualy something that would have happened) and pushed the vote on a town Honeslty noone cares about this. hy is rels mafia. Start scumhunting or just die honestly play the game.
On May 24 2015 19:13 Barakos wrote: Pretty sure, he would have been warned, since he posted and this is a newbie-game but whatever...
Your logic fails, since nobody would do this, if they actually thought, scott would be modkilled, since him flipping red would make the person pushing for lynching someone different really bad.
He pretty weakly skips past Rel's massive case against SL.
Makes a point about SL doing his usual cop claim stuff. I think we all know that's actually pretty NAI for SL.
Finally admits that he sees
SL isn’t paying attention or being deliberately confusing
Agrees that the people who got pushed on or mentioned by scott get free town points. + Show Spoiler +Really people need to stop trying to use Scott mentioning them as proof they are town. Does anyone actually buy this point?
Talks about SL giving up trying to convince me and SL joking about being masons. Not sure why these are points in his read. No idea what this is telling plots about SL.
His last point about SL is also a null point related to Dis.
Then his conclusion is a non-conclusion
Ok to summarize why I used all this. Things about SL are very shifty. He is walking on the edge. Is there any reason for him to do it when he is not scum? Is there a reason anyone who is town deliberately tries to walk on the edge, when he could pose himself to look more towny? Think about it…
Idk doesn't really seem like he's trying to read ans is more still defending SL like he has been, just in a fancier post. Just how I'm seeing this.
Posts like this from plots also strike me as odd which is partially why I went back to look at him.
On May 27 2015 01:04 plotspot wrote:SL and I might be town partners, but scum partners? + Show Spoiler +
On May 27 2015 01:16 plotspot wrote: I think I can use this "partners" thing to explain quantum mechanics. "Hey, you see if someone accuses you of being partners with another person, the none of you can make excuses or both of you know it's ridiculous. There nothing in between like one thinks it's true and other thing thinks it's bs. That's quantum mechanics." Neither of those posts say anything of value.
|
|
|
|