| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
sitromit
7051 Posts
On February 08 2013 08:51 furerkip wrote: Guys, DRG must suck as much as Stephano, he went 3-4! He definitely doesn't deserve to be in the GSL anymore and isn't a top player /sarcasm. He didn't go out in the ro32  | ||
|
forsooth
United States3648 Posts
Now I just want to see what he looks like in the super late game. | ||
|
xHQx
Russian Federation601 Posts
On February 08 2013 08:07 opterown wrote: dno where you got that from http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/details.php?section=sc2-korean&type=players&id=663&part=games&vs=all&league=individual&map=any&from_year=2012&from_month=5&from_day=20&to_year=2013&to_month=2&to_day=7&action=Update not only gsl there in today's broadcast were some stats, just added them to today's result | ||
|
furerkip
United States439 Posts
On February 08 2013 04:35 BlazeFury01 wrote: I loled at this post here. vthree definitely knows how to give me a great laugh. So, you're saying that smart casting storm isn't easier vs boxing each Templar separately and pressing the storm hot key then selecting where to storm? Lol, I guess this means that 1a+click is as easy as 1a+click+2a+click+3a+click+4a+click+5a+click huh? Why do you want a more mechanically challenging game though? Is the purpose simply to be elitist or something? More mechanically difficult games don't really prove anything except for that people have to practice harder in the mechanics department than a game with easier mechanics. But why do you want to expand this department? From the way everyone seems to refer to BW (I myself never having played it), it seems like a very troublesome game to like. It was more like taking an exam every game you play because you want to remember so many things. But from my standpoint, that's like asking for a revert to the stone age in warfare because "it was harder to kill/maim people then." It took more skill to win a war in the stone age because it was hard to hurt people from what you guys say, whereas now, we don't have to worry about that, but only have to worry about the strategy involved in achieving XYZ goal. Or like taking a math test with no calculator. It's annoying if you don't know about the tricks involved in mental math; but does the fact I solved the question slower than you because of my lack of a calculator mean that I have worse algebra/arithmetic than you? Of course not, it simply has no meaning. | ||
|
Killmouse
Austria5700 Posts
| ||
|
Goldfish
2230 Posts
On February 07 2013 20:46 opterown wrote: tastosis hyping bogus is fine, it just builds more hype and thus viewers for the RO8 :D Yeah. The best part of Artosis + Tasteless is hyping up the players. All the NesTea jokes were golden and definitely fit (especially in the GSL where Nestea did not lose a single game): Artosis (after Nestea takes 2-3 games off of Losira in the finals) - This game shouldn't even be called StarCraft II anymore... it should be called Nestea beating up nerds part 2. Hype helps StarCraft II stay alive! | ||
|
bsdaemon
618 Posts
| ||
|
geokilla
Canada8213 Posts
| ||
|
Goldfish
2230 Posts
On February 08 2013 10:02 bsdaemon wrote: Wow the restream is stuttering so bad. Yeah, same deal for me  . | ||
|
geokilla
Canada8213 Posts
Ultras gun down a Command Centre in 2 minutes! That rush to Ultralisk! | ||
|
ppshchik
United States862 Posts
On February 08 2013 09:03 furerkip wrote: Why do you want a more mechanically challenging game though? Is the purpose simply to be elitist or something? More mechanically difficult games don't really prove anything except for that people have to practice harder in the mechanics department than a game with easier mechanics. But why do you want to expand this department? From the way everyone seems to refer to BW (I myself never having played it), it seems like a very troublesome game to like. It was more like taking an exam every game you play because you want to remember so many things. But from my standpoint, that's like asking for a revert to the stone age in warfare because "it was harder to kill/maim people then." It took more skill to win a war in the stone age because it was hard to hurt people from what you guys say, whereas now, we don't have to worry about that, but only have to worry about the strategy involved in achieving XYZ goal. Or like taking a math test with no calculator. It's annoying if you don't know about the tricks involved in mental math; but does the fact I solved the question slower than you because of my lack of a calculator mean that I have worse algebra/arithmetic than you? Of course not, it simply has no meaning. Trust me, you can have BW in SC2 settings and still suck at it. Try 1 aing your whole army of dragoons into a Terran mech army or amove your whole bio army to lurkers. SC2 mechanics actually develop bad habits for you. Playing BW is like training in the time chamber under x100 gravity in DBZ and SC2 is the real world. | ||
|
vthree
Hong Kong8039 Posts
On February 08 2013 04:35 BlazeFury01 wrote: I loled at this post here. vthree definitely knows how to give me a great laugh. So, you're saying that smart casting storm isn't easier vs boxing each Templar separately and pressing the storm hot key then selecting where to storm? Lol, I guess this means that 1a+click is as easy as 1a+click+2a+click+3a+click+4a+click+5a+click huh? Then maybe you should re-read your post. You just stated that SC2 is a much easier game. You never used the word 'mechanically' in your statement. I don't think anyone is arguing that SC2 is as hard as BW mechanically. All we are saying is that a harder game mechanically does not equate to a harder game overall. | ||
|
chosenkerrigan
858 Posts
On February 08 2013 08:51 furerkip wrote: Guys, DRG must suck as much as Stephano, he went 3-4! He definitely doesn't deserve to be in the GSL anymore and isn't a top player /sarcasm. I fail to see the relevance. This is RO16 and Stephano went out RO32..because, you know, RO16 != RO32? | ||
|
vol_
Australia1608 Posts
 | ||
opterown
Australia54747 Posts
On February 08 2013 08:59 xHQx wrote: not only gsl there in today's broadcast were some stats, just added them to today's result even if you exclude the ODT it's nothing like 80% | ||
|
FeltFace
Australia577 Posts
| ||
|
Emperor_Earth
United States824 Posts
On February 08 2013 12:44 FeltFace wrote: TaeJa into the Ro8. YEEEEEEHAAAAAAAWWW!!! I was very pleasantly surprised. I bought into the /wrists crowd, especially after MVP got blown out with his injuries. | ||
|
mierin
United States4942 Posts
| ||
|
CygnusAres
Singapore893 Posts
On February 08 2013 10:51 vol_ wrote: Oh sweet! missed the games but I was one of the 9 people who voted Taeja+ Innovation to go through Voted for both of them too. | ||
|
ZenithM
France15952 Posts
Apparently I'm not alone: http://www.gomtv.net/forum/view.gom?topicid=228404&cid=0&kind=1 | ||
| ||
|
|
OSC
StarCraft2.fi
The PondCast
StarCraft2.fi
OlimoLeague
StarCraft2.fi
|
|
|
EPT
