EPTNewbie Mini Mafia XXI - Page 19
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
JingleHell
United States11308 Posts
| ||
|
ObviousOne
United States3704 Posts
| ||
|
YourHarry
United States1152 Posts
| ||
|
YourHarry
United States1152 Posts
| ||
|
tube
United States1475 Posts
| ||
|
Hapahauli
United States9305 Posts
As far as I'm concerned, tube's one-liners seem much more suspicious. Furthermore, we have a handful of lurkers that need to be pressured by town to increase their post counts. It's not good if town ends Day 1 with a couple of players who have posted nothing of substance. | ||
|
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
On July 17 2012 06:21 Hopeless1der wrote: Do you have a list of mafia for us to choose from? Are you on that list, Captain Obvious (No relation)? I thought I was supposed to get myself killed Day 1 every time, hence my abysmal history in playing this game. [/sarcasm] Lynching a bad townie in absence of scum to choose from is the best play town can make (unless its MYLO) imo. Are we allowed to Vote: No Lynch? There's some theoretical crap about even numbers of town-vs-scum being better for a potential mislynch or something to that effect. I might have it backwards in some way, but anyways, mislynching still gives information and the entire process leading up to getting tube (mis)lynched will give us information as well. If along the way someone makes a scumslip well guess what, I'll probably be voting for the scummy player. We need to do something to force reads from people who refuse to contribute. Almost getting them lynched should work as reasonable motivation I'd hope. Yes, you can vote for a no-lynch | ||
|
Hapahauli
United States9305 Posts
On July 17 2012 06:21 Hopeless1der wrote: Lynching a bad townie in absence of scum to choose from is the best play town can make (unless its MYLO) imo. Are we allowed to Vote: No Lynch? There's some theoretical crap about even numbers of town-vs-scum being better for a potential mislynch or something to that effect. I might have it backwards in some way, but anyways, mislynching still gives information and the entire process leading up to getting tube (mis)lynched will give us information as well. If along the way someone makes a scumslip well guess what, I'll probably be voting for the scummy player. We need to do something to force reads from people who refuse to contribute. Almost getting them lynched should work as reasonable motivation I'd hope. Woah, can't believe I missed this - this is pretty interesting, and you wouldn't happen to have a reference for this? I can't ever see rationale for a nolynch, especially since lynch votes and actions are a great source of information when investigating mafia motive. As far as I'm concerned, a nolynch just gives the mafia a free kill, while the town is stuck on day 1 with no reads and less information. Since this post, there has fortunately been a burst of activity, and hopefully someone can build a case. I'm planning to dig through it all tomorrow to build something more definite. | ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
|
iamperfection
United States9634 Posts
On July 17 2012 12:38 Hopeless1der wrote: Except for MYLO i agree that no-lynch is usually no good. Away from my computer right now but I should be able to find that statistic mislynch vs nolynch stuff tonight If its as good as your explanation from Newbie Mini Mafia XIX please dont bring it up. All you will manage to do is confuse yourself and everybody else. No lynch will allow the mafia to spread their vote and hide and would probally make it harder for blues to make better plays. Leave the math out no lynch = bad leave it at that. On July 17 2012 07:57 Obvious.660 wrote: Remember this? Nothing has changed. He's definitely a third mafia candidate (shitty posting history plus change in character to what looks like copy-pasted text from someone else) and it wraps up my theory quite nicely. The jig is up on the sacrificial lamb-ing and their strategy has been adjusted. His last couple of posts were completely out of character. Capitalization? Complete sentences? Total 180 and I don't think that a new-found passion for the game is going to change whether or not you type like shit. If I'm right on this vote, it will mean my read was good (unless I change my stance on the other two I've listed, which is not out of the question by any means) and I can have more faith in my other suspicions. If not, well, it takes a town to vote. ~6 Hours since the last post from YourHarry Still only one post from iamperfection. The perfect one would never sacrifice a mafia member. Also this is a mini mafia it would be very risky to throw a mafia member out. Also i dont believe i said anything about a sacrifical lamb strategy i said yourharry was trying to get heat of calgar by throwing a vote out there to take off heat from calgar. I dont know where you came up with this grand conspiracy of a sacrfical lamb from my post. And two can play at this game calgar i still got my eye on you. | ||
|
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
Vote Count Obvious.660 (2): YourHarry, JingleHell Tube (1): YourHarry (0): You have about 17 hours till the deadline. | ||
|
YourHarry
United States1152 Posts
Of course, the easy answer is that he hasn't found anyone suspicious. | ||
|
YourHarry
United States1152 Posts
| ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
And They All Lived Happily Ever Afterhttp://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=...and_they_all_lived_happily_ever_after Numbers, Part 1http://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=Numbers,_Part_1 I was vaguely correct, which may as well mean I was wrong. The links have very limited bearing on this game and are probably not worth discussing at this point in time. Hapa asked about it and I said I'd find the info I was referring to (albeit poorly applicable info). If there is something in there that someone finds relevant to the discussions, then by all means... After catching up, I notice that Fulla has disappeared yet again. Seriously what in the hell. Are you even trying to be active? I asked you a direct question and you run for the hills or something. Vote: Fulla Moving on, Un-FoS: tube since he has started to actually post things that seem reasonable, if not full reads/cases yet. Also his early posting style was too flippant for me to believe he's scum in a newbie game. If he slips later I'll revisit but for now I'm reading him as town. Too tired to properly comment on Obvious.660 right now, but basically FoS: Obvious.660. I probably wont be posting until Noon-ish tomorrow (~5 hours before deadline). | ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
##Vote: Fulla And also it seems I semi-failed at links. I'm awesome. | ||
|
ObviousOne
United States3704 Posts
| ||
|
YourHarry
United States1152 Posts
| ||
|
YourHarry
United States1152 Posts
##Unvote | ||
|
ObviousOne
United States3704 Posts
> tube still has my vote. Don't just look at the filter, it's better to read the actual thread when looking at him. Very few quotes to address the accusations against him in his responses will make analysis of tube troublesome without going through unfiltered. > YourHarry: Highly, highly suspicious of this one. Not because he voted for me, but because of HOW IT WAS DONE. > JingleHell is suspicious to me for his constant attacks on what words are chosen: "Wait and see" -- "Under the bus" conversations, where intent was pretty clear and he chose to always take it in the most negative context possible. He's railed on Calgar and me fairly hard. > Hopeless1der makes a safe vote against the lurking Fulla. Wanted to know about no-lynch for whatever reason. Leaning scum here. > Fulla seems to be lurking hard. Brings up a point of inquiry for some irrelevant statistic and probably goes to sleep. > iamperfection read my post but clearly didn't follow the conversation in entirety. Points a few fingers, nothing overly suspicious. I would call the posting history semi-engaging but barely active. Leaning scum here. > Calgar: My gut tells me town. > Mufaa: Two posts. One starts analysis with the promise of more. The extra analysis is nowhere to be found. However, his line of reasoning regarding JingleHell seems to be spot on so far today. > drwiggl3s: No scummy feelings here, yet. > Evulrabbitz: Lurky, but lives in Sweden. 7 hours ahead of EST, if my just-before-sleep math is any good. I'm probably off by an hour. Look for something from Evul in the very near future, well before vote time. > Hapahauli: Should be weighing in today. I have no strong feelings either way about his contributed play. If you get nothing else out of this, town members need to take a good look at their individual contributions and ask themselves if they've done everything they can today to work towards a good day one lynch. | ||
|
calgar
United States1277 Posts
On July 17 2012 13:30 iamperfection wrote: You've managed to vaguely reply to my post, yet you've addressed none of the content.And two can play at this game calgar i still got my eye on you. You've lurked and been generally unproductive. You come in and point two fingers immediately but fail to later support your case. You get your case from another person and add no thought to it. You use poor logic and disregard my direct questions to you. ##Vote iamperfection | ||
| ||
