|
also check it out guys:
Blazinghand 11:
Jitsu Wherebugsgo BloodyC0bbler DoctorHelvetica Dirkzor prplhz VisceraEyes Toadesstern Jackal58 risk.nuke chaoser
all of my red reads were on BH yesterday.
On February 28 2012 10:14 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 10:14 wherebugsgo wrote:On February 28 2012 10:10 VisceraEyes wrote: I didn't say I'd lynch you for claiming - I'll lynch you regardless. I said TOWN would lynch you for claiming - which as you've pointed out, has a pretty decent track-record. you need more than one scumbuddy to lynch me. Don't got none. *shrug*
yeah tbh I'm pretty mad town isn't winning overwhelmingly right now. I've been lazy, but judging from how inactive this entire game is, mafia probably has just been lurking all game. You might as well have no scumbuddies, it wouldn't seem any different.
You were gone for two whole days!
|
oh well except for RoL. did he even vote?
|
nvm he voted Dr. H:
DoctorHelvetica 1:
RebirthOfLeGenD
|
Easier conclusion to swallow: VE is town.
Your mileage may vary.
|
On February 28 2012 10:20 VisceraEyes wrote: Easier conclusion to swallow: VE is town.
Your mileage may vary.
so town VE goes and disappears for 2 days?
What happened to the town VE from Responsibility that spammed while no one was talking to get the thread active, and complained that he was the only one talking?
Why would town VE sit around and let the thread die?
I'll tell you the answer: town VE wouldn't do those things. So, you're not town VE!
Woot Occam's Razor.
|
On February 28 2012 10:22 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 10:20 VisceraEyes wrote: Easier conclusion to swallow: VE is town.
Your mileage may vary. so town VE goes and disappears for 2 days? What happened to the town VE from Responsibility that spammed while no one was talking to get the thread active, and complained that he was the only one talking? Why would town VE sit around and let the thread die? I'll tell you the answer: town VE wouldn't do those things. So, you're not town VE! Woot Occam's Razor.
Oh man, look at how amazingly large my filter is! It's because I've been doing that self-same thing ALL GAME THIS GAME!
Except, aw shucks - for the first time in like 5 years I actually decided to get schwasted for a whole weekend this weekend. Guess that means I'm scum right? Right Bugs? RIGHT?!
|
he's got more pages in his filter than I have in mine. I'd consider that spamming.
|
On February 28 2012 10:25 Toadesstern wrote: he's got more pages in his filter than I have in mine. I'd consider that spamming.
No, I'm personally responsible for the thread dying Toad - not spamming. Get it right.
|
On February 28 2012 10:05 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 10:03 prplhz wrote: I'm not really worried about how you're claiming alchemist, probably just means that BloodyC0bbler is going to vote you. haha best prpl post of the game Is that good or bad?
On February 28 2012 10:06 wherebugsgo wrote:[...] Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 10:03 prplhz wrote: @wherebugsgo
I'm not really sheeping. This thread is in a bad state and I'm blaming you. You're pushing left and right for bad reasons and your contributions all seem to be pretty irrelevant. I think there's something off about your behavior.
I'm not really worried about how you're claiming alchemist, probably just means that BloodyC0bbler is going to vote you. Why did you send a potion to kitaman27? I doubt he drank any unless he's your scum buddy. You're blaming me for no one posting? Good one. It's totally my fault that you've done jack shit all game. It's totally my fault that VE disappeared for two days and then decided to shit up the thread by forging a case on me. Yeah, totally my fault. I'm not claiming alchemist you moron.
Partially, you're responsible for the inactivity because people post less when there's an asshole around. The bad state I was talking about was how there is virtually no scum hunting going on and none of your activity seems to be focusing on this. You have pushed left and right but never used it for anything, now you want to lynch VisceraEyes on a bad case. You're usually unflappable but this seems kind of like an OMGUS on a player I don't think looks scum at all.
I think all of those problems you have with VisceraEyes are off. Do you actually think he's scum?
|
On February 28 2012 10:28 prplhz wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 10:05 kitaman27 wrote:On February 28 2012 10:03 prplhz wrote: I'm not really worried about how you're claiming alchemist, probably just means that BloodyC0bbler is going to vote you. haha best prpl post of the game Is that good or bad? Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 10:06 wherebugsgo wrote:[...] On February 28 2012 10:03 prplhz wrote: @wherebugsgo
I'm not really sheeping. This thread is in a bad state and I'm blaming you. You're pushing left and right for bad reasons and your contributions all seem to be pretty irrelevant. I think there's something off about your behavior.
I'm not really worried about how you're claiming alchemist, probably just means that BloodyC0bbler is going to vote you. Why did you send a potion to kitaman27? I doubt he drank any unless he's your scum buddy. You're blaming me for no one posting? Good one. It's totally my fault that you've done jack shit all game. It's totally my fault that VE disappeared for two days and then decided to shit up the thread by forging a case on me. Yeah, totally my fault. I'm not claiming alchemist you moron. Partially, you're responsible for the inactivity because people post less when there's an asshole around. The bad state I was talking about was how there is virtually no scum hunting going on and none of your activity seems to be focusing on this. You have pushed left and right but never used it for anything, now you want to lynch VisceraEyes on a bad case. You're usually unflappable but this seems kind of like an OMGUS on a player I don't think looks scum at all. I think all of those problems you have with VisceraEyes are off. Do you actually think he's scum?
What struck me as off about the reasons he gave were that they were all only really pertinent to today - no mention of scummy behavior before today except for his whole "u were gone 2 days lolol"
I mean, I expect him to go build a whole OMGUS case on me eventually to try and dodge the lynch, but his reasoning provided so far has been weak as fuck.
prplhz, where HAVE you been?
|
Like, I miss the wherebugsgo who poked me in like two posts in PYP:Interesting and then concluded that I was scum while I just sat there with an open mouth thinking "How the fuck did he do that?". Instead you're hiding behind a bad case on a player. The premise for that your is "Palmar said he was getting better.". That's just fucking weird. Right now, there are 4 people in this thread, you and Toadesstern, VisceraEyes, and myself, and you're calling us all scum. What the hell?
|
I've been busy and that's going to be my answer regardless of alignment and regardless of whether a meteor struck my apartment or I'd been golfing with Barack Obama.
|
VisceraEyes has looked scummy for a long time. His case on WBG is grasping at straws, especially the fact that you're pushing a player Day 3 based on loud posts Day 1? You didn't catch onto his question to syllo then?
Here's how scum play often works:
Scum 1: I need to push a bandwagon today so X doesn't get lynched Scum 2: WBG has been pretty spammy, changed his mind a lot, etc. he might be an easy candidate Scum 1: Hm, ok I'll make a post about it
I'm still reading all the posts here but it seems like VE is criticizing WBG for buddying?
On February 22 2012 14:56 VisceraEyes wrote: DocH I'm intrigued by your ideas and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
Also this:
On February 22 2012 16:42 VisceraEyes wrote: That was dangerously close to role-fishing syllo - the existance of one town-tracker doesn't preclude a second town-tracker. Am I missing something?
"Role fishing" imo is one of those things that scum accuses other townies of doing it's supposed to be "Scummy" but in 5 or 6 games as scum I have never really done it or known any teammates to do it either, except in PM games where it's pretty easy and often town roles have a lot of incentive to rolefish
On February 22 2012 15:55 VisceraEyes wrote: And BC is your strongest read right now Syllo? Like, without question?
Did you ever get around to looking at the whole WBG/chaoser thing sir? I feel like that exchange means something. chaoser's defense was solid, but I didn't mind WBG's attack either.
However, chaoser still seems to be interested in finding scum, while WBG has only recently been calling red scum...he's been tunneled in on chaoser ever since that argument.
I'm starting to get a red read on WBG.
Is this really that different than what WBG did?
|
On February 28 2012 10:37 prplhz wrote: I've been busy and that's going to be my answer regardless of alignment and regardless of whether a meteor struck my apartment or I'd been golfing with Barack Obama.
I just didn't know if you were going to actually try and excuse your absence like I did. *shrug*
What do you think of the BC/RoL Inactive-Vet-A-Thon? The fact that they're both alive is troubling to me - I think BC is the better chance for hitting scum between the two. What do you think?
|
On February 28 2012 10:24 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 10:22 wherebugsgo wrote:On February 28 2012 10:20 VisceraEyes wrote: Easier conclusion to swallow: VE is town.
Your mileage may vary. so town VE goes and disappears for 2 days? What happened to the town VE from Responsibility that spammed while no one was talking to get the thread active, and complained that he was the only one talking? Why would town VE sit around and let the thread die? I'll tell you the answer: town VE wouldn't do those things. So, you're not town VE! Woot Occam's Razor. Oh man, look at how amazingly large my filter is! It's because I've been doing that self-same thing ALL GAME THIS GAME! Except, aw shucks - for the first time in like 5 years I actually decided to get schwasted for a whole weekend this weekend. Guess that means I'm scum right? Right Bugs? RIGHT?!
size of filter does not equal quality of contribution.
Nor does it indicate anything about consistency of activity, either. It's a fact that you've been completely inactive from halfway through day 2. It's something I noted myself; I put it down as scummy that you randomly disappeared and that you never followed through on your promise to comment before lynch.
You've also still chosen to not give your thoughts on the other people you listed as scum (namely, BC.) Instead, you saw me posting in the thread and saw it as an opportunity to tunnel me, I suppose. Anyway I have no idea what you're doing, since I'm not you, but at no point in the last 48 hours have you done anything that has suggested to me that you are town.
Nice charade day 1 though, I fully believed you were town for a very long time.
On February 28 2012 10:25 Toadesstern wrote: he's got more pages in his filter than I have in mine. I'd consider that spamming.
except you've been consistent in your activity and he has not.
It's a known fact that scum generally are very active day 1 and then they drop off later. Town tend to be more consistent.
On February 28 2012 10:26 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 10:25 Toadesstern wrote: he's got more pages in his filter than I have in mine. I'd consider that spamming. No, I'm personally responsible for the thread dying Toad - not spamming. Get it right.
hello further misrepresentation
nice to see you're still putting effort into twisting my words.
On February 28 2012 10:28 prplhz wrote: Partially, you're responsible for the inactivity because people post less when there's an asshole around.
So me being a dick is me being scum?
Guess Palmar is scum every game, then?
On February 28 2012 10:28 prplhz wrote: The bad state I was talking about was how there is virtually no scum hunting going on and none of your activity seems to be focusing on this.
So what scumhunting have you done to remedy this problem, prplhz?
And what the fuck do you think I've been doing if not scumhunting? I pushed BH yesterday because I legitimately believed he was scum. I pushed redFF for the same reason (after initially finding him unreadable.). I'm pushing VE for the same reason now.
If I'm not scumhunting, then no one is. And you can't blame me for that.
On February 28 2012 10:28 prplhz wrote: You have pushed left and right but never used it for anything, now you want to lynch VisceraEyes on a bad case.
Explain how my case is bad.
You assert things but you don't even justify your assertions. I have justified 100% of what I have said but you literally said you don't even have to make a case on me bc of "burden of proof." (which is bs, the burden of proof is on the accuser)
On February 28 2012 10:28 prplhz wrote: You're usually unflappable but this seems kind of like an OMGUS on a player I don't think looks scum at all.
What the fuck?
Do you not remember XLV? I don't give a fuck what anyone thinks of OMGUS, it is in no way IMO a scum tell. It's a great way to catch scum when I know they're using bad reasons to call me scum.
That's 100% the reason I caught Dr. H scum in LoTR. I OMGUSed him when he called me scum for asking for the ring, and I was correct.
On February 28 2012 10:28 prplhz wrote: I think all of those problems you have with VisceraEyes are off. Do you actually think he's scum?
Ofc I think he's scum, what a loaded question.
Do you actually think I'm scum? You didn't even justify your vote. That's why I highly doubt you're town. Every game you talk about changing your play to be more pro-town, and when you actually roll town you look pretty pro-town. But this game is far from it.
|
On February 28 2012 10:16 Toadesstern wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 10:14 wherebugsgo wrote:On February 28 2012 10:10 VisceraEyes wrote: I didn't say I'd lynch you for claiming - I'll lynch you regardless. I said TOWN would lynch you for claiming - which as you've pointed out, has a pretty decent track-record. you need more than one scumbuddy to lynch me. why should mafia VE come in here and push you instead of just joining the Toad-wagon?
That's a really important point I made and I'm going to bring it up again:
The logical conclusion for a townie in wbg's position would be: Mafia would not try to get another wagon but unless Toad is mafia himself, therefore it's either Toad + VE mafia and VE is trying to rescue him or it's ONLY Toad mafia + a confused townie VE who joined the wrong side. OR both are townies.
However, VE being mafia is while I am a townie is the most retarded thing ever. VE could hve easily joined the Toad-wagon and he did not.
So now one might ask why isn't wbg asking himself those questions? I'd consider those things pretty important if I were confused about 4 people and can't figure out which of those 4 are mafia. I guess by now you guys already figured out what the funny thing about this all is: Wbg isn't asking these questions because he doesn't need to.
|
I want to lynch Toadesstern or Dirkzor today, regardless. I have too many reservations about VE right now to feel 100% comfortable with lynching him over those players today. I've done a lot of pressure on Toades already and since he reacted by dodging later I'm more inclined to think he is scum especially after he claimed it was super important and necessary for town to prove they are town
|
On February 28 2012 10:34 prplhz wrote: Like, I miss the wherebugsgo who poked me in like two posts in PYP:Interesting and then concluded that I was scum while I just sat there with an open mouth thinking "How the fuck did he do that?". Instead you're hiding behind a bad case on a player. The premise for that your is "Palmar said he was getting better.". That's just fucking weird. Right now, there are 4 people in this thread, you and Toadesstern, VisceraEyes, and myself, and you're calling us all scum. What the hell?
that's not at all the reason I'm accusing VE of being scum and you'd know it if you were actually reading.
w/e though, you'e probably scum so i'm just wasting time responding to you atm.
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
So everyone seems to be convinced by RoL's ragequit? If anything, it makes me want to lynch him more, not less o.O
|
On February 28 2012 10:41 Toadesstern wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 10:16 Toadesstern wrote:On February 28 2012 10:14 wherebugsgo wrote:On February 28 2012 10:10 VisceraEyes wrote: I didn't say I'd lynch you for claiming - I'll lynch you regardless. I said TOWN would lynch you for claiming - which as you've pointed out, has a pretty decent track-record. you need more than one scumbuddy to lynch me. why should mafia VE come in here and push you instead of just joining the Toad-wagon? That's a really important point I made and I'm going to bring it up again: The logical conclusion for a townie in wbg's position would be: Mafia would not try to get another wagon but unless Toad is mafia himself, therefore it's either Toad + VE mafia and VE is trying to rescue him or it's ONLY Toad mafia + a confused townie VE who joined the wrong side. OR both are townies. However, VE being mafia is while I am a townie is the most retarded thing ever. VE could hve easily joined the Toad-wagon and he did not. So now one might ask why isn't wbg asking himself those questions? I'd consider those things pretty important if I were confused about 4 people and can't figure out which of those 4 are mafia. I guess by now you guys already figured out what the funny thing about this all is: Wbg isn't asking these questions because he doesn't need to. He's not asking those questions because they are pointless and lead to absolutely no conclusion whatsoever
I'm not surprised you'd concoct a defense of VE based on shaky WIFOM
|
|
|
|