|
On February 26 2013 09:50 MilkSuckler wrote:Im still waiting for something meaningful from you. Who do you prefer: Prome and his RNG or Geript and his newbie mayor campaign
I prefer myself. That's meaningful enough for the rest of the game. Bow before your king.
|
On a serious note though, I'm still reading.
|
On February 26 2013 09:39 VisceraEyes wrote: ##Unvote ##Vote: Wade Fell WTF is this shit?
|
A vote for mayor? You know, exactly what it looks like?
|
Okay, so RNG didn't create the discussion I wanted. Screw you guys.
On February 26 2013 09:28 Wade Fell wrote: My new platform is killing Layabout
Read his posts
hes scum
Explain.
For the moment my top scum read is WoS, he responded to gerpit's candidacy all wrong, obviously assuming gerpit is town but statistically...
On February 26 2013 09:23 WaveofShadow wrote:Show nested quote +On February 26 2013 09:20 geript wrote: It looks to me that the best person for mayor is someone who is willing to: A. put in the time to read the thread B. both make and evaluate other's cases C. is unlikely to be an early target for NK In this regard I would nominate myself as I am more likely to devote more time to reading (both filters and filter in the context of the thread as a whole) than anyone else. Additionally, I am relatively unknown which removes untoward bias for or against me due to previous games as well as making me a more impartial arbiter as it regards established players.
My lynch platform is: Scum read > hard/impossible to read > null read > town read
## vote geript Except for the fact that you were killed N1 last game for the above reasons, by someone who is very likely smurfing in this game.
He focuses on the likelihood of a night kill on gerpit, he is too interested in night actions and not in the candidacy or the actual ideas which gerpit proposes. I'm not a fan of this post or WoS's mentality.
Vote me, screw random lynch. I'll lynch WoS.
|
I think he's more mad that WF's campaign is fuck him.
|
So many people didn't post yet in this friendly atmosphere of fun and jests .
|
@Vivax why do you prefer to give meaningless answers? Almost everyone would prefer themselves as mayor. You seem to have an underlying agenda in you posts. Your tone is indicative of that in the least. Why not just out with it?
|
On February 26 2013 09:49 layabout wrote:Show nested quote +On February 26 2013 09:46 jcarlsoniv wrote:On February 26 2013 09:43 layabout wrote: well gee jcarl, if scum can look townie i guess we might as well give up right now then...
the argument that we might think scum are town is disgusting. Besides nearly every game of mafia ever has a few players that look very town that are very town and if you read the thread and people are even a bit active it is not hard to find them even on day1. What I'm saying is that you think his post is a "scum agenda" and I disagree because I agree with WF's sentiment. then why did you use dishonest scare tactics?
If you think those are scare tactics then you need to grow a fucking pair.
|
Prom that's closer to what I'm looking for. Why do you prefer to lynch WoS over Vivax?
|
On February 26 2013 09:58 geript wrote: @Vivax why do you prefer to give meaningless answers? Almost everyone would prefer themselves as mayor. You seem to have an underlying agenda in you posts. Your tone is indicative of that in the least. Why not just out with it?
Why didn't you answer my question yet?
|
On February 26 2013 09:56 VisceraEyes wrote: A vote for mayor? You know, exactly what it looks like? Baby, as the french chefs keep saying "Where is the SAUCE"
|
He's making the most sense and I'm not instantly sickened by his lynch preference right now. Good enough for me.
|
Since WoS has disappeared into the shadows I'll ask someone else. @Milksuckler, any posts that you think are particularly sketchy so far?
|
On February 26 2013 10:03 VisceraEyes wrote: He's making the most sense and I'm not instantly sickened by his lynch preference right now. Good enough for me. I can live with that. Move on solider.
P.S. Can I be your shadow pl0x
|
On February 26 2013 09:57 Promethelax wrote:Okay, so RNG didn't create the discussion I wanted. Screw you guys. Show nested quote +On February 26 2013 09:28 Wade Fell wrote: My new platform is killing Layabout
Read his posts
hes scum Explain. For the moment my top scum read is WoS, he responded to gerpit's candidacy all wrong, obviously assuming gerpit is town but statistically... Show nested quote +On February 26 2013 09:23 WaveofShadow wrote:On February 26 2013 09:20 geript wrote: It looks to me that the best person for mayor is someone who is willing to: A. put in the time to read the thread B. both make and evaluate other's cases C. is unlikely to be an early target for NK In this regard I would nominate myself as I am more likely to devote more time to reading (both filters and filter in the context of the thread as a whole) than anyone else. Additionally, I am relatively unknown which removes untoward bias for or against me due to previous games as well as making me a more impartial arbiter as it regards established players.
My lynch platform is: Scum read > hard/impossible to read > null read > town read
## vote geript Except for the fact that you were killed N1 last game for the above reasons, by someone who is very likely smurfing in this game. He focuses on the likelihood of a night kill on gerpit, he is too interested in night actions and not in the candidacy or the actual ideas which gerpit proposes. I'm not a fan of this post or WoS's mentality. Vote me, screw random lynch. I'll lynch WoS. are you mad that it didn't work or that you didn't get more credit for it? Because it sure sounds like that. We had some discussion about the rnd you suggested, we had some discussion about what I suggested. I most definitely wouldn't phrase it the way your are
|
On February 26 2013 10:03 MilkSuckler wrote:Show nested quote +On February 26 2013 10:03 VisceraEyes wrote: He's making the most sense and I'm not instantly sickened by his lynch preference right now. Good enough for me. I can live with that. Move on solider. P.S. Can I be your shadow pl0x
Buddying attempt noted.
|
+ Show Spoiler +On February 26 2013 09:27 geript wrote:Show nested quote +On February 26 2013 09:23 Vivax wrote: Geript, what makes you unlikely for NK if you fulfil A + B properly?
lol Being an unknown is likely to have some minor advantages, for example seeing if I can be manipulated and utilized instead of having to waste a night action on killing me. My posting style and case formulation is different than most which will likely make me a case target more than not. That answer or this one? + Show Spoiler +On February 26 2013 09:35 geript wrote: As of yet, no. The question is why do you feel my newbie status is important? As of now I would also consider VE for mayor.
|
On February 26 2013 10:04 Toadesstern wrote:Show nested quote +On February 26 2013 09:57 Promethelax wrote:Okay, so RNG didn't create the discussion I wanted. Screw you guys. On February 26 2013 09:28 Wade Fell wrote: My new platform is killing Layabout
Read his posts
hes scum Explain. For the moment my top scum read is WoS, he responded to gerpit's candidacy all wrong, obviously assuming gerpit is town but statistically... On February 26 2013 09:23 WaveofShadow wrote:On February 26 2013 09:20 geript wrote: It looks to me that the best person for mayor is someone who is willing to: A. put in the time to read the thread B. both make and evaluate other's cases C. is unlikely to be an early target for NK In this regard I would nominate myself as I am more likely to devote more time to reading (both filters and filter in the context of the thread as a whole) than anyone else. Additionally, I am relatively unknown which removes untoward bias for or against me due to previous games as well as making me a more impartial arbiter as it regards established players.
My lynch platform is: Scum read > hard/impossible to read > null read > town read
## vote geript Except for the fact that you were killed N1 last game for the above reasons, by someone who is very likely smurfing in this game. He focuses on the likelihood of a night kill on gerpit, he is too interested in night actions and not in the candidacy or the actual ideas which gerpit proposes. I'm not a fan of this post or WoS's mentality. Vote me, screw random lynch. I'll lynch WoS. are you mad that it didn't work or that you didn't get more credit for it? Because it sure sounds like that. We had some discussion about the rnd you suggested, we had some discussion about what I suggested. I most definitely wouldn't phrase it the way your are
This is something I noticed too. It sparked discussion - I'm left wondering what kind of discussion he thought RNG was supposed to generate if it didn't generate the kind he wanted.
|
A reminder that if you can't play nice. I will end you.
|
|
|
|