But I have a little problem: when I look at your filter I see you not following up on anything until now. I am also seeing you not trying to solve the game very hard. So you are looking really bad to me, too.

I also have no idea what your reads beside Bill Murray are...
Thoughts about the un-readable sicklucker? You wanted to look at the votes, were you able to find something? Do you have secondary lynch target?

Tictock

United States6052 Posts

May 26 2015 19:09 GMT

#1182

@27nb

Didn't know you were around.

I've stated plenty of times that I think BM is looking pretty scummy for what he's been posting.

Your first post, where you vote him, in pretty OMGUS.

Then you talk about his one Big post. That post bought him some time, along with some of the other posts he made N1. I agree about all your other points, I'm pretty sure I've said pretty much the same about BM.

So, I totally agree BM is likely scum.

So @27nb if BM is scum, who do you think his last partner would be?

batsnacks

United States4466 Posts

May 26 2015 19:12 GMT

#1183

So... Since it might not be clear, my thing with bunnies, bill, and sulfur is that everyone else has either contributed or fought way harder. I switched off of bunnies because her bill post was okay and I want to see bill do something about it.

batsnacks

United States4466 Posts

May 26 2015 19:13 GMT

#1184

*contributed more

Tictock

United States6052 Posts

May 26 2015 19:13 GMT

#1185

@ BS
Other than being somewhat inactive. Why do you think Sul might be scum?

Or is that more a PoE list there?
27nb
BM
Sul

disformation

Germany8352 Posts

May 26 2015 19:13 GMT

#1186

On May 27 2015 04:12 batsnacks wrote:
So... Since it might not be clear, my thing with bunnies, bill, and sulfur is that everyone else has either contributed or fought way harder. I switched off of bunnies because her bill post was okay and I want to see bill do something about it.

Agree. I want her to fight with tooth and claw for us to keep our votes that way.
I hope Bill Murray will show up, so the two can have a solid deathmatch.

batsnacks

United States4466 Posts

May 26 2015 19:16 GMT

#1187

On May 27 2015 04:13 Tictock wrote:
@ BS
Other than being somewhat inactive. Why do you think Sul might be scum?

Or is that more a PoE list there?
27nb
BM
Sul

I can't think of anything huge off the top of my head, I'm sure I could find stuff if I dig but the main thing is that everyone else just looks -much- better. I think sulfur wasted his vote d1 too (could be wrong about that) and is wasting his vote now so there's that too.

27ninjabunnies

United States2486 Posts

May 26 2015 19:17 GMT

#1188

So, im thinking i need to reevaluate on sulfurus. I was expecting more townie posts besides the original newbie read I tried to get, but honestly, nothing has happened.

Kinda sad, I wanted Sulf to be town.

BS I find really townie here. Atleast bs is trying to figgure out the game and reevaluating as posts come along.

My mafia would be between BM, SL (maybe), and plots/BF.

I think the final two amfia are between those four.

SL i need to read more into, but i dont get a townie vibe anymore.

Plots had that really good chart post, but i dont think anything after that has been extremely eye catching.

BF is just wishy washy, and seeming to try and get a lynch somewhere on anyone.

disformation

Germany8352 Posts

May 26 2015 19:29 GMT

#1189

On May 27 2015 04:17 27ninjabunnies wrote:
So, im thinking i need to reevaluate on sulfurus. I was expecting more townie posts besides the original newbie read I tried to get, but honestly, nothing has happened.

Kinda sad, I wanted Sulf to be town.

BS I find really townie here. Atleast bs is trying to figgure out the game and reevaluating as posts come along.

My mafia would be between BM, SL (maybe), and plots/BF.

I think the final two amfia are between those four.

SL i need to read more into, but i dont get a townie vibe anymore.

Plots had that really good chart post, but i dont think anything after that has been extremely eye catching.

BF is just wishy washy, and seeming to try and get a lynch somewhere on anyone.

Sulf is currently my hot tip for being the third mafia.
sicklucker and plotspot had a kinda weird series of interaction, were you able to look into that? Yeah, pre-flip associations are not that great... wait... didn't you say that you are a video mafia player and that there you guys are all for looking into associations? Then surely you will have something to say about plotspot and sicklucker interacting. :D

Tictock

United States6052 Posts

May 26 2015 19:29 GMT

#1190

@27nb

What do you think about my last post regarding plots?

I agree about BF, he seems to be sheeping the popular opinion today. I also really don't like him looking for masons. Like he seems to be thinking it would help town to know who is masons so we have more confirmed town. Yet his possible masons are all people largely being townread, so how is that thinking helpful?

Tictock

United States6052 Posts

May 26 2015 19:30 GMT

#1191

Any chance of a vote count?

Sorry I don't have time to go digging kus I have to leave for work really soon.

Tictock

United States6052 Posts

May 26 2015 19:32 GMT

#1192

So far I'm liking 27nb's posts. They are super late to the party though...

Like the fact that she tries to start a new wagon on BM rather than going the easy route of pushing for SL is making me reconsider things.

disformation

Germany8352 Posts

May 26 2015 19:32 GMT

#1193

The plotspot and sicklucker interactions I was mentioning:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/485267-newbie-student-mafia-x?page=41#805

At votecount:
I think it is 6 bunnies 5 BM 2 sicklucker or something... let look me at that.

-Celestial-

United Kingdom3867 Posts

May 26 2015 19:32 GMT

#1194

On May 27 2015 04:30 Tictock wrote:
Any chance of a vote count?

The vote count from the previous page still holds. No votes have changed since then.

disformation

Germany8352 Posts

May 26 2015 19:33 GMT

#1195

Yup. Votecount on previous page:
5 bunnies
4 bill murray
2 sicklucker

Tictock

United States6052 Posts

May 26 2015 19:33 GMT

#1196

Oh thanks -c-

Sorry too many pages open >.<

plotspot

800 Posts

May 26 2015 19:34 GMT

#1197

On May 27 2015 04:03 Tictock wrote:
I still say the way plots acts towards SL is pretty strange.

His latest read on SL.

He starts by taking about a post SL make, says he likes Bre's and Barak's reaction to it, but still seems to support. Here are the reactions he likes even though he seems to be supporting SL's point. Says SL's point is the plausible way of doing things without risk.

Tictock I know you like to make cases against me, but how can you seriously make these elementary basic READING COMPREHENSION mistakes again and again and expect me to waste my time explaining them to you?

This is what I wrote in my case that you read:

I see SL is getting scumrpoints for some strange suggestions about how to handle Scott’s case to which Barakos and Breshke replied and I would have to agree to their opinion. It’s simply the more plausible way to do things, rather than risking it. Starting here:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=24308265

Like seriously, explain how I agree to SL’s points with this first before I go on to the rest of your points. Are you trolling me now?

Tictock

United States6052 Posts

May 26 2015 19:36 GMT

#1198

@plots

It’s simply the more plausible way to do things, rather than risking it. Starting here:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=24308265

I could swear this line is referring to SL, not the reactions of others.

plotspot

800 Posts

May 26 2015 19:38 GMT

#1199

wat? How can I agree to their opinion and at the same time agree to pursue a riskier strategy?

Tictock

United States6052 Posts

May 26 2015 19:40 GMT

#1200

@plots
care to focus on something that matters atm?

I'm clearly not making a case about you anyways. Just pointing out stuff I think is strange.

What do you think about BM and 27nb?