|
On January 12 2015 05:26 ObiWanShinobi wrote: Here's why: you have way too many unexplained scumreads and it looks like you're ignoring parts of peoples filters rather than trying to grasp the whole picture.
I have 3 scumreads... way too many?
I also never included anything from first half of d1.
|
On January 12 2015 05:26 ObiWanShinobi wrote: Here's why: you have way too many unexplained scumreads and it looks like you're ignoring parts of peoples filters rather than trying to grasp the whole picture.
They're not actually unexplained: just badly explained.
Either way, I don't like them.
|
On January 12 2015 05:30 lalalipop wrote:Show nested quote +On January 12 2015 05:26 ObiWanShinobi wrote: Here's why: you have way too many unexplained scumreads and it looks like you're ignoring parts of peoples filters rather than trying to grasp the whole picture. I have 3 scumreads... way too many? I also never included anything from first half of d1.
I was under the impression that you had Oats/Breshke as possible lynches.
Am I mistaken?
|
On January 12 2015 05:29 ObiWanShinobi wrote: SL is actually a claimed role but you somehow still don't have a read on him.
You've ignored the entirety of the lian/me interaction in favor of saying "I'm just complaining about thread atmosphere."
You've listed me in a scumteam with lian when it's obvious that we can't be a team.
Your proposed team (if you can even call it that, since you have a team made up of half the game) doesn't make any sense and you're open to way too many lynches at once.
what? I called scum on half the game? can you point out where I called scum on half the game? If I'm not mistaken, I have 3 scumreads. Meanwhile, I just have doubts about the rest, because there's questionable content in everyone's filter.
The only people who cant be a scum team is VA and anyone. Don't tell me scum cannot fake a fight. I'm not saying you're complaining about atmosphere in your interaction with liancourt. It comes more from this:
On January 09 2015 16:52 ObiWanShinobi wrote: I'm just going to assume that both lian and batsnacks are both mafia from this point on since the two of them are making the thread toxic and making the game unplayable for no reason whatsoever.
I can only see this mindset coming from mafia and I refuse to believe these two people are actually this shitty for real.
I'm ignoring the interaction you had with lian because i cant be arsed to force myself to read that fight. Thanks to lian.
|
On January 12 2015 05:32 ObiWanShinobi wrote:Show nested quote +On January 12 2015 05:30 lalalipop wrote:On January 12 2015 05:26 ObiWanShinobi wrote: Here's why: you have way too many unexplained scumreads and it looks like you're ignoring parts of peoples filters rather than trying to grasp the whole picture. I have 3 scumreads... way too many? I also never included anything from first half of d1. I was under the impression that you had Oats/Breshke as possible lynches. Am I mistaken?
definitely mistaken. Bothered to read the Conclusion that I even color coded for you?
I just don't have great feelings about breshke, while I'm asking everyone who oats is never considered. Done. Not my scumreads.
|
On January 12 2015 05:31 ObiWanShinobi wrote:Show nested quote +On January 12 2015 05:26 ObiWanShinobi wrote: Here's why: you have way too many unexplained scumreads and it looks like you're ignoring parts of peoples filters rather than trying to grasp the whole picture. They're not actually unexplained: just badly explained. Either way, I don't like them.
Read their filter for the explanation, if you don't think liancourt is scumm for his d1 end/d2 filter, I'll go eat a sock
|
On January 12 2015 05:13 ObiWanShinobi wrote:Show nested quote +On January 12 2015 05:00 Eden1892 wrote: I am hopelessly behind, working a double double is garbage. I'm voting Oats b/c out of my two suspects he hasn't really done anything to try to solve the game. Will catch up when I can. Sorry I suck
Vote Oats Vote somebody that's up for lynch. K I vote u bby
Jk I'm gonna sheep you, that cool?
|
On January 12 2015 05:46 lalalipop wrote:Show nested quote +On January 12 2015 05:31 ObiWanShinobi wrote:On January 12 2015 05:26 ObiWanShinobi wrote: Here's why: you have way too many unexplained scumreads and it looks like you're ignoring parts of peoples filters rather than trying to grasp the whole picture. They're not actually unexplained: just badly explained. Either way, I don't like them. Read their filter for the explanation, if you don't think liancourt is scumm for his d1 end/d2 filter, I'll go eat a sock
You called me scum because I called liancourt out for shitposting.
How does a townie think this?
|
|
On January 12 2015 05:47 Eden1892 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 12 2015 05:13 ObiWanShinobi wrote:On January 12 2015 05:00 Eden1892 wrote: I am hopelessly behind, working a double double is garbage. I'm voting Oats b/c out of my two suspects he hasn't really done anything to try to solve the game. Will catch up when I can. Sorry I suck
Vote Oats Vote somebody that's up for lynch. K I vote u bby Jk I'm gonna sheep you, that cool?
Do something.
|
I might renege this lala thing.
I don't know who I'd vote otherwise though. I still don't really get the drp scumreads.
|
Why did you go from
lian is not mafia in any case -> lian and bats are mafia for toxicity -> DrP needs to be lynched for lurking
? This is the only reason I'm scumreading you. You had a fight with lian, where you state that lian can't be mafia in any case because you sort of understand his case. However, you just decide to thinl that bat/lian are mafia for posting 1 post each in between your 'lian is not mafia' and 'lian/bat is mafia' posts. This is something I don't understand. Are you gloating them to play better? Or are you done with lian's toxicity despite being fine with it, calling him not mafia?
If you're really not happy with lian, why aren't you pushing him, but pushing DrP now for lurking? Isn't it a better choice to go for lian since you think he is mafia for playing badly/toxicitiy? Or do you think he can't be mafia after all?
|
On January 12 2015 05:55 ObiWanShinobi wrote:Show nested quote +On January 12 2015 05:47 Eden1892 wrote:On January 12 2015 05:13 ObiWanShinobi wrote:On January 12 2015 05:00 Eden1892 wrote: I am hopelessly behind, working a double double is garbage. I'm voting Oats b/c out of my two suspects he hasn't really done anything to try to solve the game. Will catch up when I can. Sorry I suck
Vote Oats Vote somebody that's up for lynch. K I vote u bby Jk I'm gonna sheep you, that cool? Do something. I can't right now, still at work and sneaking posts. Of the viable wagons lala is the only one I don't townread so I'm voting it. No time to do anything more involved
|
Why exactly does lalalipop have so many votes? I just don't see it.
|
I'm not pushing drp.
I'm wary of my read on lian because I don't know if I'd lynch him for personal reasons or not, and I know I try to lynch people who piss me off. I'm kind of on the fence because I can see scum motivation for shitting up the thread, but at the same time I don't think mafia would be so blatant about trying to make enemies.
|
SL is actually a claimed role but you somehow still don't have a read on him.
I'm not hunting for pr, why should I care what role SL claims? (he explicitly claimed it, but I don't buy that)
|
I swear lala isn't actually reading.
|
On January 12 2015 06:02 lalalipop wrote:Show nested quote +SL is actually a claimed role but you somehow still don't have a read on him.
I'm not hunting for pr, why should I care what role SL claims? (he explicitly claimed it, but I don't buy that)
If you think that claim is anything other than inoptimal and town as fuck then you need to check your life.
|
On January 12 2015 06:02 ObiWanShinobi wrote: I'm not pushing drp.
I'm wary of my read on lian because I don't know if I'd lynch him for personal reasons or not, and I know I try to lynch people who piss me off. I'm kind of on the fence because I can see scum motivation for shitting up the thread, but at the same time I don't think mafia would be so blatant about trying to make enemies.
you need to provide a conclusion. If you have a gun over liancourt's head, are you going to shoot or drop the gun?
|
|
|
|
|