|
On February 05 2014 01:01 LoneMeow wrote:Show nested quote +On February 05 2014 00:57 Oatsmaster wrote: mannnn Koshi's shitposting is AFTER his first post.
Is there anything else in this game that you think is worth talking about than Koshi's "shitposting"? how everyone doesnt really want to find scum lol.
I dunno, nothing really stood out. I would really like to discuss cakemanofdoom and hopeless though, what are your thoughts on them?
|
Koshi your first post was made to generate discussion. Its a null tell for me. However now that there was alot of discussion in the thread all i see you doing now is defending your self. Alot more happened then people just responding to your post. I want to see your thoughts on things like that. The back and forth that occurred and the conversation. I don't feel it should be necessary to have to supply you with questions to get your thoughts on things. You have quite a few games under your belt. Lets see some thought processes.
Lonemeow Your early posting is to be straight forward calling for a policy lynch. You state that a lurker lynch should be based on amount of content. Your content is lacking. You don't seem to have the initiative to put your own thoughts out there and make a real effort to find scum. Again this is about have a conversing with the thread. Your not doing it. There is no comment on any of the other things that happened. Besides some stuff about balla who voted ON YOU to pressure you to post more. And a speck of speculation on Koshi. Bare bones stuff not even.
On February 04 2014 07:40 LoneMeow wrote: Well, for starters I don't quite agree with your "minimum post count" thing. I'll support a lurker lynch if it's necessary, but based on amount of content, not number of posts.
I have no foundation to create a town read on you this game. So your not playing the game with the intent of showing that your town and are making the game harder for all the other players involved. So based on the assumption that you don't want to get lurker lynched I propose the same thing I said to sidesprang. I would like you to create an arbitrary about of posts that you set for your self a little higher then your would normally go for, but something that is reasonable to obtain. To keep it clear I don't want you to spam. I want you to have have a clear intention with your post. I'll repeat that CLEAR INTENTIONS WHEN YOU POST!!!
I realize I am repeating my self with my post to sidesprang and some might consider this fluff with no purpose. However if I feel its necessary to produce content and get the lurkers in here to post I'll do it till i get me some alignment reads on them.
These are people we need more content from
I would also like alakaslam to come and post some your posting last night was unreadable and made no sense. Get a computer and start reading up and posting.
Hopeless1der you had two posts about nothing yesterday time to step it up.
Sidesprang you never responded to my post about setting up a minimum post limit for your self. What say you?
|
On February 05 2014 01:03 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On February 05 2014 01:01 LoneMeow wrote:On February 05 2014 00:57 Oatsmaster wrote: mannnn Koshi's shitposting is AFTER his first post.
Is there anything else in this game that you think is worth talking about than Koshi's "shitposting"? how everyone doesnt really want to find scum lol. I dunno, nothing really stood out. I would really like to discuss cakemanofdoom and hopeless though, what are your thoughts on them?
Hopeless1der has not produced anything that I find directly useful for deducing his alignment. Which, in itself, could become alignment indicative.
cakemanofdoom seems to post pretty freely which makes me lean town on him, but I found this weird:
On February 04 2014 12:20 cakemanofdoom wrote: I wanna see more posts from LoneMeow. His first post doesn't seem very alignment-indicative to me; just a throwaway comment. Response to the vote is a decent explanation. Aside from that, his only post is about how post quality is more important than number of posts. True, but overall he's made too few posts/contributions for me to read him. That puts him more scummy than not.
Why did he single out me as someone who has not posted much and claim I'm scummy based on that, given that at the time there were many others who would fit the criteria aswell?
|
On February 05 2014 01:03 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On February 05 2014 01:01 LoneMeow wrote:On February 05 2014 00:57 Oatsmaster wrote: mannnn Koshi's shitposting is AFTER his first post.
Is there anything else in this game that you think is worth talking about than Koshi's "shitposting"? how everyone doesnt really want to find scum lol. I dunno, nothing really stood out. I would really like to discuss cakemanofdoom and hopeless though, what are your thoughts on them?
This isn't really directed at only you, but i'm quoting this since it's an example. If you want to discuss a certain topic then just go at it, no reason to ask someone else to start the conversation for you.
You obviously see something, so what it is? Then ask others what they think, whether they agree/disagree and why. Unless you have a specific reason to not reveal your hand yet.
|
On February 04 2014 20:17 LoneMeow wrote:Show nested quote +On February 04 2014 20:08 Koshi wrote:On February 04 2014 19:56 LoneMeow wrote: What do you make of Balla24's vote/unvote on me? His reasoning made sense and playing so serious from the start is townie. Even though he unvoted without any new input from me and without providing pretty much any reason at all?
Stuff like this is similar to above.
Though here it kind of seems like LoneMeow was expecting an answer and didn't get it, and he wants to call me scum for it without calling me scum.
|
On February 05 2014 01:16 Balla24 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 04 2014 20:17 LoneMeow wrote:On February 04 2014 20:08 Koshi wrote:On February 04 2014 19:56 LoneMeow wrote: What do you make of Balla24's vote/unvote on me? His reasoning made sense and playing so serious from the start is townie. Even though he unvoted without any new input from me and without providing pretty much any reason at all? Stuff like this is similar to above. Though here it kind of seems like LoneMeow was expecting an answer and didn't get it, and he wants to call me scum for it without calling me scum.
Why did you unvote me at that point?
Also, who do you think is scum?
|
Why did he single out me as someone who has not posted much and claim I'm scummy based on that, given that at the time there were many others who would fit the criteria aswell? Yeah I saw this too and thought it was weird.
Jay, stop giving advice to all the scummy people and attack someone.
Balla, I want to see stuff that is not influenced by my conclusions. What do you think about Cake and hopeless?
|
|
On February 05 2014 01:17 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +Why did he single out me as someone who has not posted much and claim I'm scummy based on that, given that at the time there were many others who would fit the criteria aswell? Yeah I saw this too and thought it was weird. Jay, stop giving advice to all the scummy people and attack someone. Balla, I want to see stuff that is not influenced by my conclusions. What do you think about Cake and hopeless? It's day one this is the time to give advice. I want to give people the chance to produce content before they are threatened with a lynch cause they are unreadable and a liability to town.
It feels early in the day to start a lynch wagon on someone. I rather keep feeling people out before going gungho on my suspected scum.
|
On February 05 2014 01:25 Koshi wrote: Oats is still hilarious. Dude this isn't the post I wanted to see from you. You have no content. Talk about something that happened this past day.
|
On February 05 2014 01:17 LoneMeow wrote:Show nested quote +On February 05 2014 01:16 Balla24 wrote:On February 04 2014 20:17 LoneMeow wrote:On February 04 2014 20:08 Koshi wrote:On February 04 2014 19:56 LoneMeow wrote: What do you make of Balla24's vote/unvote on me? His reasoning made sense and playing so serious from the start is townie. Even though he unvoted without any new input from me and without providing pretty much any reason at all? Stuff like this is similar to above. Though here it kind of seems like LoneMeow was expecting an answer and didn't get it, and he wants to call me scum for it without calling me scum. Why did you unvote me at that point? Also, who do you think is scum?
Are you saying my vote was correct in the first place, seems weird that you're calling me out for unvoting. Anyways, 2 reasons:
1. I believe it's more likely for scum to have agreed with Koshi then to disagree with him straight up like you did. 2. The conversation about my vote had already been hashed out, no reason to keep it there.
Moving my vote isn't that interesting is it? I could still have my vote on you and it wouldn't really change anything.
On February 05 2014 01:17 Oatsmaster wrote: Balla, I want to see stuff that is not influenced by my conclusions. What do you think about Cake and hopeless?
Sure but is that question really something that can be influenced by what you say. I still don't know what your conclusions are. Like I don't even really know what you're trying to get at. If you have new information then bring it forward instead of trying to get us to guess at what you see.
- I've already said stuff about cake, he's ok atm. I like how he tried to bring new information to the thread. - Hopeless has jack shit, possible scum.
|
Yeah Im not telling you my conclusions because I want to hear what you think without my conclusions coloring your analysis. I really null on cake, what he posts when he comes back is really important and will probably decided my read. Hopeless is a useless piece of shit that we should lynch.
|
On February 05 2014 01:30 Balla24 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 05 2014 01:17 LoneMeow wrote:On February 05 2014 01:16 Balla24 wrote:On February 04 2014 20:17 LoneMeow wrote:On February 04 2014 20:08 Koshi wrote:On February 04 2014 19:56 LoneMeow wrote: What do you make of Balla24's vote/unvote on me? His reasoning made sense and playing so serious from the start is townie. Even though he unvoted without any new input from me and without providing pretty much any reason at all? Stuff like this is similar to above. Though here it kind of seems like LoneMeow was expecting an answer and didn't get it, and he wants to call me scum for it without calling me scum. Why did you unvote me at that point? Also, who do you think is scum? Are you saying my vote was correct in the first place, seems weird that you're calling me out for unvoting. Anyways, 2 reasons: 1. I believe it's more likely for scum to have agreed with Koshi then to disagree with him straight up like you did. 2. The conversation about my vote had already been hashed out, no reason to keep it there. Moving my vote isn't that interesting is it? I could still have my vote on you and it wouldn't really change anything.
I was interested why the unvote happened at that moment, many hours after my last post. Point 2 answers this enough for now.
|
Such conclusions. Really happy they didn't color my analysis there otherwise I would have been a huge sheep!
Sorry dude. Looks more like you did the opposite. You asked an open-ended question because you didn't really see anything yourself, and then you said exactly what the people you asked said.
|
On February 05 2014 01:43 Balla24 wrote: Such conclusions. Really happy they didn't color my analysis there otherwise I would have been a huge sheep!
Sorry dude. Looks more like you did the opposite. You asked an open-ended question because you didn't really see anything yourself, and then you said exactly what the people you asked said. Or we came to the same conclusion independantly which says something about LM's alignment. HAH.
Do you think Im scum?
|
On February 05 2014 01:43 Balla24 wrote: Such conclusions. Really happy they didn't color my analysis there otherwise I would have been a huge sheep!
Sorry dude. Looks more like you did the opposite. You asked an open-ended question because you didn't really see anything yourself, and then you said exactly what the people you asked said. +1
|
On February 05 2014 01:46 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On February 05 2014 01:43 Balla24 wrote: Such conclusions. Really happy they didn't color my analysis there otherwise I would have been a huge sheep!
Sorry dude. Looks more like you did the opposite. You asked an open-ended question because you didn't really see anything yourself, and then you said exactly what the people you asked said. Or we came to the same conclusion independantly which says something about LM's alignment. HAH. Do you think Im scum? What you asked questions about Cake and Hopeless then you said the exact same thing balla said. Like you even called him hopeless shit when balla had refereed as to him doing jack shit.
Where did LM come into this. What do you think about LM.
|
Before I answer that can you answer me this:
Am I leaning town or scum? Same for LM.
|
On February 05 2014 01:52 jaybrundage wrote:Show nested quote +On February 05 2014 01:46 Oatsmaster wrote:On February 05 2014 01:43 Balla24 wrote: Such conclusions. Really happy they didn't color my analysis there otherwise I would have been a huge sheep!
Sorry dude. Looks more like you did the opposite. You asked an open-ended question because you didn't really see anything yourself, and then you said exactly what the people you asked said. Or we came to the same conclusion independantly which says something about LM's alignment. HAH. Do you think Im scum? What you asked questions about Cake and Hopeless then you said the exact same thing balla said. Like you even called him hopeless shit when balla had refereed as to him doing jack shit. Where did LM come into this. What do you think about LM. what. Balla called cake townie, I called him null, pretty much everyone in the game thinks hopeless should die so there is that....
I asked LM the questions first and I think he is town.
|
On February 05 2014 01:53 Balla24 wrote: Before I answer that can you answer me this:
Am I leaning town or scum? Same for LM. I thought you disapproved of the asking questions before giving your own answers?
|
|
|
|