##vote kitaman
stfu nerd
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
ObiWanShinobi
United States8089 Posts
##vote kitaman stfu nerd | ||
kushm4sta
United States8878 Posts
On September 06 2014 09:10 ObiWanShinobi wrote: ##unvote ##vote kitaman stfu nerd so rekt | ||
Tehpoofter
United States2911 Posts
On September 06 2014 08:03 kitaman27 wrote: ##Unvote ##Vote Damdred Unofficial count since I wanted to see where they are at. I never really though Obi was the best lynch and I guess I'm not very patient with pressuring him. Maybe if I ask nicely, he will post. Please give us a case? -_- Still thinking about who I would prefer between Damdred, bunnies, batsnacks, and kush. At the moment I'm at Damdred. Vivax (1): kush (4): batsnacks (2): 3d (1): Damdred (3): Vivax, ObiWanShinobi, Kita ObiWanShinobi (0): Best mod NA Thanks kita. I really wish I had about 4 different votes. I'd be on kush/damdred/3d/bunnies. It bugs me my pressure on 3d12 was ignored maybe I'm just missing something. I like the people on the damdred wagon it looks pretty good to me. Kush wagon not bad either. | ||
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
I don't even know who I'm voting for because the host lost interest after I broke his game or something. Just in case I'm still voting for kush, which I shouldn't be right now. Feel the pressure mafia. ##unvote ##vote: kitaman27 | ||
Tehpoofter
United States2911 Posts
On September 06 2014 08:49 kushm4sta wrote: AND WHAT THE F DOES THAT HAVE TO DO WITH YOU KEEPING YOUR OPTIONS OPEN? This is a good point. Idk if you're doing this emotional sort of out burst to appease me but you seem to be giving slightly more than 0 fucks atm. I also don't like 3d being on your wagon. He also hasn't followed up on his ultimatum (Which totally sounds like something that could be a damn mission) ##unvote ##Vote 3d12 Hai I think you're mafia. How do you plead? | ||
Tehpoofter
United States2911 Posts
On September 06 2014 09:10 ObiWanShinobi wrote: ##unvote ##vote kitaman stfu nerd hahaha omg I'm cracking up at work. Thanks for that. | ||
ObiWanShinobi
United States8089 Posts
I mean, I'm still probably going to tell you to fuck yourself, but it's the thought that counts. Why are you so disinterested in my responses to anything? You know that me posting a case isn't going to prove me town, especially if other players have already covered the topics I wanted to cover or if my case turns out to be bad. It could be intentionally bad, or unintentionally bad, so I don't know how you would even start to go about discerning the difference between the two when your request is for me to just post a case on anything. PEdit: Apparently I have won over the crowd. That's always fun. | ||
Tehpoofter
United States2911 Posts
On September 06 2014 09:23 batsnacks wrote: Obiwan laying down the law. Take that mafia. I don't even know who I'm voting for because the host lost interest after I broke his game or something. Just in case I'm still voting for kush, which I shouldn't be right now. Feel the pressure mafia. ##unvote ##vote: kitaman27 Real vote count please!!! What made you think kush was more townie? | ||
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
On September 06 2014 09:34 Tehpoofter wrote: Show nested quote + On September 06 2014 09:23 batsnacks wrote: Obiwan laying down the law. Take that mafia. I don't even know who I'm voting for because the host lost interest after I broke his game or something. Just in case I'm still voting for kush, which I shouldn't be right now. Feel the pressure mafia. ##unvote ##vote: kitaman27 Real vote count please!!! What made you think kush was more townie? I forgot about a couple of his posts earlier there he was telling people to back off me when he definitely didn't have to. So, he was scum reading me, but he was telling people who voted me for bad reasons to back off. That's townie. | ||
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
| ||
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On September 06 2014 09:33 ObiWanShinobi wrote: Seriously though, come at me Kita. I'm not happy with the fact that you're content to post some garbage on me that was taken completely out of context and then show no interest in following up on anything that you say. I mean, I'm still probably going to tell you to fuck yourself, but it's the thought that counts. Why are you so disinterested in my responses to anything? You know that me posting a case isn't going to prove me town, especially if other players have already covered the topics I wanted to cover or if my case turns out to be bad. It could be intentionally bad, or unintentionally bad, so I don't know how you would even start to go about discerning the difference between the two when your request is for me to just post a case on anything. PEdit: Apparently I have won over the crowd. That's always fun. I did not post garbage about you. You went 24 hours at the start of day two after claiming to be disgusted about the lack of activity the previous day. You openly bragged about doing nothing and seemed quite proud of the fact that people saw you doing nothing and thought "lol yep, that's classic Obi". If it weren't for the fact that you were voting damdred and batsnacks I would probably dislike you more. I'm not going to beg you for an explanation for your reads, but I would vote for your lynch if you're going to do nothing but troll this cycle | ||
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
| ||
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On September 06 2014 09:23 batsnacks wrote: I don't even know who I'm voting for because the host lost interest after I broke his game or something. Just in case I'm still voting for kush, which I shouldn't be right now. Here is the plan that we should take. batsnacks is going with the idea that "the host lost interest after he broke his game", the only reason to think that is that if batsnack actually has a role related to voting that could actually involve the host being concerned about the votes. I propose that batsnacks role claims. If he fails, we should lynch him because he is trolling about the idea that 3d put out there. There is zero reason to assume that the host is concerned about breaking the game as vanilla town. | ||
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On September 06 2014 09:50 batsnacks wrote: kitaman27 if I was right about you AND your mission d1 I am going to be really pleased with myself. I just want to throw that out there. Role claim for post above? | ||
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
On September 06 2014 09:52 kitaman27 wrote: Show nested quote + On September 06 2014 09:23 batsnacks wrote: I don't even know who I'm voting for because the host lost interest after I broke his game or something. Just in case I'm still voting for kush, which I shouldn't be right now. Here is the plan that we should take. batsnacks is going with the idea that "the host lost interest after he broke his game", the only reason to think that is that if batsnack actually has a role related to voting that could actually involve the host being concerned about the votes. I propose that batsnacks role claims. If he fails, we should lynch him because he is trolling about the idea that 3d put out there. There is zero reason to assume that the host is concerned about breaking the game as vanilla town. That is really, really optimistic of you. | ||
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On September 06 2014 09:53 batsnacks wrote: Show nested quote + On September 06 2014 09:52 kitaman27 wrote: On September 06 2014 09:23 batsnacks wrote: I don't even know who I'm voting for because the host lost interest after I broke his game or something. Just in case I'm still voting for kush, which I shouldn't be right now. Here is the plan that we should take. batsnacks is going with the idea that "the host lost interest after he broke his game", the only reason to think that is that if batsnack actually has a role related to voting that could actually involve the host being concerned about the votes. I propose that batsnacks role claims. If he fails, we should lynch him because he is trolling about the idea that 3d put out there. There is zero reason to assume that the host is concerned about breaking the game as vanilla town. That is really, really optimistic of you. So what are you saying? | ||
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
On September 06 2014 09:54 kitaman27 wrote: Show nested quote + On September 06 2014 09:53 batsnacks wrote: On September 06 2014 09:52 kitaman27 wrote: On September 06 2014 09:23 batsnacks wrote: I don't even know who I'm voting for because the host lost interest after I broke his game or something. Just in case I'm still voting for kush, which I shouldn't be right now. Here is the plan that we should take. batsnacks is going with the idea that "the host lost interest after he broke his game", the only reason to think that is that if batsnack actually has a role related to voting that could actually involve the host being concerned about the votes. I propose that batsnacks role claims. If he fails, we should lynch him because he is trolling about the idea that 3d put out there. There is zero reason to assume that the host is concerned about breaking the game as vanilla town. That is really, really optimistic of you. So what are you saying? That that is really, really optimistic of you. | ||
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On September 06 2014 09:55 batsnacks wrote: Show nested quote + On September 06 2014 09:54 kitaman27 wrote: On September 06 2014 09:53 batsnacks wrote: On September 06 2014 09:52 kitaman27 wrote: On September 06 2014 09:23 batsnacks wrote: I don't even know who I'm voting for because the host lost interest after I broke his game or something. Just in case I'm still voting for kush, which I shouldn't be right now. Here is the plan that we should take. batsnacks is going with the idea that "the host lost interest after he broke his game", the only reason to think that is that if batsnack actually has a role related to voting that could actually involve the host being concerned about the votes. I propose that batsnacks role claims. If he fails, we should lynch him because he is trolling about the idea that 3d put out there. There is zero reason to assume that the host is concerned about breaking the game as vanilla town. That is really, really optimistic of you. So what are you saying? That that is really, really optimistic of you. Can we be serious for just 60 seconds, that's all I ask. Do you honestly believe that the host was upset with you about your votes for role related reasons? | ||
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
On September 06 2014 09:55 kitaman27 wrote: Show nested quote + On September 06 2014 09:55 batsnacks wrote: On September 06 2014 09:54 kitaman27 wrote: On September 06 2014 09:53 batsnacks wrote: On September 06 2014 09:52 kitaman27 wrote: On September 06 2014 09:23 batsnacks wrote: I don't even know who I'm voting for because the host lost interest after I broke his game or something. Just in case I'm still voting for kush, which I shouldn't be right now. Here is the plan that we should take. batsnacks is going with the idea that "the host lost interest after he broke his game", the only reason to think that is that if batsnack actually has a role related to voting that could actually involve the host being concerned about the votes. I propose that batsnacks role claims. If he fails, we should lynch him because he is trolling about the idea that 3d put out there. There is zero reason to assume that the host is concerned about breaking the game as vanilla town. That is really, really optimistic of you. So what are you saying? That that is really, really optimistic of you. Can we be serious for just 60 seconds, that's all I ask. Do you honestly believe that the host was upset with you about your votes for role related reasons? I'm disappointed. On September 06 2014 00:28 kitaman27 wrote: Show nested quote + On September 06 2014 00:28 3d12 wrote: On September 06 2014 00:23 kitaman27 wrote: I think you're leading down the wrong path there 3d. This is probably the strangest post I've seen from you yet, kita. Many potential missions have been pointed out by you and you've been really good at pointing out/heading off potential mission-like behavior. What makes you say this couldn't be true? Honestly, from the way your viewpoint changed without any clarification, it sounds like you're trying to pull me off of bat's trail. I'm townreading you so far, so give me a reason to keep doing so. Why is this mod warning irrelevant? You don't make reads off of mod warnings, ever. | ||
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On September 06 2014 09:57 batsnacks wrote: Show nested quote + On September 06 2014 09:55 kitaman27 wrote: On September 06 2014 09:55 batsnacks wrote: On September 06 2014 09:54 kitaman27 wrote: On September 06 2014 09:53 batsnacks wrote: On September 06 2014 09:52 kitaman27 wrote: On September 06 2014 09:23 batsnacks wrote: I don't even know who I'm voting for because the host lost interest after I broke his game or something. Just in case I'm still voting for kush, which I shouldn't be right now. Here is the plan that we should take. batsnacks is going with the idea that "the host lost interest after he broke his game", the only reason to think that is that if batsnack actually has a role related to voting that could actually involve the host being concerned about the votes. I propose that batsnacks role claims. If he fails, we should lynch him because he is trolling about the idea that 3d put out there. There is zero reason to assume that the host is concerned about breaking the game as vanilla town. That is really, really optimistic of you. So what are you saying? That that is really, really optimistic of you. Can we be serious for just 60 seconds, that's all I ask. Do you honestly believe that the host was upset with you about your votes for role related reasons? I'm disappointed. Show nested quote + On September 06 2014 00:28 kitaman27 wrote: On September 06 2014 00:28 3d12 wrote: On September 06 2014 00:23 kitaman27 wrote: I think you're leading down the wrong path there 3d. This is probably the strangest post I've seen from you yet, kita. Many potential missions have been pointed out by you and you've been really good at pointing out/heading off potential mission-like behavior. What makes you say this couldn't be true? Honestly, from the way your viewpoint changed without any clarification, it sounds like you're trying to pull me off of bat's trail. I'm townreading you so far, so give me a reason to keep doing so. Why is this mod warning irrelevant? You don't make reads off of mod warnings, ever. Nope, I'm not making a read off the mod warning. I'm asking you if you were stated "because the host lost interest after I broke his game or something" as something that you actually believe to be true or you stated it to poke fun at 3d. | ||
| ||
Next event in 11h 11m
[ Submit Event ] |
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Heroes of the Storm Other Games summit1g8269 Grubby5438 tarik_tv3404 FrodaN1847 C9.Mang01175 Mew2King721 shahzam648 B2W.Neo609 JimRising 209 Hui .191 ZombieGrub191 ViBE67 Trikslyr60 Maynarde47 PiGStarcraft25 Organizations
StarCraft 2 • HeavenSC 79 StarCraft: Brood War• musti20045 23 • intothetv • AfreecaTV YouTube • Kozan • IndyKCrew • LaughNgamezSOOP • Laughngamez YouTube • Migwel • sooper7s Dota 2 League of Legends Other Games |
The PondCast
Wardi Open
OSC
OSC
CranKy Ducklings
Online Event
Korean StarCraft League
OlimoLeague
SC Evo Complete
PassionCraft
[ Show More ] Online Event
Sparkling Tuna Cup
SOOP
ByuN vs Rogue
SC Evo Complete
PassionCraft
Online Event
Wardi Open
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
|
|