|
On September 06 2014 09:59 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2014 09:57 batsnacks wrote:On September 06 2014 09:55 kitaman27 wrote:On September 06 2014 09:55 batsnacks wrote:On September 06 2014 09:54 kitaman27 wrote:On September 06 2014 09:53 batsnacks wrote:On September 06 2014 09:52 kitaman27 wrote:On September 06 2014 09:23 batsnacks wrote:
I don't even know who I'm voting for because the host lost interest after I broke his game or something. Just in case I'm still voting for kush, which I shouldn't be right now. Here is the plan that we should take. batsnacks is going with the idea that "the host lost interest after he broke his game", the only reason to think that is that if batsnack actually has a role related to voting that could actually involve the host being concerned about the votes. I propose that batsnacks role claims. If he fails, we should lynch him because he is trolling about the idea that 3d put out there. There is zero reason to assume that the host is concerned about breaking the game as vanilla town. That is really, really optimistic of you. So what are you saying? That that is really, really optimistic of you. Can we be serious for just 60 seconds, that's all I ask. Do you honestly believe that the host was upset with you about your votes for role related reasons? I'm disappointed. On September 06 2014 00:28 kitaman27 wrote:On September 06 2014 00:28 3d12 wrote:On September 06 2014 00:23 kitaman27 wrote:
I think you're leading down the wrong path there 3d. This is probably the strangest post I've seen from you yet, kita. Many potential missions have been pointed out by you and you've been really good at pointing out/heading off potential mission-like behavior. What makes you say this couldn't be true? Honestly, from the way your viewpoint changed without any clarification, it sounds like you're trying to pull me off of bat's trail. I'm townreading you so far, so give me a reason to keep doing so. Why is this mod warning irrelevant? You don't make reads off of mod warnings, ever. Nope, I'm not making a read off the mod warning. I'm asking you if you were stated "because the host lost interest after I broke his game or something" as something that you actually believe to be true or you stated it to poke fun at 3d.
If you're not making a read off of it then I don't understand why you want me to answer.
3d12 isn't scum. I have expressed this previously. You already had that information before this dialog.
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On September 06 2014 10:01 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2014 09:59 kitaman27 wrote:On September 06 2014 09:57 batsnacks wrote:On September 06 2014 09:55 kitaman27 wrote:On September 06 2014 09:55 batsnacks wrote:On September 06 2014 09:54 kitaman27 wrote:On September 06 2014 09:53 batsnacks wrote:On September 06 2014 09:52 kitaman27 wrote:On September 06 2014 09:23 batsnacks wrote:
I don't even know who I'm voting for because the host lost interest after I broke his game or something. Just in case I'm still voting for kush, which I shouldn't be right now. Here is the plan that we should take. batsnacks is going with the idea that "the host lost interest after he broke his game", the only reason to think that is that if batsnack actually has a role related to voting that could actually involve the host being concerned about the votes. I propose that batsnacks role claims. If he fails, we should lynch him because he is trolling about the idea that 3d put out there. There is zero reason to assume that the host is concerned about breaking the game as vanilla town. That is really, really optimistic of you. So what are you saying? That that is really, really optimistic of you. Can we be serious for just 60 seconds, that's all I ask. Do you honestly believe that the host was upset with you about your votes for role related reasons? I'm disappointed. On September 06 2014 00:28 kitaman27 wrote:On September 06 2014 00:28 3d12 wrote:On September 06 2014 00:23 kitaman27 wrote:
I think you're leading down the wrong path there 3d. This is probably the strangest post I've seen from you yet, kita. Many potential missions have been pointed out by you and you've been really good at pointing out/heading off potential mission-like behavior. What makes you say this couldn't be true? Honestly, from the way your viewpoint changed without any clarification, it sounds like you're trying to pull me off of bat's trail. I'm townreading you so far, so give me a reason to keep doing so. Why is this mod warning irrelevant? You don't make reads off of mod warnings, ever. Nope, I'm not making a read off the mod warning. I'm asking you if you were stated "because the host lost interest after I broke his game or something" as something that you actually believe to be true or you stated it to poke fun at 3d. If you're not making a read off of it then I don't understand why you want me to answer. 3d12 isn't scum. I have expressed this previously. You already had that information before this dialog.
I'm not asking about 3d. I'm asking, do honestly think that it's possible that the host is worried that you broke his game or were you saying it as a joke?
|
On September 06 2014 09:48 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2014 09:33 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
Seriously though, come at me Kita. I'm not happy with the fact that you're content to post some garbage on me that was taken completely out of context and then show no interest in following up on anything that you say.
I mean, I'm still probably going to tell you to fuck yourself, but it's the thought that counts. Why are you so disinterested in my responses to anything? You know that me posting a case isn't going to prove me town, especially if other players have already covered the topics I wanted to cover or if my case turns out to be bad. It could be intentionally bad, or unintentionally bad, so I don't know how you would even start to go about discerning the difference between the two when your request is for me to just post a case on anything.
PEdit: Apparently I have won over the crowd. That's always fun. I did not post garbage about you. You went 24 hours at the start of day two after claiming to be disgusted about the lack of activity the previous day. You openly bragged about doing nothing and seemed quite proud of the fact that people saw you doing nothing and thought "lol yep, that's classic Obi". If it weren't for the fact that you were voting damdred and batsnacks I would probably dislike you more. I'm not going to beg you for an explanation for your reads, but I would vote for your lynch if you're going to do nothing but troll this cycle 
You did. All of those quotes were taken completely out of context and you followed it up with a complete lack of interest in my responses to anything. "Posting a case" isn't going to make me town or not, and you know it, so why would you make such an asinine request?
Here, I'll even go through and address the quotes you made:
A) Throwing a vote down and saying I'm not going to do anything right before before I go to sleep is not the same as bitching at people for being afk at EoD. I was one of the only people that gave a damn enough to show up, so I don't know why you think it's acceptable to quote these two things with no reference to why I posted them in the first place.
B) Kush was (understandably) making posts that were eerily similar to posts he would make whilst playing his scumgame, which I called him out for. I then joked about people leaving me alone for doing very little. The second part isn't even particularly true considering the context of the first quote in this statement, and even then, my actions around EoD should have been enough to dissuade you from actually thinking that I wasn't doing anything.
Your follow up post showed a clear lack of interest in how I respond to anything, but asking me to post cases on anything is a strange way of casting doubt on me without caring about my alignment, while forcing my attention elsewhere.
|
On September 06 2014 10:03 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2014 10:01 batsnacks wrote:On September 06 2014 09:59 kitaman27 wrote:On September 06 2014 09:57 batsnacks wrote:On September 06 2014 09:55 kitaman27 wrote:On September 06 2014 09:55 batsnacks wrote:On September 06 2014 09:54 kitaman27 wrote:On September 06 2014 09:53 batsnacks wrote:On September 06 2014 09:52 kitaman27 wrote:On September 06 2014 09:23 batsnacks wrote:
I don't even know who I'm voting for because the host lost interest after I broke his game or something. Just in case I'm still voting for kush, which I shouldn't be right now. Here is the plan that we should take. batsnacks is going with the idea that "the host lost interest after he broke his game", the only reason to think that is that if batsnack actually has a role related to voting that could actually involve the host being concerned about the votes. I propose that batsnacks role claims. If he fails, we should lynch him because he is trolling about the idea that 3d put out there. There is zero reason to assume that the host is concerned about breaking the game as vanilla town. That is really, really optimistic of you. So what are you saying? That that is really, really optimistic of you. Can we be serious for just 60 seconds, that's all I ask. Do you honestly believe that the host was upset with you about your votes for role related reasons? I'm disappointed. On September 06 2014 00:28 kitaman27 wrote:On September 06 2014 00:28 3d12 wrote:On September 06 2014 00:23 kitaman27 wrote:
I think you're leading down the wrong path there 3d. This is probably the strangest post I've seen from you yet, kita. Many potential missions have been pointed out by you and you've been really good at pointing out/heading off potential mission-like behavior. What makes you say this couldn't be true? Honestly, from the way your viewpoint changed without any clarification, it sounds like you're trying to pull me off of bat's trail. I'm townreading you so far, so give me a reason to keep doing so. Why is this mod warning irrelevant? You don't make reads off of mod warnings, ever. Nope, I'm not making a read off the mod warning. I'm asking you if you were stated "because the host lost interest after I broke his game or something" as something that you actually believe to be true or you stated it to poke fun at 3d. If you're not making a read off of it then I don't understand why you want me to answer. 3d12 isn't scum. I have expressed this previously. You already had that information before this dialog. I'm not asking about 3d. I'm asking, do honestly think that it's possible that the host is worried that you broke his game or were you saying it as a joke?
What do you think?
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
I'm asking you. This doesn't need to be so difficult.
On September 04 2014 07:42 batsnacks wrote:
Given that, my vote was in an excellent spot I stand by the decisions I made day 1
On September 05 2014 08:17 batsnacks wrote:duh
On September 04 2014 03:56 batsnacks wrote:
That's two down.
On September 04 2014 07:05 batsnacks wrote:
Do you think I was right about kitaman27?
On September 04 2014 06:50 batsnacks wrote:
there is at least 1 scum between the two of you.
On September 05 2014 07:34 batsnacks wrote:
I think I will vote obiwan or kitaman today.
Considering you were so completely confident that I am mafia, why does it take a random 1 liner from kush and a joke vote from Obi for you to finally vote me. Weren't you in an "excellent spot" yesterday and you stand by you're decision? Now you're voting me in passing, saying that you'll probably end up on kush.
|
On September 06 2014 10:07 kitaman27 wrote:I'm asking you. This doesn't need to be so difficult. Show nested quote +On September 04 2014 07:42 batsnacks wrote:
Given that, my vote was in an excellent spot I stand by the decisions I made day 1 Show nested quote +On September 05 2014 08:17 batsnacks wrote:On September 05 2014 08:17 Vivax wrote:
Anyone here who thinks kita is scum? duh Show nested quote +On September 04 2014 07:05 batsnacks wrote:
Do you think I was right about kitaman27? Show nested quote +On September 04 2014 06:50 batsnacks wrote:
there is at least 1 scum between the two of you. Show nested quote +On September 05 2014 07:34 batsnacks wrote:
I think I will vote obiwan or kitaman today. Considering you were so completely confident that I am mafia, why does it take a random 1 liner from kush and a joke vote from Obi for you to finally vote me. Weren't you in an "excellent spot" yesterday and you stand by you're decision? Now you're voting me in passing, saying that you'll probably end up on kush.
Quote where I said I will probably end up on kush today and I will unvote you.
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On September 06 2014 10:04 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
"Posting a case" isn't going to make me town or not, and you know it, so why would you make such an asinine request?
Giving a read on essentially anyone is an "asinine" request?
You said that you were going to sheep Vivax and don't care to do anything at the time. It's not like I posted this right after you made your post. You went 24 hours with NOTHING. You state that making a case isn't going to make you town. Well how exactly do you expect us to make a read if you post NOTHING for more than the first half of the cycle.
If you're looking for specifics, what is your read on Kush, Damdred, Bunnies and batsnacks and why?
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On September 06 2014 10:08 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2014 10:07 kitaman27 wrote:I'm asking you. This doesn't need to be so difficult. On September 04 2014 07:42 batsnacks wrote:
Given that, my vote was in an excellent spot I stand by the decisions I made day 1 On September 05 2014 08:17 batsnacks wrote:On September 05 2014 08:17 Vivax wrote:
Anyone here who thinks kita is scum? duh On September 04 2014 03:56 batsnacks wrote:
That's two down. On September 04 2014 07:05 batsnacks wrote:
Do you think I was right about kitaman27? On September 04 2014 06:50 batsnacks wrote:
there is at least 1 scum between the two of you. On September 05 2014 07:34 batsnacks wrote:
I think I will vote obiwan or kitaman today. Considering you were so completely confident that I am mafia, why does it take a random 1 liner from kush and a joke vote from Obi for you to finally vote me. Weren't you in an "excellent spot" yesterday and you stand by you're decision? Now you're voting me in passing, saying that you'll probably end up on kush. Quote where I said I will probably end up on kush today and I will unvote you.
Misread that. The point still stands, why have you completely ignored your number one scumread. Is your case still that you think I had to be on the majority day one or are there any posts today that lead you to your conclusion?
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On September 06 2014 08:09 kitaman27 wrote:
I'm having second thoughts on a scum kush, but I'm in wait and see mode.
To elaborate on this one, from the games I've looked at, kush appears to shut down as mafia once he becomes a legitimate lynch target. He commonly lashes out at people stating that there is obviously nothing he can do, so why should he work for people who aren't willing to listen.
This game he at least seems willing to give opinions, rather than accepting his fate and going dark.
|
On September 06 2014 10:11 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2014 10:08 batsnacks wrote:On September 06 2014 10:07 kitaman27 wrote:I'm asking you. This doesn't need to be so difficult. On September 04 2014 07:42 batsnacks wrote:
Given that, my vote was in an excellent spot I stand by the decisions I made day 1 On September 05 2014 08:17 batsnacks wrote:On September 05 2014 08:17 Vivax wrote:
Anyone here who thinks kita is scum? duh On September 04 2014 03:56 batsnacks wrote:
That's two down. On September 04 2014 07:05 batsnacks wrote:
Do you think I was right about kitaman27? On September 04 2014 06:50 batsnacks wrote:
there is at least 1 scum between the two of you. On September 05 2014 07:34 batsnacks wrote:
I think I will vote obiwan or kitaman today. Considering you were so completely confident that I am mafia, why does it take a random 1 liner from kush and a joke vote from Obi for you to finally vote me. Weren't you in an "excellent spot" yesterday and you stand by you're decision? Now you're voting me in passing, saying that you'll probably end up on kush. Quote where I said I will probably end up on kush today and I will unvote you. Misread that. The point still stands, why have you completely ignored your number one scumread. Is your case still that you think I had to be on the majority day one or are there any posts today that lead you to your conclusion?
Everyone else was townreading you. I thought I was wrong for a quick minute; which, I'm wrong sometimes. I actually had a massive campaign planned against you but I dropped it at the very last minute. If you want to see it post game remind me, it's still in my notepad. I have since remembered how right I was though, and you're doing a terrible job convincing me otherwise.
Let me give you some hoops to jump through. Tell me about Vivax and bunnies.
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
I'd like you to post it within the next 60 seconds. Thanks.
|
On September 06 2014 10:10 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2014 10:04 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
"Posting a case" isn't going to make me town or not, and you know it, so why would you make such an asinine request? Giving a read on essentially anyone is an "asinine" request? You said that you were going to sheep Vivax and don't care to do anything at the time. It's not like I posted this right after you made your post. You went 24 hours with NOTHING. You state that making a case isn't going to make you town. Well how exactly do you expect us to make a read if you post NOTHING for more than the first half of the cycle. If you're looking for specifics, what is your read on Kush, Damdred, Bunnies and batsnacks and why?
No.
Reads are not the same things as cases, so don't turn around and try to change what your initial request was into trying to get my view on things when you're goading me into pushing for literally anyone's lynch.
Furthermore, what does me being afk for 24 hours have to do with anything? Do you know why I was afk? Did you think I had the ability to check the thread? Why or why not?
My current issue is that you're drawing conclusions without having any kind of buildup to them. You have no idea why I was away from the game, but you're immediately going "doing nothing is scummy." I can get the fact that going away and doing nothing for extended periods of time can be considered scummy, but I came back into the thread wanting to engage you and you just didn't care enough to figure out why. What gives?
|
On September 06 2014 10:18 ObiWanShinobi wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2014 10:10 kitaman27 wrote:On September 06 2014 10:04 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
"Posting a case" isn't going to make me town or not, and you know it, so why would you make such an asinine request? Giving a read on essentially anyone is an "asinine" request? You said that you were going to sheep Vivax and don't care to do anything at the time. It's not like I posted this right after you made your post. You went 24 hours with NOTHING. You state that making a case isn't going to make you town. Well how exactly do you expect us to make a read if you post NOTHING for more than the first half of the cycle. If you're looking for specifics, what is your read on Kush, Damdred, Bunnies and batsnacks and why? tl;dr No.
My vote is in a good spot.
|
On September 06 2014 09:45 batsnacks wrote:
poofter 3d12 isn't mafia. Just trust me, will you? Vote someone else.
Twice I've tried to pressure him this game and twice been denied before he even has a chance to respond(thats just this day if you ignore day 1). I think you can understand I am not just going to trust you off your word. I'd like to see from 3d12 where his heads at. If he convinces me then I'm okay moving off but if not I'm going to pressure someone I think is scummy.
|
damn it I quoted the wrong person, sorry jedi master pls forgive me
|
On September 06 2014 10:20 Tehpoofter wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2014 09:45 batsnacks wrote:
poofter 3d12 isn't mafia. Just trust me, will you? Vote someone else. Twice I've tried to pressure him this game and twice been denied before he even has a chance to respond(thats just this day if you ignore day 1). I think you can understand I am not just going to trust you off your word. I'd like to see from 3d12 where his heads at. If he convinces me then I'm okay moving off but if not I'm going to pressure someone I think is scummy.
I'm ok with this response. You do what you do you have my full support.
Just fyi though 3d12 said "batwagon" and that's hilarious so he's probably not mafia.
|
On September 06 2014 09:55 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2014 09:55 batsnacks wrote:On September 06 2014 09:54 kitaman27 wrote:On September 06 2014 09:53 batsnacks wrote:On September 06 2014 09:52 kitaman27 wrote:On September 06 2014 09:23 batsnacks wrote:
I don't even know who I'm voting for because the host lost interest after I broke his game or something. Just in case I'm still voting for kush, which I shouldn't be right now. Here is the plan that we should take. batsnacks is going with the idea that "the host lost interest after he broke his game", the only reason to think that is that if batsnack actually has a role related to voting that could actually involve the host being concerned about the votes. I propose that batsnacks role claims. If he fails, we should lynch him because he is trolling about the idea that 3d put out there. There is zero reason to assume that the host is concerned about breaking the game as vanilla town. That is really, really optimistic of you. So what are you saying? That that is really, really optimistic of you. Can we be serious for just 60 seconds, that's all I ask. Do you honestly believe that the host was upset with you about your votes for role related reasons?
Do you honestly think that he should role claim for this? I find it odd you're talking to him like it would have to be a role that has to do with votes but not calling it a scum thing when this is a game with missions where scum's missions have to keep them in the game and voting things seem like something they might have to do.
I don't like this line at all from you kita.
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
poofter, do you agree that batsnacks should post his "case in notepad" against me as proof that he is not lying?
If he continues to wait, that just gives him time to make one up,
|
On September 06 2014 10:21 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2014 10:20 Tehpoofter wrote:On September 06 2014 09:45 batsnacks wrote:
poofter 3d12 isn't mafia. Just trust me, will you? Vote someone else. Twice I've tried to pressure him this game and twice been denied before he even has a chance to respond(thats just this day if you ignore day 1). I think you can understand I am not just going to trust you off your word. I'd like to see from 3d12 where his heads at. If he convinces me then I'm okay moving off but if not I'm going to pressure someone I think is scummy. I'm ok with this response. You do what you do you have my full support. Just fyi though 3d12 said "batwagon" and that's hilarious so he's probably not mafia.
haha batwagon I missed that its awesome.
I appreciate if I could just not have to type things like that out and could just let it simmer as it kinda diminishes any impact it was going to have.
|
On September 06 2014 10:23 kitaman27 wrote:
poofter, do you agree that batsnacks should post his "case in notepad" against me as proof that he is not lying?
If he continues to wait, that just gives him time to make one up,
Dude you should do motivational speaking. Your optimism is off the charts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
