Newbie Mini Mafia XXI - Page 62
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
ObviousOne
United States3704 Posts
| ||
Critter
United States196 Posts
| ||
JingleHell
United States11308 Posts
On July 30 2012 13:13 Critter wrote: I feel beyond noob having to ask this... but where/what was Jingle's "obvious" breadcrumb? I'm not ashamed that I missed it while following the game, but the fact that I can't find it afterwards is quite embarassing. It was discussed during the game. Read through my filter for the post where I talked about it? Early D2. | ||
Critter
United States196 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
| ||
JingleHell
United States11308 Posts
On July 30 2012 13:30 Blazinghand wrote: No problem dude! Only Calgar and I spotted it-- most people didn't till it was pointed out to them. And you told me it was too obvious. Which is when I started coming up with tons of contingency plans for it that had NOTHING to do with the original intent. Never show indecisiveness. Even if you backtrack all over yourself, do it aggressively. It makes you townie. Like Hapa. He stayed assertive and stayed below people's most scummy spot. | ||
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
On July 30 2012 13:34 JingleHell wrote: And you told me it was too obvious. Which is when I started coming up with tons of contingency plans for it that had NOTHING to do with the original intent. Never show indecisiveness. Even if you backtrack all over yourself, do it aggressively. It makes you townie. Like Hapa. He stayed assertive and stayed below people's most scummy spot. Good advice. Although I would reword it to say "Do it confidently" but that's just semantics Also, Jingle is the king of getting nightkilled early when he's town. Obviously doing something right. +1 man. | ||
ObviousOne
United States3704 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On July 30 2012 13:34 JingleHell wrote: And you told me it was too obvious. Which is when I started coming up with tons of contingency plans for it that had NOTHING to do with the original intent. Never show indecisiveness. Even if you backtrack all over yourself, do it aggressively. It makes you townie. Like Hapa. He stayed assertive and stayed below people's most scummy spot. Yeah i mean one of the basic things i look for as scum is obvious crumbs with caps if i want to bluensnipe. If you check the scum qt theyre punching themselves for not seeing your crumb until you revealed it | ||
drwiggl3s
Canada167 Posts
| ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
| ||
Hapahauli
United States9305 Posts
On July 30 2012 13:34 JingleHell wrote: And you told me it was too obvious. Which is when I started coming up with tons of contingency plans for it that had NOTHING to do with the original intent. Never show indecisiveness. Even if you backtrack all over yourself, do it aggressively. It makes you townie. Like Hapa. He stayed assertive and stayed below people's most scummy spot. What was the original plan behind your breadcrumb? I didn't know what to think when you mentioned you were trying to get me NK'd xD | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
I don't know exactly how the game arrived there, but calgar as the final lynch there was interesting. calgar seemed the most capable of good reasoned argument (stick around and play more, man!), so targeting him and make him try to defend himself rather than work things out + discrediting him to the rest of town was quite cool. edit - hope people sign up for XXIII! | ||
JingleHell
United States11308 Posts
On July 30 2012 22:14 Hapahauli wrote: What was the original plan behind your breadcrumb? I didn't know what to think when you mentioned you were trying to get me NK'd xD The original plan was to RB Calgar, who I thought was shady. The notion of "trying" to get you NKed to see if scum were after you came when I was told it was blatantly obvious by BallsinHand. Well, if it's that obvious, how can I use that? You got to admit, from a contingency plan point of view, it was a good use. Or could have been, had it been actually noticed. | ||
calgar
United States1277 Posts
On July 30 2012 22:21 marvellosity wrote: Eh, I dunno lol. Most of my reads were wrong and a lot of my strategy/direction was with the help of blazing. Glad it made me look good though I don't know exactly how the game arrived there, but calgar as the final lynch there was interesting. calgar seemed the most capable of good reasoned argument (stick around and play more, man!), so targeting him and make him try to defend himself rather than work things out + discrediting him to the rest of town was quite cool. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On July 30 2012 23:20 calgar wrote: Eh, I dunno lol. Most of my reads were wrong and a lot of my strategy/direction was with the help of blazing. Glad it made me look good though eh, who cares how ^_^ just means you made good use of available resources gogo signup again! | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
Edit: I forgot about the good Dr. My bad. | ||
Fulla
United Kingdom519 Posts
As Hapa said should have purely and only focused on the essential 2-3 points and nothing else. | ||
Hapahauli
United States9305 Posts
On July 30 2012 23:10 JingleHell wrote: The original plan was to RB Calgar, who I thought was shady. The notion of "trying" to get you NKed to see if scum were after you came when I was told it was blatantly obvious by BallsinHand. Well, if it's that obvious, how can I use that? You got to admit, from a contingency plan point of view, it was a good use. Or could have been, had it been actually noticed. I thought your read (regarding me being not dead) was pretty good, and you might have gotten on the right track had you not stuck to the Me + Calgar scumteam theory. Wasn't too much a fan of the "obviousness" of the breadcrumb though - Jailer's a pretty powerful townie role, and is pretty bad to get a blue role like that shot N2. | ||
| ||